Finger Force Matching and Verbal Reports: Testing Predictions of the Iso-Perceptual Manifold Concept

Force matching: motor effects that are not reported by the actor

We explored unintentional drifts of finger forces during force production and matching task. Based on earlier studies, we predicted that force matching with the other hand would reduce or stop the force drift in instructed fingers while uninstructed (enslaved) fingers remain unaffected. Twelve young, healthy, right-handed participants performed two types of tasks with both hands (task hand and match hand). The task hand produced constant force at 20% of MVC level with the Index and Ring fingers pressing in parallel on strain gauge force sensors. The Middle finger force wasn't instructed, and its enslaved force was recorded. Visual feedback on the total force by the instructed fingers was either present throughout the trial or only during the first 5 s (no-feedback condition). The other hand matched the perceived force level of the task hand starting at either 4, 8, or 15 s from the trial initiation. No feedback was ever provided for the match hand force. After the visual feedback was removed, the task hand showed a consistent drift to lower magnitudes of total force. Contrary to our prediction, over all conditions, force matching caused a brief acceleration of force drift in the task hand, which then reached a plateau. There was no effect of matching on drifts in enslaved finger force. We interpret the force drifts within the theory of control with spatial referent coordinates as consequences of drifts in the command (referent coordinate) to the antagonist muscles. This command is not adequately incorporated into force perception.

Pinch force sense test-retest reliability evaluation using contralateral force matching task

A high test-retest reliability in measurement of pinch force sense is required to assess a clinical parameter accurately over a longitudinal study. Ipsilateral reproduction (IR) task and contralateral matching (CM) task have commonly been used for the assessment of force sense. To date, there has been little research on the test-retest reliability of pinch force sense utilizing the contralateral force matching task. This research aimed to explore this phenomenon across a spectrum of reference force levels (10, 30, and 50 percent maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC)) using a contralateral matching task. Every participant in the study was tested twice by the same skilled experts, with each session separated by one week. Although normalized variable error indicated a poor level of reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = - 0.25 to 0.05) for these force sense tests, normalized constant error (ICC = 0.76-0.85) and normalized absolute error (ICC = 0.61-0.81) results indicated a fair to good of reliability. The lower bound of 95% CI of ICC for NAE and NCE indicated fair test-retest reliability (0.41-0.69). These findings suggest that investigators can reasonably obtain a fair to good test-retest reliability when investigating pinch force sense using the contralateral matching task. The Bland-Altman plots, SEM, and MDD95% were lower at these lower reference force level (10% MVIC) compared to the level of higher reference forces (30% and 50% MVIC). Therefore, when the reference force level increases, the participant needs a larger NAE or NCE decrease to show that their pinch force sense has indeed improved.

The control and perception of antagonist muscle action

The review covers a range of topics related to the role of the antagonist muscles in agonist-antagonist pairs within the theory of the neural control of movements with spatial referent coordinates, the principle of abundance, and the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis. It starts with the mechanical role of the antagonist in stopping movements and providing necessary levels of effector mechanical characteristics for fast movements. Further, it discusses the role of antagonist muscle activation bursts during voluntary movements, force production, and postural tasks. Recent studies show that agonist and antagonist motor units are united into common groups related to two basic commands, reciprocal and coactivation. A number of phenomena are considered including intra-muscle synergies stabilizing net force production, unintentional force drifts during isometric force production, effects of voluntary muscle coactivation on force production and perception, and perceptual errors caused by various factors including lack of visual feedback and muscle vibration. Taken together, the findings suggest inherent instability of neural commands (time functions of the stretch reflex threshold) to antagonist muscles requiring visual information for accurate performance. They also suggest that neural commands to antagonist muscles are not readily incorporated into kinesthetic perception leading to illusions and errors in matching tasks.

