Processing of morsellised femoral heads with high-pressure saline

Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: a study in 12 dogs

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Impacted morselized allograft bone is a well-established method for reconstructing bone defects at revision surgery. However, the incorporation of bone graft is not always complete, and a substantial volume of fibrous tissue has been found around grafted implants. We hypothesized that rinsing the bone graft may improve graft incorporation by removing the majority of immunogenic factors present in blood, marrow, and fat.

METHODS

We implanted a cylindrical (10- × 6-mm) porous-coated Ti implant into each proximal tibia of 12 dogs. The implants were surrounded by a 2.5-mm gap into which morselized fresh frozen allograft bone was impacted. The bone graft was either (1) untreated or (2) rinsed in 37°C saline for 3 × 1 min. After 4 weeks, the animals were killed and implant fixation was evaluated by mechanical push-out and histomorphometry.

RESULTS

The groups (rinsed vs. control) were similar regarding mechanical implant fixation (mean (SD)): shear strength (MPa) 2.7 (1.0) vs. 2.9 (1.2), stiffness (MPa/mm) 15 (6.7) vs. 15 (5.6), and energy absorption (kJ/m(2)) 0.5 (0.2) vs. 0.6 (0.4), The same was evident for the new bone formation on the implant surface and around the implant: ongrowth (%) 6 vs. 7 and ingrowth (%) 9 vs. 9. Although not statistically significant, a 61% reduction in fibrous tissue ongrowth and 50% reduction in ingrowth were found in the rinsed group.

INTERPRETATION

Within the limits of this experimental model, we did not detect any benefits of rinsing morselized allograft bone prior to impaction grafting.

Pulse-lavage washing is an effective method for defatting of morselized allograft bone in the operating theater

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Incorporation of fresh-frozen allograft bone and safety aspects associated with this procedure can be improved by removing blood and lipids from the bone. We investigated in a quantitative manner how efficient pulse lavage might be for removal of adipose tissue from morselized allograft bone.

METHODS

Depending on the study, the washing was performed with an average of 0.8 L or 1.6 L of sterile saline at room temperature. Fat content of the morselized bone samples was determined using hexane elution. The efficiency of pulse lavage alone was compared with that after an additional wash in 12 L of warm water (55 degrees C). Unprocessed controls were also included for comparison.

RESULTS

Pulse lavage with 0.8 L saline alone removed 80% of the fat from the bone, whereas 95% of the fat was removed when washing was performed with 1.6 L of saline. The cleansing efficacy was improved further when an additional wash with warm water was used.

INTERPRETATION

Our results indicate that pulse-lavage washing alone at room temperature is an effective method for defatting of morselized allograft bone, but an additional wash with warm water improves the cleansing efficiency. Pulse lavage is easily available and simple to use in the operating theater.

Cefuroxime, rifampicin and pulse lavage in decontamination of allograft bone

The risk of bacterial infection through allogenic bone transplantation is one of the major problems facing tissue banks. Different screening methods and decontamination procedures are being used to achieve a safe surgical result. The purpose of this study was to investigate the contamination rate in fresh frozen bone allografts after treating them with different decontamination methods. The allografts were contaminated by rubbing on the operating theatre floor for 60 min, after which they were rinsed either with sterile physiological saline, cefuroxime or rifampicin solution or they were washed with low-pressure pulse lavage of sterile physiological saline. Our findings show that low-pressure pulse lavage with sterile saline solution is very effective in removing bacteria from bone allograft, when compared with the antibiotic solutions tested.