Non-Medical Use of Psychotropic Prescription Drugs Among Adolescents in Substance Use Treatment

Changes in psychological well-being among heroin-dependent adolescents during psychologically supported opiate substitution treatment

AIM

Heroin-dependent adolescents demonstrate high rates of comorbid psychological problems. Among heroin-dependent adults, opiate substitution treatment (OST) programmes appear to reduce mental health problems. We sought to examine the impact of OST on psychological well-being in adolescents, as this is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study examining psychological well-being in heroin dependent adolescents, aged 18 years or younger, engaged in outpatient psychologically supported OST. Patients were treated with either methadone or buprenorphine. This was complimented with individual key working, counselling (motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy) and group work focusing on life skills. The Beck Youth Inventory was used to measure psychological well-being at treatment entry and repeated after 4 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Among 55 consecutive treatment episodes, we examined the 32 episodes where the patient persisted with the OST programme. Polysubstance use was the norm at treatment entry. At follow-up, the median doses of methadone and buprenorphine were 50 mgs and 8 mgs, respectively. Only three patients were treated with antidepressant medication. There was significant improvement in the mean depression (65.0 to 57.9, P = 0.001), anxiety (61.7 to 57.0, P = 0.006) and anger (57.8 to 54.6, P = 0.009) subscale scores. The self-concept and disruptive behaviour subscale scores did not improve significantly.

CONCLUSION

In this relatively short-term follow-up, psychosocially assisted OST appears to be associated with improved psychological well-being in heroin-dependent adolescents, especially in the area of depressive and anxiety symptoms.

The source and diversion of pharmaceutical drugs for non-medical use: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The non-medical use (NMU) of pharmaceutical drugs is an increasing public health concern. This systematic review consolidates current knowledge about how pharmaceutical drugs are obtained for NMU and the processes and people involved in diversion.

METHODS

Peer-reviewed and grey literature databases were searched for empirical studies published between 1996 and 2017 that examined the source or diversion of pharmaceutical opioids, sedatives or stimulants for NMU in countries with reported misuse problems. Pooled prevalence meta-analyses using random effects models were used to estimate the prevalence of medical and non-medical sourcing reported by end-users, and gifting, selling and trading by various populations.

RESULTS

This review synthesizes the findings of 54 cross-sectional studies via meta-analyses, with a remaining 95 studies examined through narrative review. Pharmaceutical drugs are primarily sourced for NMU from friends and family (57%, 95% CI 53%-62%, I² = 98.5, n = 30) and despite perceptions of healthcare professionals to the contrary, illegitimate practices such as doctor shopping are uncommon (7%, 95% CI 6%-10%, I² = 97.4, n = 29). Those at risk of diversion include patients displaying aberrant medication behaviors, people with substance use issues and students in fraternity/sorority environments. Sourcing via dealers is also common (32%, 95% CI 23%-41%, I² = 99.8, n = 25) and particularly so among people who use illicit drugs (47%, 95% CI 35%-60%, I² = 99.1, n = 15). There is little to no organized criminal involvement in the pharmaceutical black market.

CONCLUSION

Pharmaceutical drugs for NMU are primarily sourced by end-users through social networks. Future research should examine how dealers source pharmaceutical drugs.

Non-medical use of olanzapine by people on methadone treatment

Aims and method We examined non-medical use (NMU) of olanzapine among adults on methadone treatment. Information was collected on patient demographics and NMU of olanzapine. The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) was administered to assess risk among current users of olanzapine. Results Ninety-two clients participated and 30% reported lifetime history of NMU of olanzapine. Nine people reported doses of 30 mg or higher on a typical day of use, with three typically using 100 mg. The most common reasons for use were to relieve anxiety and to aid sleep, but a quarter used it to 'get stoned'. Eleven participants (12%) reported NMU of olanzapine in the preceding month. Eight completed the ASSIST with four scoring in the high-risk zone. Clinical implications Self-medication is the dominant motivator for NMU of olanzapine, but hedonic motivations also occur. A small minority show features of dependency. All doctors should be aware of the potential NMU of olanzapine, especially among patients with history of addiction.

Disclosure of Use and Abuse of Controlled Substances Among Psychiatric Outpatients

BACKGROUND

Prescription drug abuse is a serious health concern and is considered a nationwide epidemic. Patients often fail or refuse to disclose the use of controlled substances, leaving prescribers and pharmacies unaware of the potential for harmful drug interactions and risk of overdose. Psychiatric patients are especially vulnerable to controlled substance misuse.

OBJECTIVES

To determine hazardous patterns of prescription drug use among psychiatric outpatients and to raise awareness about the importance of reviewing information provided by prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs).

METHODS

The medical records of 150 patients attending the Adult Outpatient Psychiatric Clinic at the Los Angeles County+University of Southern California (LAC+USC) Medical Center from July 2012 through May 2013 were reviewed. Patient activity reports were generated from California's PDMP. Nondisclosure of controlled substance use was identified by a discrepancy between patient reporting of prescriptions according to the medical records and PDMP reports. A "pattern suggestive of prescription drug abuse" was defined as having one or more of the following: within-class prescriptions from multiple providers and/or within-class early refills or within-class overlapping prescriptions picked up within 10 days of each other.

RESULTS

Of the 150 patients, 113 were found in California's PDMP database. Of these 113 patients, 81 had obtained 111 prescriptions for controlled substances in the past 12 months. Of these 111 prescriptions, 52 (47%) were not disclosed to the primary psychiatrist, of which 14 (27%) revealed patterns consistent with prescription drug abuse.

CONCLUSIONS

Reviewing PDMP databases before prescribing controlled substances should be considered a standard prescribing practice to prevent abuse, diversion, and adverse medical outcomes.