Surgical outcomes in patients with endoscopic versus transcranial approach for skull base malignancies: a 10-year institutional experience

Clinical and Operative Risk Factors Associated With Prolonged Length of Stay After Endoscopic Pituitary Adenoma Resection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are the most common intrasellar tumor. Clinically relevant adenomas have a prevalence of 1 per 1000 in the general population. Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) is the most common surgical treatment and is the first-line management for most PAs. Most patients fare well postoperatively, but a subset of patients experience a prolonged length of stay (PLOS). In this article, we aim to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with PLOS after TSS for PA.

METHODS

Patients with sellar pathologies surgically treated at a single tertiary center from March 1, 2009, to May 31, 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. All patients older than 18 years receiving nonemergent endoscopic TSS for pituitary adenoma were included. Clinical and demographic characteristics were analyzed using χ2-tests and student t-tests. For those factors with a P-value less than .01, multivariate logistic regression and negative binomial regression models were constructed to estimate the adjusted odds of PLOS across predictive factors.

RESULTS

A total of 301 patients were included in the study. This cohort had an average age of 54.65 ± 15.06 years and an average body mass index of 29.47 ± 6.69. The median length of stay was 54.9 hours [25th-75th percentiles: 43.5-72.9]. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (P < .01), postoperative diabetes insipidus (DI) (P < .01), increased surgery duration (P = .01), and elevated maximal tumor dimension (P = .01) were predictive of PLOS in logistic regression. Increased surgery duration, previous pituitary radiation, intraoperative complications, and postoperative DI (all P < .01) were associated with increased rate of PLOS in negative binomial regression.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing endoscopic TSS for PA resection demonstrate prolonged lengths of stay if they have higher tumor burden, have lengthier surgeries with intraoperative complications, or develop postoperative complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leak or DI. Careful monitoring of these factors will allow for better resource optimization, reducing costs to both the hospital and the patient.

Neurosurgery for the rhinologist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive anatomical appraisal of the neurosurgical anatomy exposed through the endonasal and paranasal sinuses routes, focusing on the most common expanded endonasal approaches (EEAs) as well as recent advances in this surgical field.

RECENT FINDINGS

The EEAs are redefining the management of skull base pathology. Neurovascular structures previously considered a limitation, can be now approached through these surgical corridors. Advances in this field include the development of new surgical techniques and routes that allow better visualization and access to pathologies located in the ventral skull base. Understanding the surgical anatomy related to EEAs is essential not only for neurosurgeons but also for rhinologists.

SUMMARY

Knowledge of the surgical anatomy of the most common EEAs that utilize paranasal sinuses as a surgical corridor enables more effective management of complex skull base pathologies. Comprehensive anatomical knowledge of these corridors and the surrounding neurovascular structures is crucial to maximize benefits of EEAs and improve outcomes.

Quality of Life Considerations in Endoscopic Endonasal Management of Anterior Cranial Base Tumors

Considering quality of life (QOL) is critical when discussing treatment options for patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) for cancers at the base of the skull. Several questionnaires have been developed and validated in the last 20 years to explore QOL in this patient population, including the Anterior Skull Base Questionnaire, Skull Base Inventory, EESBS Questionnaire, and the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test for Neurosurgery. The Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test-22 and Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12 are other tools that have been used to measure sinonasal QOL in anterior cranial base surgery. In addition to pathology-related perturbations in QOL endoscopic surgical options (transsellar approaches, anterior cranial base surgery, and various reconstructive techniques) all have unique morbidities and QOL implications that should be considered. Finally, we look ahead to new and emerging techniques and tools aimed to help preserve and improve QOL for patients with anterior cranial base malignancies.

Locoregional Control and Survival in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Localized Head and Neck Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma-The French Experience

INTRODUCTION

The head and neck (HN) are the most frequent sites of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). Alveolar RMS (ARMS) represents ~20% of all RMS cases and frequently spread to lymph nodes (LNs). The aim was to report locoregional control, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS), according to clinical and pathological features, LN staging, and treatment modalities.

METHODS

The study included all patients prospectively enrolled in EpSSG RMS 2005 study under 21 years of age with localized HN ARMS and diagnosed between 2005 and 2016 in France. Medical data including imaging, surgical report, and radiation therapy planes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (median age 6 years; range 4 months-21 years), corresponding to 30 parameningeal and 18 non-parameningeal ARMS, were included. There were 33 boys (69%). Tumor locations included the following: orbit (n = 7) among which four cases had bone erosion, paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity (n = 16), deep facial spaces (n = 10), nasolabial fold (n = 8), and other non-parameningeal HN sites (n = 7). A fusion transcript of PAX3-FOXO1 or PAX7-FOXO1 was expressed in 33 of the 45 cases (73%) with molecular analysis. At diagnosis, 10 patients had primary resection of the primary tumor (PRPT) (none with microscopic complete resection) and 9 had LN staging. After induction chemotherapy, 26 patients (54%) had secondary resection of the primary tumor (SRPT) and 13 patients (27%) had cervical LN dissection. A total of 43 patients (90%) were treated with radiation therapy.With a median follow-up of 7 years (range 2-13 years), 5-year OS and EFS were 78% (95% CI, 63-88%) and 66% (95% CI, 51-78%), respectively. We observed 16 events (10 deaths): 4 local, 4 regional, 1 local and regional, and 7 metastatic. In univariate analysis, OS was only superior for patients under 10 years of age (p = 0.002), while FOXO1-negative ARMS, SRPT for parameningeal ARMS, and LN surgery were associated with significantly better EFS.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms a better outcome for fusion-negative ARMS and ARMS in children under 10 years. Moreover, LN surgery and SRPT of parameningeal tumor may improve EFS of ARMS. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.