Serum biomarkers and Doppler pulsatile index increases likelihood ratio for prediction of preeclampsia in the second trimester of pregnancy

Clinical value of serum SIRT1 combined with uterine hemodynamics in predicting disease severity and fetal growth restriction in preeclampsia

Background

To investigate the effect and correlation of serum SIRT1 combined with uterine hemodynamic parameters on disease severity and fetal uterine growth restriction in the progression of preeclampsia, and to evaluate its clinical value as potential markers.

Methods

A total of 100 patients with preeclampsia who were hospitalized in Qufu Normal University Hospital from June 2017 to June 2021 were selected as the research objects. According to the severity, they were divided into Mild group (62 cases) and Severe group (38 cases), and according to whether the fetal growth restriction was combined or not, they were divided into the Combined fetal growth restriction group (56 cases) and the Uncomplicated fetal growth restriction group (44 cases). Serum SIRT1 levels and uterine artery hemodynamic parameters were detected, and spearman analysis was used to evaluate the association of serum SIRT1 levels and uterine artery hemodynamic parameters (peak-to-trough ratio of arterial blood velocity, pulsatility index, resistance index) with disease severity (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and random urinary protein levels) and fetal growth restriction (femoral length, biparietal diameter, head circumference and neonatal weight); unsupervised PCA analysis, supervised PLS-DA analysis, Cluster heat map analysis, ROC curve and AUC analysis were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum SIRT1 levels combined with uterine artery hemodynamic parameters in the severity of disease and fetal growth restriction in patients with preeclampsia.

Results

Serum SIRT1 levels was decreased in patients with severe preeclampsia (p < 0.0001), arterial blood flow velocity peak-to-trough ratio, pulsatility index and resistance index were increased (p < 0.001; p < 0.0001), and serum SIRT1 levels and uterine artery hemodynamic parameters were closely related to disease severity (p < 0.001; p < 0.0001). In addition, the levels of serum SIRT1 in patients with preeclampsia combined with fetal growth restriction was decreased (p < 0.0001), the peak-to-trough ratio of arterial blood flow velocity, pulsatility index and resistance index were increased (p < 0.0001), and serum SIRT1 levels and uterine artery hemodynamics were closely related to fetal growth restriction (p < 0.0001). Unsupervised PCA analysis and supervised PLS-DA analysis showed that patients with different severity of disease and patients with or without fetal growth restriction were similar within groups, and there were significant differences between groups; cluster heat map analysis showed that mild and severe groups were stratified clustering, the combined fetal growth restriction group and the uncombined group were hierarchically clustered; ROC curve and AUC analysis showed that serum SIRT1 levels combined with uterine artery hemodynamic parameters had a significant effect on the severity of preeclampsia and whether combined with fetal growth restriction high diagnostic value.

Conclusions

Serum SIRT1 combined with uterine hemodynamic parameters in preeclampsia is closely related to disease severity and fetal growth restriction, and is expected to become potential biomarkers for early clinical intervention in patients.

Clinical Value of Serum SIRT1 Combined with Uterine Hemodynamics in Predicting Disease Severity and Fetal Growth Restriction in Preeclampsia

Objective

The sirtuin regulator 1-related enzyme (SIRT1) has been shown to play an important role in various pathophysiological processes. Our aim was to investigate the effect and correlation of serum SIRT1 combined with uterine hemodynamic parameters on disease severity and fetal uterine growth restriction in the progression of preeclampsia and to evaluate its clinical value as a potential marker.

Methods

A total of 100 patients with preeclampsia who were hospitalized in Qufu Normal University Hospital from June 2017 to June 2021 were selected as the research objects. According to the severity, they were divided into the mild (62 cases) and severe groups (38 cases), and according to whether the fetal growth restriction was combined or not, they were divided into the combined fetal growth restriction group (56 cases) and the uncomplicated fetal growth restriction group (44 cases). Serum SIRT1 expression and uterine artery hemodynamic parameters were detected, and Spearman analysis was used to evaluate the association of serum SIRT1 expression and uterine artery hemodynamic parameters (the peak-to-trough ratio of arterial blood velocity, the pulsatility index, and the resistance index) with disease severity (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and random urinary protein levels) and fetal growth restriction (femoral length, biparietal diameter, head circumference, and neonatal weight); unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA), supervised partial least-squares discrimination analysis (PLS-DA), cluster heat map analysis, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the area under curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum SIRT1 expression combined with uterine artery hemodynamic parameters in the severity of disease and fetal growth restriction in patients with preeclampsia.

