Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumor of bone in Norway: results from a nationwide cohort

The risk of neurological deterioration while using neoadjuvant denosumab on patients with giant cell tumor of the spine presenting with epidural disease: a meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is most commonly a benign but locally aggressive primary bone tumor. Spinal GCTs account for 2.7% to 6.5% of all GCTs in bone. En bloc resection, which is the preferred treatment for GCT of the spine, may not always be feasible due to the location, extent of the tumor, and/or the patient's comorbidities. Neoadjuvant denosumab has recently been shown to be effective in downstaging GCT, decreasing the size and extent of GCTs. However, the risk of neurologic deterioration is of major concern for patients with epidural spinal cord compression due to spinal GCT. We experienced this concern when a patient presented to our institution with a midthoracic spinal GCT with progressive epidural disease. The patient was not a good surgical candidate due to severe cardiac disease and uncontrolled diabetes. In considering nonoperative management for this patient, we asked ourselves the following question: What is the risk that this patient will develop neurologic deterioration if we do not urgently operate and opt to treat him with denosumab instead?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the literature to (1) determine the risk of neurological deterioration in patients receiving neoadjuvant denosumab for the treatment of spinal GCT and (2) to evaluate the secondary outcomes including radiographic features, surgical/technical complexity, and histological features after treatment.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Meta-analysis of the literature.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Surgical cases of spinal GCT that (1) presented with type III Campanacci lesions, (2) had epidural disease classified as Bilsky type 1B or above and (3) received neoadjuvant denosumab therapy.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure of interest was neurologic status during denosumab treatment. Secondary outcome measures of interest included radiographic features, surgical/technical complexity, histological features, tumor recurrence, and metastasis.

METHODS

Using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, PubMed and Embase electronic databases were searched in August 2022 for articles reporting spinal GCTs treated with neoadjuvant denosumab and surgery. Keywords used were "Spine" AND "Giant Cell Tumor" AND "Denosumab."

RESULTS

A total of 428 articles were identified and screened. A total of 22 patients from 12 studies were included for review. 17 patients were female (17/22, 77%), mean age was 32 years (18-62 years) and average follow-up was 21 months. Most GCTs occurred in the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine (11 patients, 50%), followed by 36% in the lumbar spine and 14% in the cervical spine. Almost half of the patients had neurological deficits at presentation (10/22 patients, 45%), and more than 60% had Bilsky 2 or 3 epidural spinal cord compression. None of the patients deteriorated neurologically, irrespective of their neurological status at presentation (p-value=.02, CI -2.58 to -0.18). There were no local recurrences reported. One patient was found to have lung nodules postoperatively. More than 90% of cases had decreased overall tumor size and increased bone formation. Surgical dissection was facilitated in more than 85% of those who had documented surgical procedures. Four patients (18%) underwent initial spinal stabilization followed by neoadjuvant denosumab and then surgical excision of the GCT. Regarding the histologic analyses, denosumab eradicated the giant cells in 95% of cases. However, residual Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor Kappa B Ligand (RANKL)-positive stromal cells were noted, in 27% (6 cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant denosumab was a safe and effective means of treating spinal GCTs prior to surgery. Neurologic status remained stable or improved in all cases included in our review, irrespective of the presenting neurologic status. The most appropriate dosage and duration of denosumab therapy is yet to be determined. We recommend future well-designed studies to further evaluate the use of neoadjuvant denosumab for patients with spinal GCT.

Surgical Management and Denosumab for Aneurysmal Bone Cysts of the Spine in an Australian Tertiary Paediatric Centre

Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABC) are rare osteolytic, benign but often locally aggressive tumours of the long bones or vertebrae. For spinal ABC, surgical management, embolisation or sclerotherapy alone often carry high morbidity and/or high recurrence rates. Interruption of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) signalling holds promise as an effective therapeutic strategy for these tumours. We aimed to review the approach to surgical management and evaluate the efficacy and safety of denosumab for ABC of the spine in children. Retrospective review of 7 patients treated with denosumab using a standardised protocol for ABC of the spine in a tertiary paediatric centre. Surgical intervention was only conducted if there was spinal instability or significant neurological impairment. Denosumab 70 mg/m² was given 4-weekly for at least 6 months, followed by 2 doses of zoledronate 0.025 mg/kg, aiming to prevent rebound hypercalcaemia. All patients achieved stability of the spine and resolution of neurological impairment, if present. Six patients achieved metabolic remission and have ceased denosumab without recurrence to date; the other showed clinical and radiological improvement without complete metabolic remission. Three patients developed symptomatic hypercalcaemia 5-7 months after cessation of denosumab, requiring additional bisphosphonate treatment. We present our algorithm for the surgical and medical management of paediatric spinal ABC. Denosumab produced a radiological and metabolic response in all patients, with complete remission in most. Follow-up time was not long enough to evaluate the endurance of response after cessation in some patients. Incidence of rebound hypercalcaemia in this paediatric cohort was high, prompting a change to our protocol.

