Safety and efficacy of radiofrequency-assisted ALPPS (RALPPS) in patients with cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Circulating proliferative factors versus portal inflow redistribution: mechanistic insights of ALPPS-derived rapid liver regeneration

Background

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) can induce accelerated regeneration of future liver remnant (FLR) and effectively reduce the occurrence of liver failure due to insufficient FLR after hepatectomy, thereby increasing the probability of radical resection for previously inoperable patients with liver cancer. However, the exact mechanism by which ALPPS accelerates liver regeneration remains elusive.

Methods

A review of the literature was performed utilizing MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases in March of 2024. The key words "liver regeneration/hypertrophy", "portal vein ligation/embolization", "two-stage hepatectomy", "liver partition/split" and "future liver remnant" in combination with "mechanisms", "hemodynamics", "cytokines", "growth factors" or "collaterals" were searched in the title and/or abstract. The references of relevant articles were reviewed to identify additional eligible publications.

Results

Previously, a widely accepted view is that the primary role of liver splitting in ALPPS stage 1 is to accelerate liver regeneration by promoting proliferative factor release, but increasing evidence in recent years reveal that not the circulating factors, but the portal hemodynamic alternations caused by liver parenchyma transection play a pivotal role in ALPPS-associated rapid liver hypertrophy.

Conclusion

Parenchyma transection-induced portal hemodynamic alternations are the main triggers or driving forces of accelerated liver regeneration following ALPPS. The release of circulating proliferative factors seems to be a secondary response to liver splitting and plays an auxiliary role in this process.

Liver resection with two-step vascular exclusion, in situ hypothermic portal perfusion for the treatment of end-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of two-step vascular exclusion and in situ hypothermic portal perfusion in patients with end-stage hepatic hydatidosis.

METHODS

This study involved patients with advanced hepatic hydatid disease undergoing surgical treatment between 2022 and 2023, which included resection and reconstruction of the hepatic veins, inferior vena cava (IVC), and portal vein (PV). We described the technical details of liver resection and vascular reconstruction, as well as the use of two-step vascular exclusion and in situ hypothermic portal perfusion techniques during the vascular reconstruction process.

RESULT

We included 7 patients with advanced hepatic hydatid disease who underwent surgical resection using two-step vascular exclusion and in situ hypothermic portal perfusion. The mean duration of surgery was 12.5 h (range, 7.5-15.0 h). The average hepatic ischemia time was 45 min (range, 25-77 min), while the occlusion time of the IVC was 87 min (range, 72-105 min). The total blood loss was 1000 milliliters (range, 500-1250 milliliters). Postoperatively, patients exhibited good recovery of liver and renal function. The mean ICU stay was 2 days (range, 1-3 days), and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 13 days (range, 9-16 days), with no Grade III or above complications observed during a mean follow-up period of 15 months (range, 9-24 months), CONCLUSION: two-step vascular exclusion and in situ hypothermic portal perfusion for surgical resection of end-stage hepatic hydatid disease is safe and effective. This significantly reduces the anhepatic time.

Sequential Portal Vein Embolization and Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Future Liver Remnant Growth: A Minimally Invasive Alternative to ALPPS Stage-1 in Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of sequential portal vein embolization (PVE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (PVE+RFA) as a minimally invasive variant for associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) stage-1 in treatment of cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: For HCC patients with insufficient FLR, right-sided PVE was first performed, followed by percutaneous RFA to the tumor as a means to trigger FLR growth. When the FLR reached a safe level (at least 40%) and the blood biochemistry tests were in good condition, the hepatectomy was performed. FLR dynamic changes and serum biochemical tests were evaluated. Postoperative complications, mortality, intraoperative data and long-term oncological outcome were also recorded.

Results: Seven patients underwent PVE+RFA for FLR growth between March 2016 and December 2019. The median baseline of FLR was 353 ml (28%), which increased to 539 (44%) ml after 8 (7–18) days of this strategy (p < 0.05). The increase of FLR ranged from 40% to 140% (median 47%). Five patients completed hepatectomy. The median interval between PVE+RFA and hepatectomy was 19 (15–27) days. No major morbidity ≥ III of Clavien-Dindo classification or in-hospital mortality occurred. One patient who did not proceed to surgery died within 90 days after discharge. After a median follow-up of 18 (range 3–50) months, five patients were alive.

