On the unreliability of one-stage factor VIII:C clotting assays after infusion of factor VIII concentrates

The History of Clotting Factor Concentrates Pharmacokinetics

Clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) underwent tremendous modifications during the last forty years. Plasma-derived concentrates made the replacement therapy feasible not only in the hospital but also at patients’ home by on-demand or prophylactic regimen. Virucidal methods, implemented soon after hepatitis and AIDS outbreak, and purification by Mabs made the plasma-derived concentrates safer and purer. CFCs were considered equivalent to the other drugs and general rules and methods of pharmacokinetics (PK) were applied to their study. After the first attempts by graphical methods and calculation of In Vivo Recovery, compartment and non-compartment methods were applied also to the study of PK of CFCs. The bioequivalence of the new concentrates produced by means of recombinant DNA biotechnology was evaluated in head-to-head PK studies. Since the beginning, the large inter-patient variability of dose/response of replacement therapy was realized. PK allowed tailoring haemophilia therapy and PK driven prophylaxis resulted more cost effective. Unfortunately, the need of several blood samples and logistic difficulties made the PK studies very demanding. Recently, population PK (PopPK) has been applied to the prediction of CFCs dosing by Bayesian methodology. By PopPK also sparse data may allow evaluating the appropriateness of replacement therapy.

In vivo recovery with products of very high purity--assay discrepancies

In view of reports of FVIII assay discrepancies in post-infusion plasma samples depending on methods used, we compared FVIII results run by each of four different methods following infusion of rFVIII (Kogenate). Nine persons with haemophilia A were infused with each of two lots of product. Plasma samples were obtained at baseline, and at 10 min, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 30 and 48 h post-infusion for measurement of FVIII. FVIII assay methods were chromogenic, and one-stage APTT using three different types of activators: micronized, silica, ellagic acid, and kaolin. The same reference plasma standard was used throughout. Results demonstrated a consistent difference in FVIII values, with chromogenic assays being considerably higher than those run by one-stage assays. The discrepancy was greatest when kaolin was the activator. These results point out the problems in attempting to determine the "correct" FVIII level in patient plasma samples following infusion of high purity FVIII preparations. Potential "pitfalls" include the standard used for defining product potency, the methods, reagents, instrumentation and standards used in assaying plasma samples and, in some instances, the characteristics of the product itself. This situation has considerable cost implications, potential impact on patient care, and makes it difficult to compare results between laboratories.

Activated factor VIII in therapeutic preparations: analysis by ultracentrifugation

Activation of factor VIII is signaled by an increase in the 1-stage factor VIII activity and release from von Willebrand factor. Ultracentrifugation in 10-40% sucrose gradients was used to identify such activation in therapeutic concentrates. Plasma-derived factor VIII lots were examined and factor VIII sedimenting independently of von Willebrand factor was identified in some of the preparations. In addition there was slower sedimentation of factor VIII by the 1-stage assay than by the chromogenic assay. These results are consistent with a factor VIII cleaved at residue 1689, a site important for von Willebrand binding. This activated form leads to some of the assay discrepancies between the 1-stage assay and the chromogenic or the 2-stage assay. There is more rapid sedimentation of the factor VIII measured by the chromogenic assay than the von Willebrand factor in some manufacturers' samples indicating that the method of fractionation may select a low molecular weight von Willebrand factor which does not bind factor VIII. Routine comparison between the 1-stage and chromogenic assays during fractionation may be able to identify such activated preparations. Other assay discrepancies may be due to structural differences between the standards and the tested product.

Preservation of factor VIII activity in plasma by different freezing techniques, as determined with a chromogenic microtray assay

The preservation of factor VIII activity in frozen plasma was studied using three different freezing techniques. Two were conventional methods, i.e. ethanol bath at -40 degrees C, and deep-frozen at -80 degrees C, and the third was a novel air-based -40 degrees C freezer with metal compartments and snugly fitting flat 750 ml plasma containers. No statistically significant difference in preservation of factor VIII was observed, irrespective of freezing technique, as determined with a chromogenic substrate assay.