Progress on Denosumab Use in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Dose and Duration of Therapy

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an aggressive non-cancerous bone tumor associated with risks of sarcoma and metastasis. Once malignancy occurs, the prognosis is generally poor. Surgery remains the main treatment for GCTB. Multidisciplinary management is a feasible option for patients wherein surgical resection is not an option or for those with serious surgery-related complications. Denosumab is an anti-nuclear factor kappa B ligand approved for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, bone metastases, and advanced or inoperable GCTB. However, the guidelines for treating GCTB are unclear; its short-term efficacy and safety in inoperable patients have been demonstrated. Lengthier therapies (high cumulative doses) or pre-operative adjuvant therapy may be associated with severe complications and high local recurrence rates. Short-term administration helps attain satisfactory local control and functionality. As a result, lately, the impact of different doses and lengths of treatment on the efficacy of denosumab in GCTB treatment, the incidence of complications, and recurrence rates have gained attention. The efficacy and safety of denosumab against GCTB, its impact on imaging assessment, related complications, and recurrence of GCTB were previously reviewed. For further research direction, this paper reviews the progress of studies evaluating the impact of the dose and duration of denosumab therapy for GCTB.

Updated concepts in treatment of giant cell tumor of bone

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) are intermediate, locally aggressive primary bone tumors. For conventional GCTB, surgery remains treatment of choice. For advanced GCTB, a more important role came into play for systemic therapy including denosumab and bisphosphonates over the last decade.

RECENT FINDINGS

In diagnostics, focus has been on H3F3A (G34) driver mutations present in GCTB. The most frequent mutation (G34W) can be detected using immunohistochemistry and is highly specific in differentiating GCTB from other giant cell containing tumors. PD-L1 expression can be used as biological marker to predict higher recurrence risks in GCTB patients.The use of bisphosphonate-loaded bone cement is under investigation in a randomized controlled trial. A new technique consisting of percutaneous microwave ablation and bisphosphonate-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cementoplasty was proposed for unresectable (pelvic) GCTB.Increased experience with use of denosumab raised concern on elevated recurrence rates. However, conclusions of meta-analyses should be interpreted with risk of indication bias in mind. Several small studies are published with short-course denosumab (varying from 3 to 6 doses). One small trial directly compared denosumab and zoledronic acid, with no statistical differences in radiological and clinical outcome, and nonsignificantly higher recurrence rate after denosumab. As bisphosphonates directly target neoplastic stromal cells in GCTB, larger directly comparative trials are still warranted.

SUMMARY

Neoadjuvant denosumab is highly effective for advanced GCTB, and a short-course is advised to facilitate surgery, whereas increased recurrence rates remain of concern. Randomized controlled trials are conducted on bisphosphonate-loaded bone cement and on optimal dose and duration of neoadjuvant denosumab. PD-L1 could be a potential new therapy target in GCTB.

Denosumab for central giant cell granuloma in an Australian tertiary paediatric centre

BACKGROUND

Central giant cell granulomas (CGCG) are rare osteolytic, benign but often locally aggressive tumours of bone. Surgical curettage may not be possible in extensive lesions and resection carries high morbidity, especially in growing children, and previous medical therapies have had variable efficacy and high recurrence rates. Interruption of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) signalling holds promise as an effective therapeutic strategy for these tumours.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of our protocol for denosumab treatment of CGCG in children.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 4 patients treated with denosumab using a standardised protocol for CGCG in a tertiary paediatric centre. Denosumab 70 mg/m² was given 4-weekly, followed by 2 doses of zoledronate 0.025 mg/kg, aimed at preventing rebound hypercalcaemia.