Unintentional force drifts across the human fingers: implications for the neural control of finger tasks

We explored the unintentional force drift across the four fingers of the dominant hand during accurate force production in isometric conditions caused by turning the visual feedback on force off. Our hypotheses were that the Index finger would show smallest drifts and best ability to eliminate the drifts with knowledge of performance in previous trials. Young healthy subjects produced force at 20% of the maximal force level by one finger at a time. There was no significant difference among the fingers in the root mean square error of force during performance with visual feedback. Turning visual feedback off caused force drift to lower magnitudes. The magnitude of force drift was the largest during tasks performed by the Index finger. After each block of twelve trials, the subjects were given feedback on the drift magnitude in that block and used it to correct performance in future trials. There was a total of six blocks. The magnitude of drift correction between consecutive blocks correlated with the magnitude of drift in the earlier block only after the second and fourth blocks. The Index finger failed to improve its performance more than other fingers and demonstrated significant residual drifts to lower force magnitudes in the sixth block of trials. These findings falsified both our hypotheses. Taken together with earlier studies showing advantage of the Index finger across a variety of tasks that require quick and accurate changes in performance, our results suggest that effector specialization along the stability-agility continuum is not limited to the phenomenon of cortical arm/hand dominance but can also be seen across fingers of a hand controlled by the same hemisphere, possibly reflecting the differences in the finger role in prehensile tasks.

Understanding and Synergy: A Single Concept at Different Levels of Analysis?

Biological systems differ from the inanimate world in their behaviors ranging from simple movements to coordinated purposeful actions by large groups of muscles, to perception of the world based on signals of different modalities, to cognitive acts, and to the role of self-imposed constraints such as laws of ethics. Respectively, depending on the behavior of interest, studies of biological objects based on laws of nature (physics) have to deal with different salient sets of variables and parameters. Understanding is a high-level concept, and its analysis has been linked to other high-level concepts such as "mental model" and "meaning". Attempts to analyze understanding based on laws of nature are an example of the top-down approach. Studies of the neural control of movements represent an opposite, bottom-up approach, which starts at the interface with classical physics of the inanimate world and operates with traditional concepts such as forces, coordinates, etc. There are common features shared by the two approaches. In particular, both assume organizations of large groups of elements into task-specific groups, which can be described with only a handful of salient variables. Both assume optimality criteria that allow the emergence of families of solutions to typical tasks. Both assume predictive processes reflected in anticipatory adjustments to actions (motor and non-motor). Both recognize the importance of generating dynamically stable solutions. The recent progress in studies of the neural control of movements has led to a theory of hierarchical control with spatial referent coordinates for the effectors. This theory, in combination with the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis, allows quantifying the stability of actions with respect to salient variables. This approach has been used in the analysis of motor learning, changes in movements with typical and atypical development and with aging, and impaired actions by patients with various neurological disorders. It has been developed to address issues of kinesthetic perception. There seems to be hope that the two counter-directional approaches will meet and result in a single theoretical scheme encompassing biological phenomena from figuring out the best next move in a chess position to activating motor units appropriate for implementing that move on the chessboard.

Unintentional Force Drifts as Consequences of Indirect Force Control with Spatial Referent Coordinates

We explored the phenomenon of unintentional force drifts in the absence of visual feedback. Based on the idea of direct force control with internal models and on the idea of indirect force control with referent coordinates to the involved muscle groups, contrasting predictions were drawn for changes in the drift magnitude when acting against external spring loads. Fifteen young subjects performed typical accurate force production tasks by pressing with the Index finger at 20% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in isometric conditions and while acting against one of the three external springs with different stiffness. The visual feedback on the force was turned off after 5 s. At the end of each 20-s trial, the subjects relaxed and then tried to reproduce the final force level. The force drifts were significantly smaller in the spring conditions, particularly when acting against more compliant springs. The subjects were unaware of the force drifts and, during force matching, produced forces close to the initial force magnitude, which were not different across the conditions. There was a trend toward larger drifts during performance by the dominant hand. We view these observations as strong arguments in favor of the theory of control with spatial referent coordinates. In particular, force drifts were likely consequences of drifts of referent coordinates to both agonist and antagonist muscles. The lack of drift effects on both perception-to-report and perception-to-act fit the scheme of kinesthetic perception based on the interaction of efferent (referent coordinate) and afferent processes.

