What impact do Rome IV criteria have on patients with IBS in China?

Cognition of abdominal pain and abdominal discomfort in Chinese patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea

BACKGROUND

In Asia, the proportion of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with abdominal discomfort alone is significantly higher than that in western countries. The purposes of this study are to understand the cognition of abdominal pain and abdominal discomfort in Chinese patients with IBS and to compare the clinical characteristics of patients with abdominal pain alone and with abdominal discomfort alone.

METHODS

Patients with IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D) who met the Rome III diagnostic criteria and had episodes of at least one day/week were consecutively enrolled. The cognition of abdominal pain and abdominal discomfort were investigated through face-to-face unstructured interview. Patients were divided into a pain group and a discomfort group according to the cognition interviews, then the characteristics and severity of symptoms (IBS symptom severity scale, IBS-SSS), IBS quality of life (IBS-QOL) and psychological state were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients with IBS-D were enrolled. Most of the patients with self-reported abdominal pain described their pain as spasm/cramping; patients with self-reported abdominal discomfort had as many as 24 different descriptions of discomfort. Most patients having abdominal pain and discomfort could accurately distinguish the two symptoms. The degree of abdominal pain in the pain group was higher than abdominal discomfort in the discomfort group (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in IBS-SSS, extra-intestinal pain, IBS-QOL, and psychological state between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For Chinese patients with IBS-D, abdominal pain and abdominal discomfort are two different symptoms, but they have similar clinical features.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR, ChiCTR1900028082. Registered 11 December 2019 - Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn .

Rifaximin Treatment for Individual and Multiple Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea: An Analysis Using New End Points

PURPOSE

Rifaximin is indicated for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) in adults. The current aim was to evaluate rifaximin efficacy on individual and composite IBS-D symptoms using definitions not previously examined.

METHODS

Phase III post hoc analyses of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and the open-label phase of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were conducted. Adults with IBS-D received a 2-week course of rifaximin 550 mg TID. Individual and composite responses for abdominal pain (mean weekly improvements from baseline of ≥30%, ≥40%, or ≥50%), bloating (mean weekly improvements from baseline of ≥1 or ≥2 points; or ≥30%, ≥40%, or ≥50%), stool consistency (mean weekly average stool consistency score <3 or <4), and urgency (improvement from baseline of ≥30% or ≥40% in percentage of days with urgency) for ≥2 of the first 4 weeks after treatment, and weekly for 12 weeks, were assessed.

FINDINGS

Overall, 1258 patients from the double-blind trials (rifaximin [n = 624]; placebo [n = 634]) and 2438 from an open-label trial were analyzed. The percentage of bloating or urgency responders was significantly greater with double-blind rifaximin versus placebo (P ≤ 0.03). A significantly greater percentage of the double-blind group were composite abdominal pain and bloating responders versus placebo for all thresholds analyzed (P < 0.05). A significantly greater percentage of the double-blind group were tri-symptom composite end point responders (abdominal pain, bloating, and fecal urgency) versus placebo (P = 0.001). A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved response (≥30% composite tri-symptom threshold) with double-blind rifaximin versus placebo as early as 1 week posttreatment, with significance maintained through ≥5 weeks after treatment. Open-label results were consistent with those of the double-blind study.

IMPLICATIONS

Rifaximin significantly improved multiple, concurrent IBS-D symptoms, using clinically relevant definitions of treatment response. Using a novel tri-symptom composite end point (ie, abdominal pain, bloating, fecal urgency), adults with IBS-D treated with a 2-week course of rifaximin were significantly more likely to be composite end point responders than those receiving placebo (≥30% or ≥40% threshold) for the three symptoms. Thus, rifaximin not only met current standard thresholds used for adjudication of responders in clinical trials but also achieved higher thresholds for many of these symptoms, suggesting potential for even more robust clinical improvements.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifiers: NCT00731679, NCT00724126, and NCT01543178. (Clin Ther. 2023;45:XXX-XXX) © 2023 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.

Are bowel symptoms and psychosocial features different in irritable bowel syndrome patients with abdominal discomfort compared to abdominal pain?

BACKGROUND

The Rome IV criteria eliminated abdominal discomfort for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), which was previously included in Rome III. There are questions as to whether IBS patients with abdominal discomfort (seen in Rome III but not Rome IV) are different from those with abdominal pain (Rome IV).

AIM

To compare bowel symptoms and psychosocial features in IBS patients diagnosed with Rome III criteria with abdominal discomfort, abdominal pain, and pain & discomfort.

METHODS

We studied IBS patients meeting Rome III criteria. We administered the IBS symptom questionnaire, psychological status, and IBS quality of life. Patients were classified according to the predominant abdominal symptom associated with defecation into an only pain group, only discomfort group, and pain & discomfort group. We compared bowel symptoms, extraintestinal symptoms, IBS quality of life, psychological status and healthcare-seeking behaviors, and efficacy among the three groups. Finally, we tested risk factors for symptom reporting in IBS patients.

RESULTS

Of the 367 Rome III IBS patients enrolled, 33.8% (124 cases) failed to meet Rome IV criteria for an IBS diagnosis. There were no meaningful differences between the pain group (n = 233) and the discomfort group (n = 83) for the following: (1) Frequency of defecatory abdominal pain or discomfort; (2) Bowel habits; (3) Coexisting extragastrointestinal pain; (4) Comorbid anxiety and depression; and (5) IBS quality of life scores except more patients in the discomfort group reported mild symptom than the pain group (22.9% vs 9.0%). There is a significant tendency for patients to report their defecatory and non-defecatory abdominal symptom as pain alone, or discomfort alone, or pain & discomfort (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

IBS patients with abdominal discomfort have similar bowel symptoms and psychosocial features to those with abdominal pain. IBS symptoms manifesting abdominal pain or discomfort may primarily be due to different sensation and reporting experience.

Irritable bowel syndrome in China: a review on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal disease worldwide. Current guidelines of IBS are mostly based on the western populations and expected to vary in different communities. China has a large population and a vast literature is available on IBS. Due to linguistic variations in the literature, the studies are not widely known and their conclusions thus remain largely obscured to the western medical literature. In this article, we reviewed the published literatures on the investigations of IBS epidemiology, diagnosis, and management in the Chinese population and emphasized the different findings gleaned from the western publications. The detailed literature review will benefit understanding of and promote future study on IBS.