Pre-existing diabetes mellitus and all-cause mortality in cancer patients: a register-based study in Latvia

Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Current Situation and Screening in North and Central Asian Countries

The prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in the past few decades. A significant proportion of this increase is from low to middle income countries (LMIC). CRC prevalence is also increasing in North and Central Asian Countries (NCAC). Screening for colorectal cancer has decreased CRC mortality but data regarding screening practices in NCAC is limited.  A literature search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Embase and Cochrane for current colorectal cancer screening practices in NCAC. Incidence and mortality rates were derived from public health agency websites to calculate age-standardized CRC mortality-to-incidence ratios. Web-based online break-point testing defined as statistical major changes in CRC mortality trends was completed. Among the 677 screened studies, 37 studies met the criteria for inclusion for review. CRC screening in NCAC is not organized, although most countries have cancer registries. The data availability is scarce, and most data is prior to 2017. Most studies are observational. There is minimal data about colonoscopy preparations, adenoma detection and complications rates. The polyp detection rates (PDRs) and adenoma detection rates (ADRs) seem low to optimal in this region. Commonly measured outcomes include participation rate, fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) positivity rate and cost-benefit measures. Lower mortality-to-incidence ratios is seen in countries with screening programs. Kazakhstan and Lithuania with screening programs have achieved breakpoint suggesting major changes in CRC mortality trends. Data about CRC screening varies widely within NCAC. High human developmental index (HDI) countries like Lithuania and Estonia have higher incidence of CRC and mortality. Seven NCAC have CRC screening programs with most utilizing non-invasive methods for screening. Data collection is regional and not organized. The ADR and PDR are low to optimal in this region and cancer detection rates are comparable to other high-income countries (HIC). CRC detection rate is 0.05% for screening in Kazakhstan and 0.2% for screening in Lithuania. Very limited information is available on the actual cost and logistics of implementing a CRC screening program. All NCAC have a cancer registry, with some having a high-quality registry showing national coverage with good validity and completeness. Establishing guideline-based registries and increasing screening efficacy could improve CRC outcomes in NCAC.

Survival outcomes in endometrial cancer patients according to diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is an established risk factor for endometrial cancer development but its impact on prognosis is unclear and epidemiological studies to date have produced inconsistent results. We aimed to conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis to compare survival outcomes in endometrial cancer patients with and without pre-existing diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases up to February 2022 for observational studies that investigated the association between pre-existing diabetes and cancer-specific survival in endometrial cancer patients. Secondary outcomes included overall survival and progression or recurrence-free survival. Quality assessment of included studies was undertaken using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and a random-effects model was used to produce pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). (PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020196088).

RESULTS

In total, 31 studies were identified comprising 55,475 endometrial cancer patients. Pooled results suggested a worse cancer-specific survival in patients with compared to patients without diabetes (n = 17 studies, HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-1.32, I2 = 62%). Similar results were observed for progression or recurrence-free survival (n = 6 studies, HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.47, I2 = 0%) and for overall survival (n = 24 studies, HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.31-1.54, I2 = 46%).

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we show that diabetes is associated with a worse cancer-specific and overall survival in endometrial cancer patients.

Making Use of Comparable Health Data to Improve Quality of Care and Outcomes in Diabetes: The EUBIROD Review of Diabetes Registries and Data Sources in Europe

Background

Registries and data sources contain information that can be used on an ongoing basis to improve quality of care and outcomes of people with diabetes. As a specific task of the EU Bridge Health project, we carried out a survey of diabetes-related data sources in Europe.

Objectives

We aimed to report on the organization of different sources of diabetes information, including their governance, information infrastructure and dissemination strategies for quality control, service planning, public health, policy and research.

Methods

Survey using a structured questionnaire to collect targeted data from a network of collaborating institutions managing registries and data sources in 17 countries in the year 2017.

Results

The 18 data sources participating in the study were most frequently academic centres (44.4%), national (72.2%), targeting all types of diabetes (61.1%) covering no more than 10% of the target population (44.4%). Although population-based in over a quarter of cases (27.8%), sources relied predominantly on provider-based datasets (38.5%), fewer using administrative data (16.6%). Data collection was continuous in the majority of cases (61.1%), but 50% could not perform data linkage. Public reports were more frequent (72.2%) as well as quality reports (77.8%), but one third did not provide feedback to policy and only half published ten or more peer reviewed papers during the last 5 years.

Conclusions

The heterogeneous implementation of diabetes registries and data sources hampers the comparability of quality and outcomes across Europe. Best practices exist but need to be shared more effectively to accelerate progress and deliver equitable results for people with diabetes.

Economic burden of diabetes among medicare beneficiaries with cancer

Objectives

Older adults are commonly affected by cancer and diabetes, and an investigation of the economic burden faced by these older adults remains a research gap. