High prevalence of the risk factors for QT interval prolongation and associated drug-drug interactions in coronary care units

Risk Stratification of QTc Prolongation in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Antipsychotics for the Management of Delirium Symptoms

BackgroundPatients experiencing significant agitation or perceptual disturbances related to delirium in an intensive care setting may benefit from short-term treatment with an antipsychotic medication. Some antipsychotic medications may prolong the QTc interval, which increases the risk of potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias. In this targeted review, we describe the evidence regarding the relationships between antipsychotic medications and QTc prolongation and practical methods for monitoring the QTc interval and mitigating arrhythmia risk.MethodsSearches of PubMed and Cochrane Library were performed to identify studies, published before February 2023, investigating the relationships between antipsychotic medications and QTc prolongation or arrhythmias.ResultsMost antipsychotic medications commonly used for the management of delirium symptoms (eg, intravenous haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine) cause a moderate degree of QTc prolongation. Among other antipsychotics, those most likely to cause QTc prolongation are iloperidone and ziprasidone, while aripiprazole and lurasidone appear to have minimal risk for QTc prolongation. Genetic vulnerabilities, female sex, older age, pre-existing cardiovascular disease, electrolyte abnormalities, and non-psychiatric medications also increase the risk of QTc prolongation. For individuals at risk of QTc prolongation, it is essential to measure the QTc interval accurately and consistently and consider medication adjustments if needed.ConclusionsAntipsychotic medications are one of many risk factors for QTc prolongation. When managing agitation related to delirium, it is imperative to assess an individual patient's risk for QTc prolongation and to choose a medication and monitoring strategy commensurate to the risks. In intensive care settings, we recommend regular ECG monitoring, using a linear regression formula to correct for heart rate. If substantial QTc prolongation (eg, QTc > 500 msec) is present, a change in pharmacologic treatment can be considered, though a particular medication may still be warranted if the risks of discontinuation (eg, extreme agitation, removal of invasive monitoring devices) outweigh the risks of arrhythmias.AimsThis review aims to summarize the current literature on relationships between antipsychotic medications and QTc prolongation and to make practical clinical recommendations towards the approach of antipsychotic medication use for the management of delirium-related agitation and perceptual disturbances in intensive care settings.

Use of Drugs Associated with QT Interval Prolongation at the Hospital Level during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Colombia

Background. Many of the therapeutic proposals for COVID-19 have been associated with adverse effects, including the risk of QT interval prolongation and torsades de pointes (TdP). The objective was to determine the use of drugs with a risk of QT interval prolongation in 21 clinics/hospitals in Colombia from January to December 2020. Methods. This cross-sectional study identified drug use according to pharmacological groups with potential risk of QT interval prolongation according to a risk classification: conditional, possible, and known risk of TdP. Descriptive analyses were performed. Results. A total of 355,574 patients who received QT-prolonging drugs were identified (equivalent to 51.4% of all inpatients treated during the study period). Of the group of patients on QT drugs, 54.4% used at least one drug with conditional risk, 52.6% with possible risk, and 40.3% with known risk. The most commonly used belonged to the group of drugs for the nervous system (63.0%), alimentary tract and metabolism (56.8%), anti-infectives for systemic use (13.0%), and the cardiovascular system (11.7%). On average, patients received $2.0\pm 1.5$ risk drugs. Regarding drugs initially considered against COVID-19, 2,120 patients (0.6%) received azithromycin, 802 (0.2%) received chloroquine, 517 received hydroxychloroquine (0.1%), and 265 received lopinavir/ritonavir (0.1%). Conclusion. The high proportion of patients treated at the hospital level who receive drugs with risk of prolonging the QT interval should alert those responsible for their care to avoid fatal outcomes, especially during the COVID-19 epidemic, when some QT drugs are being used more frequently.

Heterogeneity in the identification of potential drug-drug interactions in the intensive care unit: A systematic review, critical appraisal, and reporting recommendations

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are frequently exposed to potential drug‐drug interactions (pDDIs). However, reported frequencies of pDDIs in the ICU vary widely between studies. This can be partly explained by significant variation in their methodological approach. Insight into methodological choices affecting pDDI frequency would allow for improved comparison and synthesis of reported pDDI frequencies. This study aimed to evaluate the association between methodological choices and pDDI frequency and formulate reporting recommendations for pDDI frequency studies in the ICU. The MEDLINE database was searched to identify papers reporting pDDI frequency in ICU patients. For each paper, the pDDI frequency and methodological choices such as pDDI definition and pDDI knowledge base were extracted, and the risk of bias was assessed. Each paper was categorized as reporting a low, medium, or high pDDI frequency. We sought associations between methodological choices and pDDI frequency group. Based on this comparison, reporting recommendations were formulated. Analysis of methodological choices showed significant heterogeneity between studies, and 65% of the studies had a medium to high risk of bias. High risk of bias, small sample size, and use of drug prescriptions instead of administrations were related to a higher pDDI frequency. The findings of this review may support researchers in designing a reliable methodology assessing pDDI frequency in ICU patients. The reporting recommendations may contribute to standardization, comparison, and synthesis of pDDI frequency studies, ultimately improving knowledge about pDDIs in and outside the ICU setting.

