Bowel wall visualisation at CT colonography

Optimizing the degree of distension and reducing discomfort in CT colonography by means of a microprocessor interface system for air insufflation

The patients’ discomfort during CT colonography determines which method is used and its frequency of use. The discomfort is largely associated with the colon’s insufflation with gas. A system for an automatic room-air insufflation has been developed that ensures a continuous and steady air insufflation and an increase in colonic pressure and enables a relatively fast decompression. This system provides constant pressure monitoring and can alert the operator, if necessary. The degree of discomfort was evaluated for 36 patients, who were subjected to manual and automated air insufflation. The degree of the colonic distension achieved by the two methods was compared. The data analysis showed a significantly lower level of discomfort in patients with automated air insufflation. The degree of colonic distension was evaluated by comparing the diameters of similar segments of the colon, as well as by the subjective opinion of the operator. The distension with automated air insufflation was higher than that with manual air insufflation. In some cases there was a significant difference (P<0,05). In conclusion, the results show that the automatic insufflation of air at room temperature can be used to optimize CT colonography.

CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting

PURPOSE

To assess the methodologic quality of available data in published reports of computed tomographic (CT) colonography by performing systematic review and meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE database was searched for colonography reports published between 1994 and 2003, without language restriction. The terms colonography, colography, CT colonoscopy, CT pneumocolon, virtual colonoscopy, and virtual endoscopy were used. Studies were selected if the focus was detection of colorectal polyps verified with within-subject reference colonoscopy by using key methodologic criteria based on information presented at the Fourth International Symposium on Virtual Colonoscopy (Boston, Mass). Two reviewers independently abstracted methodologic characteristics. Per-patient and per-polyp detection rates were extracted, and authors were contacted, when necessary. Per-patient sensitivity and specificity were calculated for different lesion size categories, and Forest plots were produced. Meta-analysis of paired sensitivity and specificity was conducted by using a hierarchical model that enabled estimation of summary receiver operating characteristic curves allowing for variation in diagnostic threshold, and the average operating point was calculated. Per-polyp sensitivity was also calculated.

RESULTS

Of 1398 studies considered for inclusion, 24 met our criteria. There were 4181 patients with a study prevalence of abnormality of 15%-72%. Meta-analysis of 2610 patients, 206 of whom had large polyps, showed high per-patient average sensitivity (93%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 73%, 98%) and specificity (97%; 95% CI: 95%, 99%) for colonography; sensitivity and specificity decreased to 86% (95% CI: 75%, 93%) and 86% (95% CI: 76%, 93%), respectively, when the threshold was lowered to include medium polyps. When polyps of all sizes were included, studies were too heterogeneous in sensitivity (range, 45%-97%) and specificity (range, 26%-97%) to allow meaningful meta-analysis. Of 150 cancers, 144 were detected (sensitivity, 95.9%; 95% CI: 91.4%, 98.5%). Data reporting was frequently incomplete, with no generally accepted format.

CONCLUSION

CT colonography seems sufficiently sensitive and specific in the detection of large and medium polyps; it is especially sensitive in the detection of symptomatic cancer. Studies are poorly reported, however, and the authors propose a minimum data set for study reporting.

Feasibility of MDCT Colonography in ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of colorectal lesions: comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of MDCT colonography in an ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of endoluminal colonic lesions compared with high-resolution video colonoscopy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

After standard bowel cleansing, 137 patients (77 men, 60 women; mean [+/- SD] age, 57.1 +/- 11.3 years) underwent high-resolution video colonoscopy within 2 hr after ultra-low-dose MDCT colonography had been performed. Ultra-low-dose MDCT colonography was performed with patients in the supine position only using 10 mAs (effective weighted CT dose index, 0.94 mGy). After mathematic noise reduction by nonlinear gaussian filter chains, using dedicated software (ECCET), images were analyzed by two blinded observers in simultaneously displayed interactive 2D and 3D modes. Findings of ultra-low-dose MDCT colonography were compared with the results obtained with high-resolution video colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Calculated effective doses were 0.7 and 1.2 mSv for men and women, respectively. Ultra-low-dose MDCT colonography detected 84 (62%) of 135 lesions: 11 (78.6%) of 14 large polyps (> 10 mm), 12 (85.7%) of 14 medium polyps (9.9-5 mm), and 61 (57%) of 107 small polyps (< 5 mm). On a patient-by-patient basis, an overall sensitivity of 70.3% with a specificity of 80.8% was calculated. False-positive findings were seen mostly for small lesions (eight medium and 29 small lesions). Two of the three false-negative lesions were retrospectively detected in contrast-enhanced cleansing fluid; one was a flat lipoma not detectable on ultra-low-dose MDCT colonography.

