A systematic overview of chemotherapy effects in gastric cancer

Two decades of gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer surgery

PURPOSE

Diagnosis and treatment of gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer have undergone many critical changes during the last two decades. We addressed the question of how clinical reality outside of clinical trials has changed for gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer patients in a European center for upper gastrointestinal surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing (sub)total gastrectomy for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma between 1996 and 2017 in a tertiary upper gastrointestinal center were included. The time was divided into a) before (1996-2006) (pre-CTx) and b) after (2006-2017) (CTx) the MAGIC trial. Data were comprehensively analyzed for demographics, tumor stage, perioperative treatment, surgery, histopathology, and survival rates (SR).

RESULTS

737 patients (32% female) underwent gastrectomy, 255 patients in the pre-CTx era and 482 patients in the CTx era. The median age was 65 years and the median follow-up was 27.5 months for surviving patients. Around 16.9% of patients received neoadjuvant treatment in the pre-CTx era versus 46.3% in the CTx era. The 3-year survival rate (3-YSR) was 46.4% in the pre-CTx and 60.9% in the CTx era (p < 0.001). For pretreated patients, 3-YSR was 39.0% (pre-CTx) versus 55.3% (CTx) (p = 0.168). Survival rate (SR) for locally advanced tumor stages (cT3/cT4) was higher when neoadjuvant therapy was administered (3-YSR: 56.7% vs 40.6%; p = 0.022). There were no significant differences according to sex (p = 0.357), age (p = 0.379), pT category (p = 0.817), pN stage (p = 0.074), cM stage (p = 0.112), Laurén classification (p = 0.158), and SRs (3-YSR: 60.3% vs 59.4%; p = 0.898) between the MAGIC and FLOT regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival rates have dramatically improved for gastric cancer patients during the last two decades. MAGIC and FLOT regimens showed similar results in the postsurgical follow-up.

End-of-life care of patients with esophageal or gastric cancer: decision making and the goal of care

BACKGROUND

Overall survival (OS) with advanced esophageal or gastric cancer is poor. To avoid overly aggressive treatments at the end-of-life and assure adequate end-of-life quality, the decision to focus on symptom-centered palliative care (PC) and terminate anticancer treatments, i.e., the PC decision, should be made in time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed the charts of patients (N = 160) with esophageal or gastric cancer treated at the Department of Oncology at Helsinki University Central Hospital in 2013 and deceased by December 2014. The use of acute services (Emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations) and places of death were compared according to the timing of the PC decision. Reasons for ED visits and hospitalizations were collected.

RESULTS

The median OS from diagnosis of advanced cancer was 6 months. Anti-cancer treatments were never started for 34% of the patients. The PC decision was made early (>30 days before death) for 54% of the patients and late (≤30 days before death) or not at all for 46%. Patients with late or no PC decision died more often in tertiary/secondary hospital (29 versus 7%, p = 0.001) and had more ED visits (49 versus 29%, p < 0.001) and hospitalizations (53 versus 28%, p = 0.001) in their last month, and visited the PC unit less often (18 versus 69%, p < 0.001), than the patients with early PC decision. The ED visits were most commonly related to cancer progression, and clinical deterioration (17%), fever (16%), and dysphagia (15%) were the most common symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The decision to focus on PC and terminate anticancer treatments, i.e., the PC decision, was made late or not at all in every other patient, leading to increased tertiary/secondary hospital service use and deaths at tertiary/secondary hospital. Early decision-making increased end-of-life care at specialized PC services or at home, implying better end-of-life care.

Systems Biology of Gastric Cancer: Perspectives on the Omics-Based Diagnosis and Treatment

Gastric cancer is the fifth most diagnosed cancer in the world, affecting more than a million people and causing nearly 783,000 deaths each year. The prognosis of advanced gastric cancer remains extremely poor despite the use of surgery and adjuvant therapy. Therefore, understanding the mechanism of gastric cancer development, and the discovery of novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutics are major goals in gastric cancer research. Here, we review recent progress in application of omics technologies in gastric cancer research, with special focus on the utilization of systems biology approaches to integrate multi-omics data. In addition, the association between gastrointestinal microbiota and gastric cancer are discussed, which may offer insights in exploring the novel microbiota-targeted therapeutics. Finally, the application of data-driven systems biology and machine learning approaches could provide a predictive understanding of gastric cancer, and pave the way to the development of novel biomarkers and rational design of cancer therapeutics.

Survival of esophageal and gastric cancer patients with adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy-a retrospective analysis of a register-based patient cohort

PURPOSE

The survival of esophageal and gastric cancer patients treated with chemotherapy is rarely assessed outside of clinical trials. Therefore, we compared the effectiveness of various curative or palliative chemotherapy regimens on the survival of esophageal and gastric cancer patients in a "real world" clinical setting.

METHODS

We identified a cohort of 966 incident esophageal and gastric cancer patients in Stockholm/Gotland County (a low-risk Western population) during 2008-2013. Patients who received chemotherapy with curative intention (n = 279) and palliative intention (n = 182) were analyzed separately. Using Cox proportional hazards regression models, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and adjusted for the potential confounding factors: age, sex, TNM stage, radiotherapy, comorbidity, marital status, education, income, and country of birth.

RESULTS

In esophageal cancer patients with curative treatment intention, we observed a higher hazard for death among patients who received carboplatin-fluorouracil compared to patients who received cisplatin-fluorouracil, corresponding to a HR of 2.18 (95% CI 1.09-4.37). Conversely, in patients with cancer in the gastroesophageal junction who had a curative treatment intention at diagnosis, we observed a reduced hazard for death among those who received fluorouracil-oxaliplatin, compared to patients who received cisplatin-fluorouracil (HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.08-0.96).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with esophageal cancer who received treatment with curative intention, cisplatin-fluorouracil was associated with better survival compared to carboplatin-fluorouracil, while patients with gastroesophageal junction cancer who were treated with cisplatin-fluorouracil had worse survival compared to fluorouracil-oxaliplatin.

