Amantadine monotherapy of chronic hepatitis C patients infected with genotype lb

Triple therapy of initial high-dose interferon with ribavirin and amantadine for patients with chronic hepatitis C

AIMS

We previously reported the potential effect of combination therapy of an initial high-dose interferon (IFN) and amantadine on the eradication of HCV-RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The additive effects of amantadine on interferon and ribavirin combination therapy remain controversial. In this study we investigated the efficacy of initial high-dose IFN with ribavirin and amantadine on the virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C with a high viral load of genotype 1b.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with high viral loads of genotype 1b hepatitis C virus were enrolled in this pilot study. Patients were administered IFN-beta for four weeks and then IFN-alpha2b for 22 weeks with daily oral administration of ribavirin and amantadine.

RESULTS

A sustained virological response (SVR) was shown in 31.8% (seven of 22 patients). With the naïve patients, the SVR rate was 21.4% (three of 14 patients). In patients who could not eradicate HCV-RNA by previous IFN monotherapy, the SVR rate was 50% (four of eight patients).

CONCLUSION

Triple therapy with an initial high dose of IFN with ribavirin and amantadine may be effective, especially for chronic hepatitis C IFN-retreatment patients with a high viral load of genotype 1b.

Viral determinants of resistance to treatment in patients with hepatitis C

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects more than 170 million persons worldwide and is responsible for the development of liver cirrhosis in many cases. Standard treatment with pegylated alpha interferon (IFN-alpha) in combination with the nucleoside analogue ribavirin leads to a sustained virologic response in approximately half of the patients. IFN-alpha is classified as an indirect treatment, as it interacts with the host's immune response. The mechanism of action of ribavirin is still unknown. The benefit of triple therapy by adding other antiviral agents, e.g., amantadine, is controversial. Currently, new direct antiviral drugs (HCV protease/polymerase inhibitors) are being evaluated in phase 1/phase 2 trials. Phenotypic resistance to antiviral therapy has been attributed to amino acid variations within distinct regions of the HCV polyprotein. While sensitivity to IFN-alpha-based antiviral therapy in vivo is clearly correlated with the number of mutations within the HCV NS5A protein, the underlying functional mechanisms for this association are unknown. In turn, in vitro, several mechanisms to circumvent the host immune defense or to block treatment-induced antiviral activities have been described for different HCV proteins. By the introduction of direct antiviral drugs, hepatitis C therapy now is entering a new era in which the development of resistance may become the most important parameter for treatment success or failure.

Amantadine in treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection?

SUMMARY

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) continues to be an important and growing challenge. As the response rate to FDA-approved treatment improved over the past decade, we are facing increasing number of difficult-to-treat patients such as those who have failed prior anti-viral therapy. The role of amantadine in the treatment of CHC remains unclear. Studies thus far have produced conflicting results, and type II error could not be excluded. This review summarized results published in the literature from 1997 to 2003, and reviewed the existing questions and controversies regarding the use of amantadine. Current literature suggests that amantadine is ineffective as monotherapy. Amantadine increased the sustained virologic response of certain treatment naïve patients when used in combination with interferon, and may be effective as an adjunct to interferon-based combination therapy in some patients who have failed or relapsed on prior therapy. Factors such as small sample size, patient characteristics, and differences in treatment protocols including amantadine preparation and duration of therapy might explain the conflicting observations of various studies. Further investigations are needed to define optimal dosing and formulation of amantadine, and its appropriate role in management of CHC infection.

Retreatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to interferon/ribavirin combination therapy with daily interferon plus ribavirin plus amantadine

There is currently no accepted therapeutic regimen for patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to standard combination treatment with interferon-alpha plus ribavirin. We investigated triple combination treatment with induction dosing of interferon-alpha plus ribavirin plus amantadine in these difficult-to-treat patients. Nonresponders (n = 67), breakthroughs (n = 16) and relapsers (n = 19) to previous interferon/ribavirin combination treatment of at least 6 months were included. For the first 16 weeks, patients received interferon-alpha2a 6 MU daily, ribavirin 800-1200 mg/d, and amantadine 200 mg/d. In cases of undetectable HCV RNA at week 12, treatment was continued with interferon-alpha2a 6 MU every other day and the same doses of ribavirin and amantadine until week 48. In cases of HCV RNA positivity at week 12, treatment was stopped. A total of 102 patients were enrolled (80%: genotype 1, 19%: cirrhosis). HCV RNA was negative in 35/102 patients (34%) at week 12 and in 27/ 102 patients (26%) at the end of treatment. Virological response was sustained in 15/102 patients (15%). On-treatment virological response was higher in previous relapsers/breakthroughs than in previous nonresponders (week 12: 49% vs. 27%, p < 0.05; week 48: 46% vs. 16%, p < 0.01) but no such difference was found for sustained virological response (20% vs. 12%, NS). In conclusion, triple combination treatment with daily interferon-alpha plus ribavirin plus amantadine for 3 months can induce virological response in a considerable number of nonresponders/relapsers to previous dual combination treatment, but the sustained virological response rate remains low.

Evaluation of amantadine in chronic hepatitis C: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The benefit of amantadine combination therapy, either with interferon (IFN) alone (double therapy) or with ribavirin and IFN (triple therapy) is unknown.

