1
|
Cui Y, Tian Z, Yu M, Liu Z, Rong T, Ma X. Effect of guanidine acetic acid on meat quality, muscle amino acids, and fatty acids in Tibetan pigs. Front Vet Sci 2022; 9:998956. [PMID: 36304417 PMCID: PMC9592698 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.998956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of guanidine acetic acid (GAA) supplementation on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in Tibetan pigs. A total of 18 male Tibetan pigs (21.35 ± 0.99 kg) were randomly assigned to the control (basal diet) and GAA (basal diet + 800 mg/kg GAA) groups for 125 days. Growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in pigs, and the chemical composition of Longissimus thoracis (LT) were not altered by GAA. In LT, compared to the control group, dietary GAA increased the superoxide dismutase activity, transcripts of stearoyl CoA desaturase (SCD) and fatty acid synthase (FAS), and contents of glutamate, glutamine, C24:0, C20:3n-6, C20:4n-6, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (P < 0.05), but it decreased the malondialdehyde content (P < 0.001). In back fat, dietary GAA reduced the transcript of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and the contents of C10:0, C12:0, C14:0, and C16:0 (P < 0.05), whereas it increased the contents of C22:0, C20:1, C22:1, C24:1, C20:2, C20:3n-3, and C22:2 (P < 0.05). These findings will provide a basis for high-quality Tibetan pork production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiyan Cui
- Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China,State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangzhou, China,The Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangzhou, China,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Animal Meat Quality and Safety Control and Evaluation, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhimei Tian
- Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China,State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangzhou, China,The Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangzhou, China,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Animal Meat Quality and Safety Control and Evaluation, Guangzhou, China
| | - Miao Yu
- Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China,State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangzhou, China,The Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangzhou, China,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Animal Meat Quality and Safety Control and Evaluation, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhichang Liu
- Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China,State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangzhou, China,The Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangzhou, China,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Animal Meat Quality and Safety Control and Evaluation, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ting Rong
- Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China,State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangzhou, China,The Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangzhou, China,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Animal Meat Quality and Safety Control and Evaluation, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xianyong Ma
- Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China,State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangzhou, China,The Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangzhou, China,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Animal Meat Quality and Safety Control and Evaluation, Guangzhou, China,Maoming Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Maoming, China,*Correspondence: Xianyong Ma
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pirgozliev V, Rose SP, Mirza MW, Whiting IM, Malins H, Bauer L, Lemme A. Feeding guanidinoacetic acid to broiler chickens can compensate for low dietary metabolisable energy formulation. Br Poult Sci 2021; 63:368-374. [PMID: 34874208 DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2021.2014399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