Five-year outcomes of a phase II study of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus docetaxel for stage III gastric cancer after curative D2 gastrectomy (OGSG1002)

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant S-1 monotherapy is standard of care for stage II and III gastric cancer (GC), but there is still a need to improve the efficacy of treatment for stage III disease. We conducted phase II study of eight cycles of S-1 plus docetaxel (DS) followed by S-1 monotherapy for up to 1 year after D2 gastrectomy for stage III GC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients with stage III GC were enrolled. They received oral S-1 (80 mg/m²/day) for 2 consecutive weeks and intravenous docetaxel (40 mg/m²) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks for 8 cycles, followed by S-1 until 1 year postgastrectomy. Treatment safety, tolerability, and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

The completion rate for eight cycles of DS therapy was 77.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 65.0-87.1%]. Subsequent S-1 monotherapy for 1 year was feasible in 71.0% (95% CI 58.1-81.8%) of patients. The incidence of neutropenia, leukopenia, anorexia, and fatigue of grade 3 or higher was 10% or higher. There were no treatment-related deaths. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 72.4% (95% CI 62.1-84.5%) and 60.0% (95% CI 48.8-73.9%), respectively. Subgroup analyses by disease stage showed 5-year OS and DFS rates of 74.5% (95% CI 60.7-91.5%) and 59.3% (95% CI 43.8-80.2%) for stage IIIA and 70.0% (95% CI 55.4-88.5%) and 60.0% (95% CI 44.8-80.4%) for stage IIIB, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant eight cycles of DS therapy might be safe and manageable and has promising OS and DFS for stage III GC.

Deguelin exerts anticancer activity of human gastric cancer MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells in vitro

During the pathogenesis of gastric cancer, Akt signaling is considered as a pivotal inducer of gastric cancer development. Here we report the identification of anticancer activities of deguelin, a natural agent that inhibits Akt signaling. When applied to MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells, deguelin suppressed the proliferation and arrested cell cycle by p21-mediated inhibition of cyclin E. We further present in vitro evidence that deguelin promoted apoptosis of cancer cells by decreasing the phospho-Akt signaling and affecting expression of the apoptosis-associated genes Bax and Bcl-2. Additionally, deguelin was found to suppress the migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells. Taken together, these results indicated that deguelin exerted anticancer activity of human gastric cancer MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells in vitro.

Gastric cancer: epidemiology, prevention, classification, and treatment

Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the world, the epidemiology of which has changed within last decades. A trend of steady decline in gastric cancer incidence rates is the effect of the increased standards of hygiene, conscious nutrition, and Helicobacter pylori eradication, which together constitute primary prevention. Avoidance of gastric cancer remains a priority. However, patients with higher risk should be screened for early detection and chemoprevention. Surgical resection enhanced by standardized lymphadenectomy remains the gold standard in gastric cancer therapy. This review briefly summarizes the most important aspects of gastric cancers, which include epidemiology, risk factors, classification, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. The paper is mostly addressed to physicians who are interested in updating the state of art concerning gastric carcinoma from easily accessible and credible source.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Whole Abdominal Irradiation for Gastric Carcinoma

Aims and Background

To analyze the efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy followed by whole abdominal irradiation in the treatment of resectable gastric cancer with positive lymph nodes.

Methods and Study Design

Between 1996 and 1999, 10 patients with node-positive gastric cancer underwent complete gross resection and were treated by postoperative chemoradiotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of 5-fluorouracil, 1000 mg/m2/day as a 96-hr continuous infusion on day 1, and cisplatin, 100 mg/m2 on day 2, every 21 days. Six courses were planned. Radiotherapy was administered 3 weeks after completion of the chemotherapy protocol as a single-fraction dose of 600 cGy in a two-field (anterior and posterior) configuration.

Results

Treatment was generally well tolerated, with no treatment-related deaths. However, 9 of the 10 patients died of recurrent disease, with a median survival of 20 months (range, 7–84).

Conclusions

Adjuvant chemotherapy with whole abdominal irradiation for gastric cancer is safe and tolerable but has no apparent effect on patient outcome. Studies in larger series are needed to evaluate the role of the approach in this disease.

[Gastric Cancer Recurrence in 12 Years after Surgical Resection]

Recurrence of gastric cancer after 10 years of surgical resection is highly rare. There are limited data on the surveillance of patients with gastric cancer after 10 years from gastrectomy. A 50-year-old man presented to the gastroenterology clinic at our hospital for the management of abnormal findings on a routine colonoscopic exam. He had undergone gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer 12 years ago. At presentation, colonoscopic examination revealed asymmetrically edematous and hyperemic mucosal change with luminal narrowing on transverse colon. Abdominal computed tomography showed no evidence of distant metastasis, except for focal bowel wall thickening on transverse colon. He underwent a laparoscopic right-hemicolectomy, and the resected specimen revealed a recurrent and metastatic lesion. We report a case of recurrence of gastric cancer after 10 years from surgical resection with relevant literature review.

[Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRI after Failure of FOLFOX-4 in Advanced Gastric Cancer]

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan based FOLFIRI chemotherapy as a second-line treatment after failure of FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients who were pathologically diagnosed with unresectable gastric cancer and received FOLFIRI chemotherapy after failure of FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy between September 2005 and February 2012 were enrolled in this study. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing the medical records. The response to chemotherapy was assessed every 3 cycles by World Health Organization criteria and long term survival was analyzed. The toxicities were evaluated for every course of chemotherapy according to National Cancer Institution (NCI) toxicity criteria version 3.0.

RESULTS

Median age of the patients was 57 years. Median overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were 7.8 and 5 months, respectively. The number of patients showing complete remission, partial remission, stable disease, and progressive disease were 0 (0.0%), 9 (17.3%), 30 (57.7%), and 13 (25.0%), respectively. The overall response rate was 17.3%. During a total of 345 cycles, anemia worse than NCI toxicity grade 3 occurred in 2.9%, leukopenia in 20.3%, neutropenia in 12.2%, and thrombocytopenia in 1.5%. Patients with less organ involvement by metastasis, less than 34 U/mL of CA 19-9 and good responsiveness to third cycle of second line chemotherapy were associated with longer OS and TTP.

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFIRI chemotherapy has a modest efficacy with acceptable toxicities in patients with advanced gastric cancer as a second-line treatment. Further well-controlled studies are needed to elucidate the efficacy of FOLFIRI chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with advanced stomach cancer.

