LOUPE-ASSISTED MODIFIED ONE-LAYER VASOVASOSTOMY

One-layer macroscopic verus two-layer microscopic vasovasostomy: Our experience in two referral hospitals

Objective:

Vasovasostomy is the most common surgery to restore the fertility of vasectomized men. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of one-layer macroscopic VV (MOLVV) or two-layer microscopic VV (TLMVV)

Methods:

This study was performed on the medical records of 100 patients who underwent VV surgery in two tertiary hospitals from 2014 to 2017. All patient information, including demographic and sperm analysis, was collected. The chi-square test, independent t-test, and survival analysis using Kaplan–Meyer test and Cox regression were performed to analyze the data using SPSS software version 25, and the significance level was considered 0.05.

Results:

The fertility rate in patients of both groups was 15%. The findings showed a statistically significant difference between the mean percentage of normal sperm morphology according to the type of surgery ( p = 0.045). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean sperm count, sperm motility percentage, and mean hospital costs according to the type of surgical procedure ( p > 0.05). The incidence of spouse pregnancy in the TLMVV method after 15 and 24 months was 87.5% and 58.3%, respectively. In patients with unilateral anastomosis, the incidence of pregnancy at 13 and 15 months after surgery was 98.7% and 95.8%, respectively. The mean and median time of pregnancy in the spouses of patients with each surgical shower were 24 and 25 months. Other variables had no significant effect on spouse pregnancy.

Conclusion:

Vasovasostomy with the one and two-layer methods had equal results. The number, movement, and normal morphology of sperm after surgery were low. Therefore, these people will need assisted reproductive techniques.

Treatment of failed vasectomy reversal using a microsurgical two-layer anastomosis technique

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the application of a microsurgical two-layer anastomosis technique in the treatment of failed vasectomy reversal.

METHODS

A microsurgical two-layer anastomosis was used in a series of 24 patients with confirmed anastomotic obstruction after previous vasectomy reversal. The patients were followed up for 9 months to 6 years, and the efficacy of the procedure was evaluated by regular seminal analysis and pregnancy records. The results were compared with those obtained from 34 patients who had received primary microsurgical vasovasostomy in our hospital using the same microsurgical technique.

RESULTS

In the treatment group for failed vasectomy reversal patients, the postoperative patency rate was 87.5% (21/24), resulting in a pregnancy rate of 54.2% (13/24). In primary reversal group, the postoperative patency rate was 94.1% (32/34), resulting in a pregnancy rate of 67.6% (23/34). Both the patency and pregnancy rate were not significantly different between these two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy provided satisfactory patency rate and natural pregnancy rate for patients with a previous failed vasectomy reversal, which is comparable with the results of patients who had undergone primary procedure.

Loupe-assisted vs microsurgical technique for modified one-layer vasovasostomy: is the microsurgery really better?

OBJECTIVES

To compare the outcome of loupe-assisted, modified one-layer vasovasostomy (MOLV) and conventional microsurgical MOLV for vasectomy reversal.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data for 74 patients who had a MOLV between 1993 and 2003; 42 had the standard microsurgical (x10-16) MOLV (group 1, mean age 40.5 years, SD 6.3, range 30-58) and 32 a loupe-assisted (x 3) MOLV (group 2, mean age 41.3 years, SD 6, range 28-64). With general anaesthesia, each operation was performed as an outpatient procedure or with hospitalization for one night after surgery. The patients' characteristics, patency rate, paternity rate, and operative duration were compared.

RESULTS

The mean (SD, range) duration of obstruction was 8.1 (5.0, 0.33-25) years in group 1 and 9.2 (4.8, 0.33-27) years in group 2. The postoperative patency and pregnancy rates were 91% and 43% for group 1 and 89% and 39% for group 2. There were no complications during or after surgery in either group, but the surgery was significantly faster for group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in the patency and paternity rates between loupe-assisted and microsurgical MOLV. The surgery was significantly faster with the loupe-assisted method. Because of the shorter operation duration and less expensive instruments required that should reduce the cost, the loupe-assisted MOLV should be considered as the best choice for simple vasectomy reversal.