RESULTS

Treatment of CGCG resulted in metabolic remission in all patients, but recurrence, detected by positron emission tomography (PET), occurred at 6 months in three patients and 12 months in one patient. Three patients developed symptomatic hypercalcaemia 4-5 months and one patient asymptomatic hypercalcaemia 7 months after cessation of denosumab, with 3 requiring additional bisphosphonate treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab produced a radiological and metabolic response in our patients, but metabolic recurrence occurred in all patients. PET imaging was effective for monitoring treatment response and early detection of recurrence. Incidence of rebound hypercalcaemia in this paediatric cohort was high. We present proposed changes to our protocol with the aim of producing sustained remission and preventing rebound hypercalcaemia.

Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Multidisciplinary Medical Management Based on Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Real-World Evidence

Simple Summary

The widely accepted local therapy in extremity giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is surgery, in the form of extended intralesional curettage with adequate disease clearance and retention of the limb, wherever possible. Denosumab is a relevant therapy option for advanced GCTB, to benefit tumor response and surgical down-staging. Most GCTB patients with localized disease can be successfully treated with surgical curettage; patients with primary unresectable lesions or metastases may experience long-term clinical and radiological remission and pain control with denosumab treatment, and in this clinical situation, denosumab is currently the treatment of choice.

Abstract

(1) Despite the benign nature of the giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), it shows a local recurrence rate of up to 50% and a chance of malignant transformation. The widely accepted local therapy in extremity GCTB is surgery, in the form of extended intralesional curettage with adequate disease clearance and retention of the limb, wherever possible. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody directed against the RANKL and associated inhibition of the RANKL pathway, is a relevant therapy option for advanced GCTB, to benefit tumor response and surgical down-staging. (2) The literature review of patients with GCTB treated with denosumab is performed via PubMed, using suitable keywords from January 2009 to January 2021. (3) Current indications for denosumab use are not definitively clear and unambiguous. Most GCTB patients with localized disease can be successfully treated with surgical curettage, and the role of denosumab in preoperative therapy in this patient population remains unclear. (4) However, patients with primary unresectable lesions or metastases may experience long-term clinical and radiological remission and pain control with denosumab treatment, and in this clinical situation, denosumab is currently the treatment of choice.

Ultra-Short Course of Neo-Adjuvant Denosumab for Nerve-Sparing Surgery for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone in Sacrum

STUDY DEIGN

This was a retrospective study about sacral giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether ultra-short course of neo-adjuvant denosumab treatment for sacral GCTB could (1) induce radiological and histological response? (2) Facilitate nerve-sparing surgery? (3) Achieve satisfactory oncological and functional outcomes?

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous reports on long course of neo-adjuvant denosumab treatment for GCTB showed significant tumor response and a relatively high recurrent rate after curettage.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients with sacral GCTB treated with neoadjuvant denosumab and nerve-sparing surgery were categorized into ultra-short course group (≤3 doses and operation within D21 since 1st dose, 41 patients) or conventional group (>3 doses or operation after D21 since 1st dose, 25 patients). The radiological and histological response, operative data, oncological and functional outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The ultra-short course group demonstrated fewer doses of neo-adjuvant denosumab (mean: 2.1 vs. 4.8, P  < 0.001) and shorter time to surgery (12.2 days vs. 72.3 days, P < 0.001). Similar patterns of radiological and histological response were observed in the two groups with less fibrosis and ossification in the ultra-short course group. The operative duration (199.9 min vs. 187.8 min, P = 0.364) and estimated blood loss (1552.4 mL vs. 1474.0 mL, P = 0.740) were comparable. Most (94.8%) of the patients received adjuvant denosumab. After a mean follow-up of 29.4 months, three cases (8.8%) and five cases (20.8%) showed local recurrence in each group (P = 0.255). The estimated recurrence-free survival (56.2 vs. 51.2 months, P = 0.210) and the functional status [Motor-Urination-Defecation scores: 25.9 vs. 25.7, P = 0.762] did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Ultra-short course of neo-adjuvant denosumab for sacral GCTB could elicit radiological and histological responses as conventional course did. The less degree of fibrosis and ossification might facilitate nerve-sparing surgery and help to achieve satisfactory local control and functional status.Level of Evidence: 4.