Cytoreductive surgery (SRC) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: Our initial experience and technical details

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to present our initial experience in peritoneal carcinomatosis treatment and the technical details of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the light of current literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data of 27 consecutive patients who were treated with CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis in Medical Park Samsun Hospital, between November 2012 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment indication and management were evaluated at the multidisciplinary oncology council. All patients underwent CRS and HIPEC with the aim of complete cytoreduction. Patients with unresectable disease and/or palliative surgery were excluded from analysis. Perioperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo classification, and HIPEC-related side effects were identified using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria. Demographic, clinical and histopathological data of the patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 54 (32-72). Nineteen patients were female. The origin of peritoneal carcinomatosis was colorectal cancer in 12 patients, ovarian cancer in 12 patients, gastric cancer in 2 patients and pseudomyxoma peritonei in 1 patient. The mean Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index was 12 (3-32), with a mean operative time of 420 (300-660) minutes. Perioperative morbidity, HIPEC-related toxicity and perioperative mortality were observed in eight (30%), one (3.7%) and four patients (14.8%), respectively. During a mean follow up of 13 (1-22) months, overall and disease-free survival rates were 95.8% and 82.6%, respectively. Two patients with colorectal cancer (after 9 and 12 months) and one patient with ovarian cancer (after 11 months) had intra-abdominal recurrence. One patient with ovarian cancer had liver metastases 13 months after surgery, and underwent resection of segments 6-7. The remaining patients are being followed-up without any recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC have favorable results in the treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Compatible with the literature, surgical outcomes of the presented series are encouraging for this treatment modality that have been recently popularized in our country. Careful perioperative evaluation, proper patient selection and multidisciplinary approach are essential for success in curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Identification of KRAS and PIK3CA but not BRAF mutations in patients with gastric cancer

Cetuximab, an immunoglobulin G1 chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor, is currently considered to be the strategy with the most potential for the treatment of gastric cancer due to the low frequency of KRAS mutations in patients with gastric cancer. However, the therapeutic success of cetuximab in colorectal cancer (CRC) has demonstrated that the clinical effect of cetuximab is closely dependent not only on KRAS mutations, but also BRAF and phosphoinositide-3-kinase, catalytic, α polypeptide (PIK3CA) mutations. In the present study, the status of KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer were investigated concomitantly in order to aid the selection of patients eligible for treatment with cetuximab. Mutations in KRAS (exon 2), BRAF (exon 15) and PIK3CA (exon 9 and exon 20) were retrospectively evaluated by high resolution melting analysis and DNA direct sequencing in samples from 156 patients with gastric cancer. Mutations in either KRAS or PIK3CA were identified in 13 samples (8.3%), 7 samples with KRAS mutations and 6 samples with PIK3CA mutations. No mutations in the BRAF gene were identified. The frequency of mutations in either KRAS or PIK3CA were significantly higher in patients without lymph node metastasis than those with. Furthermore, KRAS and PIK3CA mutations were mutually exclusive. The present study, therefore, suggested that it may be necessary to evaluate KRAS and PIK3CA mutations concomitantly for the selection of patients eligible for treatment with cetuximab.

Survival effect of supportive care services for Turkish patients with metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer- related deaths worldwide and ranks 11th or 14th among all deaths. Patients with advanced disease require supportive care along with the medical and/ or surgical treatment.

AIM

To assess the need for palliative care for patients with advanced tumours along with standard clinical therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-four patients with metastatic (stage 4) gastric cancer, including both patients who had received surgical treatment or not , were followed up in Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Division of Medical Oncology between 2011 and 2014. They were categorised as supportive care (-) (Group 1, n=37) and (+) groups (Group 2, n=47) and evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics of the patients were as follows: mean age, Group 1, 65.2±10.5 years, Group 2,63.7±11.3 years; male/female ratio, Group 1, 21/16, Group 2, 28/19; distribution of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scores of 0 and 1, Group 1, ECOG 0 (n=9) and 1 (n=14), Group 2, ECOG 0 (34) and 1 (n=13) (p<0.0001); patients receiving second-line, Group 1 (n=7) and Group 2 (n=22) (p<0.008) or third - line chemotherapy,Group 2 (n=6) (p<0.02); mortality rates, Group 1, (n=28; 75.6%) and Group 2 (n=30; 63.8%); progression-free survival (PFS) rates, Group 1, 17.4±6 weeks, Group 2, 28.3±16.2 weeks; statistically significant overall survival rates, Group 1, 20.8±8.2 weeks and Group 2, 28.3 ± 162 weeks (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The supportive care team (medical oncologist, general surgeon, internal medicine specialist, algologist, psychiatrist and radiologist) can play a role in the treatment of metastatic gastric tumours, with improvements shown in terms of the performance status of cases, eligibility of patients to be on chemotherapy programmes for longer duration and overall survival rates in Turkey.

Interim endoscopy results during neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer correlate with histopathological response and prognosis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer leads to major histopathological response in less than 30 % of patients. Data on interim endoscopic response assessment do not exist. This exploratory prospective study evaluates early endoscopy after 50 % of the chemotherapy as predictor for later response and prognosis.

METHODS

Forty-seven consecutive patients were included (45 resected; 33 R0 resections). All patients received baseline endoscopy and CT scans, after 50 % of their chemotherapy (EGD-1, CT-1) and after completion of chemotherapy (EGD-2, CT-2). Interim endoscopic response (EGD-1) was assessed after having received 50 % (6 weeks) of the planned 12 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Post-chemotherapy response was clinically assessed by a combination of CT scan (CT-2) and endoscopy (EGD-2). Histopathological response was determined by a standardized scoring system (Becker criteria). Endoscopic response was defined as a reduction of >75 % of the tumor mass.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were responders at EGD-1 and 13 at EGD-2. Nine patients (19.1 %) were clinical responders and 7 patients (15.6 %) were histopathological responders after chemotherapy. Specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value of the interim EGD-1 for subsequent histopathological response were 31/38 (82 %), 36/47 (76 %), and 31/33 (93 %); and for recurrence or death, 28/30 (93.3 %), 38/47 (80.9 %), and 28/35 (80.0 %). Response at EGD-1 was significantly associated with histopathological response (p = 0.010), survival (p < 0.001), and recurrence-free survival (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Interim endoscopy after 6 weeks predicts response and prognosis. Therefore, tailoring treatment according to interim endoscopic assessment could be feasible, but the findings of this study should be validated in a larger patient cohort.

