Evaluation of demographic, clinical, and aetiological data of patients admitted to cardiology clinics and diagnosed with left ventricular hypertrophy in Turkish population (LVH-TR)

Current barriers and recommendations on the diagnosis of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: a Delphi study

Objectives

This study has been conducted to investigate the non-invasive diagnostic journey of patients with a transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (aTTR-CM) in Turkey, identify the challenges and uncertainties encountered on the path to diagnosis from the perspectives of expert physicians, and develop recommendations that can be applied in such cases.

Methods

This study employed a three-round modified Delphi method and included 10 cardiologists and five nuclear medicine specialists. Two hematologists also shared their expert opinions on the survey results related to hematological tests during a final face-to-face discussion. A consensus was reached when 80% or more of the panel members marked the "agree/strongly agree" or "disagree/strongly disagree" option.

Results

The panelists unanimously agreed that the aTTR-CM diagnosis could be established through scintigraphy (using either 99mTc-PYP, 99mTc-DPD, or 99mTc-HMPD) in a patient with suspected cardiac amyloidosis (CA) without a further investigation if AL amyloidosis is ruled out (by sFLC, SPIE and UPIE). In addition, scintigraphy imaging performed by SPECT or SPECT-CT should reveal a myocardial uptake of Grade ≥2 with a heart-to-contralateral (H/CL) ratio of ≥1.5. The cardiology panelists recommended using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and a detailed echocardiographic scoring as a last resort before considering an endomyocardial biopsy in patients with suspected CA whose scintigraphy results were discordant/inconclusive or negative but still carried a high clinical suspicion of aTTR-CM.

Conclusion

The diagnostic approach for aTTR-CM should be customized based on the availability of diagnostic tools/methods in each expert clinic to achieve a timely and definitive diagnosis.

Differences Between Two Distinct Hypertrophic Cardiac Conditions: Fabry Disease versus Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and Fabry disease (FD) are genetically inherited diseases with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) phenotype characteristics that cause adverse cardiac outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the demographic, clinical, biochemical, electrocardiographic (ECG), and echocardiographic (ECHO) differences between HCM and FD.

METHODS

60 HCM and 40 FD patients were analyzed retrospectively as a subanalysis of the 'LVH-TR study' after excluding patients with atrial fibrillation, pace rhythm, bundle branch blocks, and second and third-degree atrioventricular (AV) blocks. The significance level was accepted as <0.05.

RESULTS

Male gender (p=0.048) and creatinine (p=0.010) are significantly higher in favor of FD; however, ST depression (p=0.028), QT duration (p=0.041), interventricular septum thickness (IVSd) (p=0.003), posterior wall thickness (PWd) (p=0.009), moderate-severe mitral regurgitation (MR) (p=0.013), and LV mass index (LVMI) (p=0.041) are significantly higher in favor of HCM in the univariate analyses. In multivariate analysis, statistical significance only continues in creatinine (p=0.018) and QT duration (0.045). FD was positively correlated with creatinine (rho=0.287, p=0.004) and HCM was positively correlated with PWd (rho=0.306, p=0.002), IVSd (rho=0.395, p<0.001), moderate-severe MR (rho=0.276, p<0.005), LVMI (rho=0.300, p=0.002), relative wall thickness (RWT) (rho=0.271, p=0.006), QT duration (rho=0.213, p=0.034) and ST depression (rho=0.222, p=0.026).

CONCLUSION

Specific biochemical, ECG, and ECHO characteristics can aid in the differentiation and early diagnosis of HCM and FD.

Different effects of medications for hypertension on renal function between patients with and without diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension are well-known atherosclerosis risk factors. Furthermore, renal dysfunction is a crucial risk factor for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and managing renal function in these patients is complicated because of comorbid conditions and potential side effects during treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of medications for hypertension on renal function after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between patients with and without DM with statins.

METHODS

In 297 consecutive patients undergoing PCI for stable angina pectoris, cystatin C (CysC) was evaluated at baseline and 9 months after PCI, and the percent change in CysC (%CysC) was calculated. The association of worsening renal function (WRF: %CysC ≥ 0) and baseline characteristics, including medications, was assessed.

RESULTS

Among 297 hypertensive patients with statins, 196 and 101 were with and without DM, respectively. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin II receptor blocker, and β-blocker were prescribed in 56 (29%), 82 (42%), and 91 (46%) patients in the DM group, and 20 (20%), 52 (51%), and 52 (51%) in the non-DM group, respectively. The patients with WRF after PCI were 100 (51%) and 59 (58%) in the DM and non-DM groups (p = 0.261). Additionally, the %CysC had no significant differences between groups [median: 0%, interquartile range (IQR): -7.9% to 8.5% vs. median: 1.1%, IQR: -6.6% to 9.6%, p = 0.521]. Multivariate logistic analysis for WRF using relevant factors from univariate analysis showed that only β-blocker [odds ratio (OR): 2.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-7.90, p = 0.048] was independently associated with WRF in the DM group whereas ACEI (OR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.47, p = 0.012) was negatively correlated with WRF in the non-DM group.

CONCLUSION

The β-blocker was the independent risk factor for WRF in patients with DM in the late phase after PCI for stable angina pectoris, while the use of ACEI had a renoprotective effect in patients without DM.

Prevalence of Fabry Disease in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy in Turkey: Multicenter study (LVH-TR subgroup analysis)

PURPOSE

In this prospective study we aimed to determine the rate of Fabry Disease (FD) in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and to evaluate the clinical presentations of patients with FD in a comprehensive manner. In addition, we aimed to raise awareness about this issue by allowing early diagnosis and treatment of FD.

METHODS

Our study was planned as national, multicenter, observational. Totally 22 different centers participated in this study. A total of 886 patients diagnosed with LVH by echocardiography (ECHO) were included in the study. Demographic data, biochemical parameters, electrocardiography (ECG) findings, ECHO findings, treatments and clinical findings of the patients were recorded. Dry blood samples were sent from male patients with suspected FD. The α-Gal A enzyme level was checked and genetic testing was performed in patients with low enzyme levels. Female patients suspected of FD were genetically tested with the GLA Gene Mutation Analysis.

RESULTS

FD was suspected in a total of 143 (16.13%) patients included in the study. The α-Gal-A enzyme level was found to be low in 43 (4.85%) patients whom enzyme testing was requested. GLA gene mutation analysis was positive in 14 (1.58%) patients. Male gender, E/e' mean ,and severe hypertrophy are important risk factor for FD.

CONCLUSION

In daily cardiology practice, FD should be kept in mind not only in adult patients with unexplained LVH but also in the entire LVH population. Dry blood test (DBS) should be considered in high-risk patients, and mutation analysis should be considered in required patients.