1
|
Li Y, Wang C, Chen W, Chen C, Tang X, Wang H, Chen J, Liu Q, Li W, Li Y, Chen P, Luo Y, Su C. Selection of surgical modality for massive splenomegaly in children. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:9070-9079. [PMID: 37798532 PMCID: PMC10709218 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10462-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS), a treatment for both benign and malignant splenic diseases, can prove technically challenging in patients with massive splenomegaly. In particular, the optimal surgical modality for treating massive splenomegaly in children remains controversial. METHODS The clinicopathologic data of 289 pediatric patients undergoing splenectomy for massive splenomegaly were studied in a retrospective analysis. Accordingly, the patients were classified into the LS surgery group and open splenectomy (OS) surgery group. In the laparoscopy cohort, they were separated into two subgroups according to the method of surgery: the multi-incision laparoscopic splenectomy (MILS) and the single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy (SILS) surgery groups, respectively. Patient demographics, clinical data, surgery, complications, and postoperative recovery underwent analysis. Concurrently, we compared the risk of adverse laparoscopic splenectomy outcomes utilizing univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS The total operation time proved remarkably shorter in the OS group in contrast to the LS group (149.87 ± 61.44 versus 188.20 ± 52.51 min, P < 0.001). Relative to the OS group, the LS group exhibited lowered postoperative pain scores, bowel recovery time, and postoperative hospitalization time (P < 0.001). No remarkable difference existed in post-operation complications or mortality (P > 0.05). Nevertheless, the operation duration was remarkably longer in the SILS surgery group than in the MILS surgery group (200 ± 46.11 versus 171.39 ± 40.30 min, P = 0.02). Meanwhile, the operative duration of MILS and SILS displayed a remarkable positive association with splenic length. Moreover, the operative duration of SILS displayed a remarkable positive association with the age, weight, and height of the sick children. Splenic length proved an independent risk factor of adverse outcomes (P < 0.001, OR 1.378). CONCLUSIONS For pediatric patients with massive splenomegaly who can tolerate prolonged anesthesia and operative procedures, LS surgery proves the optimal treatment regimen. SILS remains a novel surgery therapy which may be deemed a substitutional surgery approach for treating massive splenomegaly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Li
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road No.6, Region Qingxiu, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Congjun Wang
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road No.6, Region Qingxiu, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Weilong Chen
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Zhuhai Women and Children's Hospital, Ningxi Road No.543, Region Xiangzhou, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Chao Chen
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road No.6, Region Qingxiu, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Xianming Tang
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road No.6, Region Qingxiu, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Hong Wang
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road No.6, Region Qingxiu, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Jiabo Chen
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road No.6, Region Qingxiu, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Qiang Liu
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road No.6, Region Qingxiu, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Wei Li
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road No.6, Region Qingxiu, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Yanqiang Li
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road No.6, Region Qingxiu, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Peng Chen
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road No.6, Region Qingxiu, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Yige Luo
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road No.6, Region Qingxiu, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Province, China.
| | - Cheng Su
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road No.6, Region Qingxiu, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jensen SAMS, Fonnes S, Gram-Hanssen A, Andresen K, Rosenberg J. Long-term mortality and intestinal obstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2022; 105:106841. [PMID: 36030037 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term outcomes of cholecystectomy are largely unknown though it is a common procedure in general surgery. We aimed to investigate the long-term mortality rate and incidence of intestinal obstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis was reported according to the PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR guidelines. A protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020178906). The databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were last searched on February 9, 2022 for original studies on long-term complications with n > 40 and follow-up ≥ 6 months. Outcomes were long-term mortality and incidence of intestinal obstruction, and meta-analyses were conducted. Risk of bias was assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane "Risk of bias"-tool according to study design. RESULTS We included 41 studies that reported long-term follow-up on 1,000,534 patients. Of these, 38 studies reported on mortality (514,242 patients) that ranged from 0 to 32%. Meta-analysis estimated a long-term mortality rate of 2.0% (95% CI 1.7-2.3%) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Five studies including 486,292 patients reported on intestinal obstruction that ranged from 0 to 6%. Meta-analysis estimated a long-term rate of intestinal obstruction of 1.3% (95% CI 0.8-1.8%). CONCLUSION Long-term mortality after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 2%. The incidence of long-term intestinal obstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 1.3%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofie Anne-Marie Skovbo Jensen
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Siv Fonnes
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Anders Gram-Hanssen
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Kristoffer Andresen
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Jacob Rosenberg
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for single-incision cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review. Updates Surg 2021; 73:2039-2046. [PMID: 33886106 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01056-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The role of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (SIRC) is still unclear. We update the summarization of the feasibility and safety of SILC and SIRC. A comprehensive search of SILC and SIRC of English literature published on PubMed database between January 2015 and November 2020 was performed. A total of 70 articles were included: 41 covering SILC alone, 21 showing SIRC alone, 7 reporting both, and 1 study not specified. In total, 7828 cases were recorded (SILC/SIRC/not specified, 6234/1544/50); and the gender of 7423 cases was definitively reported: the female rate was 64.0% (SILC/SIRC/not specified, 62.1%/71.5%/74.0%). The weighted mean for body mass index (BMI), operative time, blood loss and post-operative hospital stay was 25.5 kg/m2 (SILC/SIRC, 25.0/27.0 kg/m2), 73.8 min (SILC/SIRC, 68.2/88.8 min), 12.6 mL (SILC/SIRC, 12.1/14.8 mL) and 2.5 days (SILC/SIRC, 2.8/1.9 days), respectively. The pooled prevalence of an additional port, conversion to open surgery, post-operative complications, intraoperative biliary injury, and incisional hernia was 4.1% (SILC/SIRC, 4.7%/1.9%), 0.9% (SILC/SIRC, 0.7%/1.5%), 5.9% (SILC/SIRC, 6.2%/4.1%), 0.1% (SILC/SIRC, 0.2%/0.09%), and 2.1% (SILC/SIRC, 1.4%/4.8%), respectively. Compared with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, SIRC has experienced more postoperative incisional hernias (risk difference = 0.05, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.07; P < 0.0001). By far, SILC and SIRC have not been considered a standard procedure. With the innovation of medical devices and gradual accumulation of surgical experience, feasibility and safety of performing SILC and SIRC will improve.
Collapse
|