Three-year outcomes of a phase II study of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus docetaxel for stage III gastric cancer after curative D2 gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

We have previously reported the superior feasibility and safety of adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel in patients with stage III gastric cancer during a prospective phase II study. We report 3-year follow-up data on patients enrolled in this study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-three patients with histologically confirmed stage III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were enrolled into this study. They received oral S-1 (80 mg/m(2)/day) for 2 consecutive weeks and intravenous docetaxel (40 mg/m(2)) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks (one cycle). Treatment was initiated within 45 days after surgery and repeated for four cycles, followed by S-1 monotherapy (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off) until 1 year after surgery. Three-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The OS rate at 3 years was 78.4 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 67.9-90.6 %] and the DFS rate at 3 years was 66.2 % (95 % CI, 54.4-80.7 %). Subgroup analyses according to disease stage showed a 3-year OS and DFS rate of 85.7 % (95 % CI, 74.9-98.1 %) and 70.8 % (95 % CI, 57.1-87.8 %) for stage IIIA, and 62.5 % (95 % CI, 42.8-91.4 %) and 56.2 % (95 % CI, 36.5-86.7 %) for stage IIIB, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of 3-year follow-up data, postoperative adjuvant therapy with S-1 plus docetaxel yielded promising OS and DFS in stage IIIA gastric cancer patients who had undergone D2 gastrectomy. We believe that this regimen is a candidate for future phase III trials studying the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for stage III gastric cancer.

Mitomycin C and capecitabine in pretreated patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II study

PURPOSE

We conducted a multicenter phase II study to assess the toxicity and efficacy of a combination of mitomycin C (MMC) and capecitabine in pretreated patients with metastatic or locally advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients (77 % male) between 33 and 78 years (median 66) with pretreated locally advanced or metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma and eastern cooperative oncology group performance status of ≤2, measurable lesions, and adequate organ functions were recruited into the study. Eight patients (21 %) had received more than one prior chemotherapy regimen. Treatment consisted of three-weekly MMC 10 mg/m(2) day 1 and capecitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) (day 1-14; repeated day 22).

RESULTS

A median of three cycles of therapy was administered. Grade 3 toxicity occurred in 20 patients (54 %). Main grade 3 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (11 %, n = 4), fatigue (8 %, n = 3), and neuropathy (8 %, n = 3). Two events of grade 4 toxicity were reported (5 %) (dyspnea and elevation of alkaline phosphatase due to bone metastases). Partial remission was noticed in 10.3 % (n = 4), stable disease in 33.3 % (n = 13) adding to a tumor control rate of 43.6 %. The median progression-free and overall survival were 2.8 and 5.6 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination of MMC and capecitabine exhibited a favorable tolerability profile in pretreated patients with gastric cancer. The disease control rate compares adequately with that of other phase II and phase III trials for second-line therapy in gastric cancer. This regimen may be considered as an alternative second-line treatment, especially for patients not suitable for or pretreated with taxanes and/or irinotecan.

Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: review and update of current practices

No standard adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy regimen has been internationally approved for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is administered prior to surgery and is used in the Unitied States, and intensified chemotherapy is administered prior to and after surgery and is used in Europe. Limited D1 dissections are also frequently performed in the United States and Europe. In Korea, patients undergoing D2 resection appear to benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy using S-1 or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin. Fluoropyrimidine, platinum, taxane, epirubicin, and irinotecan may be employed alone or in combination as a first-line therapy in a palliative chemotherapy regimen. In Asia, an orally administered fluoropyrimidine, such as capecitabine or S-1, is favored over the continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil because of its convenience. Trastuzumab has been integrated into the current standard chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing gastric cancers. There is currently no standard regimen for secondary palliative chemotherapy. Clinical studies of several targeted therapies are ongoing.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with epirubicin-based triplet chemotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction

Background

Due to low tolerance to chemotherapy, the maximum number of cycles of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is 4 in adjuvant gastric clinical trials. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjuvant epirubicin-based triplet chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of resected locally advanced stomach or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Methodology/Principal Findings

From January 2004 to July 2008, ninety-seven consecutive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma patients in stages T3–4/N+ were treated with postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The recommended treatment plan was radical resection followed by 1–2 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and, finally, 4–5 cycles of ACT. The patients were classified into two groups depending on the number of cycles of ACT: group 1 received 4–6 cycles (n = 59), and group 2 received 0–3 cycles (n = 38). The detailed grouping is as follows: RT alone, 2; RT and CT, 18; concurrent RTCT and CT, 41; and CRT, 36. Of the 97 patients, 77 patients received concurrent therapy (CRT, (5-fluorouracil or capecitabine), and 20 received radiotherapy alone because of patient refusal (n = 15) or treatment toxicity (n = 5). After a median follow-up of 44 months, the 3-year disease free survival(DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 66.5% and 69.5% for group 1 and 45.5% and 50% for group 2, respectively (p = 0.005 and p = 0.024). Multivariate analysis revealed that 4–6 cycles of ACT, lymphovascular invasion, or peritoneal metastasis were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival or overall survival (p<0.05).

Conclusions/Significance

This study demonstrates that concurrent chemoradiation with adjuvant epirubicin-based triplet chemotherapy is feasible and tolerable for gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma patients. Patients can benefit from more cycles of ACT.

Phase I trial of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (DOC) in untreated gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

A combination of docetaxel (D), oxaliplatin (O), and capecitabine (C) (DOC) was studied in this dose-escalation phase Ib trial in patients with untreated advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) included any grade 4 hematological or any grade 3 non-hematological toxicity, besides alopecia and nausea or vomiting. Cohorts of three patients, expanded to six if one DLT occurred, were studied. Two DLTs out of three patients, or ≥3 out of six patients defined the toxic level. The preceding level, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), was further expanded to nine patients. The primary objective was to establish the MTD of the DOC regimen.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients entered four dose levels. Levels I, II, and IIb were considered safe and included 3, 6, and 6 patients, respectively. Level III defined our toxic level with three analyzed patients. Therefore, level IIB was expanded to 9 patients. No other DLTs were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Fractionation of doses and the use of less toxic and more convenient derivatives are the rationales for this new combination. The MTD (mg/m(2)) was: D, 30 and O, 70, both on days 1 and 8, i.v.; C 1000 per day, days 2-15, p.o.; all given every 3 weeks. A cooperative phase II study has been opened.

Updated analysis of SWOG-directed intergroup study 0116: a phase III trial of adjuvant radiochemotherapy versus observation after curative gastric cancer resection

PURPOSE

Surgical resection of gastric cancer has produced suboptimal survival despite multiple randomized trials that used postoperative chemotherapy or more aggressive surgical procedures. We performed a randomized phase III trial of postoperative radiochemotherapy in those at moderate risk of locoregional failure (LRF) following surgery. We originally reported results with 4-year median follow-up. This update, with a more than 10-year median follow-up, presents data on failure patterns and second malignancies and explores selected subset analyses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 559 patients with primaries ≥ T3 and/or node-positive gastric cancer were randomly assigned to observation versus radiochemotherapy after R0 resection. Fluorouracil and leucovorin were administered before, during, and after radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was given to all LRF sites to a dose of 45 Gy.

