Microwave ablation shows similar survival outcomes compared with surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma between 3 and 5 cm

Outcomes and Complications of Image-Guided Percutaneous Tumour Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma at the Irish National Liver Transplant Centre

Background: Image-guided tumour ablation is a minimally invasive treatment for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our study reviews the complications and long term outcomes in patients treated at a tertiary referral centre. Methods: Retrospective study. All patients with HCC who underwent microwave ablation (MWA) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) from 1st January 2014 to 31st December 2022 were identified. Treatment response of target lesion, complications, and survival were recorded. Results: One hundred seventy ablations were performed in 118 patients; 70% MWA, 30% RFA. Median radiological follow-up 21 months (range 3-107). Follow-up imaging was reported using LI-RADS and mRECIST. At first follow-up imaging, 94 patients had complete response (primary efficacy rate 80.3%) while 19.7% (n = 23) had residual disease. Fifteen of these had repeat ablation; 10 had complete response (secondary efficacy rate 85.6%). By end of study duration, 70.5% (n = 79) achieved sustained local complete response from single ablation without documented recurrence. 14.3% (n = 16) required more than one ablation of target lesion. Overall, 84.8% (n = 95) demonstrated long term local complete response to ablation. Complication occurred in 5.9% (n = 10); 40.0% Grade I, 40.0% Grade II, 10.0% Grade III, 10.0% Grade IV as per the CIRSE Classification. 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 97%, 68%, and 61% respectively. Mean OS was 5.3 years (median 4.7). No difference in OS (P = .7) or local progression free survival (P = .5) between patients treated with MWA versus RFA. Conclusion: This study demonstrates excellent long-term response to TA, with acceptable complication profile. No difference in survival between RFA versus MWA.

Ablative Treatments and Surgery for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

We compared overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), cryoablation, and liver resection (LR), with the aim of evaluating treatment plans for early-stage HCC.

METHODS

Studies in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from April 1, 2004, to April 1, 2024, were searched. Articles were evaluated for quality using the randomized controlled trials tool. Two tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data obtained from the literature were netted using Stata 15.0 and r 4.2.3. The assessed primary outcomes were OS and DFS at 1 and 3 y.

RESULTS

A total of 25 publications with 4548 patients were included, including 13 studies in mainland China and 12 in other regions. For 1-y DFS, the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.54 (95% credible interval (CrI): 0.38-0.76) for LR compared with RFA and 0.57 (95% CrI: 0.3--0.82) for LR compared with MWA. For 3-y DFS, the HR was 0.52 (95% CrI: 0.38-0.72) for LR compared with RFA and 0.53 (95% CrI: 0.37-0.76). In the Chinese mainland, LR may have a better 1- and 3-y DFS than MWA, but similar survival to RFA. In the other regions, LR had a better DFS than MWA and RFA patients. The rest of the comparisons were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

For early-stage HCC, LR may be more effective in reducing tumor recurrence than ablative treatments. Cryoablation may be a potential treatment for HCC. The differences in treatment effectiveness in different regions are worth further study.

Microwave ablation versus laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension: a propensity score-matched study of postoperative liver decompensation

OBJECTIVES

The study of postoperative liver decompensation after microwave ablation (MWA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is still lacking. The purpose of the present study was to compare the postoperative liver decompensation after MWA and laparoscopic resection (LR) for HCC in patients with CSPH.

METHODS

The present retrospective study enrolled 222 HCC patients with CSPH who underwent MWA (n = 67) or LR (n = 155). Postoperative liver decompensation, complications, postoperative hospital stays, and overall survival were analyzed. Factors associated with postoperative liver decompensation were identified.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, the postoperative liver decompensation rate was significantly lower in the MWA group than that in the LR group (15.5% versus 32.8%, p = 0.030). The multivariable regression analysis identified that type of treatment (MWA vs. LR, odds ratio [OR] 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.91; p = 0.026) and Child-Pugh B (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.24-6.61; p = 0.014) were independent predictors for postoperative liver decompensation. The rate of complications for patients in the MWA group was significantly lower than that in the LR group (p < 0.001). And MWA showed shorter postoperative hospital stays than LR (3 days vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). Overall survival rate between the two groups was not significantly different (p = 0.163).

CONCLUSION

Compared with laparoscopic resection, microwave ablation has a lower rate of postoperative liver decompensation and might be a better option for HCC patients with CSPH.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Microwave ablation exhibited a lower incidence of postoperative liver decompensation in comparison to laparoscopic resection, thereby conferring greater advantages to hepatocellular carcinoma patients with clinically significant portal hypertension.