One more time about motor (and non-motor) synergies

We revisit the concept of synergy based on the recently translated classical book by Nikolai Bernstein (On the construction of movements, Medgiz, Moscow 1947; Latash, Bernstein's Construction of Movements, Routledge, Abingdon 2020b) and progress in understanding the physics and neurophysiology of biological action. Two aspects of synergies are described: organizing elements into stable groups (modes) and ensuring dynamical stability of salient performance variables. The ability of the central nervous system to attenuate synergies in preparation for a quick action-anticipatory synergy adjustments-is emphasized. Recent studies have demonstrated synergies at the level of hypothetical control variables associated with spatial referent coordinates for effectors. Overall, the concept of synergies fits naturally the hierarchical scheme of control with referent coordinates with an important role played by back-coupling loops within the central nervous system and from peripheral sensory endings. Further, we review studies showing non-trivial changes in synergies with development, aging, fatigue, practice, and a variety of neurological disorders. Two aspects of impaired synergic control-impaired stability and impaired agility-are introduced. The recent generalization of the concept of synergies for non-motor domains, including perception, is discussed. We end the review with a list of unresolved and troubling issues.

Production and Perception of Intentional and Unintentional Actions

Physical approach to biological movement is based on the idea of control with referent spatial coordinates for effectors, from the whole body to single muscles. Within this framework, neural control signals induce changes in parameters of corresponding biology-specific laws of nature, and motor performance emerges as a result of interaction with the external force field. This approach is naturally compatible with the principle of abundance and the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis, which offer the framework for analysis of movement stability. The presence of two basic commands, reciprocal and co-activation, makes even single-effector tasks abundant and allows stabilizing their performance at the control level. Kinesthetic perception can be viewed as the process of estimating afferent signals within a reference system provided by the efferent process. Percepts are reflections of stable iso-perceptual manifolds in the combined afferent-efferent multi-dimensional space. This approach offers new, logical and based on laws of nature, interpretations for such phenomena as muscle co-activation, unintentional drifts in performance, and vibration-induced kinesthetic illusions. It also allows predicting new phenomena such as counter-intuitive effects of muscle co-activation of force production and perception, vibration-induced force illusions, performance drifts at two different speeds, and high variability in matching the contribution of individual elements in multi-element tasks. This approach can be developed for various subfields of movement studies including studies of athletics, movement disorders, and movement rehabilitation.

Efference copy in kinesthetic perception: a copy of what is it?

A number of notions in the fields of motor control and kinesthetic perception have been used without clear definitions. In this review, we consider definitions for efference copy, percept, and sense of effort based on recent studies within the physical approach, which assumes that the neural control of movement is based on principles of parametric control and involves defining time-varying profiles of spatial referent coordinates for the effectors. The apparent redundancy in both motor and perceptual processes is reconsidered based on the principle of abundance. Abundance of efferent and afferent signals is viewed as the means of stabilizing both salient action characteristics and salient percepts formalized as stable manifolds in high-dimensional spaces of relevant elemental variables. This theoretical scheme has led recently to a number of novel predictions and findings. These include, in particular, lower accuracy in perception of variables produced by elements involved in a multielement task compared with the same elements in single-element tasks, dissociation between motor and perceptual effects of muscle coactivation, force illusions induced by muscle vibration, and errors in perception of unintentional drifts in performance. Taken together, these results suggest that participation of efferent signals in perception frequently involves distorted copies of actual neural commands, particularly those to antagonist muscles. Sense of effort is associated with such distorted efferent signals. Distortions in efference copy happen spontaneously and can also be caused by changes in sensory signals, e.g., those produced by muscle vibration.

Distortions of the Efferent Copy during Force Perception: A Study of Force Drifts and Effects of Muscle Vibration

We used a finger force matching task to explore the role of efferent signals in force perception. Healthy, young participants performed accurate force production tasks at different force levels with the index and middle fingers of one hand (task-hand). They received visual feedback during an early part of each trial only. After the feedback was turned off, the force drifted toward lower magnitudes. After 5 s of the drift, the participants matched the force with the same finger pair of the other hand (match-hand). The match-hand consistently overshot the task-hand force by a magnitude invariant over the initial force levels. During force matching, both hands were lifted and lowered smoothly to estimate their referent coordinate (RC) and apparent stiffness values. These trials were performed without muscle vibration and under vibration applied to the finger/hand flexors or extensors of the task-hand or match-hand. Effects of vibration were seen in the match-hand only; they were the same during vibration of flexors and extensors. We interpret the vibration-induced effects as consequences of using distorted copies of the central commands to the task-hand during force matching. In particular, using distorted copies of the RC for the antagonist muscle group could account for the differences between the task-hand and match-hand. We conclude that efferent signals may be distorted before their participation in the perceptual process. Such distortions emerge spontaneously and may be amplified by the response of sensory endings to muscle vibration combined over both agonist and antagonist muscle groups.