RESULTS

Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) data demonstrate continued strong benefit from postoperative radiochemotherapy. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS is 1.32 (95% CI, 1.10 to 1.60; P = .0046). The HR for RFS is 1.51 (95% CI, 1.25 to 1.83; P < .001). Adjuvant radiochemotherapy produced substantial reduction in both overall relapse and locoregional relapse. Second malignancies were observed in 21 patients with radiotherapy versus eight with observation (P = .21). Subset analyses show robust treatment benefit in most subsets, with the exception of patients with diffuse histology who exhibited minimal nonsignificant treatment effect.

CONCLUSION

Intergroup 0116 (INT-0116) demonstrates strong persistent benefit from adjuvant radiochemotherapy. Toxicities, including second malignancies, appear acceptable, given the magnitude of RFS and OS improvement. LRF reduction may account for the majority of overall relapse reduction. Adjuvant radiochemotherapy remains a rational standard therapy for curatively resected gastric cancer with primaries T3 or greater and/or positive nodes.

Targeted therapies for gastric cancer: current status

Gastric cancer represents one of the most common cancers internationally. Unfortunately the majority of patients still present at an advanced stage, and despite advances in diagnostic and treatment strategies, outcomes still remain poor with high mortality rates despite a decline in incidence. Whilst the utility of classical chemotherapy agents has been explored thoroughly (and continues to be investigated, alone or in various combinations), advances have been slow and the efficacy of these agents has reached a plateau. As such, the focus of recent study has shifted toward developing a greater understanding of the molecular biology of carcinogenesis and the cancer cell phenotype, and, in turn, the development of rationally designed drugs that target molecular aberrancies in signal transduction pathways specific to gastric cancer. These targets include circulating growth and angiogenic factors, cell surface receptors, and other molecules that comprise downstream intracellular signalling pathways, including receptor tyrosine kinases. Therapeutic advances in this area significantly lag behind other solid organ malignancies such as breast and colorectal cancer. This article reviews the role of targeted therapies in gastric cancer, including rationale and mechanism of action, current and emerging data, as single-agent therapy or in combination regimens. A recently published randomized phaseIII trial supporting the use of trastuzumab, an anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu monoclonal antibody, in a selected population of patients is discussed. Therapies that have been evaluated in phase II trials are also reviewed, as well as promising new therapies currently being investigated in preclinical or phase I studies. There is optimism that targeted therapies, whether as single-agent therapy or in combination with traditional therapies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, may yet have an impact on improvement of the overall prognosis of gastric cancer.

Comparison of the prognostic value of various preoperative inflammation-based factors in patients with stage III gastric cancer

The aim of present study was to examine whether the C-reactive protein (CRP)-based systemic inflammatory response such as the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS; a combination of CRP and albumin) offers prognostic value that is superior to the circulating white cellular components as neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients undergoing resection for stage III gastric cancer. The medical records of 324 patients with stage III gastric adenocarcinoma were reviewed. Potential prognosis factors were evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier methodology and multivariable Cox hazards model. An increase of GPS was associated with an increase weight loss, higher NLR, higher PLR, and larger tumor size. On multivariate analysis, only the GPS, tumor-nodes-metastasis staging, and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated independently with disease-free and overall survival. However, the NLR and PLR were not. In subgroup analysis, patients with a GPS of 2 had a significantly poorer median survival (13.70 months) when compared with patients with a GPS of 1 (27.4 months) or 0 (median survival had not been reached) in patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Our study demonstrated that elevated preoperative GPS is superior to circulating white cellular components and was associated with reduced overall and disease-free survival for patients with stage III gastric cancer.

Systematic review of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis has a poor prognosis. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been proposed as a treatment option. This systematic review examined recent literature to determine the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched between January 2004 and January 2010 for relevant studies. Defined outcomes of interest were treatment-related morbidity and mortality, long-term survival and sites of recurrence.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were identified involving 914 patients with gastric cancer, of whom 819 (89·6 per cent) received intraperitoneal chemotherapy. There were two randomized controlled trials, two case-control studies and ten observational studies. Methodological quality was rated as poor in 12 studies, with selection and observer bias apparent in most non-randomized cohorts. Studies were often small and varied in terms of intraperitoneal timing of chemotherapy, chemotherapeutic agents, treatment temperature, and the use of adjuvant therapies. In the better conducted studies, survival was longer in patients receiving intraperitoneal chemotherapy and surgery than in those having surgery alone.

CONCLUSION

There is limited good-quality evidence to determine the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer is worthy of further appraisal. However, the quality of trials must be improved, and studies must be conducted more uniformly to minimize bias and aid comparison between centres.

Phase I study of docetaxel, oxaliplatin and capecitabine (TEX) as first line therapy to patients with advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin, 5-FU) has been a standard first-line regimen in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer (GEC). If cisplatin is substituted by oxaliplatin (Eloxatin®) - E) and 5-FU by capecitabine (X - Xeloda®) this regimen is easily administered with at least comparable efficacy and lower toxicity. Recent studies indicate that efficacy can be improved by adding docetaxel (Taxotere® - T) to CF. We initiated a phase I trial of T, short-time infusion of E and continuously X (TEX) as first-line therapy in GEC to establish the recommended dose (RD) for further therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were enrolled in cohorts of three at five dose levels. Patients had histologically confirmed GEC adenocarcinoma. Therapy was administered day 1 with escalating doses of docetaxel (60 mg/m² to 75 mg/m² iv as a 60 minutes infusion), oxaliplatin (85 to 130 mg/m² iv as a 30 minutes infusion) and oral capecitabine (1 000 to 1 250 mg/m²/day). TEX was repeated every third week for a maximum of eight cycles. Toxicity was evaluated according to CTCAE v3.0 and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was evaluated after the first course of TEX.

RESULTS

From June 2007 to April 2009, 23 consecutive patients received TEX. At dose level V, two of four patients experienced DLT and therefore we included additional seven patients at dose level IV. Only one of seven experienced DLT but dose-intensity was reduced to 75% in four of seven patients after three courses of TEX. Therefore we defined dose level III as RD. Efficacy was promising with response rate 38%, PFS 9.4 months and OS 12.5 months.

CONCLUSION

The recommended dose of TEX (docetaxel 60 mg/m² iv day 1, oxaliplatin 115 mg/m² iv day 1 and oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m²/day continuously) every three weeks is easily administered in an out-patient setting. Efficacy is promising and will be evaluated in a phase II study.

