Stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of subcardiac hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study

Stereotactic ablation: A game changer?

For both primary and metastatic liver cancer, thermal ablation represents an interesting alternative to surgery. However, except for a small fraction of patients, conventional ultrasound- and CT-guided single-probe approaches have not achieved oncologic outcomes comparable with surgery. In this overview, we describe our stereotactic ablation workflow and discuss the short- and long-term results of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) and stereotactic microwave ablation (SMWA) for the treatment of primary and secondary liver tumours. The advantages of this method are discussed together with a summary of the existing stereotactic techniques for thermal ablation and the clinical data that support them. Stereotactic ablation is based on an optical navigation system and a specialized aiming tool. The workflow includes advanced three-dimensional planning, precise needle/probe placements according to the plan and intraoperative image fusion to check the needle positions and the ablation margins. Stereotactic ablation offers all the advantages of a minimally invasive procedure while producing oncological results comparable with surgery. The number of locally treatable liver cancers may be significantly expanded with these cutting-edge instruments and methods. We firmly believe that it can become a cornerstone in the treatment of liver cancers.

Non-Surgical Locoregional Therapies Alone or in Combination with Systemic Therapy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer, representing the third-leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Curative intent treatment options for patients with HCC include liver transplantation, resection and ablation of small lesions. Other potentially curative therapies include cryoablation, microwave ablation and percutaneous alcohol injection. For locally advanced disease, different arterially directed therapies including transarterial chemoembolization and selective internal radiation therapy, plus external beam radiation including three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy and proton beam therapy, are available or studied. Systemic therapies based on checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are available for the management of metastatic HCC and sometimes for locally advanced disease. Combinations of locoregional therapies with systemic drugs are currently the subject of several clinical trials.

Reliability of Stereotactic Radiofrequency Ablation (SRFA) for Malignant Liver Tumors: Novice versus Experienced Operators

PURPOSE

To compare the results of a novice with those of experienced interventional radiologists (IRs) for stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) of malignant liver tumors in terms of safety, technical success, and local tumor control.

METHODS

A database, including all SRFA procedures performed in a single center between January 2011 and December 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. A total of 39 ablation sessions performed by a novice IR were compared to the results of three more experienced IRs. Comparative SRFA sessions were selected using propensity score matching considering tumor type, age, sex, tumor size, and tumor number as matching variables. Overall, 549 target tumors were treated in 273 sessions. Median tumor size was 2.2 cm (1.0-8.5 cm) for 178 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and 3.0 cm (0.5-13.0 cm) for 371 metastases. A median of 2 (1-11) tumors were treated per session.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed when comparing the results of more experienced IRs with those of a novice IR regarding the rates of major complications (6.8% [16/234] vs. 5.1% [2/39]; p = 0.477), mortality (1.3% [2/234] vs. 0% [0/39]; p = 0.690), primary technical efficacy (98.5% [525/533] vs. 98.9% [94/95]; p = 0.735), and local recurrence (5.6% [30/533] vs. 5.3% [5/95]; p = 0.886). However, the median planning/placement time was significantly shorter for the experienced IRs (92 min vs. 119 min; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

SRFA is a safe, effective, and reliable treatment option for malignant liver tumors and favorable outcomes can be achieved even by inexperienced operators with minimal supervision.

Safety of CT-Guided Microwave Ablation of Subcardiac Liver Tumors

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety of CT-guided microwave ablation (MWA) of subcardiac hepatic tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 19 patients (11 males and 8 females, age: 64.0 years (IQR: 58.3, 71.0) who underwent CT-guided MWA of 22 subcardiac tumors from January 2016 through December 2020. The subcardiac tumors consisted of 6 hepatocellular carcinomas and 16 metastases. Hydrodissection or other thermal protection technique was not used during the ablation. Subcardiac ablation was defined as the ablation zone extended ≤ 0.5 cm from myocardium or coronary artery. The safety of MWA of subcardiac tumors was evaluated based on procedural and post-procedural complications and intra-procedural ECG changes. Local tumor progression (LTP) was also analyzed and correlated with tumor and ablation zone sizes.