Clinical and pathological analysis of giant cell tumor of bone with denosumab treatment and local recurrence

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a primary bone tumor which comprises giant cells and two types of stromal cells. Recent studies have suggested therapeutic risks of denosumab. No previous studies have reported changes in serum TRACP-5b and SUVmax of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in recurred GCTB after denosumab treatment. Therefore, we assessed the relationship between clinical and pathological features of GCTB which recurred after denosumab treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 26 patients with GCTB who underwent curettage between 2010 and 2018. Fourteen patients treated with denosumab were defined as the denosumab group. We evaluated TRACP-5b and SUVmax values in the denosumab group. H&E staining and immunohistochemistry for H3.3 G34W were performed for pathological assessment. Twelve patients treated without denosumab were defined as the non-denosumab group and compared with denosumab group.

RESULTS

The local recurrence rate in the denosumab group was 57.4%. The mean TRACP-5b and SUVmax values were significantly decreased after denosumab therapy (P < 0.001, 1077 ± 161 to 74 ± 9 mU/dL and 8.88 ± 0.40 to 3.79 ± 0.56, respectively). Both parameters significantly increased with local recurrence. H&E staining after denosumab treatment revealed the disappearance of giant cells and histological changes in stromal cells. Specimens of local recurrence subjected to H&E staining and immunohistochemistry for H3.3 G34W demonstrated almost identical features to those in the first biopsy.

CONCLUSION

Although denosumab can prevent GCTB from osteolysis, local recurrence cannot be reduced by denosumab treatment. The clinical and pathological results were almost the same as those before denosumab treatment, suggesting that the changes of GCTB by denosumab are reversible.

Common Skeletal Neoplasms and Nonneoplastic Lesions at 18F-FDG PET/CT

Numerous primary and metastatic osseous lesions and incidental osseous findings are encountered at fluorine 18 (¹⁸F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT. These lesions show varying degrees of FDG uptake. Malignancies are generally more FDG avid than are benign lesions, but many exceptions exist. Although aggressive lesions tend to be more FDG avid than nonaggressive lesions, this concept holds true particularly for lesions of the same histologic subtype. In addition, some benign osseous processes such as Paget disease have variable degrees of FDG avidity on the basis of disease metabolic activity. This creates a diagnostic dilemma for radiologists and clinicians, especially in patients with known malignancies, and can result in unnecessary diagnostic imaging or interventions for incidental osseous lesions. Evaluation of morphologic CT characteristics of osseous lesions at FDG PET/CT can be a valuable adjunct to metabolic analysis to further characterize lesions, enhance diagnostic and staging accuracy, and avoid unnecessary invasive biopsy procedures. The authors review the common primary and metastatic bone lesions at FDG PET/CT, with an emphasis on morphologic CT assessment of lesions to help narrow the differential diagnosis. Imaging manifestations of common incidental nonneoplastic bone lesions at FDG PET/CT are discussed to provide information on differentiation of these lesions from osseous neoplasms. The guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for common primary osseous malignancies are also summarized. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Clinical, radiological and pathological outcomes following treatment of primary giant cell tumour of bone with Denosumab

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTOB) is a relatively uncommon, benign, but locally aggressive neoplasm. Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody with inhibitory effects on receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand that has shown early promise as a possible treatment adjuvant for GCTB. However, much is still unknown about its current indications, long-term effects, the potential risk for rapid relapse and its involvement in sarcomatous transformation.

METHODS

We analysed the outcomes of 154 patients with GCTOB. We assessed clinical outcomes via local recurrence free-survival, metastatic free-survival and sarcomatous transformation between those treated without Denosumab and those with neo-adjuvant Denosumab. Our radiological and pathological outcomes were assessed through independent specialist reviews.

RESULTS

Four (19.0%) patients of the neo-adjuvant group had local recurrence of disease versus 16 (12.0%) patients in the surgery alone group; this results in a 3.62 times increased likelihood of developing local recurrence (P = 0.030). The median time to local recurrence was shorter for the neo-adjuvant group (421.5 days versus 788.5 days) (P = 0.01). There was no difference between Denosumab and the surgery groups in terms of metastatic disease (P = 0.45). Two patients in our cohort with GCTOB developed sarcomatous transformation, both were treated with Denosumab.