HIF-1alpha is an unfavorable determinant of relapse in gastric cancer patients who underwent curative surgery followed by adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy

Among several chemotherapeutic agents, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been widely used as a key drug in adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. However, no reliable marker, which predicts the response to 5-FU in an adjuvant setting, has been identified. Hypoxia-induced drug resistance, via upregulation of HIF-1alpha, is a major obstacle in the development of effective cancer therapy. However, few clinical studies have so far assessed the relationship between the HIF-1alpha expression and the chemo-resistance of gastric cancer patients in an adjuvant setting. We established 2 HIF-1alpha knockdown gastric cancer cell lines in order to clarify the role of HIF-1alpha in chemo-resistance against 5-FU. Furthermore, expression of HIF-1alpha was immunohistochemically assessed in 91 resected specimens. Sixty-four of 91 patients received 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. HIF-1alpha expression was associated with the significantly shorter relapse-free survival and disease-specific survival in the 64 patients of adjuvant group (p = 0.026, 0.014, respectively), but not in the 27 of surgery group. Multivariate analysis showed that HIF-1alpha was an independent risk factor for relapse in 64 patients in the adjuvant group (p = 0.029). In conclusion, the current study confirmed, for the first time that HIF-1alpha expression is an independent risk factor for relapse in high-risk gastric cancer patients who underwent curative surgery followed by adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy. A favorable effect of 5-FU might therefore be expected in patients that do not express HIF-1alpha, whereas, other types of chemotherapy or additional treatments, such as HIF-1alpha inhibitors, should be considered in patients that do express HIF-1alpha.

Randomized phase II study of sequential docetaxel and irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (leucovorin) in patients with advanced gastric cancer: the GATAC trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma (GC) is yet to be determined. We compared sequential administration of docetaxel and irinotecan, both in combination with infused 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-Fu/Lv), and randomly assigned patients to start with either of the two.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic GC and with measurable lesions (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; RECIST) were randomly assigned to start with docetaxel 45 mg/m(2) (arm T) or irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) (arm C) with bolus/44-h infusion of 5-Fu/Lv (day 1 every 2 weeks). After four courses, there was a prescheduled crossover to the alternative regimen for four additional courses.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were randomized and 78 started treatment. Complete and partial responses were seen in 31 (40%) patients after 8 weeks and in 32 (41%) after 16 weeks, with similar results in both study arms. The median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 and 10.6 months in arms T and C, respectively (P = 0.3). The two schedules were feasible and did not differ in the overall rate of severe adverse events (SAEs).

CONCLUSION

This is the first randomized comparison of two of the newer cytostatic drugs in GC therapy. No differences favoring either arm T or arm C were found with respect to response rate, OS, or toxicity. The median OS of 11 months indicates that sequential administration of the two combinations is effective and is similar to triple combinations. Thus, comparable efficacy to platinum combinations appears to be obtained with newer, less toxic regimens when given sequentially.

R0 resection in the treatment of gastric cancer: Room for improvement

Gastric carcinoma is one of the most frequent malignancies in the world and its clinical behavior especially depends on the metastatic potential of the tumor. In particular, lymphatic metastasis is one of the main predictors of tumor recurrence and survival, and current pathological staging systems reflect the concept that lymphatic spread is the most relevant prognostic factor in patients undergoing curative resection. This is compounded by the observation that two-thirds of gastric cancer in the Western world presents at an advanced stage, with lymph node metastasis at diagnosis. All current therapeutic efforts in gastric cancer are directed toward individualization of therapeutic protocols, tailoring the extent of resection and the administration of preoperative and postoperative treatment. The goals of all these strategies are to improve prognosis towards the achievement of a curative resection (R0 resection) with minimal morbidity and mortality, and better postoperative quality of life.

Outcomes of modified FOLFOX-6 as first line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer in a single institution; retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

Treatment options for patients with advanced gastric cancer remain limited. Few studies have investigated the efficacy and tolerability of the combination regimen of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin for patients with advanced gastric cancer. The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy and toxicity of a modified FOLFOX-6 (mFOLFOX-6) regimen as a first-line chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March, 2006, to December, 2007, 82 patients with advanced gastric cancer received 100 mg/m² oxaliplatin and 100 mg/m² leucovorin on the first day of treatment, followed by 2,400 mg/m² of 5-fluorouracil on the first and second days of treatment every 2 weeks as a first-line treatment.

RESULTS

The median age of the enrolled patients was 62 years (range; 30~75). Out of 82 patients, 34 cases (41.5%) were recurrent cases after curative resection, and the other 48 cases were unresectable or non-curative resectable cases. Their response was evaluated every 6 weeks. The overall response rate was 40.2%, with 2 (2.4%) complete response and 31 (37.8%) partial responses. The median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) time were 6.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.69~7.31) and 13.0 months (7.99~18.0), respectively. The grade 3~4 hematologic toxicities observed included neutropenia (34.1%), thrombocytopenia (7.3%), and anemia (1.2%). The gastrointestinal toxicities observed included grade 3~4 nausea (9.8%) and vomiting (7.3%). Six patients (7.3%) experienced grade 3 neuropathy. No treatment-related deaths were recorded.

CONCLUSION

The modified FOLFOX-6 regimen is effective and well tolerated as a first-line chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Factors predicting outcome for advanced gastroesophageal cancer in elderly patients receiving palliative chemotherapy

AIMS

Most patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer are elderly, but current standard regimens have emerged from trials predominantly involving patients with a median age <65 years. The aim of this study was to assess the factors influencing survival outcome for an elderly gastroesophageal cancer non-trial population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the case notes of all patients in our centre over the age of 65 years who received palliative chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer over a period of 3.5 years. Patients were classified as having received standard, non-standard combination or single-agent chemotherapy. After an initial univariate analysis, a multivariate analysis of the most significant prognostic factors was carried out.

RESULTS

In total, 120 patients were suitable for analysis. The median overall survival for patients receiving standard chemotherapy was 8.1 months, non-standard combination 8.3 months and single-agent fluoropyrimidines 3.9 months. Poor prognosis was predicted by two independent factors: poor performance status (hazard ratio 2.402; 95% confidence interval 1.53-3.77, P<0.001) and the presence of cancer symptoms (hazard ratio 2.235; 95% confidence interval 1.32-3.79, P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

An assessment of the performance status and the level of symptoms is vital in this vulnerable group of patients. Prospective randomised trials to assess the benefit of chemotherapy in elderly patients with gastroesophageal cancer are required.

