Patient-reported outcomes in patients with severe maxillary bone atrophy restored with zygomatic implant-supported complete dental prostheses: a systematic review

20 Years of Clinical Evolution in Zygomatic Implant Rehabilitation: Long-Term Outcomes and Current States

Zygoma implants are an alternative for rehabilitating severe maxillary atrophy. Since 2004, when Prof. Branemark first reported the long-term findings on zygomatic implants using the original intra-sinus approach, various surgical techniques have been introduced. In 2006, an anatomy-guided approach was developed, applying different implant trajectories based on alveolar atrophy levels and sinus concavity. The purpose of this review is to clarify the existing techniques and long-term outcomes of ZI rehabilitation over the past 20 years. Additionally, it aims to enhance the quality of current practices and identify gaps in the understanding of ZI treatment for future studies.

Comparative study of 3D contact area percentage between zygomatic implant and bone in different surgical approaches: clinical and biomechanical perspectives

BACKGROUND

Zygomatic implants, either alone or in combination with dental implant placement, have emerged as a viable surgical option for elderly patients with severe bone atrophy for occlusal restoration. This study aims to examine the biomechanical impact of the three-dimensional contact area between zygomatic implants and bone on biomechanics under different surgical methods.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images from 10 patients with severe bone atrophy, we reconstructed 3D maxillary bone models and created corresponding 3D zygomatic implant models. Two distinct surgical methods (extramaxillary or intrasinus approaches) were employed based on the position and angle of the zygomatic implant for each patient. The 3D bone-to-implant contact percentage (BIC%) was calculated, and finite element analysis with nonlinear contact was conducted to assess the relationship between 3D BIC% and surrounding bone stress for both surgical methods.

RESULTS

The 3D BIC% of extramaxillary approach (57.63 %) and intrasinus approach (56.49 %) for total bone (including cortical and cancellous bone) was similar (P = 0.425) in zygomatic implant surgery. In contrast, the intrasinus method exhibited higher 3D BIC% in cortical bone contact (28.08 %) compared to the extramaxillary approach (21.92 %) (P = 0.011). The correlation between 3D BIC% and high bone stress was stronger in the intrasinus approach, likely due to increased contact area in cortical bone.

CONCLUSION

The intrasinus approach led to lower bone stress and a more robust correlation between bone stress and 3D BIC%, particularly in cortical bone contact. Importantly, the coverage area of cortical bone surrounding the zygomatic implant significantly influenced biomechanical performance of the zygomatic implants.

Analysis of Long-Term Success and Biological Complications in Zygomatic Implant-Supported Prostheses

Introduction

Patients with significant maxillary atrophy who are not candidates for standard implants now have an option thanks to zygomatic implants. Long-term statistics on difficulties and success are, however, scarce.

Methods

A tertiary care center's patient data were retrospectively analyzed. Included were patients who underwent zygomatic implant surgery between 2017 and 2022. This research gathered and examined data on follow-up, surgical techniques, complications, demographics, and implant features.

Findings

There were 100 patients in all. 92% of the implants were successful, and 92 of them survived. Peri-implantitis (20%), soft tissue dehiscence (15%), sinusitis (10%), prosthesis fracture (8%), and infection (5%), were among the biological consequences. In summary, zygomatic implants have the potential to help individuals with severe maxillary atrophy recover, but close observation and effective management of any problems are necessary to maximize results. To enhance patient care and improve treatment regimens, further research is required.

Round and flat zygomatic implants: effectiveness after a 3‑year follow‑up non‑interventional study

PURPOSE

This non-interventional study investigates variations in the type and frequency of late complications linked to novel zygomatic implant designs, installed adhering to the Zygoma Anatomy-Guided Approach (ZAGA) concept, over an extended follow-up period of at least 3 years.

METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting indications for treatment with ZIs were treated according to ZAGA recommendations. Implants were immediately loaded. The ORIS success criteria for prosthetic offset, stability, sinus changes and soft-tissue status were used to evaluate the outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were treated. Ten patients received two ZIs and regular implants; one received three ZIs plus regular implants, and nine received four ZIs. Fifty-nine ZIs were placed: thirty-six (61%) Straumann ZAGA-Flat implants and twenty-three (39%) Straumann ZAGA-Round implants. Four patients (20%) presented earlier sinus floor discontinuities. Fifteen patients (75%) had prior sinus opacities. Nineteen patients were followed for between 38 and 53 months (mean 46.5 months). One patient dropped out after 20 months. When comparing pre-surgical CBCT with post-surgical CBCT, 84.7% of the sites presented identical or less sinus opacity; nine locations (15%) showed decreased, and another nine increased (15%) post-surgical sinus opacity. Fifty-three ZIs (89.8%) maintained stable soft tissue. Six ZIs had recessions with no signs of infection. ZIs and prosthesis survival rate was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the effectiveness of ZAGA-based zygomatic implant rehabilitations using Round and Flat designs. Despite patient number constraints, minimal changes in the frequency of late complications from the 1-year follow-up were observed. 100% implant and prosthesis survival rate over a mean follow-up of 46.5 months is reported.

