Live discharge from hospice care: psychosocial challenges and opportunities

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Hospice Live Discharge

Hospice care is designed to support the medical and psychosocial needs of individuals with serious illness and their caregivers through the dying process. Some individuals, though, leave hospice prior to death, generally referred to as disenrollment or a "live discharge." Live discharge from hospice is a common and often distressing issue for hospice patients, their caregivers, and also for hospice professionals and agencies. This paper discusses common issues surrounding live discharge that clinicians and other healthcare professionals should consider when dealing with live discharge in their own clinical practices. Where applicable, we provide practical steps for hospice and palliative care clinicians to better support patients and families through this critical care transition. Further, we offer strategic directions interprofessional clinicians can take to affect systemic change to improve live discharge experiences.

Improving Policy and Practices of Hospice Live Discharge: A Historical Exploration of the Medicare Hospice Benefit

Hospice care in the US is heavily regulated to ensure access to the Medicare Hospice Benefit (MHB) for individuals with serious illness. Policy changes to the MHB, many of which intended to minimize potential fraud (e.g. focused medical reviews; documentation requirements for certifications, recertifications, and discharges; requirements of physician narratives and face-to-face visits), directly impact current hospice discharge practices and experiences. When patients revoke hospice or are unable to be recertified due to a stabilized condition, they lose access to the holistic philosophy of care and experience additional stressors with increased potential for burdensome transitions. Patients with chronic conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease or related dementias, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, or heart failure are more likely to have longer length of stays and are more often discharged alive from hospice. Few policy changes have been made to account for growing incidents of patients dying of chronic illness though the policy was originally created primarily for cancer patients, reflecting a time when most patients were dying of cancer. This manuscript describes the uniquely American phenomenon of a hospice live discharge, reviews relevant and historical policies, and provides recommendations for future research, policy, and practice to better support patients and families during this critical healthcare transition.

Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Caregiver Perspectives on Hospice Re-Enrollment Following a Hospice Live Discharge

Background: The number of individuals dying of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs) is steadily increasing and they represent the largest group of hospice enrollees. In 2020, 15.4% of hospice patients across the United States were discharged alive from hospice care, with 5.6% decertified due to being "no longer terminally ill." A live discharge from hospice care can disrupt care continuity, increase hospitalizations and emergency room visits, and reduce the quality of life for patients and families. Furthermore, this discontinuity may impede re-enrollment into hospice services and receipt of community bereavement services. Objectives: The aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of caregivers of adults with ADRDs around hospice re-enrollment following a live discharge from hospice. Design: We conducted semistructured interviews of caregivers of adults with ADRDs who experienced a live discharge from hospice (n = 24). Thematic analysis was used to analyze data. Results: Three-quarters of participants (n = 16) would consider re-enrolling their loved one in hospice. However, some believed they would have to wait for a medical crisis (n = 6) to re-enroll, while others (n = 10) questioned the appropriateness of hospice for patients with ADRDs if they cannot remain in hospice care until death. Conclusions: A live discharge for ADRD patients impacts caregivers' decisions on whether they will choose to re-enroll a patient who has been discharged alive from hospice. Further research and support of caregivers through the discharge process are necessary to ensure that patients and their caregivers remain connected to hospice agencies postdischarge.

Identifying Key Domains and Implementation Challenges for a Live Discharge From Hospice Protocol

Background: Hospice agencies lack an explicit live discharge process to guide practitioners in transitioning these patients and their primary caregivers (PCGs) out of hospice care. Based on previous research and input from an advisory committee, a live discharge protocol (LDP) was drafted with .three general areas of assessment: 1) concrete services; 2) psychosocial assessment; and 3) 30-day post discharge follow-up phone call. This study sought to gather perspectives from hospice social workers on the proposed assessment components and other needs in implementing a LDP. Methods: Purposive, convenience sampling occurred over 4 months. Participants were hospice social workers (n = 14) recruited through personal and professional contacts and social media. Four focus groups were conducted via Zoom. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Three major themes appeared: 1) benefits and challenges of having a structured discharge protocol (n = 14); 2) need for specific LDP roles across team members (n = 11); and 3) education and clear boundaries for both patients/PCGs and professionals (n = 9). Conclusions: All three assessment components of the preliminary LDP were deemed necessary by participants; however, implementation challenges were both unique for each agency and reflective of the broader hospice culture. Further research is needed to measure the impact of the LDP.

Hospice Quality, Race, and Disenrollment in Hospice Enrollees With Dementia

Background: Racial and ethnic minoritized people with dementia (PWD) are at high risk of disenrollment from hospice, yet little is known about the relationship between hospice quality and racial disparities in disenrollment among PWD. Objective: To assess the association between race and disenrollment between and within hospice quality categories in PWD. Design/Setting/Subjects: Retrospective cohort study of 100% Medicare beneficiaries 65+ enrolled in hospice with a principal diagnosis of dementia, July 2012-December 2017. Race and ethnicity (White/Black/Hispanic/Asian and Pacific Islander [AAPI]) was assessed with the Research Triangle Institute (RTI) algorithm. Hospice quality was assessed with the publicly-available Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey item on overall hospice rating, including a category for hospices exempt from public reporting (unrated). Results: The sample included 673,102 PWD (mean age 86, 66% female, 85% White, 7.3% Black, 6.3% Hispanic, 1.6% AAPI) enrolled in 4371 hospices nationwide. Likelihood of disenrollment was higher in hospices in the lowest quartile of quality ratings (vs. highest quartile) for both White (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.12 [95% confidence interval 1.06-1.19]) and minoritized PWD (AOR range 1.2-1.3) and was substantially higher in unrated hospices (AOR range 1.8-2.0). Within both low- and high-quality hospices, minoritized PWD were more likely to be disenrolled compared with White PWD (AOR range 1.18-1.45). Conclusions: Hospice quality predicts disenrollment, but does not fully explain disparities in disenrollment for minoritized PWD. Efforts to improve racial equity in hospice should focus both on increasing equity in access to high-quality hospices and improving care for racial minoritized PWD in all hospices.

The Forgotten and Misdiagnosed Care Transition: Live Discharge From Hospice Care

Every aspect of the United States healthcare industry presents transitions in care—hospitalizations, rehabilitation, long-term care placement—each requiring careful attention. With a goal of maintaining safety during a known point of vulnerability for patients, discharge planning is required in hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and home health agencies under Medicare guidelines. Yet, no required discharge planning or clear guidelines are available for a discharge from hospice; it is a forgotten care transition in our healthcare system. Of the 1.6 million Medicare recipients hospices serve each year, hospices discharge 17.4% alive. Under Medicare regulations, if clinicians cannot document acceptable patient decline, then patients are decertified from hospice categorized as “no longer terminally ill”, otherwise known as a live discharge. These patients are often referred to as “not dying fast enough,” or “failure to die on time,” as ultimately, they are still dying, and they are still terminally ill, just not within the prescribed 6-month framework. This paper outlines what is known about the occurrences and experiences of live discharge from hospice care and provides suggestions for improving both practice and policy.