1
|
Tobener E, Doettl S, Plyler P, McCaslin D, Lewis J. Effects of Noise Exposure on Video Ocular Counter Roll Measurements. Am J Audiol 2025; 34:19-28. [PMID: 39560604 DOI: 10.1044/2024_aja-24-00101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of noise exposure on otolith function measures of video ocular counter roll (vOCR), ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP), cervical VEMP (cVEMP), and subjective visual vertical (SVV). Additionally, this study compared the vOCR results with other otolith function measures: cVEMP, oVEMP, and SVV. METHOD This was a cross-sectional, between-group prospective study that compared otolith function tests between noise exposure groups. Thirty-three adults between the ages of 40-60 years with no middle ear pathology, history of balance disorder, neurologic pathology, systemic diseases, or receiving ototoxic medications were included in the study. Group 1 included 17 adults (34 ears) with low-risk noise exposure, and Group 2 included 16 adults (32 ears) with high-risk noise exposure. Independent samples t tests were used to assess group mean differences for dependent variables. The independent variable was group with two levels (low risk and high risk). The dependent variables were Noise Exposure Structured Interview (NESI) score, vOCR torsion, cVEMP amplitude, oVEMP amplitude, and SVV angle. Additional analyses were completed using Pearson correlation to evaluate the relationship of vOCR to the other otolith function tests and NESI score to the otolith function tests. RESULTS The results indicated significantly decreased vOCR torsion, cVEMP amplitude, and oVEMP amplitude in individuals with high-risk noise exposure compared with those in the low-risk group. Significant correlations were found for NESI scores as well as vOCR and oVEMP measures. CONCLUSIONS This study describes the concomitant degeneration of the auditory and vestibular systems from noise exposure affecting otolith function, as measured by audiologic testing and otolith testing. vOCR appears to be sensitive to this degeneration, indicating that vOCR could be used as a vestibular screening measure for patients with noise exposure and/or suspected utricle dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Tobener
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville
| | - Steven Doettl
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville
| | - Patrick Plyler
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville
| | - Devin McCaslin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - James Lewis
- Department of Communication Disorders and Sciences, Viterbo University, La Crosse, WI
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang X, Deng Q, Huang X, Wen C, Wang W, Chen T. Clinical study on the optimal rotational stimulation for the unilateral centrifugation subjective visual vertical test. Front Neurosci 2025; 19:1529572. [PMID: 40035062 PMCID: PMC11872882 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1529572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the optimal stimulation intensity and reference range of the unilateral centrifugation subjective visual vertical (UC-SVV) test and to fill the technical gap in otolithic function evaluation in patients with peripheral vestibular diseases. Method Forty healthy subjects (median age 28 years) underwent a UC-SVV test at rotation speeds of 60, 120, 180, and 240 deg./s using the Neuro Kinetics Inc. (NKI) I-Portal 6.0 NOTC rotating chair system. The deviation angles of the UC-SVV line in the centre and left/right positions at each rotation speed were recorded and analysed. Results Forty healthy subjects completed the test. The deviation angle of the UC-SVV line differed according to the rotation speed (60, 120, 180, and 240 deg./s). At each rotation speed, the position of the rotation axis (left/centre/right position) affected the deviation angle and direction of the UC-SVV line. At each position of the rotation axis, the rotation speed also affected the deviation angle. When the rotation chair was translated to the left and right positions, the UC-SVV line deviated to the right and left sides, respectively, and the deviation angle increased with increasing rotation speed. The deviation angle at 60 deg./s was significantly less than that at 180 and 240 deg./s (p < 0.001). When the rotation axis was in the centre position, the absolute value of the SVV deviation was less than 0.3, and there was no statistically significant difference at any rotation speed. Conclusion This study preliminarily discussed the deviation direction and angle of the UC-SVV line under different stimulation intensities in a range of healthy middle-aged subjects. The optimal stimulation intensity for the UC-SVV test is suggested to be 180 or 240 deg./s. Specifically, the peak rotation speed could be 180 deg./s if the subject is unable to tolerate high-speed rotation. This study provides support for improving this technology for evaluation of otolith function and its diagnostic significance in peripheral vestibular diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueqing Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Institute of Otolaryngology of Tianjin, Tianjin, China
- Key Laboratory of Auditory Speech and Balance Medicine, Tianjin, China
- Key Medical Discipline of Tianjin (Otolaryngology), Tianjin, China
- Quality Control Centre of Otolaryngology, Tianjin, China
| | - Qiaomei Deng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Institute of Otolaryngology of Tianjin, Tianjin, China
- Key Laboratory of Auditory Speech and Balance Medicine, Tianjin, China
- Key Medical Discipline of Tianjin (Otolaryngology), Tianjin, China
- Quality Control Centre of Otolaryngology, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaobang Huang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Institute of Otolaryngology of Tianjin, Tianjin, China
