Fistula in ano: evaluation with low-field magnetic resonance imaging (0.1 T)

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound is accurate and reproducible in determining type and height of anal fistulas

AIM

Surgical treatment of high anal fistulas is associated with the potential risk of faecal incontinence and recurrence. The primary aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) in the assessment of height and type of anal fistulas, compared to the intra-operative findings (gold standard). The secondary aim was to evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility of 3D-EAUS.

METHOD

The study design was a prospective analysis of retrospective data. 299 patients (202 men), mean age 45.3 years, who underwent surgery for anal fistulas, were included. All patients were preoperatively assessed by 3D-EAUS. Two readers independently reviewed the volumes to determine the type and height of fistulas. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, proportion of agreements and Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) were calculated for both examiners. Ultrasound findings were compared with intra-operative data (reference standard), evaluated blindly by the surgeons.

RESULTS

At surgery, 201 (67%) were transsphincteric, 49 (16%) suprasphincteric, 47 (16%) intersphincteric and two (1%) extrasphincteric fistulas. Intra-operatively, 177 (59%) were low and 122 (41%) high fistulas. The overall accuracy of 3D-EAUS was 91% for fistula type (271/299 fistulas: 97% transsphincteric, 100% intersphincteric, 57% suprasphincteric, 0% extrasphincteric) and 92% for fistula height (275/299 fistulas: 80% high and 100% low). Both readers reported very good agreement with surgery in the assessment of fistula type (proportion of agreement 0.88, κ = 0.89) and height (proportion of agreement 0.90, κ = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

3D-EAUS is an accurate and reproducible modality for the assessment of type and height of anal fistulas.

A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal ultrasound and MRI for perianal fistula assessment

BACKGROUND

Imaging modalities such as endoanal ultrasound or MRI can be useful preoperative adjuncts before the appropriate surgical intervention for perianal fistulas.

OBJECTIVES

We present a systematic review of published literature comparing endoanal ultrasound with MRI for the assessment of idiopathic and Crohn's perianal fistulas.

DESIGN

A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled values for specificity and sensitivity.

SETTINGS

Electronic databases were searched from January 1970 to October 2010 for published studies.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Four studies were used in our analysis. There were 241 fistulas in the ultrasound group and 240 in the magnetic resonance group.

RESULTS

The combined sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance for fistula detection were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.63-0.96) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.51-0.82). There was a high degree of heterogeneity between studies reporting on MRI sensitivity (df = 3, I = 93%). This compares to a sensitivity and specificity for endoanal ultrasound of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.70-0.95) and 0.43 (95% CI: 0.21-0.69). There was a high degree of heterogeneity between studies reporting on endoanal ultrasound sensitivity (df = 3, I = 92%).

CONCLUSIONS

From the available literature, the summarized performance characteristics for MRI and endoanal ultrasound demonstrate comparable sensitivities at detecting perianal fistulas, although the specificity for MRI was higher than that for endoanal ultrasound. Both specificity values are considered to be diagnostically poor, however. The high degree of data heterogeneity and the shortage of applicable studies precludes any firm conclusions being made for clinical practice. Future trials with improved study design (including prospective data collection and consideration of verification bias) may help to further clarify the role of MRI in the assessment and treatment response monitoring of perianal fistulas (particularly in patients with Crohn's disease).

Imaging of fistula in ano

Fistula in ano is a common condition that often recurs despite seemingly adequate surgery, usually because of infection that was missed at surgery. It is now increasingly recognized that preoperative imaging can help identify infection that would have otherwise gone unidentified. In particular, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings have been shown to influence surgery and markedly diminish the chance of recurrence; thus, preoperative imaging will become increasingly routine in the future. In this article, the authors describe the pathogenesis, classification, and imaging of fistula in ano, with an emphasis on MR imaging. Most important, the authors describe how the radiologist is well placed to answer the surgical riddles that must be solved for treatment to be effective.

Anal abscesses and fistulas

Anal abscesses and fistulas are a common part of surgical practice. Most abscesses simply need to be drained and most fistulas can be safely laid open. Excessive probing should not be attempted when draining abscesses as this may lead to iatrogenic fistulas. A small percentage of fistulas are complex and very challenging to manage. Management involves an accurate diagnosis and a balance between eradication of the fistula and maintenance of continence. A decision should be made, based on clinical evaluation and anal ultrasound (if available), whether the fistula can be laid open. If it cannot be laid open, a loose seton is placed and the sepsis is allowed to settle. Once the sepsis is quiescent, a definitive repair can be attempted. There are various techniques available including rectal advancement flap, fibrin glue and cutaneous flaps all of which are discussed.

Imaging anal fistula

The management of fistula-in-ano has been based on digital examination and operative findings. MR imaging has shown significant limitations to this approach, particularly in the management of recurrent fistula. The most cost-effective approach may be using a combination of endosonography and MR imaging. Preoperative confirmation of fistula complexity facilitates surgery planning of sphincter saving techniques and prevents sepsis being missed, which has been shown to reduce recurrence. Imaging has a significant role to play in this condition to improve patient outcome.