Dril Influences Short-term Visual Outcome after Intravitreal Corticosteroid Injection for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

A New Approach to Staging Diabetic Eye Disease: Staging of Diabetic Retinal Neurodegeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema

Topic

The goal of this review was to summarize the current level of evidence on biomarkers to quantify diabetic retinal neurodegeneration (DRN) and diabetic macular edema (DME).

Clinical relevance

With advances in retinal diagnostics, we have more data on patients with diabetes than ever before. However, the staging system for diabetic retinal disease is still based only on color fundus photographs and we do not have clear guidelines on how to incorporate data from the relatively newer modalities into clinical practice.

Methods

In this review, we use a Delphi process with experts to identify the most promising modalities to identify DRN and DME. These included microperimetry, full-field flash electroretinogram, spectral-domain OCT, adaptive optics, and OCT angiography. We then used a previously published method of determining the evidence level to complete detailed evidence grids for each modality.

Results

Our results showed that among the modalities evaluated, the level of evidence to quantify DRN and DME was highest for OCT (level 1) and lowest for adaptive optics (level 4).

Conclusion

For most of the modalities evaluated, prospective studies are needed to elucidate their role in the management and outcomes of diabetic retinal diseases.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Clinical and optical coherence tomography biomarkers as prognostic factors in dexamethasone intravitreal implant for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

Aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone (DEX) 0.7 mg intravitreal implant in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and serous retinal detachment (SRD), and to study the prognostic factors on a follow up of 12 months.

METHODS

Forty eyes of twenty- six patients with centre involving DME and SRD, who underwent DEX implant, were enrolled. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Swept source OCT imaging and intraocular pressure were evaluated. Central macular thickness (CMT), vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRILs), hyperreflective dots (HRD), SRD and ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption were included in the analysis at baseline and 12 months after implant.

RESULTS

According to our parametric analysis, at 12 months, BVCA improvement from 48.6 ± 23.4 letters to 53.3 ± 24.5 letters was statistically significant (p = 0.04), CMT decreased from 460 ± 99.52 μm to 322.9 ± 117 μm. The presence at baseline of VMA (p = 0.01), EZ disruption (p = 0.03) and DRILs (p = 0.04), were associated with poor BCVA improvement at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, OCT biomarkers can be considered significant prognostic factors for treatment outcome in patients with DME undergoing DEX intravitreal implant.

Impact of Pachychoroid and DRIL on the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Oedema with Intravitreal Bevacizumab

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term outcome of intravitreal bevacizumab in eyes with diabetic macular oedema (DME) following a PRN (pro re nata) regimen. Additionally, we investigated the effect of the presence of disorganisation of the retinal inner layers (DRILs) and pachychoroid (PC) at baseline on clinical outcome.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 112 naïve eyes with DME that were followed up for 2 years. All eyes were treated with six initial bevacizumab injections at monthly intervals and then received treatment according to a PRN regimen. In case of poor response to bevacizumab, therapy was switched to other agents. Main outcome measures included: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and number of intravitreal injections (IVI s). In addition, we examined the effect of the presence of DRILs and PC at baseline on clinical outcome.

RESULTS

BVCA improved significantly and CMT decreased significantly during the first 2 years of treatment. The number of IVI s per eye was 11.1 ± 4.8 at the end of the second year. Treatment had to be switched to other agents in 47 eyes (42%). The timing of switching was 12.4 ± 6.1 months after a mean of 9.2 ± 3.3 IVI s. Patients with DRILs at baseline (29.5%) had significantly worse BCVA at all time points before and after treatment, although CMT was significantly lower before treatment and comparable to patients without DRILs during treatment. Patients with PC at baseline (35.7%) had no significant differences in BVCA and CMT at all time points compared with patients without PC.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates statistically significant functional and anatomical improvement in patients with DME treated with intravitreal bevacizumab after 2 years. However, more than 40% of eyes required a switch in therapy. The presence of DRILs at baseline had a negative effect whereas the presence of PC at baseline had no effect on clinical outcome.

Clinical Utility of Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Marker Disorganization of Retinal Inner Layers in Diabetic Retinopathy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) is a potential spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging biomarker with clinical utility in diabetic retinopathy (DR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted at a large academic center. The cohort was composed of 1,175 patients with type 2 diabetes with and without retinopathy on initial examination between September 2009 and January 2019 (n = 2,083 eyes). DR risk and progression factors were obtained from the medical record. Trained graders masked to patients' clinical histories evaluated SD-OCT scans for DRIL.