Results

Compared with patients with mild preeclampsia, serum SIRT1 expression was lower in patients with severe preeclampsia (p < 0.0001), the arterial blood flow velocity peak-to-trough ratio, pulsatility index, and resistance index were higher (p < 0.001; p < 0.0001); and serum SIRT1 expression and uterine artery hemodynamic parameters were closely related to disease severity (p < 0.001; p < 0.0001). In addition, the expression of serum SIRT1 in patients with preeclampsia combined with fetal growth restriction was lower than patients without preeclampsia (p < 0.0001); the peak-to-trough ratio of arterial blood flow velocity, the pulsatility index, and the resistance index were higher (p < 0.0001); and serum SIRT1 expression and uterine artery hemodynamics were closely related to fetal growth restriction (p < 0.0001). Unsupervised PCA analysis and supervised PLS-DA analysis showed that patients with different severity of disease and patients with or without fetal growth restriction were similar within the groups, and there were significant differences between the groups; cluster heat map analysis showed that the mild and severe groups were stratified clustering, and the combined fetal growth restriction group and the uncombined group were hierarchically clustered; ROC curve showed that the AUC of serum SIRT1 expression combined with uterine artery hemodynamic parameters was 0.776 in identifying the severity of preeclampsia and 0.956 in identifying the preeclampsia complicated by fetal growth restriction.

Conclusion

Serum SIRT1 combined with uterine hemodynamic parameters in preeclampsia is closely related to disease severity and fetal growth restriction and is expected to become a potential biomarker for early clinical intervention in patients.

Biophysical Markers of Suspected Preeclampsia, Fetal Growth Restriction and the Two Combined—How Accurate They Are?

Objectives—To conduct a secondary analysis of prediction accuracy of biophysical markers for suspected Preeclampsia (PE), Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR) and the two combined near delivery in a Slovenian cohort. Methods—This was a secondary analysis of a database of a total 125 Slovenian pregnant women attending a high-risk pregnancy clinic due to suspected PE (n = 31), FGR (n = 16) and PE + FGR (n = 42) from 28–39 weeks gestation and their corresponding term (n = 21) and preterm (PTD, n = 15) controls. Data for Mean Arterial blood Pressure (MAP) and Uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA PI) estimated by Doppler sonography were extracted from the database of patients who were tested at admission to the high-risk clinic with the suspected complications. The reactive hyperemia index (RHI), and the Augmentation Index (AIX%) were extracted from the patient database using measured values obtained with the assistance of the Endo PAT, a device set to measure the signal of the peripheral arterial tone (PAT) from the blood vessels endothelium. Linear regression coefficients, Box and Whisker plots, Area under the Curve (AUC) of receiver Operation Characteristic (ROC) curves, and multiple regression were used to assess the marker accuracy using detection rate (DR) and false-positive rate (FPR) and previously reported cut-offs for estimating the positive and negative predictive value (NPV and PPV). The SPSS non-parametric statistics (Kruskal Wallis and Mann–Whitney) and Spearman’s regression coefficient were used to assess marker accuracy; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results—MAP values reached diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.00, DR = 100%) for early PE cases delivered < 34, whereas UtA Doppler PI values yielded such results for early FGR < 34 weeks and the two combined reached such accuracy for PE + FGR. To reach diagnostic accuracy for all cases of the complications, the Endo PAT markers with values for MAP and UtA Doppler PI were required for cases near delivery. Multiple regression analyses showed added value for advanced maternal age and gestational week in risk assessment for all cases of PE, FGR, and PE + FGR. Spearman’s regression coefficient yielded r > 0.6 for UtA Doppler PI over GA for PE and FGR, whereas for RHI over BMI, the regression coefficient was r > 0.5 (p < 0.001 for each). Very high correlations were also found between UtA Doppler PI and sFlt-1/PlGF or PlGF (r = −0.495, p < 0.001), especially in cases of FGR. Conclusion—The classical biophysical markers MAP and UtA Doppler PI provided diagnostic accuracy for PE and FGR < 34 wks gestation. A multiple biophysical marker analysis was required to reach diagnostic accuracy for all cases of these complications. The UtA Doppler PI and maternal serum sFlt-1/PlGF or PlGF were equally accurate for early cases to enable the choice of the markers for the clinical use according to the more accessible method.