Docetaxel in advanced gastric cancer--review of the main clinical trials

The aim was to investigate the activity of docetaxel in advanced gastric cancer either as single agent or in combination with other drugs. A systematic review was carried out using the databases of Medline, Embase and CancerLit. Results from ASCO and ESMO meetings during 2002 were also included. Eight phase II trials focused on docetaxel as a single agent. Considering collectively the 262 evaluable patients enrolled in these studies, the mean response rate (RR) was 19% (CI 95% 14-24%). Docetaxel was well tolerated with a dose-limiting myelosuppression (grade 3-4 neutropenia in 36-95% of cases). Adding fluorouracil, an RR ranging from 22% to 86% was registered, due to differences in populations studied (young vs elderly) and modalities of drug administration (continuous vs. bolus infusion). RRs for docetaxel-cisplatin combination were 56%, 37% and 36% in three phase II trials and 35% in a phase III trial. The addition of both cisplatin and fluorouracil to docetaxel did not increase toxicity. Randomized trials comparing docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil with ciplatin-fluorouoracil or epirubicin-cisplatin-fluorouracil, the most commonly used regimens, are ongoing. The future results of the above phase III studies could indicate docetaxel as a key drug to improve treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

The potential of proton beam radiation therapy in gastrointestinal cancer

A group of Swedish oncologists and hospital physicists have estimated the number of patients in Sweden suitable for proton beam therapy. The estimations have been based on current statistics of tumour incidence, number of patients potentially eligible for radiation treatment, scientific support from clinical trials and model dose planning studies and knowledge of the dose-response relations of different tumours and normal tissues. In gastrointestinal cancers, it is assessed that at least 345 patients, mainly non-resectable rectal cancers, oesophageal and liver cancers, are eligible. Great uncertainties do however exist both in the number of patients with gastrointestinal cancers suitable for radiation therapy, and in the proportion of those where proton beams may give sufficiently better results.

Survival after radiotherapy in gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the impact of radiotherapy on both 3- and 5-year survival in patients with resectable gastric cancer.

METHODS

Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) in which radiotherapy, (preoperative, postoperative and/or intraoperative), was compared with surgery alone or surgery plus chemotherapy in resectable gastric cancer were identified by searching web-based databases and supplemented by manual examination of reference lists. Meta-analysis was performed using Risk Ratios (RRs). Random or fixed effects models were used to combine data. The methodological quality was evaluated by Chalmers' score.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy had a significant impact on 5-year survival. Using an intent to treat (ITT) and a Per Protocol (PP) analysis, the overall 5-year RR was 1.26 (95% CI: 1.08-1.48; NNT=17) and 1.31 (95% CI: 1.04-1.66; NNT=13), respectively. Although the quality of the studies was variable, the data were consistent and no clear publication bias was found.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed a statistically significant 5-year survival benefit with the addition of radiotherapy in patients with resectable gastric cancer. Radiotherapy remains a standard component in the treatment of resectable gastric cancer and new RCTs need to address the impact of new conformal radiotherapy technologies.

Phase II study of short-time oxaliplatin, capecitabine and epirubicin (EXE) as first-line therapy in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer

Epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusion of 5-FU is a widely used palliative regimen in patients with gastric cancer. If cisplatin is substituted by oxaliplatin and 5-FU by capecitabine this regimen can be administered in the outpatient setting. Dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin is peripheral sensory neuropathy and it is recommended to give oxaliplatin as a 120 min infusion. However, in patients with colorectal cancer a 30 min infusion of oxaliplatin can safely be administered without increasing neurotoxicity, standard infusion time is 30 min at our departments. In our phase I study the recommended doses of EXE was established (Dupont et al, 2006). Patients with non-resectable gastric adenocarcinoma were eligible. Patients received EXE (epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) day 1; capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) day(-1) continuously and oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) day 1) as outpatient therapy every third week for a maximum of 8 cycles. From June 2004 to September 2005, we enroled 54 patients. Median age was 60 years (31-74 years) Median number of courses was 6 (1-8). Response rate was 45%. Median PFS was 6.8 (5.2-7.9) months and median survival was 10.1 (7.9-1.1) months. Most important grade 3 toxicities were as follows: nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea (6%). Neurotoxicity grade 2 was seen in 36.5%. We therefore conclude, that EXE every third week is a convenient regimen that easily can be administrated in the outpatient setting but the regimen needs further evaluation in a phase III study.

An explorative randomised phase II study of sequential chemotherapy in advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer

The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of planned sequential administration of docetaxel and irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin in advanced upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma (UGIA) are unknown. Seventy-three patients with gastric (GC; n = 22), pancreatic (PC; n = 28) or biliary cancer (BC; n = 23) were randomised to start with 45 mg/m(2) docetaxel or 180 mg/m(2) irinotecan combined with 5-FU/leucovorin every 2nd week. After every 2nd course, the patients were crossed over to the other combination. Treatment was given for a maximum of 12 courses. Quality-of-life (QoL) was evaluated during the first two months using the EORTC QLQ-C30. Eighteen patients (25%; GC 32%, PC 21%, BC 22%) demonstrated partial response (PR) and 21 (29%) had prolonged stable disease. Mean QoL scores were low at baseline. Twenty-three (32%) patients had improved QoL using a summary measure and 13 were stable. Median time to progression was 4.4 months and overall survival 8.2 months. The treatments were reasonably well tolerated. Grade 3-4 toxicities were slightly more common for the docetaxel combination. There were two treatment-related deaths. Planned sequential treatment with docetaxel or irinotecan with 5-FU/leucovorin is feasible, reasonably tolerable and appears active in advanced UGIA.

Meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus of opinion about postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery for advanced gastric cancer. This is a meta-analysis of the published results of relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Electronic databases from January 1998 to December 2007 were searched and 12 RCTs were selected. These included a total of 3809 patients. The hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival was calculated.

RESULTS

The pooled HR for overall survival was 0.78 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.71 to 0.85) in favour of chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis showed that the advantage of chemotherapy was not influenced by depth of tumour infiltration, status of lymph node metastasis, type of lymphadenectomy, geographical distribution of patients or route of drug administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative chemotherapy can improve overall survival after radical surgery for gastric cancer; there is no standardized chemotherapy regimen. Japanese-style D2 radical surgery plus oral 5-fluorouracil appears an effective treatment at present.