CONCLUSION

Our use of Denosumab tended to be for those patients who had surgically difficult tumours to halt the progression and allow easier resections. Of concern we noted a trend towards increasing recurrence rates with the potential risk for rapid relapse. Furthermore, two cases experienced sarcomatous transformation, which is a growing area of concern within the literature.

Role of (Neo)adjuvant Denosumab for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

OPINION STATEMENT

Denosumab is a RANK ligand inhibitor approved for the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone. While the role of denosumab in the setting of advanced and unresectable disease is well established, its role in surgically resectable disease is currently under discussion. Several prospective and retrospective series on neoadjuvant therapy in potentially resectable tumor with high morbidity surgery reported a relapse rate of 10-20% after resection and 30-40% after curettage. At the same time, less morbid surgery has obvious clinical advantages for the patient, and several studies have shown the efficacy of denosumab in downgrading of the surgical procedure. Currently, the role of neoadjuvant denosumab in operable GCTB is limited to selected cases in which a diffuse reactive bone formation and peripheral ossification can make an easier surgical procedure, for example, in tumors with a large soft tissue component. A planned resection may become less morbid when preoperative denosumab is administered. Whenever a segmental resection is thought to be indicated at diagnosis, denosumab may be considered in the neoadjuvant setting. A preoperative course of 6 months is considered safe and effective. Two case scenarios are presented and critically discussed. Because of the high recurrence rates after denosumab treatment followed by curettage, we discourage the use of denosumab when curettage is considered feasible. In this setting, a short course of preoperative denosumab (2-6 months) may be considered for highly selected cases, for example in pathological fractures. The role of adjuvant denosumab needs further investigation. Long-term disease control has been reported in case of non-surgical lesions, even after treatment interruption, but there is no consensus on ideal treatment duration and dosage for these scenarios. In all cases, multidisciplinary discussion with oncology, pathologist, radiologist, and surgeons is mandatory. Patient's comorbidities, dental conditions, and preferences, including family planning, should always be taken into account.

Pre-operative denosumab is associated with higher risk of local recurrence in giant cell tumor of bone: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

In 2013, denosumab was introduced as peri-operative adjuvant treatment for giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone as it inhibits osteoclast activity. It is suggested that denosumab relives pain, facilitate curettage in lesions requiring resection initially. However, controversy remains whether denosumab increases the risk of local recurrence after surgery.

Methods

Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched in June 2019 to identify studies investigating the clinical outcome of GCT of bone with and without peri-operative denosumab after surgery. Data were gathered and a meta-analysis was conducted.

Result

Ten studies with 1082 cases (169 in denosumab group, 913 in control group) were included. Overall, denosumab was associated with significantly higher risk of recurrence(P < 0.02) and inferior 5 year recurrence free survival(P = 0.000). Denosumab and curettage has a relatively higher risk of recurrence comparing to curettage alone(P = 0.07). The risk of recurrence is not significantly increased if denosumab was administered both preoperatively and postoperatively(P = 0.24).

Conclusion

Administration of denosumab is associated with increased risk of recurrence due to a variety of reasons, though it is proven effective in relieving pain, enabling curettage and improved functional outcome. Post-operative denosumab is recommended as it continuously suppress/eliminate residue tumor cells.

Challenges of denosumab in giant cell tumor of bone, and other giant cell-rich tumors of bone

Purpose of review

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an uncommon benign primary bone tumor, consisting of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANK) expressing reactive osteoclast-like giant cells and neoplastic spindle-shaped cells. Denosumab was approved by FDA in 2013 and by EMA in 2014 to treat adults and skeletally mature adolescents with unresectable GCTB or when resection is likely to result in severe morbidity. However, there is much discussion regarding the optimal applied treatment strategy.

Recent findings

Neoadjuvant treatment of GCTB with denosumab can effectively downstage tumors to facilitate less morbid surgery or completely avoid the need for resection, but there is concern about local recurrence postsurgery. Definitive treatment of unresectable GTCB improves symptoms and halts tumor progression. The optimal treatment duration is unclear and long-term treatment is associated with adverse events like osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and atypical femoral fractures. Denosumab maintenance dose interval is currently being investigated.

Summary

For the related but heterogenous group of giant cell rich tumors of bone, like aneurysmal bone cysts (ABC) and central giant cell granuloma (CGCG), denosumab is a new treatment modality under investigation. Given the effectiveness in GCTB, this could be a promising treatment option for selected patients with advanced disease.

