1
|
Phelan CM, Lawal AS, Boomsma J, Kaur K, Kelly KE, Holmes HA, Ivey CE. Analyzing the Role of Chemical Mechanism Choice in Wintertime PM 2.5 Modeling for Temperature Inversion-Prone Areas. ACS ES&T AIR 2025; 2:162-174. [PMID: 39975536 PMCID: PMC11833766 DOI: 10.1021/acsestair.4c00139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2024] [Revised: 01/01/2025] [Accepted: 01/02/2025] [Indexed: 02/21/2025]
Abstract
Chemical transport models are used for federal compliance demonstrations when areas are out of attainment, but there is no guidance for choosing a chemical mechanism. With the 2024 change of the annual PM2.5 standard and the prevalence of multiday wintertime inversion episodes in the western U.S., understanding the wintertime performance of chemical transport models is important. This study explores the impact of chemical mechanism choice on the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model performance for PM2.5 and implications for attainment demonstration in inversion-prone areas in the western United States. Total and speciated PM2.5 observations were used to evaluate wintertime CMAQ simulations using four chemical mechanisms. The study evaluated intermechanism differences in total and secondary PM2.5 and the impact of meteorology at sites with observed multiday temperature inversions. Model performance for total PM2.5 was similar across chemical mechanisms, but intermechanism differences for total and secondary PM2.5 were exacerbated during inversion periods, suggesting that modeled chemistry contributes to the model bias. Results suggest that nitrate, ammonium, and organic carbon are secondary species for which model results do not agree or perform to standard evaluation metrics in scientific literature. These findings show a need for mechanistic investigations of the causes of these differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cam M. Phelan
- Department
of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
| | - Abiola S. Lawal
- Department
of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
- Department
of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, United States
| | - Jacob Boomsma
- Department
of Chemical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
| | - Kamaljeet Kaur
- Department
of Chemical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
| | - Kerry E. Kelly
- Department
of Chemical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
| | - Heather A. Holmes
- Department
of Chemical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
| | - Cesunica E. Ivey
- Department
of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
| |
Collapse
|