Multi-target stool DNA test in the surveillance of inflammatory bowel disease: a cross-sectional cohort study

Colorectal cancer screening: The role of MT-sDNA testing

ABSTRACT

Because an estimated 10.5% of new colorectal cancer (CRC) cases occur in patients under age 50 years, the US Preventive Services Task Force in 2021 recommended CRC screening for adults ages 45 to 49 years. The prevalence of up-to-date CRC screening with any recommended test among patients age 45 years and older in the United States is only 59% in 2023, indicating that existing screening practices are ineffective. Screening options now include invasive and noninvasive measures. Multi-target stool DNA (MT-sDNA) testing is a simple, low-risk, noninvasive test that provides excellent sensitivity and specificity, is cost-effective, and may increase patient screening rates. CRC screening guideline recommendations and alternative screening methods may help improve patient outcomes and reduce morbidity and mortality. This article describes MT-sDNA testing, its effectiveness, recommended use, and potential expanding role as a screening option.

Incidence of cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis 30 years after diagnosis (the IBSEN study)

OBJECTIVES

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have shown an increased risk for colorectal cancer, hepatobiliary, hematologic, and skin cancers, but updated long-term data is needed. This study aimed to estimate the risk of cancer in patients with UC compared to the general Norwegian population, in a population-based cohort (the IBSEN study), 30 years after diagnosis; and to identify possible risk factors associated with cancer.

METHODS

The IBSEN cohort prospectively included all incident patients between 1990 and 1993. Cancer incidence data were obtained from the Cancer Registry of Norway. The overall and cancer-specific hazard ratios (HR) were modelled using Cox regression. Standardized incidence ratios were estimated compared to the general population.

RESULTS

In total, the cohort included 519 patients, and 83 cases were diagnosed with cancer. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall cancer risk (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: [0.79-1.29]) and colorectal cancer risk (HR = 1.37, 95% CI: [0.75-2.47]) between patients and controls. The incidence of biliary tract cancer was higher than expected (SIR = 9.84, 95%CI: [3.19-20.15]), especially when UC patients suffered from primary sclerosing cholangitis. Male UC patients were also more at risk of being diagnosed with hematologic malignancies (HR = 3.48, 95% CI: [1.55-7.82]). Being prescribed thiopurines was associated with a higher risk of cancer (HR = 2.03, 95% CI: [1.02-4.01]).

CONCLUSIONS

At 30 years after diagnosis, the risk of all cancer in patients with UC was not significantly increased compared with the general population. However, the risks of biliary tract cancer and hematologic cancers were increased, particularly in male patients.

Predicting Colorectal Cancer Occurrence in IBD

Patients with colonic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), and are therefore enrolled into a surveillance programme aimed at detecting dysplasia or early cancer. Current surveillance programmes are guided by clinical, endoscopic or histological predictors of colitis-associated CRC (CA-CRC). We have seen great progress in our understanding of these predictors of disease progression, and advances in endoscopic technique and management, along with improved medical care, has been mirrored by the falling incidence of CA-CRC over the last 50 years. However, more could be done to improve our molecular understanding of CA-CRC progression and enable better risk stratification for patients with IBD. This review summarises the known risk factors associated with CA-CRC and explores the molecular landscape that has the potential to complement and optimise the existing IBD surveillance programme.

Patients' perception of colonoscopy and acceptance of colonoscopy based IBD related colorectal cancer surveillance

OBJECTIVES

Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Current surveillance for CRC involves often uncomfortable colonoscopy. To assess IBD patients' perception of colonoscopy and examine preferences for hypothetical alternatives.

METHODS

IBD patients in clinical remission rated acceptable frequency of colonoscopy and hypothetical alternatives to colonoscopy-based surveillance (preference of yearly blood, yearly stool or 5-yearly imaging tests over 5-yearly colonoscopy). Participants rated discomfort of the last colonoscopy was compared with hospital records.

