1
|
Hanna LN, Munster LJ, Joshi S, Wendelien van der Bilt JD, Buskens CJ, Hart A, Tozer P. Isolated perianal Crohn's disease: a systematic review and expert consensus proposing novel diagnostic criteria and management advice. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025:S2468-1253(25)00007-X. [PMID: 40315877 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(25)00007-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2024] [Revised: 12/20/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2025] [Indexed: 05/04/2025]
Abstract
Perianal fistulae can present a diagnostic challenge when distinguishing perianal Crohn's disease from idiopathic perianal fistulae. This distinction is key, as perianal Crohn's disease requires inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy, whereas idiopathic perianal fistulae are primarily managed surgically. When luminal inflammation is absent, but Crohn's disease is suspected, the term isolated perianal Crohn's disease is sometimes applied. However, no formal guidance exists for diagnosing or managing isolated perianal Crohn's disease. Furthermore, whereas fistula granuloma might provide specific evidence of Crohn's disease, they are rarely detected in perianal fistulae, so are unlikely to sensitively delineate aetiology. This project aimed to develop an opinion-based framework for isolated perianal Crohn's disease. A systematic review evaluated clinical features suggestive of isolated perianal Crohn's disease and evidence for IBD therapies in patients with perianal fistulae without luminal IBD. The findings of this systematic review informed a multidisciplinary consensus process with IBD specialists, resulting in the formulation of diagnostic criteria and management recommendations for isolated perianal Crohn's disease. We then tested this diagnostic approach in a prospective cohort of 50 patients treated as having idiopathic perianal fistulae at a proctology referral centre, identifying six (12%) individuals as meeting the diagnostic criteria. Our findings underscore the scarcity of evidence guiding isolated perianal Crohn's disease diagnosis and the need for a composite risk-based assessment. The proposed framework provides a tool for clinical practice and research but requires validation and refinement. Clear communication with patients is essential, given the diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties. Future studies should refine these criteria, explore biological markers for isolated perianal Crohn's disease, and establish evidence-based methods to differentiate isolated perianal Crohn's disease within the perianal fistulae spectrum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Nathan Hanna
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Liesbeth Jozefien Munster
- Department of Surgery, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Shivani Joshi
- Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | | | | | - Ailsa Hart
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Phil Tozer
- Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Munster LJ, Hanna LN, Hart AL, Tozer PJ, Buskens CJ, van der Bilt JDW. Diagnosing Crohn's disease in presumed cryptoglandular perianal fistulas: an expert Delphi consensus on early identification of patients at risk of Crohn's disease in perianal fistulas (PREFAB). J Crohns Colitis 2025; 19:jjaf002. [PMID: 39777453 PMCID: PMC11783332 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this Delphi study was to reach consensus on a new clinical decision tool to help identify or exclude Crohn's disease (CD) in patients with perianal fistula(s) (PAF). METHODS A panel of international experts in the field of proctology/inflammatory bowel disease was invited to participate. In the first round (electronic survey), participants were asked to anonymously provide their opinion probing (1) the relevance and use of clinical characteristics suggestive of underlying CD, (2) the use of fecal calprotectin (FCP) for screening for CD, and (3) on the diagnostic work-up for CD in PAF patients with raised clinical suspicion. In the second/third round (virtual consensus meetings), statements were paired/revised and presented in final sets of statements. Consensus was predefined as ≥70% (dis)agreement. RESULTS Final consensus was reached on 12 statements, including screening of all PAF patients (regardless of the complexity, biological behavior, and co-existent perianal symptoms) and referral of PAF patients for a colonoscopy in case of elevated FCP levels (≥150 mcg/g) and/or in case of one clinical major criterion (defined as: unintentional weight loss, unexplained diarrhea, PSC, UC, >1 internal fistula openings, fistula involving other organs (vagina/bladder), recurrent fistulation (after initial healing), proctitis, and anal stenosis). Also, clinical (fistula-)characteristics that warrant raised suspicion for CD and an algorithm on the diagnostic work-/follow-up of patients with raised suspicion were defined. CONCLUSION International consensus was reached on a new, clinical decision tool, including a practical and relevant algorithm for finding/excluding CD in PAF patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth J Munster
- Department of Surgery, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luke N Hanna
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Mark’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ailsa L Hart
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Mark’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Phil J Tozer
- Department of Surgery, St. Mark’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jarmila D W van der Bilt
- Department of Surgery, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
López-Callejas R, Velasco-García PS, Betancourt-Ángeles M, Rodríguez-Méndez BG, Berrones-Stringel G, Jaramillo-Martínez C, Farías-López FE, Mercado-Cabrera A, Valencia-Alvarado R. Use of Non-Thermal Plasma as Postoperative Therapy in Anal Fistula: Clinical Experience and Results. Biomedicines 2024; 12:1866. [PMID: 39200330 PMCID: PMC11351551 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12081866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Revised: 07/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Anal fistula, characterized by abnormal tracts between the perianal skin and the anal canal, presents challenges in treatment because of its diversity and complexity. This study investigates the use of non-thermal plasma as a postsurgical therapy for anal fistula, aiming to promote healing and tissue regeneration. A specialized plasma reactor was designed to apply non-thermal plasma within the anorectal cavity practically. Non-thermal plasma treatment was administered to 20 patients including 10 undergoing fistulectomies and 10 undergoing fistulotomies. The average duration of non-thermal plasma application in the operating room was shorter for fistulotomies. The pain reported the day after surgery was similar in both groups. Improvements in the number of evacuations starting from the day after surgery, as well as the assessment of stool quality using the Bristol scale, indicated satisfactory intestinal recovery. Fistulotomy patients exhibited faster wound healing times. These findings underscore the efficacy of non-thermal plasma as a postoperative therapy for anal fistula, enhancing healing and recovery outcomes without increasing complication risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Régulo López-Callejas
- Plasma Physics Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, Carretera México-Toluca S/N, La Marquesa, Ocoyoacac 52750, Mexico; (R.L.-C.); (A.M.-C.); (R.V.-A.)
