Antenatal corticosteroid prescribing: A complete audit cycle

Antenatal corticosteroid therapy, delivery intervals and perinatal mortality in low-resource settings

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty exists regarding the ideal interval between the administration of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) and delivery. The study's objective was to assess the risks of perinatal mortality and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) among preterm neonates whose mothers gave birth within 48 h of the administration of ACS and those whose mothers gave birth between 48 h and 7 days.

METHODS

The study design was a secondary analysis of data from an observational prospective chart review study that was carried out in Tanzania in 2020. Preterm infants born to mothers who got at least one dose of ACS between 28 and 34 weeks of pregnancy were included.

RESULTS

A total of 346 preterm neonates (294 singletons and 52 twins) were exposed to ACS. Compared to infants born 48 h following the first dose of ACS, those exposed to the drug between 48 h and 7 days had significantly decreased rates of perinatal mortality and RDS. Multivariable analysis revealed that infants exposed ACS between 48 h and 7 days prior to delivery had lower risk of perinatal mortality (aRR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.66) and RDS (aRR 0.27, 95% CI 0.14-0.52).

CONCLUSION

The first dose of ACS given between 48 h and 7 days before delivery was associated with a lower risk of perinatal mortality and RDS than when the first dose was given <48 h before delivery. To improve neonatal outcomes, healthcare providers should consider administering ACS to mothers at the appropriate time.

Missed opportunities for optimal antenatal corticosteroid timing in medically indicated preterm births

OBJECTIVE

Although delivery timing is physician dictated in indicated preterm births, suboptimal antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) administration occurs in most cases. We aimed to characterize the patterns of use of ACS in indicated preterm births and identify missed opportunities of optimal ACS administration.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of women who received ACS and were delivered due to maternal or fetal indications at 24-34 weeks of gestation during 2015-2017 at a university hospital. Optimal ACS timing was defined as delivery ≥24 h ≤7 d from the previous ACS course.

RESULTS

Overall, 188 pregnancies were included. The median gestational age at delivery was 32 weeks. Considering only the initial ACS course, the rate of optimal timing was 32.4%. Of 105 (55.8%) women eligible (delivery >7 d since the initial ACS course), only a third (n = 38) received a rescue ACS course. Among women who did not receive rescue ACS course despite their eligibility (n = 67), the decision-to-delivery was ≥3 h in 36 (53.7%), and ≥24 h in 20 (29.9%), representing 19.1 and 10.6% of the entire cohort, respectively. The urgency of the decision to deliver (i.e. in the upcoming 24 h and later) and allowing a trial of labor, were both positively associated with decision-to-delivery interval ≥3 h and ≥24 h. The rate of delivery within any optimal window (either initial or rescue course) was 40.4%, with gestational hypertensive disorders (OR [95% CI]: 2.40 (1.23, 4.72), p = .01) and decision to deliver made at first hospitalization (OR [95% CI]: 2.27 (1.04, 4.76), p = .04) as independent positive predictors of optimal ACS timing. The rate of composite adverse neonatal outcome was significantly lower in those with optimal ACS administration as compared to those with suboptimal timing (32.9 versus 50.9%, OR [95% CI]: 0.47 (0.26, 0.87), p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Suboptimal ACS administration occurred in most indicated preterm births. Underutilization of rescue ACS course and a substantial rate of missed opportunities for optimal ACS administration were identified as potentially modifiable contributors to improve ACS timing.