Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cisplatin in pediatric patients with peritoneal mesothelioma: a single institution experience and long term follow up

A Review of the Use of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Malignancy in Pediatric Patients

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can directly target microscopic peritoneal disease, has achieved regular consideration in the treatment of several adult cancer types, and is more recently being studied in pediatrics. This review paper provides an overview of the use of this modality in pediatrics in order to identify medication choice, discuss post-operative morbidity and mortality, and evaluate impact on overall survival. Four databases were searched including Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL and ultimately 37 papers documenting the use of this modality comprising 264 pediatric patients were included. Malignancies treated include desmoplastic small round cell tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, angiosarcoma, colorectal carcinoma, and mesothelioma, with several rarer tumor types. Cisplatin was the most commonly used drug for HIPEC at varying concentrations for 30-90 min in duration at temperatures of approximately 41-42 °C. Reported toxicities were generally self-limited and there was no post-operative mortality. The impact on overall survival versus systemic chemotherapy and debulking surgery is uncertain due to lack of clinical trials and very small sample size across tumor subsets and the overall pediatric population. The relationship between degree of tumor burden and extent of surgical debulking needs to be further clarified. Future directions include prospective clinical trials, establishment of patient databases to facilitate standardization of HIPEC in pediatric patients, and additional approaches to optimize HIPEC.

Comparative Survival Outcomes of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy, Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Intravenous Chemotherapy for Primary Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the survival outcomes and adverse events of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IP)and intravenous chemotherapy (IP)for primary advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials), Embase, Web of Science and Scopus were searched using multiple terms for primary advanced ovarian cancer, including randomized controlled trials and comparative studies in both Chinese and English (up to date 15 August 2022). Outcomes include overall survival, progression-free survival and adverse events. The data were pooled and reported as hazard ratio (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scales were used to assess the risk of bias in the included comparative study. The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool was used for randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

In total, 32 studies, including 6347 patients and 8 different platinum-based chemotherapy regimens, were included in this network meta-analysis. Our analysis results showed that HIPEC2 (carboplatin with area under the curve 10) exhibited a statistically significant OS benefit compared to IV, weekly dose-dense chemotherapy and HIPEC1 (cisplatin with 75/100 mg/m²). Intraperitoneal plus intravenous chemotherapy was associated with a statistically significantly better likelihood of overall survival compared to IV. For progression-free survival, our statistical results only suggest a better progression-free survival in ovarian cancer patients treated with HIPEC1 compared with weekly dose-dense chemotherapy. No evidence of difference was observed between the other comparison groups. Compared with the non-HIPEC group, HIPEC may had a higher incidence of electrolyte disturbances (≥grade 3).

CONCLUSION

Our statistical analysis suggests that the groups receiving HIPEC2 had a better OS than the groups receiving IV, weekly dose-dense chemotherapy and HIPEC1. For PFS, our analysis only showed HIPEC1 is better than IV. Moreover, HIPEC may lead to a higher incidence of electrolyte disturbances (≥grade 3). HIPEC therapy for advanced ovarian cancer is currently controversial.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignant tumors in children: Initial experience in a single institution

Background

Peritoneal malignant tumors in children are rare but commonly associated with disease progression and poor outcome. The successful treatment experience of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in adult peritoneal carcinoma has been applied to pediatric peritoneal malignancy in recent years. However, patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) accounted for the majority of patients treated with CRS and HIPEC in previous studies. The role of CRS and HIPEC remains controversial due to the rarity of the disease and the limited sample size of studies. Additionally, the cases using CRS and HIPEC except DSRCT were mainly small case reports with unclear outcomes. We present our experience in the treatment of pediatric peritoneal malignancies using CRS and HIPEC, with more emphasis on the safety, feasibility, and short-term outcome.

Methods

A retrospective query from December 2019 to February 2022 identified 19 children with peritoneal malignancies who underwent CRS and HIPEC in our institution. Clinical characteristics, therapies, and outcomes were summarized and analyzed.

Results

The median age of the patients was 6.4 years (range, 0.7-13.9 years). The histologic types included rhabdomyosarcoma (7), Wilms tumor (2), clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (2), undifferentiated sarcoma (2), immature teratoma (1), peritoneal serous carcinoma (1), malignant rhabdoid of the kidney (1), malignant germ cell tumor (1), neuroblastoma (1), and epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblast sarcoma (1). Seven patients underwent initial operation, and 12 patients received reoperation for tumor recurrence. The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index was 5 (range, 2-21). There were no perioperative deaths or life-threatening complications of CRS and HIPEC. Two patients had grade 3 complications of wound infection and wound dehiscence. With a median follow-up time of 14 months (range, 1.5-31 months), 14 patients were alive, and 5 died of tumor recurrence. Of the 14 patients who were alive, 2 relapsed after CRS and HIPEC and then received radiotherapy and molecular-targeted therapy or chemotherapy.

Conclusions

CRS and HIPEC are safe and feasible in children, without increasing serious complications in the peri- and postoperative periods. The complication is acceptable. The short-term outcome shows possible effectiveness in pediatric peritoneal malignant tumors. The long-term effectiveness needs to be verified by additional cases and long-term follow-ups.

Immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic agents in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural mesothelioma has limited therapeutic options and a poor outcome. Antiangiogenic agents might increase the efficacy of immunotherapy as second-line treatment of advanced-stage malignancies.

CASE SUMMARY

A patient with stage IIIB pleural mesothelioma received second-line treatment with a combination of pembrolizumab, bevacizumab and chemotherapy following standard chemotherapy under the guidance of second-generation sequencing. He achieved a partial response after four cycles of treatment with progression-free survival of 5 mo. Pembrolizumab was suspended due to grade 2 immunerelated pneumonia, which was resolved by oral glucocorticoids. However, disease progression was observed after immunotherapy rechallenge and anlotinib therapy. The patient had disease progression, multiorgan dysfuntion and died suddenly in October 2019.

CONCLUSION

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor, anti-angiogenic agents and chemotherapy showed effective response for advanced pleural mesothelioma, but with adverse reactions.