Pentachlorophenyl Complexes of Gold(I) and Gold(III)

A Single-Molecule Observation of Dichloroaurate(I) Binding to an Engineered Mycobacterium smegmatis porin A (MspA) Nanopore

Gold(I) compounds are known to bind sulfur-containing proteins, forming the basis in the design of gold(I)-based drugs. However, the intrinsic molecular mechanism of the chemical reaction is easily hidden when monitored in ensemble. We have previously demonstrated that Mycobacterium smegmatis porin A (MspA) can be engineered (MspA-M) to contain a specialized nanoreactor to probe chemical reactions involving tetrachloroaurate(III). Here, we provide further investigations of coordination interactions between dichloroaurate(I) and MspA-M. Gold compounds of different coordination geometry and valence states are as well probed and evaluated, demonstrating the generality of MspA-M. With single-molecule evidence, MspA-M demonstrates a preference for dichloroaurate(I) than tetrachloroaurate(III), an observation in a single molecule that has never been reported. By counting the maximum number of simultaneous ion bindings, the narrowly confined pore restriction also efficiently distinguishes dichloroaurate(I) and tetrachloroaurate(III) according to their differences in geometry or size. The above demonstration complemented a previous study by demonstrating other possible gold-based single-molecule chemical reactions observable by MspA. These observations bring insights in the understanding of gold-based coordination chemistry in a nanoscale.

Study of the coordination abilities of stibine ligands to gold(I)

The reaction of [AuCl(tht)] (tht = tetrahydrothiophene) with SbMes(n)Ph(3-n) (n = 3 (1), 2 (2), 1 (3)) produces the 1:1 adducts [AuCl(SbMes(n)Ph(3-n))] (n = 3 (4), 2 (5), 1 (6)), with a Sb-Au-Cl environment, regardless of the molar ratio used (1:1 to 1:4). Addition of the same stibines to [Au(tht)(2)]ClO(4) (molar ratio 1:1 to 1:4) results in isolation of the 1:2 adducts [Au(SbMes(n)Ph(3-n))(2)]ClO(4) (n = 3 (7), 2 (10)), containing linear Sb-Au-Sb fragments, or the 1:3 adduct [Au(SbMesPh(2))(3)]ClO(4) (11), with a quasi trigonal planar AuSb(3) core. The same 1:2 cations are produced when [Au(tht)(2)]CF(3)SO(3) is reacted with 1 or following a rearrangement process when 4 is treated with AgSbF(6), that is, [Au(SbMes(3))(2)]X (X = CF(3)SO(3) (8), SbF(6) (9)). The compounds were characterized by spectroscopic methods, and the molecular structures of 2-4, 7, 8.2CDCl(3), 9, and 11 were established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Theoretical calculations were carried out on model systems of type ER(3) and [Au(ER(3))(n)](+) (E = P or Sb; R = Ph or Mes; n = 2, 3, or 4) to gain insight into the bonding nature of SbR(3) ligands in homoleptic gold-stibine adducts, in comparison with phosphine-gold(I) compounds. Steric effects govern the coordination of stibines with mesityl substituents. A preference for higher coordination numbers is observed for SbPh(3) when compared with PPh(3) and experimentally observed C-Sb-C and Sb-C structural distortions of stibines upon coordination are reproduced theoretically.

Group 11 complexes with the bis(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl)methane ligand. How secondary bonds can influence the coordination environment of Ag(i): the role of coordinated water in [Ag2(µ-L)2(OH2)2](OTf)2

The complexation properties of the ligand bis(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl)methane (L) towards group 11 metals have been studied. The reaction in a 1 : 1 molar ratio with [Cu(NCMe)4]PF6 or Ag(OTf) complexes gives the mononuclear [CuL(NCMe)]PF6 (1), with crystallographic mirror symmetry, or dinuclear [Ag2(mu-L)2](OTf)2 (2) (OTf = trifluoromethanesulfonate) in which the ligand bridges both silver centres, an unprecedented mode of coordination for this type of ligands. Compound 2 crystallizes with two water molecules and forms a supramolecular structure through classical hydrogen bonding. The reaction in a 2 : 1 ratio affords in both cases the four-coordinated derivatives [ML2]X (M = Cu, X = PF6 (3); Ag, X = OTf 4). The treatment of [Ag(OTf)(PPh3)] with the ligand L gives [AgL(PPh3)]OTf (5). The gold(I) derivative [Au2(C6F5)2(mu-L)] (6) has also been obtained by reaction of L with two equivalents of [Au(C6F5)(tht)]. These complexes present a luminescent behaviour at low temperature; the emissions being mainly intraligand but enhanced after coordination of the metal. Compounds 1-4 have been characterized by X-ray crystallography. DFT studies showed that, in the silver complex 2, coordination of H2O to Ag in the binuclear complex is favoured by formation of a hydrogen-bonding network, involving the triflato anion, and releasing enough energy to allow distortion of the Ag2 framework.

Gold and silver complexes with the ferrocenyl phosphine FcCH2PPh2

Linear gold(I) and silver(I) complexes with the ferrocenyl phosphine FcCH2PPh2 [Fc = (eta5-C5H5)Fe(eta5-C5H4)] of the types [AuR(PPh2CH2Fc)], [M(PPh3)(PPh2CH2Fc)]OTf, and [M(PPh2CH2Fc)2]OTf (M = Au, Ag) have been obtained. Three-coordinate gold(I) and silver(I) derivatives of the types [AuCl(PPh2CH2Fc)2] and [M(PPh2CH2Fc)3]X (M = Au, X = ClO4; M = Ag, X = OTf) have been obtained from the corresponding gold and silver precursors in the appropriate molar ratio, although some of them are involved in equilibria in solution. The crystal structures of [AuR(PPh2CH2Fc)] (R = Cl, C6F5), [AuL(PPh2CH2Fc)]OTf (L = PPh3, FcCH2PPh2), [Au(C6F5)3(PPh2CH2Fc)], and [Ag(PPh2CH2Fc)3]OTf have been determined by X-ray diffraction studies.