KEY POINTS

•Postoperative liver decompensation rate after microwave ablation was lower than that of laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension. •Microwave ablation showed shorter postoperative hospital stays than laparoscopic resection. •Microwave ablation had fewer complications than laparoscopic resection.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical resection and ablation for the treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment strategy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, specifically in regard to surgical resection (SR) and ablation. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of SR and ablation on recurrence and prognosis in early-stage HCC patients, to optimize treatment strategies and improve long-term survival.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 801 patients diagnosed with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0/A HCC and treated with SR or ablation between January 2015 and December 2019. The effectiveness and complications of both treatments were analyzed, and patients were followed up to measure recurrence and survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to increase comparability between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze recurrence and survival, and a Cox risk proportional hazard model was used to identify risk factors that affect recurrence and surviva.

RESULTS

Before PSM, the overall survival (OS) rates were similar in both groups, with recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates better in the SR group than in the ablation group. After PSM, there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups. However, the RFS rates were significantly better in the SR group than in the ablation group. The ablation group exhibited superior outcomes compared to the SR group, with shorter treatment times, reduced bleeding, shorter hospital stays, and lower hospital costs. Concerning the location of the HCC within the liver, comparable efficacy was observed between SR and ablation for disease located in the noncentral region or left lobe. However, for HCCs located in the central region or right lobe of the liver, SR was more effective than ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed no significant difference in OS between SR and ablation for early-stage HCC, with SR providing better RFS and ablation demonstrating better safety profiles and lower hospital costs. These findings offer valuable insights for clinicians in determining optimal treatment strategies for early-stage HCC patients, particularly in terms of balancing efficacy, safety, and cost considerations.

A multicenter case-controlled study on laparoscopic hepatectomy versus microwave ablation as first-line therapy for 3-5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma in patients aged 60 and older

BACKGROUND

There is currently a lack of convincing evidence for microwave ablation (MWA) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for patients ≥60 years old with 3-5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were divided into three cohorts based on restricted cubic spline analysis: 60-64, 65-72, and ≥73 years. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the baseline variables in a 1:1 ratio. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed, followed by a comparison of complications, hospitalization, and cost.

RESULTS

Among 672 patients, the median age was 66 (IQR 62-71) years. After PSM, two groups of 210 patients each were selected. During the 36.0 (20.4-52.4) month follow-up period, the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates in the MWA group were 97.6, 80.9, and 65.3% and 95.5, 78.7, and 60.4% in the LLR group (HR 0.98, P =0.900). The corresponding DFS rates were 78.6, 49.6, and 37.5% and 82.8, 67.8, and 52.9% (HR 1.52, P =0.007). The 60-64 age cohort involved 176 patients, with no a significant difference in OS between the MWA and LLR groups (HR 1.25, P =0.370), MWA was associated with a higher recurrence rate (HR 1.94, P =0.004). A total of 146 patients were matched in the 65-72 age cohort, with no significant differences in OS and DFS between the two groups (OS (HR 1.04, P =0.900), DFS (HR 1.56, P =0.110)). In 76 patients aged ≥73 years after PSM, MWA provided better OS for patients (HR 0.27, P =0.015), and there were no significant differences in DFS between the two groups (HR 1.41, P =0.380). Taken together, for patients older than 65 years, the recurrence rate of MWA was comparable with LLR. Safety analysis indicated that LLR was associated with more postoperative bleeding ( P =0.032) and hypoproteinemia ( P =0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

MWA was comparable to LLR in patients aged 65 years and older. MWA could be an alternative for the oldest old or the ill patients who cannot afford LLR, while LLR is still the first option of treatments for early-stage 3-5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma in capable elderly's.

Clinical Results, Risk Factors, and Future Directions of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, with a relatively poor prognosis, especially for advanced HCC. With the availability of a variety of treatment options, the treatment strategies for HCC have become more and more diversified. Microwave ablation (MWA) has gradually been considered as a viable alternative to surgical resection (SR) owing to its comparable long-term survival, reduced complications, and greater preservation of hepatic parenchyma. However, clinical outcomes, tumor progression, and recurrence of HCC after MWA remain major concerns. Here, after reviewing the current therapeutic options for HCC, we focus on MWA, describing the advantages and challenges of MWA and the clinical results after treatment. We then focused on prognostic factors that influence post-ablation clinical outcomes and briefly presented the strategy of MWA for future clinical treatment.

Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation as bridge therapy in potentially transplantable patients with single HCC ≤ 3 cm: A propensity score-matched study

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as bridge therapy has been gradually confirmed. We aimed to compare the recurrence beyond the Milan criteria (RBM) rates in potentially transplantable patients with HCC receiving MWA or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as bridge therapy.

METHODS

In total, 307 potentially transplantable patients with single HCC ≤ 3 cm who initially received MWA (n = 82) or RFA (n = 225) were included. RBM, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between MWA and RFA groups by using propensity score matching (PSM). Competing risks Cox regression was used to identify predictors of RBM.

