1
|
Shin DY, Park JS, Lee HS, Shim W, Jin L, Lee KW, Park JB, Kim DH, Kim JH. The effect of hydroxyethyl starch as a cryopreservation agent during freezing of mouse pancreatic islets. Biochem Biophys Rep 2024; 38:101658. [PMID: 38362049 PMCID: PMC10867579 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Islet transplantation is the most effective treatment strategy for type 1 diabetes. Long-term storage at ultralow temperatures can be used to prepare sufficient islets of good quality for transplantation. For freezing islets, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a commonly used penetrating cryoprotective agent (CPA). However, the toxicity of DMSO is a major obstacle to cell cryopreservation. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) has been proposed as an alternative CPA. To investigate the effects of two types of nonpermeating CPA, we compared 4 % HES 130 and HES 200 to 10 % DMSO in terms of mouse islet yield, viability, and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). After one day of culture, islets were cryopreserved in each solution. After three days of cryopreservation, islet recovery was significantly higher in the HES 130 and HES 200 groups than in the DMSO group. Islet viability in the HES 200 group was also significantly higher than that in the DMSO group on Day 1 and Day 3. Stimulation indices determined by GSIS were higher in the HES 130 and 200 groups than in the DMSO group on Day 3. After three days of cryopreservation, HES 130 and HES 200 both reduced the expression of apoptosis- and necrosis-associated proteins and promoted the survival of islets. In conclusion, the use of HES as a CPA improved the survival and insulin secretion of cryopreserved islets compared with the use of a conventional CPA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Du Yeon Shin
- Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Graduate School, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Suh Park
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology/Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea
| | - Han-Sin Lee
- R&D Center, Cellstormer, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 16677, Republic of Korea
| | - Wooyoung Shim
- R&D Center, Cellstormer, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 16677, Republic of Korea
| | - Lauren Jin
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology/Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyo Won Lee
- Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Berm Park
- Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Graduate School, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Hyun Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology/Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hyeon Kim
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Graduate School, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McAfee JG, Subramanian G, Gagne G. Technique of leukocyte harvesting and labeling: problems and perspectives. Semin Nucl Med 1984; 14:83-106. [PMID: 6374901 DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(84)80023-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Mixed leukocyte suspensions obtained after gravity sedimentation of red cells and labeled with 111In lipophilic chelates are now widely used clinically for abscess localization at many medical centers. So far, labeling with 111In-oxine or tropolone has been more successful than any 99mTc method. More sophisticated approaches are available for isolation and labeling of specific leukocyte cell types, to study their migration in vivo. The most significant advances in cell harvesting include newer density gradients for isopyknic centrifugation (nonionic contrast media such as Nycodenz and Percoll, PVP-coated colloidal silica), centrifugal elutriation, and flow cytometry. Unlike current radioactive agents which label many cell types indiscriminately, more selective ligands are being developed which bind to specific cell surface receptors. These will label certain leukocyte populations or subtypes while not reacting with others, thereby avoiding laborious separation techniques. Monoclonal antibodies against leukocyte cell-surface antigens appear particularly promising as agents for selective cell labeling.
Collapse
|
6
|
Echlin P, Skaer HB, Gardiner BO, Franks F, Asquith MH. Polymeric cryoprotectants in the preservation of biological ultrastructure. II. Physiological effects. J Microsc 1977; 110:239-55. [PMID: 73592 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1977.tb00035.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
A study has been made of the physiological effects of three non-penetrating polymeric cryoprotective agents on sixteen different plant and animal cells and tissues. The cryoprotectants, when used at concentrations at which they are effective in preventing ice-crystal formation, generally have a lower toxicity to cells and tissue than similar concentrations of glycerol. The relatively low toxicity of these substances suggests that they would be more suitable as cryoprotectants for morphological and analytical studies than the commonly used low molecular weight compounds.
Collapse
|