Effects of cardiac toxicity of combination therapy with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in COVID-19 patients

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which began in China, caused a global pandemic. Few studies have shown the benefit of hydroxychloroquine (HY) ± azithromycin (AZ) for treating COVID-19. Concerns of QT prolongation and increased risks of torsade's de pointes (TdP) with this combination have been raised since each agent can individually prolong the QT interval. This retrospective, observational study included hospitalized patients treated with HY and AZ from March 2020 to May 2020 at a large community hospital. Serial assessments of the QT interval were performed. Our aim is to evaluate the safety and characterize the change in QTc interval and arrhythmic events in COVID-19 patients treated with HY/AZ. A total of 21 COVID patients who received at least four days of HY and AZ were included in this study. Mean baseline was QTc 403 ms, mean maximum QTc was 440 ms, mean change in QTc was 36 ms. Only one patient (4.8%) developed prolonged QTc > 500 ms. No patient had a change in QTc of 60 ms or more. No patient developed TdP. Fifteen patients (71.4%) had hypoxia on admission, with only two patients (9.5%) required oxygen of 1-2 L at discharge. 80.9% of patients have been discharged home or inpatient rehabilitation.

Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin Combination in The Management of COVID-19 Infection: Safety and Effectiveness Challenges

BACKGROUND

The treatment of COVID-19 disease remains a dilemma so far because there is no approved therapy for it. This study aimed to evaluate the use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin combination in treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This study was carried out to determine the safety and effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin combination in COVID 19 patients.

METHODS

This study included 90 adult COVID 19 patients. Treatment of all patients followed Egyptian Ministry of Health COVID-19 protocols, receiving a combination of hydroxychloroquine 400mg twice on day 1, then 200 mg twice daily in addition to azithromycin 500mg/day for 5 days. ECG findings especially the QTc interval was assessed before and after 5 days from the administration.

RESULTS

All patients showed a statistically significant higher post-treatment QTc readings (433.6 ± 37.2) compared to baseline QTc (402.4 ± 31.3) at p<0.005 with a median QTc prolongation by 26 mSec and IQR (17.8-41.3), but without serious clinical complications. Only 5.6% of patients showed QTc more than 500 mSec and no torsade de points or cardiac arrest. Geriatric patients were at higher risk for QTc prolongation compared to patients aged less than 65 years but without a significant difference as regards the median max QTc difference p˂0.65. The expected therapeutic effectiveness was 82.5% for moderate patients compared to 26% in severe patients (P<0.005).

CONCLUSION

In a modest safety profile, we support the evidence that HQ/AZ therapy can be used to treat Covid-19 infection with more effectiveness in moderate rather than severe cases, which might be a reflection to the time of administration in the disease course.

Effect of ciprofloxacin vs levofloxacin on QTc-interval and dysglycemia in diabetic and non-diabetic patients

BACKGROUND

Levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin are more commonly used amongst fluoroquinolone class and the question of cardiac safety and glucose hemostasis of this class has been raised.

OBJECTIVE

To compare intravenous levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin regarding their risk on QTc prolongation and dysglycemia in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

METHODS

A randomised prospective study at Beni-Suef university hospital was conducted on 200 adult patients over 6 months. The patients received intravenous levofloxacin 750mg once daily or ciprofloxacin 400mg twice daily. Electrocardiogram and fasting blood glucose were obtained from each patient before starting the antibiotic, 24 hours, 72 hours after the first dose, and 72 hours after antibiotics cessation.

RESULTS

The results of the current study showed the relative risk for QTc prolongation with levofloxacin was more than ciprofloxacin by about 4 and 1.5 times in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, respectively. The relative risk for dysglycemia with levofloxacin was 2.28 and 1.39 times more than ciprofloxacin in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that the risk for QTc prolongation and hyperglycemia was greater with levofloxacin than ciprofloxacin in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. In addition, the risk for hypoglycemia was greater with levofloxacin than ciprofloxacin in non-diabetic patients.