- Key Laboratory of Auditory Speech and Balance Medicine, Tianjin, China
- Key Medical Discipline of Tianjin (Otolaryngology), Tianjin, China
- Quality Control Centre of Otolaryngology, Tianjin, China
| | - Chao Wen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Institute of Otolaryngology of Tianjin, Tianjin, China
- Key Laboratory of Auditory Speech and Balance Medicine, Tianjin, China
- Key Medical Discipline of Tianjin (Otolaryngology), Tianjin, China
- Quality Control Centre of Otolaryngology, Tianjin, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Institute of Otolaryngology of Tianjin, Tianjin, China
- Key Laboratory of Auditory Speech and Balance Medicine, Tianjin, China
- Key Medical Discipline of Tianjin (Otolaryngology), Tianjin, China
- Quality Control Centre of Otolaryngology, Tianjin, China
| | - Taisheng Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Institute of Otolaryngology of Tianjin, Tianjin, China
- Key Laboratory of Auditory Speech and Balance Medicine, Tianjin, China
- Key Medical Discipline of Tianjin (Otolaryngology), Tianjin, China
- Quality Control Centre of Otolaryngology, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Argaet EC, Kwok BYC, Bradley J, Young AS, Nham B, Calic Z, Taylor RL, Pogson JM, Reid N, Kong JHK, Flanagan S, Halmagyi GM, Rosengren SM, Welgampola MS. Subjective visual horizontal correlates better with ocular than with cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 152:1-10. [PMID: 37257318 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between widely used otolith function tests: the Subjective Visual Horizontal (SVH) and Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMP). METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on 301 patients who underwent SVH, ocular and cervical VEMP (oVEMP and cVEMP) tests on the same day. Correlations between the mean SVH tilt and amplitude asymmetry ratios for bone-conducted (BC) oVEMP and air-conducted (AC) cVEMP were examined. Diagnoses included vestibular neuritis, stroke, vestibular migraine, Meniere's disease, sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) and vestibular schwannoma. RESULTS SVH results were concordant with the oVEMP in 64% of cases and the cVEMP in 51%. Across all patients, SVH demonstrated a significant moderate correlation with BC oVEMP amplitude asymmetry ratios (r = 0.55, p < 0.001) and a weak correlation with AC cVEMP amplitude asymmetry ratios (r = 0.35, p < 0.001). A stronger correlation between SVH and oVEMPs was observed in patients with vestibular neuritis (r = 0.67, p < 0.001) and SSNHL (r = 0.76, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS SVH correlates better with oVEMP than cVEMP symmetry. SIGNIFICANCE This finding reinforces the hypothesis of a common utricular origin for both SVH and oVEMPs which is distinct from the saccular origin of cVEMPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C Argaet
- Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Belinda Y C Kwok
- Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Justine Bradley
- Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Allison S Young
- Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Benjamin Nham
- Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Zeljka Calic
- Department of Neurophysiology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Rachael L Taylor
- Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Jacob M Pogson
- Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Nicole Reid
- Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Jonathan H K Kong
- Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sean Flanagan
- Department of Otolaryngology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gabor M Halmagyi
- Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Sally M Rosengren
- Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Miriam S Welgampola
- Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
赵 雅, 陈 钢, 吴 佳, 杨 捷, 周 丽, 李 莹. [Clinical application progress of subjective visual vertical test]. LIN CHUANG ER BI YAN HOU TOU JING WAI KE ZA ZHI = JOURNAL OF CLINICAL OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD, AND NECK SURGERY 2022; 36:884-892. [PMID: 36347586 PMCID: PMC10127558 DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Subjective visual vertical test is considered as an effective technique to evaluate otolith organ function and central pathway of gravity perception. This test is non-invasive, easy to operate and has little stimulation. At present, there are few such studies in China. This paper reviews the concept, measurement principle and method, influencing factors, application, advantages and disadvantages of subjective visual vertical test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- 雅楠 赵
- 山西医科大学护理学院(太原,030001)College of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China
| | - 钢钢 陈
- 山西医科大学第一医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
| | - 佳鑫 吴
- 山西医科大学第一医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
| | - 捷 杨
- 山西医科大学第一医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
| | - 丽媛 周
- 山西医科大学第一医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
| | - 莹 李