Short-term Preoperative Denosumab With Surgery in Unresectable or Recurrent Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Objective

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and oncological results of combination treatment of short‐term preoperative denosumab (the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa‐B ligand inhibitor) with surgery in unresectable or recurrent cases of giant cell tumor of the bone (GCTB).

Methods

Between 2016 and 2018, 11 eligible patients (1 man, 10 women, mean age 38.1 years) with grade 3 GCTB were treated with a combination of short‐term (six doses) preoperative denosumab and surgery in a single institution. The clinical, radiological, and pathological alteration after the denosumab treatment were compared. The oncological results of the combination therapy were also recorded. Meanwhile, adverse effects or complications of denosumab, if any, were reported.

Results

The median follow‐up time after surgical procedure was 30 months (range 13–45 months). After 3–4 denosumab injections, pain relief was observed in all patients. In two spine patients, the neurological status improved after four doses of treatment. Intraoperatively, the margin of the tumor became clear and the intensity of the tumor increased while the blood supply around and within the lesion decreased. Within the lesion, the typically soft and loose tissue were replaced by the tough and dense fibro‐osseous tissue. The mean diameter of the lesion before and after treatment was 61.55 ± 22.49 mm and 51.81 ± 21.12 mm, respectively, and the T‐score was 1.02 (P = 0.32). Variable calcification was observed at the periphery and within the lesion. A total of three patients experienced local recurrence in this study. In the resection group, only one extremity patient had soft tissue recurrence that was treated with en‐bloc excision. In the curettage group, two of three sacral tumor patients had local occurrence. Both refused re‐operation and restarted the monthly denosumab injection thereafter, and the lesions remained stable at the final follow up. Finally, no adverse effects or complications related to denosumab treatment were found.

Conclusion

For the unresectable or recurrent GCTB cases, short‐term (six doses) preoperative use of denosumab improved clinical symptoms, decreased the tumor size, and increased the tumor density. The changes in tumors, in turn, simplified the tumor removal manipulation and, subsequently, decreased the local recurrence for the resection surgery. For the curettage, the denosumab‐induced changes had mixed impacts, and shorter term (fewer than six doses) usage may be more appropriate. Our six‐dose regime was deemed safe, while the safety of long‐term use remains unknown.

Denosumab treatment for giant-cell tumor of bone: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that specifically inhibits tumor-associated bone lysis through the RANKL pathway and has been used as neoadjuvant therapy for giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in surgical as well as non-surgical cases. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature, therefore, is to investigate: (1) demographic characteristics of patients affected by GCTBs treated with denosumab and the clinical impact, as well as, possible complications associated with its use (2) oncological outcomes in terms of local recurrence rate (LRR) and development of lung metastasis, and (3) characteristics of its treatment effect in terms of clinical, radiological, and histological response.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and COCHRANE search including the following terms and Boolean operators: "Denosumab" AND "primary bone tumor", "denosumab" AND "giant cell tumor", "denosumab" AND "treatment", and finally, "denosumab" AND "giant cell tumor" AND "treatment" since 2000. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 19 articles were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using STROBE for the assessment of observational studies.

RESULTS

A total of 1095 patients were included across all 19 studies. Across all the studies included, there were 615 females and 480 males. The mean patient age was 33.7 ± 8.3 years when starting the denosumab treatment. The pooled weighted local recurrence rate was 9% (95% CI 6-12%) and the pooled weighted metastases rate was 3% (95% CI 1-7%). The most common adverse event was fatigue and muscular pain. Radiologic response was estimated to occur in 66-100% of the patients. A significant reduction in pain under denosumab treatment was reported in seven studies and additional improvement in function and mobility was reported by several authors. Only two studies reported musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) scores which were better after denosumab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of denosumab as an adjuvant treatment of GCTB has shown a positive but variable histological response with consistent radiological changes and several types of adverse effects. There is a positive clinical response in terms of pain relief with decrease on the morbidity of surgical procedures to be performed. Finally, oncological outcomes are disparate with neither effect on metastatic disease nor local recurrence rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

A new computerized tomography classification to evaluate response to Denosumab in giant cell tumors in the extremities