Frequency of Long QT in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection Treated with Hydroxychloroquine: A Meta-analysis

Introduction Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been proposed as a SARS-CoV-2 treatment but the frequency of long QT (LQT) during use is unknown. Objective To conduct a meta-analysis of the frequency of LQT in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with HCQ. Data Sources PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and preprint servers (medRxiv, Research Square) were searched for studies published between December 2019 and June 30, 2020. Methods Effect statistics were pooled using random effects. The quality of observational studies and randomized controlled trials was appraised with STROBE and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment tools, respectively. Outcomes Critical LQT was defined as: (1) maximum QT corrected (QTc)≥500 ms (if QRS<120 ms) or QTc≥550 ms (if QRS≥120 ms), and (2) QTc increase ≥60 ms. Results In the 28 studies included (n=9124), the frequency of LQT during HCQ treatment was 6.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.7-10.2). In 20 studies (n=7825), patients were also taking other QT-prolonging drugs. The frequency of LQT in the other 8 studies (n=1299) was 1.7% (95% CI: 0.3-3.9). Twenty studies (n=6869) reported HCQ discontinuation due to LQT, with a frequency of 3.7% (95% CI: 1.5-6.6). The frequency of ventricular arrhythmias during HCQ treatment was 1.68% (127/7539) and that of arrhythmogenic death was 0.69% (39/5648). Torsades de Pointes occurred in 0.06% (3/5066). Patients aged >60 years were at highest risk of HCQ-associated LQT (P<0.001). Conclusions HCQ-associated cardiotoxicity in SARS-CoV-2 patients is uncommon but requires ECG monitoring, particularly in those aged >60 years and/or taking other QT-prolonging drugs.

Effect of Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine, and Azithromycin on the Corrected QT Interval in Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection

BACKGROUND

The novel SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) is responsible for the global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Small studies have shown a potential benefit of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine±azithromycin for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019. Use of these medications alone, or in combination, can lead to a prolongation of the QT interval, possibly increasing the risk of Torsade de pointes and sudden cardiac death.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients treated with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine±azithromycin from March 1 to the 23 at 3 hospitals within the Northwell Health system were included in this prospective, observational study. Serial assessments of the QT interval were performed. The primary outcome was QT prolongation resulting in Torsade de pointes. Secondary outcomes included QT prolongation, the need to prematurely discontinue any of the medications due to QT prolongation, and arrhythmogenic death.

RESULTS

Two hundred one patients were treated for coronavirus disease 2019 with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine. Ten patients (5.0%) received chloroquine, 191 (95.0%) received hydroxychloroquine, and 119 (59.2%) also received azithromycin. The primary outcome of torsade de pointes was not observed in the entire population. Baseline corrected QT interval intervals did not differ between patients treated with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine (monotherapy group) versus those treated with combination group (chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin; 440.6±24.9 versus 439.9±24.7 ms, P=0.834). The maximum corrected QT interval during treatment was significantly longer in the combination group versus the monotherapy group (470.4±45.0 ms versus 453.3±37.0 ms, P=0.004). Seven patients (3.5%) required discontinuation of these medications due to corrected QT interval prolongation. No arrhythmogenic deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest reported cohort of coronavirus disease 2019 patients to date treated with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine±azithromycin, no instances of Torsade de pointes, or arrhythmogenic death were reported. Although use of these medications resulted in QT prolongation, clinicians seldomly needed to discontinue therapy. Further study of the need for QT interval monitoring is needed before final recommendations can be made.

Drug interactions and creatinine levels are associated with QTc prolongation in intensive care units: a prospective, observational study

Background Prolongation of the QTc interval may lead to life threatening arrhythmias. QTc prolongation is common in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The objectives of this study were to identify the role of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and other predictors (age, sex, cardiovascular diseases, and electrolyte abnormalities) in life threatening QTc prolongation in patients admitted to medical (M), surgical (S) and emergency (E) ICUs. Methods This prospective, observational study included patients above the age of 18 years who were admitted to SICU, EICU, and MICU at a tertiary respiratory referral center. Electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring was performed during the first 5 days of ICU admission. Risk factors and DDIs which were anticipated to be associated with the prolongation of the QTc interval were assessed for all patients. Results Two hundred patients were included in the study. QTc prolongation occurred in 10.7% of patients and the majority of patients presenting with QTc prolongation had creatinine levels above 1.3 mg/dL during their 5 days of ICU admission. Incidence of pharmacodynamic (PD) DDIs was significantly higher in patients with QTc prolongation vs. other patients. Creatinine levels above 1.3 mg/dL and PD DDIs were associated with QTc prolongation during 5 days of ICU admission. Conclusions High serum creatinine and PD DDIs can increase the risk of QTc prolongation in patients admitted to the ICU. QTc interval measurements should be performed prior to initiation or after starting any drug that is associated with QT prolongation, specifically in patients with the known risk factors.