Neutron and X-ray diffraction patterns of aqueous sulphuric acid solutions

Structure of Sulfuric Acid Solutions Using Pair Distribution Function Analysis

Solvation and mesoscale ordering of sulfuric acid and other strong acid solutions leads to suppressed freezing points and strong rheological changes with varying concentration. While the solid-state structures are well-understood, studies focused on the evolving solvation structure in the solution phase have probed a limited concentration range (∼1-6 M). This study applies a total scattering approach in both the wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) and pair distribution function (PDF) regimes to elucidate the evolving solvation structure over its full range of acid concentration (0-18 M). The emergence of a prepeak in the WAXS regime at intermediate concentrations indicates a transition from noninteracting sulfate molecules in the dilute limit to sterically limited sulfates at concentrations near its deep eutectic point. Fits to the PDF data quantify this trend, showing a transition from octahedrally hydrated sulfates up to 6-7 M concentrations, followed by gradual dehydration, and eventually reaching a solution structure similar to that of water-in-salt electrolyte systems at high acid concentrations.

First-principles molecular dynamics study on aqueous sulfuric acid solutions

The properties of aqueous sulfuric acid have been studied employing density functional theory-based molecular dynamics simulations in conjunction with norm-conserving pseudopotentials. The simulations were carried out for two different concentrations whose molar concentrations were fixed at 0.84 and 10.2 mol/l. The structural features of aqueous sulfuric acid solutions show a strong dependency on the concentration. The Grötthuss-type proton transfer mechanism is not effectively operative at the higher concentration because of the broken hydrogen bond network of water induced by ions generated by the dissociation of sulfuric acid. In addition, to evaluate electrical properties, we carried out a simulation that takes an electric field into account. Results are compared with those of the simulation undertaken with no external electric field.