METHODS

We analyzed the effect of amantadine on the end-of-treatment virological response and the sustained response using meta-analysis of 31 randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

Overall analysis revealed a significant effect of amantadine. Triple therapy was the best regimen for improving the sustained response (mean difference: 8.4%, 95% CI: 2.4-13.8%, P=0.002). In subgroup analysis, amantadine did not have a significant effect upon naive patients or relapsers. In non-responders, combination therapy with amantadine was associated with a significant effect on the sustained response (mean difference: 8.3%, 95% CI: 1.9-14.6%, P=0.01). In sensitivity analysis, double therapy did not improve virological responses. Conversely, triple therapy tended to improve the end-of-treatment virological response and was associated with a significant effect upon the sustained response (mean difference: 12.7%, 95% CI: 3.8-21.6%, P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with amantadine is of no effect upon naive patients or relapsers. In non-responders, triple therapy with amantadine improved the sustained response. New randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this meta-analysis.

A randomized controlled trial of amantadine plus interferon-alpha2a vs. interferon-alpha2a alone in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C randomized according to the early virological response to interferon-alpha2a monotherapy

BACKGROUND

An early virological response to interferon-alpha treatment is a strong predictor of sustained response, but it has never been exploited to stratify patients in clinical trials.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of amantadine plus interferon-alpha compared with interferon-alpha alone in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C who were randomized on the basis of the early virological response to interferon-alpha.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-one patients received recombinant interferon-alpha2a (3 MU three times weekly) for 2 months and 164 were evaluated for early (i.e. month 2) virological response. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA-negative patients (n = 66) were randomized to receive 3 MU of interferon-alpha three times weekly, with or without amantadine (200 mg/day); HCV RNA-positive patients (n = 98) were randomized to receive 6 MU of interferon-alpha three times weekly, with or without amantadine (200 mg/day). HCV RNA-positive patients at 6 months discontinued treatment, and all others completed 12 months.

RESULTS

At month 6, HCV RNA-negative patients made up 54.2% of the interferon + amantadine group and 42.0% of the monotherapy group (P = 0.07). At month 12, HCV RNA-negative patients made up 38.5% of the interferon + amantadine group and 28.4% of the monotherapy group (N.S.). The sustained virological response rates were 21.6% and 20.9%, respectively (N.S.).

CONCLUSION

The addition of amantadine does not enhance the sustained virological response to interferon-alpha in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C; however, an additive effect of amantadine occurs in the first 6 months, mainly in patients without an early response to monotherapy. Early response to interferon-alpha is a strong predictor of sustained virological response.

Amantadine's viral kinetics in chronic hepatitis C infection

Treatment for hepatitis C virus infection is limited in patients not responding to traditional therapy. Amantadine is effective for influenza infections and has been studied in patients with hepatitis C. Our aim was to determine the efficacy and safety of amantadine and to study the viral kinetics following amantadine therapy. Twelve patients with detectable HCV antibodies received amantadine 100 mg, orally twice daily. Serial HCV RNA and ALT blood samples were drawn and adverse effects were evaluated. Mean HCV RNA levels did not decrease in the first 24 hr of amantadine therapy but did decline significantly by day 3, only to rebound by day 7. All HCV RNA levels remained detectable throughout therapy and were not different from baseline values. Thirty-three percent of the patients obtained normal ALT levels after the first 24 hr of treatment and levels remained within normal range throughout the study period. More than a third of the patients discontinued therapy due to severe adverse effects occurring within one to three months after initiating treatment. In conclusion, although amantadine therapy alone was not effective, it should be considered as an adjunctive form of therapy along with interferon and ribavirin.

Interferon and amantadine in naive chronic hepatitis C: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Recent controlled trials on the efficacy of an amantadine/interferon combination in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C yielded contradictory results. We therefore conducted a large, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C: 246 patients were randomized to receive interferon alfa-2a (6 MIU sc thrice weekly for 20 weeks, then 3 MIU sc thrice weekly) and either amantadine sulphate (2 x 100 mg p.o. QD) or placebo. Treatment continued for a total of 52 weeks, if HCV-RNA in serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) had fallen below detection limit (1,000 copies/mL) at treatment week 10, and stopped otherwise. All patients were followed for 24 weeks off therapy. After 10 weeks of treatment, 66/121 patients treated with amantadine (55%) and 78/125 treated with placebo (62%) had lost HCV-RNA (n.s.). After 24 weeks of follow-up, 25 patients in the amantadine (21%) and 17 (14%) in the placebo group remained HCV-RNA negative (n.s.). During therapy, virologic breakthroughs occurred less often in the amantadine than in the placebo group [14 (12%) vs. 27 (22%) patients; P =.04]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed genotype, viremia level, age, and amantadine therapy [risk ratio 0.4 (95%CI 0.2-1.0), P =.05] as predictors of sustained virologic response. Adverse events and impact of therapy on quality of life were similar in amantadine and placebo treated patients. Compared with current standard treatment (interferon/ribavirin), the interferon/amantadine combination was not cost-effective. In conclusion, amantadine does not add to a clinically relevant extent to the treatment of naive patients with chronic hepatitis C.