RESULTS

The primary efficacy rate was 100%. The median follow-up was 20.5 months (IQR: 6.0, 29.8). There was no 30-day mortality. One grade 3 complication occurred (severe shoulder and chest pain), and there were 19 events of grade 1 or 2 complications. No instances of cardiac complications or significant procedural ECG changes were observed. There were 22 events of grade 1 and 2 laboratory toxicity and 1 event of grade 3 elevated bilirubin. The LTP was 13.6% at 1 year and 22.7% at 2 years. There was no significant correlation between LTP and tumor or ablation zone sizes.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided MWA of subcardiac hepatic tumors is safe, and MWA should be considered as an option for managing subcardiac tumors. LTP rates for MWA of subcardiac tumors may be inferior to ablation of tumors in common location.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

Cohort Study.

Stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of tumors at the hepatic venous confluence

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is subject to "heat-sink" effects, particularly for treatment of tumors adjacent to major vessels.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 104 patients with 137 tumors (40 HCC, 10 ICC and 54 metastatic liver tumors) close to (≤1 cm from) the hepatic venous confluence underwent stereotactic RFA (SRFA) between June 2003 and June 2018. Median tumor size was 3.7 cm (1.4-8.5) for HCC, 6.4 cm (0.5-11) for ICC and 3.8 cm (0.5-13) for metastases. Endpoints comprised safety, local tumor control, overall and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

The overall major complication rate was 16.0% (20/125 ablations), where 8 (40%) were successfully treated by the interventional radiologist in the same anesthetic session and did not prolong hospital stay. 134/137 (97.8%) tumors were successfully ablated at initial SRFA. Local recurrence (LR) developed in 19/137 tumors (13.9%). The median and overall survival (OS) rates at 1-, 3-, and 5- years from the date of the first SRFA were 51.5 months, 73.5%, 67.0%, and 49.7% for HCC, 14.6 months, 60.0%, 32.0% and 32.0% for ICC and 38.1 months, 91.4%, 56.5% and 27.9% for metastatic disease, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SRFA represents a viable alternative to hepatic resection for challenging tumors at the hepatic venous confluence.

Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors

PURPOSE

To assess the technical outcome and local tumor control of multi-probe stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) in a large series of patients. Furthermore, to determine factors accounting for adverse outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2003 and 2018, 865 patients were treated by SRFA for 2653 primary and metastatic liver tumors with a median tumor size of 2.0 cm (0.5 - 19 cm). Primary technical efficacy (PTE) and local recurrence (LR) were evaluated, and possible predictors for adverse events analyzed using uni- and multi-variable binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 2553 of 2653 tumors were successfully ablated at initial SRFA resulting in a PTE rate of 96.2%. Predictors of lower PTE rates were age > 70 years, tumor size > 5 cm, number of probes, location close to liver capsule/organs and segment II. LR occurred in 220 of 2653 tumors (8.3%) with the following predictors: age, tumor type/size, conglomerates, segments I/IVa/IVb, number of probes and location close to major vessels/bile duct. Multivariable analysis revealed tumor size > 5 cm (odds ratio [OR] 3.153), age > 70 years (OR 1.559), and location in segment II (OR 1.772) as independent prognostic factors for PTE, whereas tumor location close to major vessels (OR 1.653) and in segment IVb (OR 2.656) were identified as independent prognostic factors of LR.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic RFA is an attractive option in the management of primary or metastatic liver tumors with good local tumor control, even in large tumors. The presented prognostic factors for adverse local oncological outcome might help to stratify unfavorable tumors for ablation.

Aggressive local treatment for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma—Stereotactic radiofrequency ablation as a valuable addition to hepatic resection

Background

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and overall clinical outcome of local treatment for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection.

Methods

Between 2007 and 2019 72 consecutive patients underwent hepatic resection for primary intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. If amenable, recurrent tumors were aggressively treated by HR or stereotactic radiofrequency ablation with local curative intent. Endpoints consisted of morbidity and mortality, locoregional and de novo recurrence, disease free survival, and overall survival.

Results

After a median follow-up of 28 months, recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma was observed in 43 of 72 patients undergoing hepatic resection (60.3%). 16 patients were subsequently treated by hepatic resection (n = 5) and stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (n = 11) with local curative intention. The remaining 27 patients underwent palliative treatment for first recurrence. Overall survival of patients who underwent repeated aggressive liver-directed therapy was comparable to patients without recurrence (p = 0.938) and was better as compared to patients receiving palliative treatment (p = 0.018). The 5-year overall survival rates for patients without recurrence, the repeated liver-directed treatment group and the palliative treatment group were 54.3%, 47.7% and 12.3%, respectively. By adding stereotactic radiofrequency ablation as an alternative treatment option, the rate of curative re-treatment increased from 11.9% to 37.2%.