- 山西医科大学第一医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Curthoys IS, Grant JW, Pastras CJ, Fröhlich L, Brown DJ. Similarities and Differences Between Vestibular and Cochlear Systems - A Review of Clinical and Physiological Evidence. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:695179. [PMID: 34456671 PMCID: PMC8397526 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.695179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The evoked response to repeated brief stimuli, such as clicks or short tone bursts, is used for clinical evaluation of the function of both the auditory and vestibular systems. One auditory response is a neural potential - the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) - recorded by surface electrodes on the head. The clinical analogue for testing the otolithic response to abrupt sounds and vibration is the myogenic potential recorded from tensed muscles - the vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP). VEMPs have provided clinicians with a long sought-after tool - a simple, clinically realistic indicator of the function of each of the 4 otolithic sensory regions. We review the basic neural evidence for VEMPs and discuss the similarities and differences between otolithic and cochlear receptors and afferents. VEMPs are probably initiated by sound or vibration selectively activating afferent neurons with irregular resting discharge originating from the unique type I receptors at a specialized region of the otolithic maculae (the striola). We review how changes in VEMP responses indicate the functional state of peripheral vestibular function and the likely transduction mechanisms allowing otolithic receptors and afferents to trigger such very short latency responses. In section "ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY" we show how cochlear and vestibular receptors and afferents have many similar electrophysiological characteristics [e.g., both generate microphonics, summating potentials, and compound action potentials (the vestibular evoked potential, VsEP)]. Recent electrophysiological evidence shows that the hydrodynamic changes in the labyrinth caused by increased fluid volume (endolymphatic hydrops), change the responses of utricular receptors and afferents in a way which mimics the changes in vestibular function attributed to endolymphatic hydrops in human patients. In section "MECHANICS OF OTOLITHS IN VEMPS TESTING" we show how the major VEMP results (latency and frequency response) follow from modeling the physical characteristics of the macula (dimensions, stiffness etc.). In particular, the structure and mechanical operation of the utricular macula explains the very fast response of the type I receptors and irregular afferents which is the very basis of VEMPs and these structural changes of the macula in Menière's Disease (MD) predict the upward shift of VEMP tuning in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian S. Curthoys
- Vestibular Research Laboratory, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John Wally Grant
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Christopher J. Pastras
- The Menière’s Research Laboratory, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Laura Fröhlich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Daniel J. Brown
- School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fröhlich L, Wilke M, Plontke SK, Rahne T. Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients. J Vestib Res 2021; 32:355-365. [PMID: 34308918 PMCID: PMC9398058 DOI: 10.3233/ves-210028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment with a cochlear implant (CI) poses the risk of inducing a behaviorally unmeasurable air-bone gap leading to false negative absence of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs, oVEMPs) to air conducted sound (ACS). OBJECTIVE To investigate VEMP response rates to ACS and bone conducted vibration (BCV) in CI patients and the applicability of the B81 transducer for BCV stimulation. METHODS Prospective experimental study including unilateral CI patients, measuring cVEMPs and oVEMPs to ACS and to BCV, comparing response rates, signed asymmetry ratios, latencies, and amplitudes. RESULTS Data of 13 CI patients (mean age 44±12 years) were analyzed. For the CI side, oVEMP and cVEMP response rates were significantly higher for BCV (77%cVEMP, 62%oVEMP) compared to ACS (23%cVEMP, 8%oVEMP). For the contralateral side, no difference between response rates to ACS (85%cVEMP, 69%oVEMP) and BCV (85%cVEMP, 77%oVEMP) was observed. Substantially higher asymmetries were observed for ACS (-88±23%for cVEMPs, -96±11%for oVEMPs) compared to BCV (-12±45%for cVEMPs, 4±74%for oVEMPs). CONCLUSIONS BCV is an effective stimulus for VEMP testing in CI patients. The B81 is a feasible stimulator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Fröhlich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & NeckSurgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - M Wilke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & NeckSurgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - S K Plontke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & NeckSurgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - T Rahne
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & NeckSurgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Totilienė M, Uloza V, Lesauskaitė V, Damulevičienė G, Kregždytė R, Kaski D, Ulozienė I. Impaired Subjective Visual Vertical and Increased Visual Dependence in Older Adults With Falls. Front Aging Neurosci 2021; 13:667608. [PMID: 34177553 PMCID: PMC8232053 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.667608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Aging affects the vestibular system and may disturb the perception of verticality and lead to increased visual dependence (VD). Studies have identified that abnormal upright perception influences the risk of falling. The aim of our study was to evaluate subjective visual vertical (SVV) and VD using a mobile virtual reality-based system for SVV assessment (VIRVEST) in older adults with falls and evaluate its relationship with clinical balance assessment tools, dizziness, mental state, and depression level. This study included 37 adults >65 years who experienced falls and 40 non-faller age-matched controls. Three tests were performed using the VIRVEST system: a static SVV, dynamic SVV with clockwise and counter-clockwise background stimulus motion. VD was calculated as the mean of absolute values of the rod tilt from each trial of dynamic SVV minus the mean static SVV rod tilt. Older adults who experienced falls manifested significantly larger biases in static