Long-term survival and complications of Quad Zygoma Protocol with Anatomy-Guided Approach in severely atrophic maxilla: A retrospective follow-up analysis of up to 17 years

INTRODUCTION

The objective of the study was to provide long-term clinical outcomes and complications in the severely atrophic edentulous maxillae treated by means of the quad zygoma protocol (QZP) using the Anatomy-Guided Approach (AGA).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients with severely atrophic edentulous maxilla and insufficient bone height and width in the anterior and posterior regions bilaterally, who underwent rehabilitation with the QZP between May 2006 and December 2021. All patients were followed for at least 1 year. All zygomatic implants (ZIs) were placed by the same surgeon. The primary endpoint of the study was the implant survival rate. Secondary endpoints were implant success rate, prosthesis success rate, complications, and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life using the OHIP-14 questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients (men 16, women 40) with 224 ZIs (Nobel Biocare, n = 204; Straumann, n = 16; Southern Implant, n = 4) placement were included with a mean follow-up period 8.8 ± 3.9 years (range, 1.2-17.0). The survival (success) rate was 97.7%. Five ZIs in four patients failed. The mean time between implant placement and failure was 8.6 years (range, 0.5-13.3). All patients received immediate loading with acrylic prosthesis. The successful rates for the definitive prosthesis were 98.2%. Forty-two patients received posterior cantilever for rehabilitation of fixed definitive prosthesis. Local orofacial inflammation (35.7%) and Sinusitis (12.5%) were the most common complications, occurring at a mean follow-up of 10.0 (range, 4.2-14.9) and 10.3 (range, 4.3-16.2) years, respectively. In 48 patients, the mean score of the OHIP-14 questionnaire was 1.7 ± 2.6 with the follow-up period of 9.0 ± 4.1 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The rehabilitation of severely atrophic edentulous maxilla using the QZP has shown a predictable and high survival rate in the long term. The implementation of an immediate loading protocol offers potential benefits in stabilizing ZIs with cross-arch stabilization. Moreover, the use of a posterior cantilever in reconstruction can effectively establish functional occlusion through well-distributed ZIs, eliminating the need for additional implant placement.

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

The Scientific Investigation Committee of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry offers this review of the 2022 dental literature to briefly touch on several topics of interest to modern restorative dentistry. Each committee member brings discipline-specific expertise in their subject areas that include (in order of the appearance in this report): prosthodontics; periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; dental materials and therapeutics; occlusion and temporomandibular disorders; sleep-related breathing disorders; oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery; and dental caries and cariology. The authors focused their efforts on reporting information likely to influence the daily dental treatment decisions of the reader with an emphasis on innovations, new materials and processes, and future trends in dentistry. With the tremendous volume of literature published daily in dentistry and related disciplines, this review cannot be comprehensive. Instead, its purpose is to update interested readers and provide valuable resource material for those willing to subsequently pursue greater detail on their own. Our intent remains to assist colleagues in navigating the tremendous volume of newly minted information produced annually. Finally, we hope that readers find this work helpful in managing patients.

Bone reconstruction of extensive maxillomandibular defects in adults

Reconstruction of significant maxillomandibular defects is a challenge that has been much discussed over the last few decades. Fundamental principles were developed decades ago (bone bed viability, graft immobilization). Clinical decision-making criteria are highly relevant, including local/systemic factors and incision designs, the choice of material, grafting technique, and donor site morbidity. Stabilizing particulated grafts for defined defects-that is, via meshes or shells-might allow significant horizontal and vertical augmentation; the alternatives are onlay and inlay techniques. More significant defects might require extra orally harvested autologous bone blocks. The anterior iliac crest is often used for nonvascularized augmentation, whereas more extensive defects often require microvascular reconstruction. In those cases, the free fibula flap has become the standard of care. The development of alternatives is still ongoing (i.e., alloplastic reconstruction, zygomatic implants, obturators, distraction osteogenesis). Especially for these complex procedures, three-dimensional planning tools enable facilitated planning and a surgical workflow.