Blunt-tipped versus sharp-tipped needles: wound morbidity

Time to consider blunt needles for implant surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis shows that blunt suture needles reduce glove perforation

BACKGROUND

Despite a recent Cochrane Review demonstrating blunt suture needles are safer for surgeons, the use of blunt suture needles has not become widely adopted. In the 'Implant Era', with the value of medical implant companies to surpass $145 billion by 2027, should we re-examine the use of blunt suture needles, especially to reduce infection in implant surgery? We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing whether blunt suture needles reduce risks to surgeons and patients.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE databases were searched for RCTs. Dichotomous variables were pooled as risk ratios (RR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the MH method. Random or fixed effects modelling use was based on statistical heterogeneity (I2).

RESULTS

14 RCTs were identified with 2488 patients. The RCTs included laparotomies, caesarean sections, episiotomies, and orthopaedic surgeries. Blunt suture needles when compared with sharp needles resulted in a significant reduction in glove perforation; RR: 0.47, 95% CI [0.37 to 0.60] and needlestick injuries, RR: 0.50, 95% CI [0.26 to 0.97]. Sharp needles caused more wound infections, but the result was not statistically significant; RR: 2.73, 95% CI [0.54 to 13.76], p 0.22. Surgeon's satisfaction decreased with blunt needles compared with sharp (RR: 1.22, 95% CI [1.09 to 1.37]).

CONCLUSION

Blunt suture needles are safer than sharp needles for surgeons and likely reduce risks to patients. This, however, comes at the cost of decreased ease of use. The authors recommend the routine use of blunt suture needles, especially in implant surgery.

FIGO good practice recommendations on surgical techniques to improve safety and reduce complications during cesarean delivery

FIGO is actively contributing to the global effort to reduce maternal morbidity, mortality, and disability worldwide. Cesarean delivery rates are increasing globally, without signs of slowing down. Bleeding associated with cesarean delivery has become an important cause of hemorrhage-related maternal deaths in many low- and middle-income countries. Correct surgical techniques to improve safety and reduce complications of cesarean delivery is of the utmost importance. This article presents FIGO's good practice recommendations for effective surgical techniques to reduce cesarean complications. Evidence-based information is included where data are available. An expanded WHO Surgical Safety Checklist for maternity cases is suggested. Different incision techniques through the layers of the abdominal wall with appropriate indications are discussed. Hysterotomy through a transverse incision is described, as are indications for low vertical and classical incisions. Important precautions when extracting the fetus are explained. Uterine closure includes a safe method ensuring adequate reapproximation of the upper segment if a vertical incision is made. The paper concludes with the management of two common bleeding problems following delivery of the placenta.

ECLAPTE: Effective Closure of LAParoTomy in Emergency-2023 World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines for the closure of laparotomy in emergency settings

Laparotomy incisions provide easy and rapid access to the peritoneal cavity in case of emergency surgery. Incisional hernia (IH) is a late manifestation of the failure of abdominal wall closure and represents frequent complication of any abdominal incision: IHs can cause pain and discomfort to the patients but also clinical serious sequelae like bowel obstruction, incarceration, strangulation, and necessity of reoperation. Previous guidelines and indications in the literature consider elective settings and evidence about laparotomy closure in emergency settings is lacking. This paper aims to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) project called ECLAPTE (Effective Closure of LAParoTomy in Emergency): the final manuscript includes guidelines on the closure of emergency laparotomy.

Cesarean delivery: an evidence-based review of the technique

The cesarean section is utilized to deliver babies since the late 19^th century. Nowadays, the frequency of cesarean section is increased, mainly because of the low rate of complications and for the increasing demand from future mothers, scared by the idea of painful labor. Although the technique to perform cesarean section has been refined over time, infections, hemorrhage, pain and other consequences still represent matter of debate. To try to reduce the incidence of these complications many trials, randomized or not, have been performed, with the aim to analyze different technical aspects of this surgery. The aim of our review was to resume all the evidence-based instructions on how to best approach to cesarean section practice, in a step-to-step fashion, considering pre-operative actions, opening and closing steps, and postoperative prophylaxis.

Dual-hemostat port closure technique with customized surgical suture after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

Dual-hemostat techniques for port closure have previously been reported, but their safety and efficacy have not been evaluated. Here, we describe the dual-hemostat port closure technique employed at our institution, which uses a customized surgical suture for safe and certain port closure, and we assess the incidence rate of trocar-site hernia (TSH) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

From March 1999 to March 2017 at our institution, 316 patients underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a single experienced surgeon. We routinely used a dual-hemostat technique with a customized surgical suture to achieve safe and certain port closure. We assessed the incidence rate of TSH after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (defined as a reoperation for a TSH or clinical hernia at the port site) based on follow-up data from patient questionnaires and clinical examinations.

RESULTS

After 67 patients were excluded because of death, unknown address, or conversion to open cholecystectomy, 249 eligible patients received questionnaires, of which 173 were returned (response rate, 69.5%). From these responses, TSH was suspected in three patients, but only one underwent reoperation for TSH after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Thus, the incidence rate of TSH after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 0.6% (1/173).

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-center experience demonstrated that our port closure technique using a dual-hemostat technique with customized surgical suture provides an appropriate option for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, especially given its ease and low incidence of TSH.

The impact of subcutaneous tissue suturing at caesarean section on wound complications: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Caesarean wound complications are frequently observed in everyday practice.

