Cervical corpectomy in delayed presentation of irreducible cervical dislocation: experience with eight cases

Risk factors and surgical approaches in neglected subaxial cervical spine fractures-dislocations: Experiences with two cases and literature review

This case report describes our experience of surgical strategies of two patients with neglected subaxial cervical spine fracture-dislocation that came to our center with subsequent follow-ups. Subaxial cervical spine fracture-dislocation must be immediately diagnosed and treated. However, it can be neglected in some cases, especially in developing health care systems and patients with low socioeconomic status. We reported two neglected subaxial cervical fracture-dislocation with a mean age of 54 years old who presented with axial cervical pain, and decreased muscle forces. In one out of two, cervical closed traction was applied, then unsuccessful result led to circumferential decompression and fixation via anterior-posterior (AP) approach. Accordingly, we used AP approach without applying closed reduction in another patient successfully. Except one of our cases who died after 2 weeks of surgery due to aspiration pneumonia, other one found complete improvement at the end of 6-month follow-up. Our study emphasizes the importance of AP approach in patients with irreducible joint dislocations. The approach can minimize the surgical risks and increase the cost-benefit as compared to three or more staged approaches. Our approach is less intensive than some other AP approaches while is a safe and efficacious procedure since the posterior reduction is not performed before discectomy and decompression.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of one-level cervical corpectomy with an expandable cage for three-column uncomplicated subaxial type «B» injures: a multicenter retrospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical and radiological results of the operative management of three-column uncomplicated type «B» subaxial injures treated with a one-level cervical corpectomy with an expandable cage.

METHODS

This study included 72 patients with a three-column uncomplicated type «B» subaxial injures who met the inclusion criteria, underwent a one-level cervical corpectomy with an expandable cage at one of three neurosurgical departments between 2005 and 2020, and were followed up for clinical and radiological outcomes at a minimum 3-yr follow-up.

RESULTS

There was a decrease in the VAS pain score from an average of 80 mm to 7 mm (p = 0.03); a decrease in the average NDI score from 62 to 14% (p = 0.01); excellent and good outcomes according to Macnab's scale were 93% (n = 67/72). There was an average change in the cervical lordosis (Cobb method) from -9.10 to -15.40 (p = 0.007), without significant loss of lordosis (p = 0.27). There was no significant degeneration of the adjacent levels by 3 years post-op. The fusion rate, using the Cervical Spine Research Society criteria, was poor: it was 62.5% (n = 45/72), and using the CT criteria, it was 65.3% (n = 47/72). 15.4% patients (n = 11/72) suffered complications. Statistical difference between the fusion and pseudoarthrosis (according to X-ray criteria) subgroups showed that there were no statistically significant differences in the smoking status, diabetes, chronic steroid use, cervical injury level, subtypes of AO type B subaxial injuries and types of expandable cage systems.

CONCLUSIONS

One-level cervical corpectomy with an expandable cage, despite a poor fusion rate, can be considered a feasible and relatively safe method for treating three-column uncomplicated subaxial type «B» injures, with the benefit of immediate stability, anatomical reduction, and direct decompression of the spinal cord. While no one in our series had any catastrophic complications, we did note a high complication rate.

Nonoperative Management of Chronically Subluxated Bilateral Cervical Facets with Bony Fusion: A Case Report

CASE

We describe a case of a 65-year-old woman with bilateral chronically subluxated C6 to 7 facets with facet fusion, who presented for care for the first time 1 year after a motor vehicle accident. The patient was minimally symptomatic at the time of her evaluation; thus, nonoperative treatment was provided. At 3-year follow-up, our patient remained minimally symptomatic with no progression of neurologic deficits.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with previous reports, conservative management was used rather than surgical fusion in a patient with stable osseous fusion complexes and minimal neurologic symptoms.