Conclusion: Sequential PVE+RFA is a feasible and effective strategy for FLR growth prior to extended hepatectomy and may provide a minimally invasive alternative for ALPPS stage-1 for treatment of patients with cirrhosis-related HCC.

Rescue radiofrequency ablation or percutaneous ethanol injection: a strategy for failed RALPPS stage-1 in patients with cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

The future liver remnant (FLR) faces a risk of poor growth in patients with cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after stage-1 radiofrequency-assisted ALPPS (RALPPS). The present study presents a strategy to trigger further FLR growth using supplementary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI).

Methods

At RALPPS stage-1 the portal vein branch was ligated, followed by intraoperative RFA creating a coagulated avascular area between the FLR and the deportalized lobes. During the interstage period, patients not achieving sufficient liver size (≥ 40%) within 2–3 weeks underwent additional percutaneous RFA/PEI of the deportalized lobes (rescue RFA/PEI) in an attempt to further stimulate FLR growth.

Results

Seven patients underwent rescue RFA/PEI after RALPPS stage-1. In total five RFAs and eight PEIs were applied in these patients. The kinetic growth rate (KGR) was highest the first week after RALPPS stage-1 (10%, range − 1% to 15%), and then dropped to 1.5% (0–9%) in the second week (p < 0.05). With rescue RFA/PEI applied, KGR increased significantly to 4% (2–5%) compared with that before the rescue procedures (p < 0.05). Five patients proceeded to RALPPS stage-2. Two patients failed: In one patient the FLR remained at a constant level even after four rescue PEIs. The other patient developed metastasis. Except one patient died after RALPPS stage-2, no severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) occurred among remaining six patients.

Conclusions

Rescue RFA/PEI may provide an alternative to trigger further growth of the FLR in patients with cirrhosis-related HCC showing insufficient FLR after RALPPS stage-1.

Trial registration Retrospectively registered.

The role of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in the management of patients with colorectal liver metastasis

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) approach emerged as a promising surgical strategy for rapid and large hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) when a major liver resection is necessary. Colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is their main indication. However, the promising results published so far, are very difficult to interpret since they usually focus on the technique and not on the underlying disease. Moreover, they are usually made up of complex populations, which received different chemotherapy schemes, with the ALPPS technical variations implemented over time and without consistent long-term follow-up results as well. Whereby, its role in CRLM should be analyzed as carefully as possible to indicate and select the best candidates who will benefit the most from this approach. We conducted a computerized search using PubMed and Google Scholar for reports published so far, using mesh headings and keywords related to the ALPPS and CRLM.

Safety, feasibility, and efficacy of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in treating hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) allows radical resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). However, the effect of ALPPS on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not completely understood. This systematic review aimed to examine the existing data on the safety, feasibility, and oncologic effect of ALPPS on HCC. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase, were systemically searched to identify articles on ALPPS and HCC. Additional articles were identified manually. The feasibility (liver hypertrophy between two stages), safety (90-day mortality), and therapeutic effect (long-term survival) were analyzed. Nine published articles that satisfied the retrieval standards were included, and these studies involved 176 patients. The evidence level of the enrolled studies was low, among which, the greatest Oxford evidence level was 2c. Additionally, the average median increase in future liver volume was 178 mL, the average interval between two stages was 11.2 days, the interval was remarkably longer in radiofrequency-assisted ALPPS (RALPPS) patients (28 days), and the average 90-day mortality was 17.6% (range, 0–50%). However, the oncological outcomes were not well documented. Survival following ALPPS was evidently improved compared with that after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). This value was comparable to that following the one-stage hepatectomy and portal vein embolization (PVE), and it was similar to that in CRLM patients over the long term. Publication biases caused by case series and single-center reports are common in the review. It is concluded in this review that ALPPS is a safe and feasible approach to treat selected patients with unresectable HCC, but its oncological outcome requires further study. RALPPS is not recommended for HCC patients because of the long waiting time between the two stages.