Association of ERBB2 gene status with histopathological parameters and disease-specific survival in gastric carcinoma patients

The clinical significance of ERBB2 amplification/overexpression in gastric cancer remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the ERBB2 status in 463 gastric carcinomas using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), and compared the findings with histopathological characteristics and with disease-specific survival. ERBB2 overexpression (2+ and 3+) and amplification (ratio ERBB2/CEP17⩾2) were found in 43 (9.3%) and 38 (8.2%) gastric carcinomas, respectively. Perfect IHC/FISH correlation was found for the 19 cases scored as 0 (all negative by FISH), and also for the 25 cases scored as 3+ (all positive by FISH). One out of six carcinomas scored as 1+ and 12 out of 18 carcinomas scored as 2+ were positive by FISH. ERBB2 amplification was associated with gastric carcinomas of intestinal type (P=0.007) and with an expansive growth pattern (P=0.021). ERBB2 amplification was detected in both histological components of two mixed carcinomas, indicating a common clonal origin. A statistically significant association was found between ERBB2 amplification and worse survival in patients with expansive gastric carcinomas (P=0.011). We conclude that ERBB2 status may have clinical significance in subsets of gastric cancer patients, and that further studies are warranted to evaluate whether patients whose gastric carcinomas present ERBB2 amplification/overexpression may benefit from therapy targeting this surface receptor.

Locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer: current management and new treatment developments

The management of gastric cancer remains a challenge. In recent years, the most important advances have been achieved in the adjuvant setting for patients with locally advanced disease, where significant survival benefits have been demonstrated for both perioperative chemotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. These findings have changed the standard of care for patients with resectable disease. In the setting of metastatic gastric cancer, the development of new cytotoxic regimens must consider the balance between efficacy and toxicity in patients whose overall prognosis is poor. Major advances in recent years include the development of orally administered fluoropyrimidine analogues, which can be used in place of intravenous fluorouracil, and the addition of newer agents such as oxaliplatin and docetaxel, which have demonstrated efficacy in patients with advanced disease. Targeted therapies have had a major impact on the management of certain malignancies, and while their evaluation in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer remains early, it is likely that these agents will continue to be developed and studied in combination with chemotherapy. This article reviews recent advances in the use of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Targeted therapies, their mechanisms of action and emerging data supporting their use in gastric cancer are also discussed. The two randomized phase III trials supporting adjuvant therapy for locally advanced, resectable gastric cancer are discussed in detail, together with strategies for future trials in this area. Overall, there remains optimism that further incremental gains will be achieved with future studies combining chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapies, both in the adjuvant and metastatic disease settings.

Randomized phase III study comparing irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid to cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction

BACKGROUND

We aimed to establish the superiority (or noninferiority if superiority was not achieved) in terms of time to progression (TTP) of irinotecan/5-fluorouracil (IF) over cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (CF) in chemonaive patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach/esophagogastric junction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received either IF: i.v. irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) 30 min, folinic acid 500 mg/m(2) 2 h, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 2000 mg/m(2) 22 h, for 6/7 weeks or CF: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) 1-3 h, with 5-FU 1000 mg/m(2)/day 24 h, days 1-5, every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

In all, 333 patients were randomized and treated (IF 170, CF 163). Patient characteristics were balanced except more IF patients had Karnofsky performance status 100%. TTP for IF was 5.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-5.8] and 4.2 months (95% CI 3.7-5.5) for CF (P = 0.088). Overall survival (OS) was 9.0 versus 8.7 months, response rate 31.8% versus 25.8%, time to treatment failure (TTF) 4.0 versus 3.4 months for IF and CF, respectively. The difference in TTF was statistically significant (P = 0.018). IF was better in terms of toxic deaths (0.6% versus 3%), discontinuation for toxicity (10.0% versus 21.5%), severe neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and stomatitis, but not diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

IF did not yield a significant TTP or OS superiority over CF, and the results of noninferiority of IF were borderline. However, IF may provide a viable, platinum-free front-line treatment alternative for metastatic gastric cancer.

Randomized controlled trial of adjuvant uracil-tegafur versus surgery alone for serosa-negative, locally advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

This prospective randomized study compared the survival of patients with tumour node metastasis (TNM) stage T2 N1-2 gastric cancer treated by gastrectomy alone or gastrectomy followed by uracil-tegafur.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to surgery alone or to surgery and postoperative uracil-tegafur 360 mg per m(2) per day orally for 16 months. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Relapse-free survival and site of recurrence were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Of 190 registered patients, 95 were randomized to each group; two patients with early cancer were subsequently excluded from the chemotherapy group. The trial was terminated before the target number of patients was reached because accrual was slower than expected. Drug-related adverse effects were mild, with no treatment-related deaths. At a median follow-up of 6.2 years, overall and relapse-free survival rates were significantly higher in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for overall survival 0.48, P = 0.017; hazard ratio for relapse-free survival 0.44, P = 0.005), confirming the survival benefit shown in an interim analysis performed 2 years earlier.

CONCLUSION

Interim and final analyses revealed a significant survival benefit for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur in patients with serosa-negative, node-positive gastric cancer.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00152243 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

The effectiveness of intravenous 5-fluorouracil-containing chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric carcinoma: A systematic review of published randomized controlled trials

This is a review of randomized controlled trials of intravenous 5-flurorouracil (5-FU)-containing chemotherapy after curative resection versus surgery alone in patients with gastric carcinoma to determine the impact on survival rate, safety and economics. Data sources were the Cochrane Library (2006, Issue 2), Pub-Medline and Chinese Biomedical Database. We included 22 randomized controlled trials comparing 4501 patients. Intravenous 5-FU-containing chemotherapy after curative resection had a slightly significant improvement in 3-, 5- and 7-year overall survival rate (OR 1.49, 1.41 and 1.32). No benefit of postoperative disease-free survival rate was induced by 5-FU-containing chemotherapy. Sensitivity analysis was restricted to trials with the highest methodological quality, and the result was similar when the studies with Jadad score less than 3' were excluded. Subgroup analyses found borderline improved overall survival rate in both Western and Eastern countries but the statistical significance was stronger in the Eastern subset. The combinations of 5-FU plus mitomycin C, 5-FU plus cytosine arabinoside and 5-FU plus adriamycin or epidoxorubicin induced potentially more improvement of 3- and 5-year overall survival rates. Severe toxicities were reported in 1629 patients from 15 included trials, and hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were the most remarkable side effects, around 5%-15% respectively. The chemotherapy-related overall mortality was 1.1%. No trials mentioned cost-effectiveness analysis. Although the results provide some evidence of a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU-containing regimens, they are inconclusive due to the limitations of methodological quality of including randomized controlled trials. Large scale randomized controlled trials with a positive result are still mandatory before postoperative chemotherapy are recommended.