SVV (p = 0.012), dynamic SVV (p < 0.001), and VD (p = 0.014) than controls. The increase in static SVV (odds ratio = 1.365, p = 0.023), dynamic SVV (odds ratio = 1.623, p < 0.001) and VD (odds ratio = 1.460, p = 0.010) tilt by one degree significantly related to falls risk in the faller group. Fallers who had a high risk of falling according to the Tinetti test exhibited significantly higher tilts of dynamic SVV than those who had a low or medium risk (p = 0.037). In the faller group, the increase of the dynamic SVV tilt by one degree was significantly related to falls risk according to the Tinetti test (odds ratio = 1.356, p = 0.049). SVV errors, particularly with the dynamic SVV test (i.e., greater VD) were associated with an increased risk of falling in the faller group. The VIRVEST system may be applicable in clinical settings for SVV testing and predicting falls in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milda Totilienė
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Virgilijus Uloza
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Vita Lesauskaitė
- Department of Geriatrics, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Gytė Damulevičienė
- Department of Geriatrics, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Rima Kregždytė
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Diego Kaski
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ingrida Ulozienė
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fröhlich L, Wilke M, Plontke SK, Rahne T. Influence of bone conduction transducer type and placement on ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Sci Rep 2021; 11:8500. [PMID: 33875696 PMCID: PMC8055867 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87682-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Evaluating the effectiveness of different bone conduction (BC) transducers with controlled coupling force to elicit cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs, oVEMPs) in healthy subjects by comparing response rates, amplitudes, latencies, thresholds and asymmetry ratios. Prospective experimental study including healthy participants. VEMPs were measured to different stimulation modes; the BC transducer coupling force was controlled to 5.4 (± 0.5) Newton. cVEMPs: to bone conducted vibration (BCV) with the B81 transducer on the mastoid; oVEMPs: to BCV with the B81 on the mastoid, BCV with the B81 on the forehead, and BCV with the Mini-Shaker 4810 on the forehead. Air conducted sound (ACS) with insert earphones was used as reference. Data of 24 normal subjects (mean age 25.3 (± 3.0) years) were analyzed. ACS and BCV with the B81on the mastoid evoked cVEMPs in 100% of ears. The highest oVEMP response rates were obtained with the B81 on the mastoid (83-92%), the lowest with the B81 on the forehead (17-22%). The Mini-Shaker elicited lower response rates (65%) compared to results from the literature without coupling force control and compared to ACS (78-87%). Amplitudes were higher for BCV than ACS. ACS and BCV on the mastoid caused higher asymmetry compared to BCV forehead stimulation. The B81 was feasible to elicit VEMPs with mastoid placement and can be used as an approved medical device to measure BCV VEMPs in a clinical set-up. Normative asymmetry values have to be established due to higher variability for mastoid stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Fröhlich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
| | - Maira Wilke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Stefan K Plontke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Torsten Rahne
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Obrero-Gaitán E, Molina F, Montilla-Ibañez MDA, Del-Pino-Casado R, Rodriguez-Almagro D, Lomas-Vega R. Misperception of Visual Vertical in Peripheral Vestibular Disorders. A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Laryngoscope 2020; 131:1110-1121. [PMID: 32965689 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The main aim was to assess the misperception of visual verticality (VV) in patients with peripheral vestibular disorders (PVD) in comparison with healthy controls. As secondary objectives, we checked if vestibular, visual, and somatosensory postural pathways can be affected in patients with PVD as well as the characteristics of PVD that could influence on the VV perception. METHODS A systematic review with meta-analysis was carried out. The bibliographic search was performed in January, 2020 in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), CINAHL, SciELO. Two reviewers selected the studies that met the inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The VV perception was assessed in two meta-analysis according the used test: The Subjective Visual Vertical test (SVV) or the Rod and Frame Test (RFT) in comparison with healthy subjects. The Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) and its 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) was used to estimate the pooled effect. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger's test and Trim and Fill Method. RESULTS Thirty-four studies were included reporting 3,524 participants. PVD patients showed a misperception of the VV with SVV (SMD = 1.510; 95%CI: 1.190-1.830) and the RFT (SMD = 0.816; 95% CI: 0.234-1.398) respect healthy controls. A subgroup of patients in the acute phase (SMD = 2.5; 95%CI: 2.022-2.978) and who underwent a vestibular surgery (SMD = 2.241; 95%CI: 1.471-3.011) had the greater misperception of VV. CONCLUSION Patients with PVD show an alteration in the perception of VV, being greater in the acute phase and after a vestibular surgery. Laryngoscope, 131:1110-1121, 2021.
Collapse
|
10
|
ARDIÇ FN, ŞENTÜRK M, ÇİL T. The effect of head roll and soft surface on Virtual SVV in healthy subjects: A normalization study. ENT UPDATES 2020. [DOI: 10.32448/entupdates.743714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|