OBJECTIVES

To study whether subcutaneous tissue closure following caesarean section results in decreased wound complications.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We systematically searched Medline (1966-2016), Scopus (2004-2016), ClinicalTrials.gov (2008-2016) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL (1999-2016) databases together with reference lists from included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials that investigated the impact of subcutaneous tissue suturing on wound complications following caesarean section were held eligible for inclusion. Retrospective studies and prospective nonrandomised studies were excluded from the present meta-analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The methodological quality of studies was assessed with the Jadad scale. Statistical meta-analysis was performed with the RevMan 5.3 software.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten studies were finally included in our meta-analysis, which involved 3696 women delivered by caesarean section. Re-approximation of the subcutaneous tissue significantly reduced the odds of developing any type of wound complication [3811 women, random effects model (REM), odds ratio (OR) 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.93]. The incidence of seroma was also decreased (1979 women, REM, OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.84). On the other hand, the incidence of haematoma remained unaffected by subcutaneous closure (1663 women, REM, OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.22-2.42) as well as the likelihood of developing a wound infection (1971 women, REM, OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.70-1.41).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our meta-analysis suggest that subcutaneous tissue closure may benefit women undergoing caesarean section. Current data in women with high body mass index remain very limited; hence, definitive conclusions are precluded for this specific group.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Subcutaneous tissue closure may benefit women undergoing caesarean section.

Blunt versus sharp suture needles for preventing percutaneous exposure incidents in surgical staff

BACKGROUND

Surgeons and their assistants are especially at risk of exposure to blood due to glove perforations and needle stick injuries during operations. The use of blunt needles can reduce this risk because they don't penetrate skin easily but still perform sufficiently in other tissues.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of blunt needles compared to sharp needles for preventing percutaneous exposure incidents among surgical staff.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (until May 2011), CENTRAL, NHSEED, Science Citation Index Expanded, CINAHL, Nioshtic, CISdoc, PsycINFO, and LILACS (until September 2010).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of blunt versus sharp suture needles for preventing needle stick injuries among surgical staff measured as glove perforations or self-reported needle stick injuries.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study eligibility and risk of bias in trials and extracted data. We synthesized study results with a fixed-effect model meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

We located 10 RCTs involving 2961 participating surgeons performing an operation in which the use of blunt needles was compared to the use of sharp needles. Four studies focused on abdominal closure, two on caesarean section, two on vaginal repair and two on hip replacement. On average, a surgeon that used sharp needles sustained one glove perforation in three operations. The use of blunt needles reduced the risk of glove perforations with a relative risk (RR) of 0.46 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 0.54) compared to sharp needles. The use of blunt needles will thus prevent one glove perforation in every six operations.In four studies, the use of blunt needles reduced the number of self-reported needle stick injuries with a RR of 0.31 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.68). Because the force needed for the blunt needles is higher, their use was rated as more difficult but still acceptable in five out of six studies.The quality of the evidence was rated as high.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is high quality evidence that the use of blunt needles appreciably reduces the risk of exposure to blood and bodily fluids for surgeons and their assistants over a range of operations. It is unlikely that future research will change this conclusion.

Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to provide evidenced-based guidance for surgical decisions during cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and COCHRANE searches with the terms cesarean section, cesarean delivery, cesarean, pregnancy, randomized trials, and each technical aspect of cesarean delivery. All randomized trials that covered a surgical aspect of cesarean delivery were included in the review. Each surgical step of cesarean delivery was reviewed separately.

RESULTS

US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations favor blunt uterine incision expansion, prophylactic antibiotics (either ampicillin or first-generation cephalosporin for just 1 dose), spontaneous placental removal, non-closure of both visceral and parietal peritoneum, and suture closure or drain of the subcutaneous tissue when thickness is > or =2 cm.

CONCLUSION

Cesarean delivery techniques that are supported by good quality recommendations should be performed routinely. All technical aspects that have recommendations with lower quality should be researched with adequately powered and designed trials.

Techniques and materials for closure of the abdominal wall in caesarean section

BACKGROUND

There is a variety of techniques for closing the abdominal wall during caesarean section. Some methods may be better in terms of postoperative recovery and other important outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of alternative techniques for closure of the rectus sheath and subcutaneous fat on maternal health and healthcare resource use.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (September 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2003), EMBASE (1980 to September 2003), CINAHL (1983 to September 2003) and CAB Health (1973 to September 2003), and the reference lists of included articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials making any of the following comparisons: (a) any suturing technique or material used for closure of the rectus sheath versus any other; (b) closure versus non-closure of subcutaneous fat; (c) any suturing technique or material used for closure of the subcutaneous fat versus any other; (d) any type of needle for repair of the abdominal wall in caesarean section versus any other; (e) any other comparison of methods of abdominal wall closure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both reviewers evaluated trials for eligibility and methodological quality without consideration of their results.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies involving 2056 women were included. The risk of haematoma or seroma was reduced with fat closure compared with non-closure (relative risk (RR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.82), as was the risk of 'wound complication' (haematoma, seroma, wound infection or wound separation) (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.88). No difference in the risk of wound infection alone or other short-term outcomes was found. No long-term outcomes were reported. There was no difference in the risk of wound infection between blunt needles and sharp needles in one small study. No studies were found examining suture techniques or materials for closure of the rectus sheath or subcutaneous fat.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Closure of the subcutaneous fat may reduce wound complications but it is unclear to what extent these differences affect the well-being and satisfaction of the women concerned.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Further trials are justified to investigate whether the apparent increased risk of haematoma or seroma with non-closure of the subcutaneous fat is real. These should use a broader range of short- and long-term outcomes, and ensure that they are adequately powered to detect clinically important differences. Further research comparing blunt and sharp needles is justified, as are trials evaluating suturing materials and suturing techniques for the rectus sheath.