1. This study compared the responses of broilers to diets supplemented with the same level of guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) but formulated to have different N-corrected apparent metabolisable energy (AMEn) contents. The study involved 1280, one-day-old Ross 308 broilers, in 64 pens comprising 32 pens of males and 32 pens females, (20 birds in each) aged from 0 to 42 days.2. Commercial AME levels of 12.55 MJ/kg, 12.97 MJ/kg and 13.18 MJ/kg in the starter, grower and finisher diets, respectively, were set for the positive control (PC) feed. Four dietary treatments were prepared: PC (as above); negative control 1 (NC; PC - 0.21 MJ ME /kg); NC1+ 0.06% GAA; NC2 (PC - 0.42 MJ ME/kg + 0.06% GAA). Each diet was provided in 16 pens (eight male and eight female), following randomisation.3. Overall, birds fed NC1 had lower feed intakes (FI) compared to birds fed the PC and NC2+GAA, lower weight gain (WG) compared to all the other diets and lower final body weight than birds fed the GAA diets (P<0.05). There was a diet x sex interaction (P=0.039), whereby feeding NC+GAA to female birds improved feed efficiency compared to being fed NC2 and NC1+GAA, but not in males. Birds fed diets with GAA had a higher poultry efficiency factor (P < 0.001) than those fed NC1.4. There were no effects of treatment or sex on litter moisture, footpad score, white striping, wooden breast, AMEn, dry matter and fat retention (P>0.05). However, the diet NC1+GAA had 11.2% higher nitrogen retention coefficient compared to the NC1 diet (P=0.038).6. Overall, the results implied that lower performance induced by a reduction of dietary AMEn in the range of 0.21 to 0.42 MJ/kg was more than compensated by supplementing 600 g/t GAA to the feed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Pirgozliev
- The National Institute of Poultry Husbandry, Harper Adams University, Shropshire, TF10 8NB, UK
| | - S P Rose
- The National Institute of Poultry Husbandry, Harper Adams University, Shropshire, TF10 8NB, UK
| | - M W Mirza
- The National Institute of Poultry Husbandry, Harper Adams University, Shropshire, TF10 8NB, UK
| | - I M Whiting
- The National Institute of Poultry Husbandry, Harper Adams University, Shropshire, TF10 8NB, UK
| | - H Malins
- Pure Offices, Lake View House, Wilton Drive, Suite 23/Evonik, GB-Warwick CV34 6RG,UK
| | - L Bauer
- Evonik Operations GmbH, Rodenbacher Chaussee 4, 63457 Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany
| | - A Lemme
- Evonik Operations GmbH, Rodenbacher Chaussee 4, 63457 Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khalil S, Saenbungkhor N, Kesnava K, Sivapirunthep P, Sitthigripong R, Jumanee S, Chaosap C. Effects of Guanidinoacetic Acid Supplementation on Productive Performance, Pectoral Myopathies, and Meat Quality of Broiler Chickens. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:ani11113180. [PMID: 34827912 PMCID: PMC8614519 DOI: 10.3390/ani11113180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Genetic selection for rapid growth is accompanied with challenges in meat quality such as pectoral myopathies, which lead to downgrading of breast muscle and economic losses for slaughterhouses. This experiment evaluated the effects of guanidinoacetic acid supplementation at rate of 0%, 0.06%, and 0.12% on the productive performance and meat quality of broiler chickens. Result showed that wooden breast was manifested by low creatine and high ultimate pH, and more associated with heavy birds. Guanidinoacetic acid supplementation increased muscle glycogen, reduced the ultimate pH, and reduced the incidence of wooden breast severity. In conclusion, guanidinoacetic acid can be used in broiler diets to improve the productive performance without exacerbating pectoral myopathy or affecting meat quality. Abstract The effects of guanidinoacteic acid (GAA) supplementation on productive performance, pectoral myopathies, and meat quality of broilers were studied. Treatments consisted of corn/soybean-based diets with a GAA supplement (0%, 0.06%, and 0.12%). A total of 546 one-day-old Ross-308 males were randomly allocated to 42 floor pens with 14 replicates (13 birds/pens) for each treatment. The results showed that GAA at doses of 0.06% and 0.12% improved feed conversion, increased the percentage of normal breast, and decreased the severity of wooden breast. Breast muscle myopathy severity was positively correlated with heavy birds and negatively correlated with breast muscle creatine and glycogen. Breast muscle creatine and glycogen correlated positively with normal, less severe pectoral myopathies and meat quality. In conclusion, GAA supplementation improved broiler performance without exacerbating pectoral myopathy or affecting meat quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shady Khalil
- AlzChem Trostberg GmbH, 83308 Trostberg, Germany;
- Correspondence: (S.K.); (C.C.); Tel.: +20-12-8195-0008 (S.K.); +668-3882-9217 (C.C.)
| | | | | | - Panneepa Sivapirunthep
- Department of Agricultural Education, Faculty of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand;
| | - Ronachai Sitthigripong
- Department of Animal Production Technology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand; (R.S.); (S.J.)
| | - Sukanya Jumanee
- Department of Animal Production Technology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand; (R.S.); (S.J.)
| | - Chanporn Chaosap
- Department of Agricultural Education, Faculty of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand;
- Correspondence: (S.K.); (C.C.); Tel.: +20-12-8195-0008 (S.K.); +668-3882-9217 (C.C.)
| |
Collapse
|