Eisele RM, Neumann U, Neuhaus P, Schumacher G. Open surgical is superior to percutaneous access for radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases.
World J Surg 2009;
33:804-11. [PMID:
19184639 DOI:
10.1007/s00268-008-9905-1]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE
This study was designed to determine the best approach to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the liver.
METHODS
From a total of 41 procedures, 37 patients with 47 tumors were treated with RFA for metastatic disease. Indications included colorectal cancer (n=28, 68%), neuroendocrine tumors (n=2, 5%), gynecological primaries (n=4, 10%), pancreatic/duodenal cancer (n=2, 5%), and miscellaneous entities (n=5, 12%). Mean follow-up period was 18 (median, 18) months. All ways of approach to RFA were applied: percutaneous was chosen in 17 (41.5%), laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic in 5 (12.2%), and open surgical in 19 cases (46.3%), and in 10 cases, RFA was combined with hepatic resection. The average maximum tumor size was 2.3 (range, 0.8-6) cm, and the mean number of nodules treated per patient in a single session was 1.3 (range, 1-3).
RESULTS
Overall survival was 59.5% at 2 years, recurrence-free 2-year survival was 12.6%, local tumor recurrence rate was 34%, and overall recurrence was 75.6%. Local tumor recurrence and disease-free survival were significantly improved in the open surgically treated patients compared with the percutaneous treatment group (15.8% [n=3] vs. 58.8% [n=10] and 11.5 vs. 7.9 months, p<0.01 [chi2 test] and p<0.05 [log-rank test], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Open surgical approach is superior to percutaneous access for RFA in metastatic hepatic disease.
Collapse