Objectives

The aim of this study was to describe the cohort of patients who have been treated with Denosumab as neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery for aggressive giant cell tumor of bone in the extremities, to evaluate the radiological responses to Denosumab comparing Choi criteria and a newly described computerized tomography (CT) classification, and to evaluate the risk of local recurrence after intralesional curettage or radical excision.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 36 patients (20 females and 16 males; mean age at diagnosis 36 years (range, 18–64)) treated with neoadjuvant Denosumab therapy prior to surgery for aggressive giant cell tumor of bone in the extremities. The radiological responses to Denosumab treatment were analyzed on the preoperative images after the neoadjuvant course with the Choi criteria and with a newly proposed classification based on CT. All these images were independently reviewed by two of the researchers. Surgical intervention methods were noted and local recurrence rates were evaluated. The correlation between radiological response amount and local recurrence were analyzed for both Choi criteria and the new CT classification.

Results

Denosumab was administered for a mean of 21 weeks (range 7–133). Five patients also had a short postoperative course. According to Choi criteria there was a radiological response in 32 patients (89%), while the new CT classification identified responses in all the 36 patients (100%). The identification of changes after 7 weeks of treatment was higher using the CT classification compared to Choi criteria (p = 0.043 vs p = 0.462). The surgical interventions after Denosumab comprised curettage in 29 patients (74%) and resection in 7 (26%). Local recurrence was higher in patients managed with intralesional curettage than in those treated with en bloc resection (55.1% vs 0%, p < 0.001). At last follow up 19 patients (53%) required en bloc resections. Good responders to Denosumab (type 2C) had lower risk of local recurrence (p = 0.047) after either resection or curettage.

Conclusion

The new CT classification evaluated more accurately the response to Denosumab. Our experience suggests that the requirement for radical bone resection remains high despite the use of Denosumab.

Level of evidence

Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

Applications of PET/CT and PET/MR Imaging in Primary Bone Malignancies

Primary bone malignancies are characterized with anatomic imaging. However, in recent years, there has been an increased interest in PET/computed tomography scanning and PET/MRI with fludeoxyglucose F 18 for evaluating and staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. These hybrid imaging modalities have shown promise largely owing to their high sensitivity, ability to perform more thorough staging, and ability to monitor treatment response. This article reviews the current role of PET/computed tomography scanning and PET/MRI in primary malignancies of bone, with an emphasis on imaging characteristics, clinical usefulness, and current limitations.

Prognosis of metastatic giant cell tumor of bone in the pre-denosumab era. A systematic review and a meta-analysis

Background

Data on long-term prognosis of metastatic GCT (mGCT) is scant. The frequency of spontaneous regressions (SRs) is unknown. We aimed to estimate the prognosis of mGCT.

Methods

We searched electronic scientific literature databases and generic Internet from January 1980 to August 2017. After identifying eligible studies we performed descriptive analyses and meta-analyses to estimate overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS) and frequency of SRs in the years before the widespread use of denosumab. We performed pre-specified subgroup analyses of studies published before and after 2000 and of those with more and less than 10 years of follow-up.

Results

After retrieving and combining data from 26 relevant retrospective case-series totaling 242 patients with a median follow-up of 6.9 years, the estimated pooled OS was 86.9% (95% CI 78.0-94.2). Pooled DSS was 88.0% (95% CI 79.7-94.7). SRs were observed in 4.5% of patients. In the subgroup of studies published after 2000 mGCT was the only cause of death of affected subjects. In case-series with a follow-up longer than 10 years pooled DSS was 69.7% (95% CI 25.5-99.8).

Conclusions

To our knowledge this is the first study to derive estimated pooled OS and DSS of mGCT based on a large dataset. SRs were not exceptional phenomena. In a long run the disease could impact in a significant way on the life expectancy of affected subjects.

Denosumab: Current Use in the Treatment of Primary Bone Tumors

Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits bone resorption by binding on the receptor activator of the nuclear factor kappa-β ligand, has recently emerged as an additional option in the treatment of musculoskeletal osteolytic tumors. This article focuses on the recent literature regarding the effectiveness of denosumab in the management of giant cell tumor, multiple myeloma, aneurysmal bone cyst, and osteosarcoma. The mechanism of action of denosumab in the management of these tumors and the associated side effects are discussed in detail. [ Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):204-210.].