Methacholine dose response curve and acceptability criteria of respiratory mechanics modeling

Signal processing to remove spurious contributions to the assessment of respiratory mechanics

Signal disruptions in small animals during the realization of the Forced Oscillation Technique are a well-known cause of data loss as it leads to non-reliable estimations of the respiratory impedance. In this work, we assessed the effects of removing the disrupted epoch when a 3-seconds input signal composed of one and a half 2-seconds full cycle is used.

We tested our hypothesis in 25 SAMR1 mice under different levels of bronchoconstriction due to methacholine administration by iv bolus injections in different doses (15 animals) and by iv continuous infusion in different infusion rates (10 animals). Signal disruptions were computationally simulated as sharp drops in the pressure signal within a short timescale, and signal processing was performed using own developed algorithms.

We found that the model goodness of fit worsens when averaging techniques to estimate the input respiratory impedance are not used. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the comparison between Constant Phase Model parameters of the full 3-s signal and the 2-s non disrupted epoch in all doses or infusion rates for both methacholine delivery strategies.

The proposed technique presents reliable outcomes that can reduce animal use in Forced Oscillation Technique realization.

Respiratory mechanics during methacholine bolus and continuous infusion protocols in asthma model

Balb/c mice respiratory mechanics was studied in two intravenous methacholine (MCh) protocols: bolus and continuous infusion. The Constant Phase Model (CPM) was used in this study. The harmonic distortion index (k_d) was used to assess the respiratory system nonlinearity. The analysis of variance showed difference between groups (OVA vs control) and among doses for both protocols. Bolus protocol posttest: there was a difference between OVA and control at 0.3 and 1 mg/kg doses (p<0.0001 and p<0.001) for R_n. Infusion: there was a difference between OVA and control at 192 μg.kg^-1.min^-1 dose for R_n, G and H, (p<0.01; p<0.001; p<0.001). An increment was found in k_d values near to the observed peak values in bolus protocol. The bolus protocol could better differentiate inflamed and non-inflamed airway resistance, whereas the differences between OVA and control in continuous infusion protocol were associated to airway- and, mainly, parenchyma-related parameters. Moreover, the bolus protocol presented a higher nonlinear degree compared to the infusion protocol.

Drug class effects on respiratory mechanics in animal models: access and applications

Assessment of respiratory mechanics extends from basic research and animal modeling to clinical applications in humans. However, to employ the applications in human models, it is desirable and sometimes mandatory to study non-human animals first. To acquire further precise and controlled signals and parameters, the animals studied must be further distant from their spontaneous ventilation. The majority of respiratory mechanics studies use positive pressure ventilation to model the respiratory system. In this scenario, a few drug categories become relevant: anesthetics, muscle blockers, bronchoconstrictors, and bronchodilators. Hence, the main objective of this study is to briefly review and discuss each drug category, and the impact of a drug on the assessment of respiratory mechanics. Before and during the positive pressure ventilation, the experimental animal must be appropriately sedated and anesthetized. The sedation will lower the pain and distress of the studied animal and the plane of anesthesia will prevent the pain. With those drugs, a more controlled procedure is carried out; further, because many anesthetics depress the respiratory system activity, a minimum interference of the animal's respiration efforts are achieved. The latter phenomenon is related to muscle blockers, which aim to minimize respiratory artifacts that may interfere with forced oscillation techniques. Generally, the respiratory mechanics are studied under appropriate anesthesia and muscle blockage. The application of bronchoconstrictors is prevalent in respiratory mechanics studies. To verify the differences among studied groups, it is often necessary to challenge the respiratory system, for example, by pharmacologically inducing bronchoconstriction. However, the selected bronchoconstrictor, doses, and administration can affect the evaluation of respiratory mechanics. Although not prevalent, studies have applied bronchodilators to return (airway resistance) to the basal state after bronchoconstriction. The drug categories can influence the mathematical modeling of the respiratory system, systemic conditions, and respiratory mechanics outcomes.