Conclusion

Repeated hepatic resection is often precluded due to patient morbidity or anatomical and functional limitations. Due to the application of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation in case of recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma, the number of patients treated with curative intent can be increased. This leads to favorable clinical outcome as compared to palliative treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma recurrence.

Stereotactic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Stereotactic navigation techniques aim to enhance treatment precision and safety in minimally invasive thermal ablation of liver tumors. We qualitatively reviewed and quantitatively summarized the available literature on procedural and clinical outcomes after stereotactic navigated ablation of malignant liver tumors.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed on procedural and clinical outcomes when using stereotactic or robotic navigation for laparoscopic or percutaneous thermal ablation. The online databases Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. Endpoints included targeting accuracy, procedural efficiency, and treatment efficacy outcomes. Meta-analysis including subgroup analyses was performed.

Results

Thirty-four studies (two randomized controlled trials, three prospective cohort studies, 29 case series) were qualitatively analyzed, and 22 studies were included for meta-analysis. Weighted average lateral targeting error was 3.7 mm (CI 3.2, 4.2), with all four comparative studies showing enhanced targeting accuracy compared to free-hand targeting. Weighted average overall complications, major complications, and mortality were 11.4% (6.7, 16.1), 3.4% (2.1, 5.1), and 0.8% (0.5, 1.3). Pooled estimates of primary technique efficacy were 94% (89, 97) if assessed at 1–6 weeks and 90% (87, 93) if assessed at 6–12 weeks post ablation, with remaining between-study heterogeneity. Primary technique efficacy was significantly enhanced in stereotactic vs. free-hand targeting, with odds ratio (OR) of 1.9 (1.2, 3.2) (n = 6 studies).

Conclusions

Advances in stereotactic navigation technologies allow highly precise and safe tumor targeting, leading to enhanced primary treatment efficacy. The use of varying definitions and terminology of safety and efficacy limits comparability among studies, highlighting the crucial need for further standardization of follow-up definitions.

Percutaneous Navigation under Local Anesthesia for Computed Tomography-Guided Microwave Ablation of Malignant Liver Lesions Located in the Hepatic Dome

Background and Objectives: The aim of the present study was to report the safety and efficacy of percutaneous navigation under local anesthesia for computed tomography-guided microwave ablation of malignant liver lesions located in the hepatic dome. Patients with primary and secondary malignant liver lesions located in the hepatic dome who underwent percutaneous computed tomography-guided microwave ablation using a computer-assisted navigation system under local anesthesia were prospectively evaluated. The primary objective was technical success. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 10 participants (16 lesions) with a mean age of 60.60 years (SD = 9.25 years) and a mean size of 20.37 ± 7.29 cm, and the mean follow-up time was 3.4 months (SD = 1.41) months. Results: Primary technical success was 93.75%. Tumor remnant was noticed at one month follow-up in a single metastatic lesion, which was re-treated with an ablation session, and no tumor remnant was depicted in the subsequent imaging follow-up (secondary technical success 100%). Grade I self-limited complications (according to the CIRSE classification system) included small pleural effusion (n = 1) and minor bleeding post antenna removal (n = 1) requiring nothing but observation. Conclusions: the findings of the present study indicate that percutaneous navigation under local anesthesia is a safe and efficacious approach for computed tomography-guided microwave ablation of malignant liver lesions located in the hepatic dome. Large randomized controlled studies are warranted to observe treatment effectiveness and compare the results with those of other options.

