Percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a comparison between the outcomes of grayscale US guidance and Sonazoid CEUS Kupffer phase guidance using propensity score matching

Perfluorobutane application value in microwave ablation of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma (<3 cm)

BACKGROUND

No studies have been retrieved comparing perfluorobutane with sulfur hexafluoride for microwave ablation (MWA) in small hepatocellular carcinoma(sHCC).

OBJECTIVE

To retrospective investigate the value of perfluorobutane ultrasonography contrast agent in ultrasonography (US)-guided MWA of sHCC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective clinical controlled study about US-guided percutaneous MWA in patients with sHCC, and in patients undergoing intra-operative treatment with perfluorobutane or sulfur hexafluoride. In both groups, a contrast agent was injected to clear the tumor and then a needle was inserted. A 5-point needle prick difficulty score was developed to compare needle prick difficulty in the two groups of cases.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients were included: 25 patients in group perfluorobutane, aged 41-82 (60.64±9.46), tumor size 1.1-2.8 (1.78±0.45) cm. 42 patients in group sulfur hexafluoride, aged 38-78 (62.26±9.27), with tumor size of 1.1-3.0 (1.89±0.49) cm. There was no significant difference in age or tumor size in both groups (P >  0.05). Puncture difficulty score (5-point): 2.0-2.7 (2.28±0.29) in group perfluorobutane, and 2.0-4.7 (2.95±0.85) in group sulfur hexafluoride, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <  0.05). Enhanced imaging results within 3 months after surgery: complete ablation rate was 100% (25/25) in the group perfluorobutane, 95.2% (40/42 in the group sulfur hexafluoride), with no significant difference between the two groups (P >  0.05).

CONCLUSION

Perfluorobutane kupffer phase can make the operator accurately deploy the ablation needle and reduce the difficulty of operation.