Information processing in patients with intracranial tumours: a preliminary evaluation of the clinical utility of inspection time

Compromised Motor Dexterity Confounds Processing Speed Task Outcomes in Stroke Patients

Most conventional measures of information processing speed require motor responses to facilitate performance. However, although not often addressed clinically, motor impairment, whether due to age or acquired brain injury, would be expected to confound the outcome measure of such tasks. The current study recruited 29 patients (20 stroke and 9 transient ischemic attack) with documented reduction in dexterity of the dominant hand, and 29 controls, to investigate the extent to which 3 commonly used processing speed measures with varying motor demands (a Visuo-Motor Reaction Time task, and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Symbol Search and Coding subtests) may be measuring motor-related speed more so than cognitive speed. Analyses include correlations between indices of cognitive and motor speed obtained from two other tasks (Inspection Time and Pegboard task, respectively) with the three speed measures, followed by hierarchical regressions to determine the relative contribution of cognitive and motor speed indices toward task performance. Results revealed that speed outcomes on tasks with relatively high motor demands, such as Coding, were largely reflecting motor speed in individuals with reduced dominant hand dexterity. Thus, findings indicate the importance of employing measures with minimal motor requirements, especially when the assessment of speed is aimed at understanding cognitive rather than physical function.

Cognitive functioning in newly presenting patients with supratentorial intracranial tumors: is there a role for inspection time?

Quantifying the extent of cognitive dysfunction in patients with intracranial tumors is important to monitor treatment effects and assess patients' needs. Inspection time, a measure of the efficiency of visual information processing, was evaluated, and its usefulness in patients with intracranial tumors was compared with that of other widely used cognitive tests. Newly presenting inpatients with supratentorial intracranial tumors (n = 118) underwent preoperative assessment using inspection time and a number of other measures of cognitive function, mood, and functional status. The brain tumor cohort was compared with patients admitted for elective spinal surgery (n = 85) and a healthy control group (n = 80). Analysis of covariance was used to compare the performance of the 3 groups. The brain tumor cohort had significantly lower inspection time scores than the spinal surgery group (P = .005) and the healthy volunteer control group (P < .001). The effect size was moderate. There was a large effect size of participant group for the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Digit Symbol-Coding, and Verbal Fluency (P = .002). The performance of patients with brain tumors was significantly worse than that of both of the control groups. Inspection time was well-tolerated by patients with intracranial tumors. However, inspection time is neither as easy to perform nor as sensitive as some other measures of cognitive function. Although its lack of any motor speed or coordination requirements, conceptual simplicity, repeatability, and relative lack of learning effect make inspection time a potentially useful tool in clinical neuro-oncology, practical considerations will limit its use.

Depression in cerebral glioma patients: a systematic review of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Depression is a common and important complication of primary cerebral glioma. However, observational studies of this relationship have not been systematically reviewed.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO for all English-language cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies of depression in adults with primary glioma published between January 1, 1980, and September 16, 2009. We identified 42 eligible studies that recruited 4089 individual glioma patients. We conducted a narrative review of these studies regarding the heterogeneity in diagnostic methods, the frequency of depression and its clinical associations, and the quality of study reporting.

RESULTS

Most studies of depression in adults with glioma were small, cross-sectional, or retrospective. Depression was most often measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; n = 10 studies). The Beck Depression Inventory, another frequently used screening instrument, returned a higher frequency of depression (median = 39%, range = 38%-42%) than the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (median = 16%, range = 0%-21%). At clinical interview, the median frequency of depression in glioma was 15% (range = 6%-28%). Depression was consistently associated with reduced physical function, cognitive impairment, and reduced quality of life. It may be associated with reduced survival, although evidence for this association was modest. There was an absence of clear associations between depression and many tumor-related variables. Few observational studies examined the treatment of depression in glioma patients. Multivariable analyses were rare, and study reporting was of variable quality.

CONCLUSIONS

In glioma, mild to moderate depressive symptoms may only rarely be due to tumor-associated structural or functional disruption of neuronal emotional networks. Improved methodological reporting would help clinicians better evaluate future studies, and facilitate improved evidence-based care of depressed glioma patients.

Recruitment difficulties in brain tumour patients cause participation bias: findings from a neuropsychological study of adult inpatients with supratentorial intracranial tumours

PURPOSE

Patients who participate in questionnaire surveys, clinical studies and clinical trials can be different from patients who do not participate. The occurrence and direction of this response, participation or ascertainment bias is unpredictable, and can harm the external validity of medical research.

METHODS

We compared the characteristics of patients with intracranial tumours who participated in a psychological study of inspection time with the characteristics of patients who did not participate for a number of reasons.

RESULTS

Of 178 newly diagnosed adults with intracranial tumours, 136 (76%) were eligible, of whom 76 (56%) participated and 34 (25%) declined. There were no significant differences in terms of age and sex of the patients who participated and those who declined. When the participation group was combined with those who were ineligible and those who declined, the majority of patients in the combined cohort (n = 152) had a WHO grade III or IV glioma (high-grade glioma) (48.0%), and only 13.2% had a WHO grade I or II glioma (low-grade glioma). However, only 38.2% of those who participated had a WHO grade III or IV glioma, and 23.7% had a WHO grade I or II glioma. Comparisons of the participation vs. ineligible and declined groups revealed there was a significant difference (p = 0.002) between the ratio of high-grade to low-grade gliomas in the total and recruited cohorts. Comparisons of only the participation vs. declined groups approached significance (p = 0.051). WHO grade III and IV glioma patients were under-represented, and WHO grade I or II glioma patients were over-represented in the study group.

CONCLUSIONS

Noninterventional, non-therapeutic applied neuropsychological studies in neuro-oncology are susceptible to bias since the spectrum of neuropathologies in recruited patients can be significantly different from that of the total cohort. These data could help anticipate recruitment rates for applied neuropsychological studies in clinical neuro-oncology and may help anticipate likely selection biases amongst those who participate.