ALPPS for hepatocarcinoma under cirrhosis: a feasible alternative to portal vein embolization

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and malignant tumors. Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is currently the most accepted treatment before major hepatic resection for HCC in patients with liver fibrosis or cirrhosis and associated insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). In the last decade, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) technique has been described to obtain an increase of volume regarding PVE and a decrease of drop out. The initial excessive morbidity and mortality of this technique have decreased drastically due to a better selection of patients, the learning curve and the use of less aggressive variations of the original technique in the first stage. For both techniques a complete preoperative assessment of the FLR is the most important issue and only patients with and adequate FLR should be resected. ALPPS could be a feasible technique in very selected patients with HCC and cirrhosis. As long as it is performed in an experienced center could be used as a first choice technique versus PVE or could be used as a rescue technique in case of PVE failure.

Percutaneous Radio-frequency Assisted Liver Partition with Portal vein embolization in Staged liver resection (PRALPPS) in patients with perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: evaluation of short-term results

Objective. To estimate the short-term results of modified variant of ALPPS (PRALPPS) in patients with perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Material and methods. Procedure was indicated for future liver remnant <40%.

Results. PRALPPS was applied in 13 patients and completed in 10 patients. Degree of hypertrophy and kinetic growth rate were 48 and 4.3%/day respectively. Major morbidity (>II) after the stage 1 and 2 was presented in 3 (only IIIa) and 7 patients, respectively.

Conclusion. PRALPPS may be considered as an effective and safe procedure in patients with perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Tourniquet-ALPPS is a promising treatment for very large hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

When very large hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCCs) with insufficient future liver remnants are treated using associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), the outcome is often poor. We therefore tested the efficacy of a modified version of that technique, tourniquet-ALPPS. A review of the literature examining outcomes of HCC and IHCC patients treated with ALPPS revealed the incidences of morbidity ≥ III and postoperative mortality to be respectively 20.7% and 16.1% among HCC patients and 50% and 45.4% among IHCC patients. In the present case series, in which HCC and IHCC patients were treated with tourniquet-ALPPS, median tumor size was 100 mm (range: 70-200 mm). After surgical stage I, there was no morbidity, no mortality and the median future liver remnant had increased at day 7 by 76%. In surgical stage II, 100% of tumors were resectable (8 right trisectionectomies, 5 with inferior vena cava resection). Two patients experienced serious morbidity ≥ IIIB and 1 patient died (11%). One- and 3-year overall survival was 75% and 60%, respectively. Thus tourniquet-ALPPS appears to be an effective alternative to classical ALPPS for the treatment of patients with HCC or IHCC.

Hypertrophy and Liver Function in ALPPS: Correlation with Morbidity and Mortality

Background

ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) was introduced with the promise to reduce posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in extended hepatectomies but has higher morbidity and mortality rates compared to conventional methods of volume enhancement. There are few studies of the incidence of PHLF after ALPPS and little information on how to avoid PHLF by functional testing. It remains unclear what causes the compromise in liver function despite rapid volume gain and if any of the modifications proposed reduce the incidence of PHLF. This review summarizes published data on this topic.

Methods

This is a systematic review that studies literature on the incidence of liver failure and assessment of liver function following ALPPS as well as modifications of the existing technique. Articles were searched in PubMed, evaluated, selected, and tabulated.

Results

The literature search revealed 326 articles that met the selection criteria. PHLF criteria as defined by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) were the most commonly used criteria, but PHLF was frequently not defined. PHLF occurred most frequently after stage 2 of ALPPS at around 30% in most larger studies. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy showed a discrepancy between volume and functional growth of the liver. Function increase was only 50% compared to volume increase. Mechanistic explanations using histologic analyses have been given to explain the immaturity of the liver after rapid hypertrophy. Modifications of ALPPS showed a comparable volumetric gain when compared to classic ALPPS, but data were lacking to assess PHLF.

Conclusion

ALPPS has relatively high rates of PHLF, morbidity, and mortality. This may be explained by data demonstrating functional growth when compared to volume growth. ALPPS should not be performed without functional assessment and with caution.