RESULTS

Of 2,083 eyes, 28.1% (n = 585) demonstrated presence of DRIL with high interrater reliability (K = 0.88, 95% CI 0.86-0.90). DRIL was associated with worse visual acuity (VA) (P < 0.001) and DR severity (P < 0.0001). Insulin users had more severe DR (P < 0.0001). DR-related factors, race (Black, White) and sex (male) were significantly associated with DRIL (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DRIL was strongly associated with DR severity and worse VA, supporting its utility as an unfavorable prognostic indicator. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:692-700.].

The Disorganization of Retinal Inner Layers Is Correlated to Müller Cells Impairment in Diabetic Macular Edema: An Imaging and Omics Study

The disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) is an optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarker strictly associated with visual outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) whose pathophysiology is still unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize in vivo, using retinal imaging and liquid biopsy, DRIL in eyes with DME. This was an observational cross-sectional study. Patients affected by center-involved DME were enrolled. All patients underwent spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and proteomic analysis of aqueous humor (AH). The presence of DRIL at OCT was analyzed by two masked retinal experts. Fifty-seven biochemical biomarkers were analyzed from AH samples. Nineteen eyes of nineteen DME patients were enrolled. DRIL was present in 10 patients (52.63%). No statistically significant difference was found between DME eyes with and without DRIL, considering the AH concentration of all the analyzed biomarkers except for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a biomarker of Müller cells dysfunction (p = 0.02). In conclusion, DRIL, in DME eyes, seems to strictly depend on a major dysfunction of Müller cells, explaining its role not only as imaging biomarker, but also as visual function Müller cells-related parameter.

Prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy at first presentation to vitreoretinal services in Bhutan: a 3-year national study

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) at first presentation among diabetic patients attending national vitreoretinal (VR) services in Bhutan STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study METHODS: We included all diabetic patients in Bhutan who presented for retinal evaluation for the first time over a 3-year period (2013-2016). Data including demography, clinical details, diagnostic tests, and clinical staging of DR were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 843 diabetic patients, aged 57.2 ± 12.0 (range 18-86) years, were enrolled. The majority were male (452, 53.6%; cumulative frequency [cf] 391, 46.4%; P = .14) and from urban settings (570, 67.6%; cf 273; 32.4%) and did not have modern schooling (555, 65.8%). Hypertension was the most common systemic comorbidity (501, 59.4%). The prevalence of DR was 42.7%, with mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR) being the most common type (187, 51.9%), followed by moderate NPDR (88, 24.4%) and proliferative DR (45, 12.5%). In addition, 120 patients had clinically significant macular edema (CSME), with a prevalence of 14.2%. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 6/60 or worse occurred in 231 eyes (13.7%), and 41 patients (4.86%) had BCVA of 6/60 or worse bilaterally due to DR/CSME. A logistic regression model indicated that the major determinant of DR was the duration of diabetes, the odds rising by 1.27× with each year of disease (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of DR, including CSME, was high. Although a national DR screening program is established in Bhutan, there is a need to accelerate health education, community screening, and referral systems to reduce the prevalence of DR and CSME.

Comparison of Inflammatory and Angiogenic Factors in the Aqueous Humor of Vitrectomized and Non-Vitrectomized Eyes in Diabetic Macular Edema Patients

Objectives: To compare the aqueous concentrations of inflammatory and angiogenetic factors in vitrectomized vs. non-vitrectomized eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods: Aqueous samples were obtained from 107 eyes with DME before intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF, 36 eyes with previous pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with pan-retinal endolaser photocoagulation (PRP), and 71 treatment-naïve. Interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, interferon-induced protein (IP)-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were measured by cytometric bead array (CBA). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used for measuring central retinal thickness (CRT).

Results: IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, and MCP-1 in aqueous humor of DME vitrectomized eyes were significantly higher than in non-vitrectomized DME eyes, while VEGF was lower than in non-vitrectomized DME eyes. VEGF in aqueous humor significantly correlated with CRT for DME in non-vitrectomized DME eyes. IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, and MCP-1 in aqueous humor were not significantly associated with VEGF for DME in vitrectomized eyes.

Conclusions: Inflammation might play an important role in the pathogenesis of DME in vitrectomized eyes. Moreover, inflammation might play a central role in the development of DME via the VEGF-independent pathway. Thus, anti-inflammatory therapy might be a strategy for DME in vitrectomized eyes.