Compared with conventional procedures, an intraoperative navigation system for ventriculoperitoneal shunting via the occipital horn improves outcomes in patients with hydrocephalus

Evaluation of Overshunting between Low and Medium Pressure Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts in Dogs with Severe Hydrocephalus Using Frameless Stereotactic Ventricular Shunt Placement

Hydrocephalus is a neurological disorder characterized by an abnormal accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within the ventricular system of the brain, leading to cerebral ventricular dilation, brain parenchyma compression, and neuronal cell loss. Surgery is an effective method of draining excessive amounts of CSF. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) allows excess CSF to divert into the abdomen; this device is the most commonly used in the treatment of hydrocephalus both in veterinary and human patients. This study aims to describe the application of two types of VPS, low-pressure valve and medium-pressure valve, using a frameless stereotactic neuronavigational system in eight severe hydrocephalus in dogs and, in particular, analyze the prevalence of postoperative overshunting. Non-communicating hydrocephalus was found in seven dogs, whereas the rest of them had communicating hydrocephalus caused by traumatic brain injury with a skull fracture. The criteria for pressure valve selection depended on the intraoperative intraventricular pressure (IVP) that was determined by the adaptive manometer, according to the human protocol. Low-pressure valve placement was performed in five dogs, and the others received medium-pressure valve placement. The follow-up period was 2 weeks, 4-12 weeks, and 12 weeks to 12 months. Pre- and postoperative information including neurological signs, CT-Scan or MRI, medical treatment, complications, and ventricular volume were compared in all dogs. Seven dogs showed neurological improvement within 2 weeks after surgery. Overshunting was seen in four dogs who received low-pressure valve placement. Three of them had shunt infections within 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. One dog underwent shunt revision from a low-pressure valve to a medium-pressure valve caused by severe overshunting and progressive neurological signs. In addition, cognitive and learning improvements were evaluated based on the owners' feedback, and neurological signs were examined during the follow-up period in two dogs that received low-pressure valve placement. We conclude that a medium-pressure valve is recommended for overshunting prevention. However, low-pressure valve placement seems to improve cognitive function and learning ability, which is related to an increase in the brain parenchyma observed during long-term monitoring. Moreover, we also report our experience and surgical procedure for frameless stereotactic ventricular shunt placement (FSVSP) in VPS surgery in dogs affected by hydrocephalus.

Improved Accuracy and Lowered Learning Curve of Ventricular Targeting Using Augmented Reality-Phantom and Cadaveric Model Testing

BACKGROUND

Augmented reality (AR) has demonstrated significant potential in neurosurgical cranial, spine, and teaching applications. External ventricular drain (EVD) placement remains a common procedure, but with error rates in targeting between 10% and 40%.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate Novarad VisAR guidance system for the placement of EVDs in phantom and cadaveric models.

METHODS

Two synthetic ventricular phantom models and a third cadaver model underwent computerized tomography imaging and registration with the VisAR system (Novarad). Root mean square (RMS), angular error (γ), and Euclidian distance were measured by multiple methods for various standard EVD placements.

RESULTS

Computerized tomography measurements on a phantom model (0.5-mm targets showed a mean Euclidean distance error of 1.20 ± 0.98 mm and γ of 1.25° ± 1.02°. Eight participants placed EVDs in lateral and occipital burr holes using VisAR in a second phantom anatomic ventricular model (mean RMS: 3.9 ± 1.8 mm, γ: 3.95° ± 1.78°). There were no statistically significant differences in accuracy for postgraduate year level, prior AR experience, prior EVD experience, or experience with video games ( P > .05). In comparing EVDs placed with anatomic landmarks vs VisAR navigation in a cadaver, VisAR demonstrated significantly better RMS and γ, 7.47 ± 0.94 mm and 7.12° ± 0.97°, respectively ( P ≤ .05).

CONCLUSION

The novel VisAR AR system resulted in accurate placement of EVDs with a rapid learning curve, which may improve clinical treatment and patient safety. Future applications of VisAR can be expanded to other cranial procedures.