Stereotactic Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors: 3D Planning, Multiple Needle Approach, and Intraprocedural Image Fusion Are the Key to Success-A Narrative Review

Thermal ablation is an emerging, potentially curative approach in treating primary and metastatic liver cancer. Different technologies are available, with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) being the most widely used. Regardless of the technique, destruction of the entire tumor, including an adequate safety margin, is key. In conventional single-probe US- or CT-guided thermal ablation, the creation of such large necrosis zones is often hampered by technical limitations, especially for large tumors (i.e., >2-3 cm). These limitations have been overcome by stereotactic RFA (SRFA): a multiple needle approach with 3D treatment planning and precise stereotactic needle placement combined with intraprocedural image fusion of pre- and post-interventional CT scans for verification of treatment success. With these sophisticated tools and advanced techniques, the spectrum of locally curable liver malignancies can be dramatically increased. Thus, we strongly believe that stereotactic thermal ablation can become a cornerstone in the treatment of liver malignancies, as it offers all the benefits of a minimally invasive method while providing oncological outcomes comparable to surgery. This article provides an overview of current stereotactic techniques for thermal ablation, summarizes the available clinical evidence for this approach, and discusses its advantages.

Can accurate evaluation of the treatment success after radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors be achieved by visual inspection alone? Results of a blinded assessment with 38 interventional oncologists

OBJECTIVES

To assess the difficulties in the immediate judgment of treatment success after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver tumors by visual inspection alone and to evaluate whether radiologist's expertise affects the resultant judgment.

METHODS

Peri-interventional CT-scans of nine patients with nine hepatocellular carcinomas with known outcomes after RFA were presented to 38 participants from 14 different countries. In a total of 342 reads, all interventional oncologists assessed the pre- and immediate post-interventional CT-scans through conventional side-by-side juxtapositioning of images and judged whether complete ablation (i.e., technical success and technique efficacy) was achieved. Results were compared regarding expertise in percutaneous tumor ablation (>50 interventions performed). An 'overcall' was defined as insufficient ablation that was misjudged as sufficient, and an 'undercall' as an erroneous assessment of complete ablation.

RESULTS

Overall 3.97 ± 1.27 out of 9 (44.1%) cases per radiologist were misjudged. The mean number of overcalls and undercalls per radiologist were 0.74 ± 0.50 out of 2 (37.0%), and 3.24 ± 1.28 out of 7 (46.3%), respectively. 18/38 (47.4%) participants had considerable experience in percutaneous tumor ablation, with such expertise having no significant influence on the results (overall: p = 0.70; overcalls: p = 0.87; undercalls: p = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional side-by-side evaluation of treatment success after RFA of liver tumors by the juxtaposition of pre- and post-interventional CT-scans is very difficult for experienced radiologists. The implementation of advanced processing techniques such as rigid/non-rigid image fusion with the assessment of the periablational margin is thus likely needed in order to decrease errors and objectively evaluate technical success and predict technique efficacy of liver RFA.

Stereotactic Radiofrequency Ablation of Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: Short- and Long-Term Results with Predicting Factors for Survival

Purpose

To evaluate safety, local oncological control, long-term outcome and potential prognostic factors of stereotactic RFA (SRFA) for the treatment of BCLMs.

Methods

Between July 2003 and December 2019, 42 consecutive female patients with median age 54.0 years were treated with SRFA at our institution for 110 BCLMs in 48 ablation sessions. Median tumor size was 3.0 cm (0.8–9.0). Eighteen (42.9%) patients had extrahepatic metastasis at initial SRFA.

Results

Technical success rate was 100%, i.e., all coaxial needles were inserted with appropriate accuracy within 10 mm off plan and 107/110 (92.3%) BCLMs were successfully ablated at initial SRFA. Four Grade 1 (8.3%, 4/48) and one Grade 2 (2.1%, 1/48) complications occurred. No perioperative deaths occurred. Local recurrence developed in 8 of 110 tumors (7.3%). Overall survival (OS) rates of all patients at 1, 3, and 5 years from the date of the first SRFA were 84.1%, 49.3%, and 20.8% with a median OS of 32.3 months. Univariable cox regression analyses revealed age > 60 years and extrahepatic disease (without bone only metastases) as significant predictors of worse OS (p = 0.013 and 0.025, respectively). Size and number of metastases, hormone receptor status and time onset did not significantly affect OS after initial SRFA.

Conclusions

SRFA is a safe, minimally invasive treatment option in the management of BCLMs, especially in younger patients without advanced extrahepatic metastasis, including those with large liver tumors.

Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively assess the periablational 3D safety margin in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) referred for stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and to evaluate its influence on local treatment success.