RESULTS

Of 282 patients with recollection of colonoscopy 65.8% rated the discomfort as moderate to severe, which correlated weakly with endoscopists' perception (r = 0.225; p = 0.015). There were no significant differences in patients' or endoscopists' perceptions of discomfort between sedated and unsedated colonoscopies. Undergoing a yearly colonoscopy was acceptable to 49.5%. Experienced discomfort did not correlate with patients' views on acceptable frequency of surveillance colonoscopy. Over 95% of patients would prefer blood, stool, or imaging tests over colonoscopy but nearly half expected sensitivities ≥95%.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of IBD patients experienced colonoscopy as moderate to severely uncomfortable but would still accept colonoscopy surveillance frequency according to current guidance. Participants expected sensitivities ≥95% for potential alternatives to colonoscopy-based surveillance programs.

EXPERT OPINION

IBD patients frequently experience colonoscopy as uncomfortable but accept colonoscopy as the gold standard for colorectal cancer surveillance. The currently suggested frequencies of surveillance by colonoscopy are acceptable to IBD patients. They do however express a clear preference for non-invasive surveillance techniques. Some promising initial results have been obtained based on faecal or blood sampling. However, these have yet to be tested in large prospective studies to determine their sensitivity and specificity. IBD patients expect these non-invasive tests to meet high standards for sensitivity. In our view it is feasible that analogue to faecal immunochemistry based testing for general population bowel cancer screening non-invasive IBD surveillance techniques will emerge. This could lead to a reduction in the need for colonoscopy to those testing positive on faecal or blood based surveillance.

Identification of microRNA-16-5p and microRNA-21-5p in feces as potential noninvasive biomarkers for inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic idiopathic gastrointestinal disease. Increasing evidence suggests that microRNAs (miRNAs) may participate in the pathophysiology of IBD.

METHODS

A miRCURY™ LNA Array and in situ hybridization were employed to screen for differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) in fecal specimens from 41 IBD patients (22 ulcerative colitis (UC), 19 Crohn's disease (CD)) and 23 healthy controls (HC). RT-qPCR was performed to confirm the findings. The DEMs target genes and corresponding biological functions were predicted by bioinformatics analysis.

RESULTS

Compared with HC, miR-16-5p in the feces was up-regulated both in UC and CD patients (p < 0.01), while miR-21-5p was up-regulated only in UC patients (p < 0.01). TargetScan 7.2, miRWalk, and miRDB were used to predict 216 public target genes of miR-16-5p and miR-21-5p, and six hub genes (PIK3R1, GRB2, SUZ12, NTRK2, Smurf2, and WWP1) were analyzed using the STRING database and Cytoscape. All the hub genes promote the occurrence and development of IBD-related colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The elevated levels of miR-16-5p and miR-21-5p in feces of IBD patients have to guide significance for the noninvasive clinical diagnosis of IBD and have a warning effect on the occurrence of IBD-related colorectal cancer.

Multi-Target Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Emerging Learning on Real-world Performance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multi-target stool DNA (MT-sDNA) was approved in 2014 for use in screening average-risk patients for colorectal cancer (CRC). Here, we highlight recent literature from post-market studies to provide an update on clinical use and utility not possible from pre-approval studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

MT-sDNA has been included in major society guidelines as an option for colorectal cancer screening, and has seen exponentially increasing use in clinical practice. MT-sDNA appears to be attracting new patients to CRC screening, and patient adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive MT-sDNA test is high. Approximately two-thirds of these patients are found to have colorectal neoplasia (CRN), 80% of whom have at least one right-sided lesion; 1 in 3 will have advanced CRN. High yield of CRN is due not only to post-screening increase in probability but also likely improved endoscopist attention. In those with a negative high-quality colonoscopy after positive MT-sDNA test ("false positive MT-sDNA"), further interventions do not appear to be necessary.

SUMMARY

MT-sDNA is a promising tool to improve rates and quality of CRC screening. Further investigation should examine MT-sDNA performance in populations at increased risk for CRC, and as an interval test after colonoscopy to detect potentially missed lesions.

Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Dysplasia in the Modern Era

This article begins with a brief overview of risk factors for colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease to concretize the approach to risk stratification. It then provides an up-to-date review of diagnosis and management of dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease, which integrates new and emerging data in the field. This is particularly relevant in an era of increased attention to cost- and resource-containment from the health systems vantage point, coupled with a heightened prioritization of patient quality of life and shared decision-making. Also provided is a brief discussion of the status of newer therapeutic techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection.