Twelve tips for the pre-brief to promote psychological safety in simulation-based education

Bridging the gap: Leveraging simulation expertise to improve active learning environments

Introduction

Active learning engages learners in constructing knowledge through interactive strategies such as simulation, small-group discussion, and peer instruction. Although recognized as a superior approach to traditional passive learning, its adoption has been inconsistent. Barriers include reliance on traditional lectures, lack of training, and limited time to develop materials. Simulation educators have a unique skill set that may inform and support active learning initiatives.

Methods

Fifteen emergency medicine simulation experts convened to define the unique skill set of simulation educators and identify transferable simulation-based medical education (SBME) skills and concepts to promote effective active learning beyond the simulation lab. Workgroup members are simulation education directors who have undergone specialized training in SBME. During biweekly meetings over 6 months, workgroup members reviewed primary literature in SBME and active learning, along with relevant simulation educator training materials. Objectives were achieved through iterative review, group conceptualization, and expert consensus.

Unique treatment

The increasing prevalence of SBME in medical education, along with the growth of simulation fellowships, has produced a group of education experts with shared competencies. Simulation educators acquire expertise in psychological safety, facilitation, communication, and debriefing, through specialized training and extensive experience. These skills are critical for active learning environments where learners benefit from structured, engaging, and psychologically safe experiences.

Implications for educators

Key transferable SBME topics were identified for use in active learning environments outside of the simulation lab: (1) psychological safety, (2) facilitation strategies, and (3) communication techniques. Transferable tools and concepts were identified to promote efficacy and learner engagement during active learning in diverse environments. Simulation educators' expertise is an underutilized resource for faculty development initiatives aimed at advancing active learning. This work advocates for leveraging simulation educators' skills to close the active learning implementation gap, enhance learner outcomes, and meet the evolving needs of contemporary medical education.

Applying collaborativist theory to reenvision small-group learning in emergency medicine education

Introduction

Small-group discussion is an instructional strategy that is increasingly incorporated in emergency medicine (EM) educational settings. Compared to individualistic learning, small-group education enables learners to compare and synthesize perspectives in collaboration with peers and educators. This fosters communication, team-building, and critical thinking skills that are essential in EM professional environments. To ensure these benefits are delivered to EM small-group learners, educators should utilize instructional strategies grounded in learning theory.

Methodology

A workgroup from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Simulation Academy and Education Research Interest Group sought to develop theory-informed recommendations for EM educators to optimize small-group instruction. Workgroup members were faculty with undergraduate medical education and EM residency leadership roles, including the development and deployment of small-group education.

Unique treatment

Through primary literature review and iterative discussion, the workgroup identified a suitable theoretical framework, collaborativism, that postulates that small-group learning occurs as learners advance from divergent to convergent thinking through discussion. Through this lens, discussion is the centerpiece of small-group learning, and educational interventions that improve the quality of discussion also improve the quality of learning.

Implications

Collaborativism-informed strategies to strengthen small-group learning were proposed, organized by instructional design, learner-learner interactions, and educator-learner interactions. These educational interventions focused on enhancing engagement, cooperativity, and critical thinking behaviors in small-group learners as they engage in discussion. Recommended strategies were synthesized into a 50-min workshop presented at the 2024 SAEM Annual Meeting.

The 2024 French guidelines for scenario design in simulation-based education: manikin-based immersive simulation, simulated participant-based immersive simulation and procedural simulation

BACKGROUND

Simulation-based education in healthcare encompasses a wide array of modalities aimed at providing realistic clinical experiences supported by meticulously designed scenarios. The French-speaking Society for Simulation in Healthcare (SoFraSimS) has developed guidelines to assist educators in the design of scenarios for manikin- or simulated participant- based immersive simulation and procedural simulation, the three mainly used modalities.

METHODS

After establishing a French-speaking group of experts within the SoFraSimS network, we performed an extensive literature review with theory-informed practices and personal experiences. We used this approach identify the essential criteria for practice-based scenario design within the three simulation modalities.

RESULTS

We present three comprehensive templates for creating innovative scenarios and simulation sessions, each tailored to the specific characteristics of a simulation modality. The SoFraSimS templates include five sections distributed between the three modalities. The first section contextualizes the scenario by describing the practicalities of the setting, the instructors and learners, and its connection to the educational program. The second section outlines the learning objectives. The third lists all the elements necessary during the preparation phase, describing the educational method used for procedural simulation (such as demonstration, discovery, mastery learning, and deliberate practice). The fourth section addresses the simulation phase, detailing the behaviors the instructor aims to analyze, the embedded triggers, and the anticipated impact on simulation proceedings (natural feedback). This ensures maximum control over the learning experience. Finally, the fifth section compiles elements for post-simulation modifications to enhance future iterations.

CONCLUSION

We trust that these guidelines will prove valuable to educators seeking to implement simulation-based education and contribute to the standardization of scenarios for healthcare students and professionals. This standardization aims to facilitate communication, comparison of practices and collaboration across different learning and healthcare institutions.

More than a feeling: emotional regulation strategies for simulation-based education

Simulation-based education often involves learners or teams attempting to manage situations at the limits of their abilities. As a result, it can elicit emotional reactions in participants. These emotions are not good or bad, they simply are. Their value at any given moment is determined by their utility in meeting the goals of a particular situation. When emotions are particularly intense, or a given emotion is not aligned with the situation, they can impede learners' ability to engage in a simulation activity or debriefing session, as well as their ability to retain knowledge and skills learned during the session. Building on existing guidance for simulation educators seeking to optimize the learning state/readiness in learners, this paper explores the theory and research that underpins the practical application of how to recognize and support learners' emotions during simulation sessions. Specifically, we describe the impact of various emotions on the cognitive processes involved in learning and performance, to inform practical guidance for simulation practitioners: (1) how to recognize and identify emotions experienced by others, (2) how to determine whether those emotional reactions are problematic or helpful for a given situation, and (3) how to mitigate unhelpful emotional reactions and leverage those that are beneficial in achieving the goals of a simulation session.

Scotland's internal medicine simulation strategy: A 5-year journey

In 2019, the internal medicine (IM) stage 1 curriculum was implemented in the UK. This introduced a revised 3-year training programme for physicians in training. The new IM stage 1 curriculum emphasised simulation-based education, triggering the integration of simulation training on a national scale in Scotland. Bespoke training courses were developed for IM trainees in Scotland, spanning all 3 years of their training programme. Each course was meticulously designed with input from key stakeholders and trainees, aligning learning objectives with curriculum outcomes. The Scottish IM simulation strategy encompasses a 3-day bootcamp in IM year 1, a 1-day skills day in IM year 2, and a 2-day 'registrar ready' course in IM year 3. These courses, delivered at central locations, focus on immersive simulation, communication workshops, and simulation-based mastery learning of procedural skills. Evaluation of the programme includes pre- and post-course questionnaires, data tracking over the training programme, interviews with trainees and faculty, and annual review days to gather feedback and make necessary adaptations. The impact of the programme for trainees includes transfer to clinical practice of communication skills, improved non-technical skills, and increased confidence in procedural skills. Alignment with the IM stage 1 curriculum supports trainees' annual reviews of competence progression. The IM simulation training also offers valuable social benefits and remains crucial, especially with increased pressure in the NHS. It is our belief that ongoing delivery of this training is invaluable to the IM stage 1 programme in Scotland.

Peer Emotion in Collaborative Simulation Among Nursing Students

BACKGROUND

The emotional experiences of nursing students are linked to learning outcomes. Peer learning is a key component of nursing education and simulation. However, little is known about the emotions of students in the context of peer learning. This study sought to provide an in-depth description of nursing students' emotional experiences when participating with another peer in a simulation activity.

METHOD

Data were obtained from a study of peer collaborative clinical decision making in simulation. All data related to emotions were extracted, summarized, and interpreted using thematic analytic techniques.

RESULTS

Six themes were identified: (1) experiencing a multitude of emotions; (2) hiding emotions; (3) suppressing emotions; (4) revealing emotions; (5) perceiving peers' emotions; and (6) absorbing peers' emotions.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the importance of peer emotion in collaborative simulation and renders important implications for nursing education. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(11):746-754.].

'They mirror what they see': A constructivist grounded theory study of simulation culture in four professional domains in Ireland

PURPOSE

In simulation-based education (SBE), educators integrate their professional experiences to prepare learners for real world practice and may embed unproductive stereotypical biases. Although learning culture influences educational practices, the interactions between professional culture and SBE remain less clear. This study explores how professional learning culture informs simulation practices in healthcare, law, teacher training and paramedicine.

METHODS

Using constructivist grounded theory, we interviewed 19 educators about their experiences in designing and delivering simulation-based communication training. Data collection and analysis occurred iteratively via constant comparison, memo-writing and reflexive analytical discussions to identify themes and explore their relationships.

RESULTS

Varied conceptualizations and enactments of SBE contributed to distinct professional learning cultures. We identified a unique 'simulation culture' in each profession, which reflected a hyper-real representation of professional practice shaped by three interrelated elements: purpose and rationale for SBE, professional values and beliefs, and educational customs and techniques. Dynamic simulation cultures created tensions that may help or hinder learning for later interprofessional practice.

CONCLUSION

The concept of simulation culture enhances our understanding of SBE. Simulation educators must be mindful of their uni-professional learning culture and its impacts. Sharing knowledge about simulation practices across professional boundaries may enhance interprofessional education and learners' professional practice.

Changing the conversation: impact of guidelines designed to optimize interprofessional facilitation of simulation-based team training

BACKGROUND

Interprofessional simulation-based team training (ISBTT) is commonly used to optimize interprofessional teamwork in healthcare. The literature documents the benefits of ISBTT, yet effective interprofessional collaboration continues to be challenged by complex hierarchies and power dynamics. Explicitly addressing these issues during ISBTT may help participants acquire skills to navigate such challenges, but guidelines on how to do this are limited.

METHODS

We applied an educational design research approach to develop and pilot structured facilitator guidelines that explicitly address power and hierarchy with interprofessional teams. We conducted this work in a previously established ISBTT program at our institution, between September 2020 and December 2021. We first reviewed the literature to identify relevant educational theories and developed design principles. We subsequently designed, revised, and tested guidelines. We used qualitative thematic and content analysis of facilitator interviews and video-recording of IBSTT sessions to evaluate the effects of the guidelines on the pre- and debriefs.

RESULTS

Qualitative content analysis showed that structured guidelines shifted debriefing participation and content. Debriefings changed from physician-led discussions with a strong focus on medical content to conversations with more equal participation by nurses and physicians and more emphasis on teamwork and communication. The thematic analysis further showed how the conversation during debriefing changed and how interprofessional learning improved after the implementation of the guidelines. While power and hierarchy were more frequently discussed, for many facilitators these topics remained challenging to address.

CONCLUSION

We successfully created and implemented guidelines for ISBTT facilitators to explicitly address hierarchy and power. Future work will explore how this approach to ISBTT impacts interprofessional collaboration in clinical practice.

Links between learning goals, learning activities, and learning outcomes in simulation-based clinical skills training: a systematic review of the veterinary literature

Introduction

In veterinary education programs it is important to have a balance between providing students with valuable hands-on experience and ensuring the ethical treatment and welfare of the animals involved. In the last years simulation-based veterinary education played an important role helping with the replacement of experimental animals in education and at the same time creating a safe learning environment offering endless options for training in a safe environment. The aim of this systematic review was to discern which type of learning outcomes are used to evaluate specific learning goals of clinical skills training and to grasp the impact of diverse simulator characteristics on the measured learning outcomes in clinical skills training.

Methods

A systematic search from 1977 until November 2023 has been conducted resulting in 103 included papers. The categories, learning goals, learning activities, and learning outcomes in clinical skills training were used for data extraction of all included studies.

Results

This study investigated the interplay between learning goals, learning activities, and learning outcomes. Competence and knowledge were the most frequently described learning outcomes; static and screen-based simulators are the are most frequently used technologies. Static simulators are primarily used to train procedural steps and screen-based simulators are primarily used to train relevant knowledge and clinical reasoning. Notably, none of the reviewed studies made explicit connections between learning goals, learning activities, and learning outcomes.

Discussion

In simulation-based education it is important to provide a structured, constructively aligned process where students gain relevant and effective experience. The results of this study underscore the importance of aligning the learning process in simulation-based clinical skills training, and that alignment in the learning process is not always evident.

Training as imagined? A critical realist analysis of Scotland's internal medicine simulation programme

BACKGROUND

Evaluating the impact of simulation-based education (SBE) has prioritised demonstrating a causal link to improved patient outcomes. Recent calls herald a move away from looking for causation to understanding 'what else happened'. Inspired by Shorrock's varieties of human work from patient safety literature, this study draws on the concept of work-as-done versus work-as-imagined. Applying this to SBE recognises that some training impacts will be unexpected, and the realities of training will never be quite as imagined. This study takes a critical realist stance to explore the experience and consequences, intended and unintended, of the internal medicine training (IMT) simulation programme in Scotland, to better understand 'training-as-done'.

METHODS

Critical realism accepts that there is a reality to uncover but acknowledges that our knowledge of reality is inevitably our construction and cannot be truly objective. The IMT simulation programme involves three courses over a 3-year period: a 3-day boot camp, a skills day and a 2-day registrar-ready course. Following ethical approval, interviews were conducted with trainees who had completed all courses, as well as faculty and stakeholders both immersed in and distant from course delivery. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using critical realist analysis, influenced by Shorrock's proxies for work-as-done.

RESULTS

Between July and December 2023, 24 interviews were conducted with ten trainees, eight faculty members and six stakeholders. Data described proxies for training-as-done within three broad categories: design, experience and impact. Proxies for training design included training-as-prescribed, training-as-desired and training-as-prioritised which compete to produce training-as-standardised. Experience included training-as-anticipated with pre-simulation anxiety and training-as-unintended with the valued opportunity for social comparison as well as a sense of identity and social cohesion. The impact reached beyond the individual trainee with faculty development and inspiration for other training ventures.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight unintended consequences of SBE such as social comparison and feeling 'valued as a trainee, valued as a person'. It sheds light on the fear of simulation, reinforcing the importance of psychological safety. A critical realist approach illuminated the 'bigger picture', revealing insights and underlying mechanisms that allow this study to present a new framework for conceptualising training evaluation.

Unlocking the learning potential of simulation-based education

Simulation is ubiquitous in the training of hospital-based doctors worldwide, often focusing on an individual level in traditional 'skills and drills'-based training. However, there has been an expansion in the use of simulation in healthcare practice and training. Simulation is being adopted into many disciplines that traditionally have not used this form of experiential learning. Moreover, simulation is increasingly being harnessed to enhance team and organisational learning in hospital-based practice. This article shares some insights into simulation-based education and makes the 'familiar unfamiliar' about this important method of learning. The aim is to broaden readers' outlook about what simulation has to offer beyond the classic notion of skills and drills-based training.

"Asking for help is a strength"-how to promote undergraduate medical students' teamwork through simulation training and interprofessional faculty

The ability to team up and safely work in any kind of healthcare team is a critical asset and should be taught early on in medical education. Medical students should be given the chance to "walk the talk" of teamwork by training and reflecting in teams. Our goal was to design, implement and evaluate the feasibility of a simulation-based teamwork training (TeamSIM) for undergraduate medical students that puts generic teamwork skills centerstage. We designed TeamSIM to include 12 learning objectives. For this pre-post, mixed-methods feasibility study, third-year medical students, organized in teams of 11-12 students, participated and observed each other in eight simulations of different clinical situation with varying degrees of complexity (e.g., deteriorating patient in ward; trauma; resuscitation). Guided by an interprofessional clinical faculty with simulation-based instructor training, student teams reflected on their shared experience in structured team debriefings. Using published instruments, we measured (a) students' reactions to TeamSIM and their perceptions of psychological safety via self-report, (b) their ongoing reflections via experience sampling, and (c) their teamwork skills via behavior observation. Ninety four students participated. They reported positive reactions to TeamSIM (M = 5.23, SD = 0.5). Their mean initial reported level of psychological safety was M = 3.8 (SD = 0.4) which rose to M = 4.3 (SD = 0.5) toward the end of the course [T(21) = -2.8, 95% CI -0.78 to-0.12, p = 0.011 (two-tailed)]. We obtained n = 314 headline reflections from the students and n = 95 from the faculty. For the students, the most frequent theme assigned to their headlines involved the concepts taught in the course such as "10 s for 10 min." For the faculty, the most frequent theme assigned to their headlines were reflections on how their simulation session worked for the students. The faculty rated students' teamwork skills higher after the last compared to the first debriefing. Undergraduate medical students can learn crucial teamwork skills in simulations supported by an experienced faculty and with a high degree of psychological safety. Both students and faculty appreciate the learning possibilities of simulation. At the same time, this learning can be challenging, intense and overwhelming. It takes a team to teach teamwork.