| | - Pasquinely Salvador Velasco-García
- Medical Center ISSEMyM Toluca, Av. Baja velocidad 284 km. 57.5, San Jerónimo Chicahualco, Metepec 52170, Mexico; (P.S.V.-G.); (M.B.-Á.); (G.B.-S.); (C.J.-M.); (F.E.F.-L.)
| | - Mario Betancourt-Ángeles
- Medical Center ISSEMyM Toluca, Av. Baja velocidad 284 km. 57.5, San Jerónimo Chicahualco, Metepec 52170, Mexico; (P.S.V.-G.); (M.B.-Á.); (G.B.-S.); (C.J.-M.); (F.E.F.-L.)
| | - Benjamín Gonzalo Rodríguez-Méndez
- Plasma Physics Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, Carretera México-Toluca S/N, La Marquesa, Ocoyoacac 52750, Mexico; (R.L.-C.); (A.M.-C.); (R.V.-A.)
| | - Guillermo Berrones-Stringel
- Medical Center ISSEMyM Toluca, Av. Baja velocidad 284 km. 57.5, San Jerónimo Chicahualco, Metepec 52170, Mexico; (P.S.V.-G.); (M.B.-Á.); (G.B.-S.); (C.J.-M.); (F.E.F.-L.)
| | - César Jaramillo-Martínez
- Medical Center ISSEMyM Toluca, Av. Baja velocidad 284 km. 57.5, San Jerónimo Chicahualco, Metepec 52170, Mexico; (P.S.V.-G.); (M.B.-Á.); (G.B.-S.); (C.J.-M.); (F.E.F.-L.)
| | - Fernando Eliseo Farías-López
- Medical Center ISSEMyM Toluca, Av. Baja velocidad 284 km. 57.5, San Jerónimo Chicahualco, Metepec 52170, Mexico; (P.S.V.-G.); (M.B.-Á.); (G.B.-S.); (C.J.-M.); (F.E.F.-L.)
| | - Antonio Mercado-Cabrera
- Plasma Physics Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, Carretera México-Toluca S/N, La Marquesa, Ocoyoacac 52750, Mexico; (R.L.-C.); (A.M.-C.); (R.V.-A.)
| | - Raúl Valencia-Alvarado
- Plasma Physics Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, Carretera México-Toluca S/N, La Marquesa, Ocoyoacac 52750, Mexico; (R.L.-C.); (A.M.-C.); (R.V.-A.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Manzo Margiotta F, Michelucci A, Fidanzi C, Granieri G, Salvia G, Bevilacqua M, Janowska A, Dini V, Romanelli M. Monoclonal Antibodies in the Management of Inflammation in Wound Healing: An Updated Literature Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4089. [PMID: 39064129 PMCID: PMC11278249 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2024] [Revised: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Chronic wounds pose a significant clinical challenge due to their complex pathophysiology and the burden of long-term management. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are emerging as a novel therapeutic option in managing difficult wounds, although comprehensive data on their use in wound care are lacking. This study aimed to explore existing scientific knowledge of mAbs in treating chronic wounds based on a rationale of direct inhibition of the main molecules involved in the underlying inflammatory pathophysiology. We performed a literature review excluding primary inflammatory conditions with potential ulcerative outcomes (e.g., hidradenitis suppurativa). mAbs were effective in treating wounds from 16 different etiologies. The most commonly treated conditions were pyoderma gangrenosum (treated with 12 different mAbs), lipoid necrobiosis, and cutaneous vasculitis (each treated with 3 different mAbs). Fourteen mAbs were analyzed in total. Rituximab was effective in 43.75% of cases (7/16 diseases), followed by tocilizumab (25%, 4/16 diseases), and both etanercept and adalimumab (18.75%, 3/16 conditions each). mAbs offer therapeutic potential for chronic wounds unresponsive to standard treatments. However, due to the complex molecular nature of wound healing, no single target molecule can be identified. Therefore, the use of mAbs should be considered as a translational approach for limited cases of multi-resistant conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Manzo Margiotta
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (F.M.M.); (A.M.); (G.G.); (G.S.); (M.B.); (A.J.); (V.D.)
- Interdisciplinary Center of Health Science, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies of Pisa, 56127 Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandra Michelucci
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (F.M.M.); (A.M.); (G.G.); (G.S.); (M.B.); (A.J.); (V.D.)
- Interdisciplinary Center of Health Science, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies of Pisa, 56127 Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Giammarco Granieri
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (F.M.M.); (A.M.); (G.G.); (G.S.); (M.B.); (A.J.); (V.D.)
| | - Giorgia Salvia
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (F.M.M.); (A.M.); (G.G.); (G.S.); (M.B.); (A.J.); (V.D.)
| | - Matteo Bevilacqua
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (F.M.M.); (A.M.); (G.G.); (G.S.); (M.B.); (A.J.); (V.D.)
| | - Agata Janowska
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (F.M.M.); (A.M.); (G.G.); (G.S.); (M.B.); (A.J.); (V.D.)
| | - Valentina Dini
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (F.M.M.); (A.M.); (G.G.); (G.S.); (M.B.); (A.J.); (V.D.)
| | - Marco Romanelli
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (F.M.M.); (A.M.); (G.G.); (G.S.); (M.B.); (A.J.); (V.D.)
| |
Collapse
|