RESULTS

After PSM, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative RBM rates were 6.8%, 18.3%, and 39.3% in the MWA group (n = 75), and 7.4%,18.5%, and 27.7% in the RFA group (n = 137), respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.386). MWA and RFA were not the independent risk factors of RBM, and patients with higher alpha-fetoprotein, non-antiviral treatment, and higher MELD score were at greater risk of RBM. Neither corresponding RFS rates (66.7%, 39.2% and 21.4% vs. 70.8%, 47% and 34.7%, p = 0.310) nor OS rates (97.3%, 88.0%, and 75.4% vs. 97.8%, 85.1%, and 70.7%, p = 0.384) for 1-, 3- and 5-years were significantly different between the MWA and RFA groups. The MWA group showed more frequent major complications (21.4% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.004) and longer hospital stays (4 days vs. 2 days, p < 0.001) compared with the RFA group.

CONCLUSION

MWA showed comparable RBM, RFS, and OS rates to RFA in potentially transplantable patients with single HCC ≤ 3 cm. Compared to RFA, MWA might provide the same effect as bridge therapy.

Microwave ablation versus surgical resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study of long-term therapeutic outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The therapeutic efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been well characterized. We aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of MWA and surgical resection (SR) in patients with subcapsular HCC.

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 321 patients with subcapsular HCC meeting the Milan criteria who received MWA (n = 99) or SR (n = 222). Local tumor progression (LTP), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM) to compare the therapeutic efficacy.

RESULTS

In the total cohort, there were no significant differences in 5-year LTP rates (14.0% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.12), OS rates (70.7% vs. 73.2%, p = 0.63), and DFS rates (38.3% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.22) between the MWA and SR groups. After PSM, the cumulative LTP rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 9.7%, 14.0%, and 16.4% in the MWA group (n = 84) and 7.2%, 8.6%, and 10.6% in the SR group (n = 84), respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.31). Neither corresponding OS rates (96.4%, 84.8%, and 73.0% vs. 95.2%, 85.5%, and 72.1%, p = 0.89) nor DFS rates (76.0%, 52.6%, and 38.1% vs. 76.2%, 44.7%, and 32.3%, p = 0.43) were significantly different between the MWA and SR groups. Whereas MWA obtained fewer complications for both cohorts (both p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MWA showed comparable long-term therapeutic outcomes to SR, and it might be an alternative curative option for subcapsular HCC within the Milan criteria.

KEY POINTS

• Microwave ablation showed comparable local tumor progression, overall survival, and disease-free survival to surgical resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria. • Microwave ablation obtained fewer complications and shorter postoperative hospital stay.

Ablation for Benign Liver Tumors: Current Concepts and Limitations

Percutaneous ablation under imaging guidance is a curative treatment that can induce complete tumor necrosis with advantages of minimal invasiveness and a low risk of complications. Thermal ablation, which includes radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation, is a representative technique that has sufficient antitumor effects in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma with ≤3 lesions measuring ≤3 cm and preserved liver function. The short- and long-term outcomes of patients are comparable with those achieved with surgical resection. Despite their nonmalignant nature, some benign liver tumors require treatment for symptoms caused by the presence of the tumor and/or continuous enlargement. Ablation may be the treatment of choice because it has lower burden on patients than surgical treatment. This review describes the recent concepts, progress, and limitations of ablation-based treatment for benign liver tumors.

Surveillance Strategy after Complete Ablation of Initial Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Risk-Based Machine Learning Study

PURPOSE

To investigate surveillance strategies for initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (irHCC) after ablation to support clinical decision making, as there is no consensus regarding the monitoring strategy for irHCC after ablation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from patients with irHCC who received ablation were retrospectively collected at 2 medical centers. The risk of tumor relapse in each month was calculated through random survival forest methodology, and follow-up schedules were arranged thereafter to maximize the capability of relapse detection at each visit.

RESULTS

The cumulative 0.5-, 1-, 1.5-, and 2-year risk-adjusted probabilities in the training/validation cohorts were 26.2%/21.5%, 42.3%/39.4%, 55.5%/52.6%, and 61.3%/63.2%, respectively, with the highest recurrence rate occurring in the second month (maximum, 7.9%/7.4%). The surveillance regime primarily concentrated on the first year after treatment, especially the initial 6 months. The delay in detecting tumor recurrence gradually decreased when the total number of follow-up visits increased from 4 to 8. Compared with the control strategies, this schedule (follow-up visits at 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months) reduced the delay in detection. The benefits of this surveillance regime were evident when the patients were followed up 6 times. The proposed 6-visit surveillance strategy significantly decreased the delay in detection compared with the control 7-visit approach (1.32 months vs 1.82 months, respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed new surveillance schedule minimized the delay in detecting recurrence in patients with irHCC after ablation. The risk-related machine learning method described in this study could be applied to develop follow-up strategies for other patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.