METHODS

Forty-five patients (31 males; mean age 64.5 [range 31-87 years]) with 76 CRLM were treated with stereotactic RFA and retrospectively analyzed. Image fusion of pre- and post-interventional contrast-enhanced CT scans using a non-rigid registration software enabled a retrospective assessment of the percentage of predetermined periablational 3D safety margin and CRLM successfully ablated. Periablational safety zones (1-10 mm) and percentage of periablational zone ablated were calculated, analyzed, and compared with subsequent tumor growth to determine an optimal safety margin predictive of local treatment success.

RESULTS

Mean overall follow-up was 36.1 ± 18.5 months. Nine of 76 CRLMs (11.8%) developed local tumor progression (LTP) with mean time to LTP of 18.3 ± 11.9 months. Overall 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative LTP-free survival rates were 98.7%, 90.6%, and 88.6%, respectively. The periablational safety margin assessment proved to be the only independent predictor (p < 0.001) of LTP for all calculated safety margins. The smallest safety margin 100% ablated displaying no LTP was 3 mm, and at least 90% of a 6-mm circumscribed 3D safety margin was required to achieve complete ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin can be used as an intraprocedural tool to evaluate local treatment success in patients with CRLM referred to stereotactic RFA. Ablations achieving 100% 3D safety margin of 3 mm and at least 90% 3D safety margin of 6 mm can predict treatment success.

KEY POINTS

• Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin can be used as an intraprocedural tool to evaluate local treatment success following thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases. • Ablations with 100% 3D periablational safety margin of 3 mm and ablations with at least 90% 3D safety margin of 6 mm can be considered indications of treatment success. • Image fusion of pre- and post-interventional CT scans with the software used in this study is feasible and could represent a useful tool in daily clinical practice.

Thermal ablation of CT 'invisible' liver tumors using MRI fusion: a case control study

Purpose: To evaluate whether 'invisible' liver tumors on CT can be treated by stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) using fusion of pre-ablation MRI.Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 60 patients (14 with Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 46 with metastatic liver tumors) with CT 'invisible' lesions underwent SRFA using MRI-fusion between June 2005 and June 2018 ('fusion group'). For comparison, 60 patients who underwent SRFA without image fusion were selected using nearest neighbor propensity score matching ('control group'). Endpoints consisted of local tumor control, safety, overall and disease-free survival.Results: Major complications occurred in 6/69 ablations (8.7%) in the fusion group and in 6/89 ablations (6.7%) in the control group (p = 0.434). Primary technical efficacy rate (i.e., successful initial ablation) was 96.6% (28/29) for HCC and 97.9% (166/170) for metastatic disease in the fusion group and 100% (33/33) and 93.3% (184/194) in the control group, respectively (p = 0.468 and 0.064). Local recurrence (LR) was observed in 1/29 (3.5%) HCCs and in 6/170 metastases (4.0%) in the fusion group and 1/33 (3.0%) and 21/196 (10.7%) in the control group, respectively. The LR rate of metastasis in the control group was significantly higher (p = 0.007), although differences in OS and DFS did not reach statistical significance.Conclusions: Image fusion using pre-procedural MRI allows for ablation of CT-'invisible' liver tumors that are otherwise untreatable. Moreover, local oncological control was higher in metastatic liver tumors versus matched controls which suggests it could be useful tool for all stereotactic radiofrequency ablation procedures.

Frequency and risk factors for major complications after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors in 1235 ablation sessions: a 15-year experience

Objectives

To assess the frequency of major complications after multi-probe stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) in a large cohort of patients over 15 years and to elucidate risk factors for adverse events.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study was carried out between July 2003 and December 2018. Seven hundred ninety-three consecutive patients (median 65.0 years (0.3–88), 241 women and 552 men, were treated in 1235 SRFA sessions for 2475 primary and metastatic liver tumors with a median tumor size of 3.0 cm (0.5–18 cm). The frequency of major complications was evaluated according to SIR guidelines and putative predictors of adverse events analyzed using simple and multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Thirty-day mortality after SRFA was 0.5% (6/1235) with an overall major complication rate of 7.4% (91/1235). The major complication rate decreased from 11.5% (36/314) (before January 2011) to 6.0% (55/921) (p = 0.001). 50.5% (46/91) of major complications were successfully treated in the same anesthetic session by angiographic coiling for hemorrhage and chest tube insertion for pneumothorax. History of bile duct surgery/intervention, number of coaxial needles, and location of tumors in segment IVa or VIII were independent prognostic factors for major complications following multivariable logistic regression analysis. Simple logistic regression revealed the number of tumors, tumor size, location close to the diaphragm, tumor conglomerate, and segment VII as other significant predictors.