CONCLUSION

Despite an effective dose of approximately 1 mSv, MDCT colonography using an ultra-low-dose technique performs as well as MDCT colonography with a standard dose, according to published data. After mathematic noise reduction, 82% of polyps larger than 5 mm can be detected.

Extracolonic and Incidental Findings on CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy)

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to prospectively determine the frequency and clinical importance of extracolonic findings on CT colonography in symptomatic patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. One hundred eleven symptomatic patients referred for colonoscopy underwent CT colonography before colonoscopy. Helical CT from the diaphragm to the symphysis was performed with the patient in the supine and prone positions after rectal air insufflation. Image interpretation was done on a digital workstation. Extracolonic findings were classified as minor, moderate, or major according to potential clinical importance. Patient records, with a follow-up time of about 3 years, were reviewed to determine final diagnoses.

RESULTS

Twenty-six (23%) of the patients had CT findings of major importance such as lymphadenopathy (n = 7), aortic aneurysm (n = 6), suspected solid hepatic masses (n = 5), and suspected solid renal masses (n = 4). Fifty-eight patients (52%) had findings of moderate importance such as gallstones (n = 16), indeterminate renal masses (n = 9), adrenal masses with benign appearance (n = 8), and hiatal hernia (n = 7). Forty-six patients (41%) had no or only minor findings, such as renal cysts (n = 34), renal calcifications (n = 19), and hepatic cysts (n = 14). Review of patient records showed that CT colonography contributed to the detection of major, previously unknown extracolonic disorders in 14 (13%) of the 111 patients.

CONCLUSION

Potentially important extracolonic findings were revealed in 23% of the patients, leading to additional diagnostic or therapeutic considerations. Some of these findings were clinically important, whereas others were previously known or led to unnecessary workup. This finding must be taken into account when CT colonography is considered for routine diagnostic workup or screening.

MR colonography: How does air compare to water for colonic distention?

PURPOSE

To prove the feasibility of air-distended magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) and compare it with water-based distention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In five volunteers, the colon was imaged twice: once after distending the colon with air and a second time after distending the colon with water. A total of 50 patients, who had been referred to colonoscopy for a suspected colorectal pathology were randomized into water-distention (N = 25) and air-distention (N = 25) groups. A contrast-enhanced T1-weighted three-dimensional volume interpolated breath-hold (VIBE) sequence was collected. Comparative analysis was based on qualitative ratings of image quality and bowel distention, as well as contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements for the colonic wall with respect to the colonic lumen. In addition, patient acceptance was evaluated.

RESULTS

Inflammatory changes and colorectal masses were correctly identified on MRC in eight patients each. One 4-mm polyp identified at colonoscopy was missed on water-distended MRC. There were no false positive findings. No significant differences were found between air- and water-distention regarding discomfort levels and image quality. The presence of air in the colonic lumen was not associated with susceptibility artifacts. CNR of the contrast-enhanced colonic wall, as well as bowel distention, were superior on air-distended three-dimensional data sets.

CONCLUSION

MRC can be performed using either water or air for colonic distention. Both techniques permit assessment of the colonic wall and identification of colorectal masses. While discomfort levels are similar for both agents, MRC with air provides higher CNR and better colonic distention.

Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of hyoscine butylbromide and an inflatable rectal balloon catheter on luminal distention during computed tomographic (CT) colonography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-six subjects undergoing CT colonography were randomized to receive either 20 mg or 40 mg of hyoscine butylbromide or no spasmolytic. Subjects were also independently randomized to undergo CT colonography with an inflatable rectal balloon catheter or a standard thin rectal tube. Multi-detector row CT colonography was performed with patients in prone and supine positions, with colonic segmental distention assessed by a single observer with a four-point scale. A simple assessment of whether distention was adequate for clinical interpretation was also made, and the effect of hyoscine butylbromide and catheter use was examined by using multivariate ordered logistic regression.

RESULTS

Administration of hyoscine butylbromide was associated with significantly improved cecal (P =.05), ascending (P =.001), and transverse (P <.001) colonic distention when patients were supine and improved ascending (P <.001) and descending (P <.001) colonic distention when patients were prone. Compared with control subjects, patients given a spasmolytic had odds of 6.49 for clinically adequate distention throughout all colonic segments (P =.001). There was no incremental advantage with use of a 40-mg dose. In contrast, rectal balloon catheter use was not significantly associated with improved distention.

CONCLUSION

Hyoscine butylbromide improves colonic distention during CT colonography and should be routinely administered where it is available. Use of a thin rectal tube for insufflation is adequate.