Conclusion

SRFA of liver tumors is safe and can extend the treatment spectrum of conventional RFA. Adaptations over time combined with increasing experience resulted in a significant decrease in complications.

Key Points

• In 1235 ablation sessions in 793 patients over 15 years, we found a mortality rate of 0.5% (6/1235) and an overall major complication rate of 7.4%, which fell from 11.5 (36/314) to 6.0% (55/921, p = 0.001) after January 2011, likely due to procedural adaptations.

• History of bile duct surgery/intervention (p = 0.013, OR = 3.290), number of coaxial needles (p = 0.026, OR = 1.052), and location of tumors in segment IVa (p = 0.016, OR = 1.989) or VIII (p = 0.038, OR = 1.635) were found to be independent prognostic factors.

• Simple logistic regression revealed that number of tumors, tumor size, location close to the diaphragm, tumor conglomerates, and segment VII were other significant predictors of major complications.

Quality of life analysis after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) of liver tumors and identify variables associated with decreased HRQoL and to compare it to other treatments in case of concurrency. From 2011 to 2017 577 patients underwent SRFA for liver tumors in 892 ablation sessions. 303 (52.5%) patients completed a HRQoL questionnaire once after the ablation. HRQoL was assessed by the Short Form (SF)-12 health survey with mental and physical component scales and by a general questionnaire to assess disease and treatment-specific items as well as to compare tolerability of SRFA to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), hepatic resection (HR) and chemotherapy (CTX). The median SF-12 PCS was 46.6 and MCS was 53.2. Patients experiencing pain or complications and patients refusing repeat SRFA showed significantly lower PCS (43.2 vs 48.6, p = 0.0003; 32.8 vs 46.9, p = 0.005 and 40.6 vs 46.9, p = 0.009). 355 (97.8%) patients indicated willingness to undergo repeat SRFA with little to no fear in 292 (80.7%) patients. Among patients with multiple therapies, SRFA was rated by 40 (90.9%) as preferred re-treatment, HR by 1 (2.3%) and CTX by 3 (6.8%). In conclusion, we have shown that SRFA has good HRQoL-outcomes and reported low morbidity rates. Consequently the vast majority of study patients would accept a repeated SRFA if necessary (97.8%), without fear (80.7%). SRFA was preferred among patients who experienced concurrent treatments, such as HR or CTX.

Safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation for very large (≥8 cm) primary and metastatic liver tumors

To assess the safety and clinical outcomes of multi-probe stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) for very large (≥8 cm) primary and metastatic liver tumors with curative treatment intent. A retrospective, single center study carried out between 01.2005 and 06.2018. 34 consecutive patients had a total of 41 primary and metastatic liver tumors with a median size of 9.0 cm (8.0–18.0 cm) at initial SRFA. Patients were treated under CT guidance using a 3D navigation system. Endpoints consisted of (i) technical efficacy; primary - requiring one treatment, and secondary – requiring two treatments (ii) complication and mortality rates (iii) local and distant recurrence (LR), (iv) disease free survival (DFS), (v) overall survival (OS). 33/41 tumors were successfully ablated at initial SRFA (80.5% primary technical efficacy rate (PTE)). Four tumors required repeat ablation, resulting in a secondary technical efficacy (STE) rate of 90.2%. Local tumor recurrence (LR) developed in 4 of 41 tumors (9.8%). The 30-day perioperative mortality was 2.3% (1/ 44 ablations). The total major complication rate was 20.5% (9 of 44 ablations). Three of nine (33.3%) major complications, such as pleural effusion, pneumothoraces or perihepatic hemorrhages were relatively easy to treat. The overall survival (OS) rates at 1-, 3-, and 5- years from the date of the first SRFA were 87.1%, 71.8%, and 62.8% for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 87.5%, 70.0% and 70.0% for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) respectively. Patients with metastatic disease had OS rates of 77.8% and 22.2% at 1- and 3- years. The clinical results of SRFA in this study are encouraging and warrant a prospective multicenter study. SRFA may become one of the best therapeutic choices for a growing number of patients with primary and metastatic liver cancer.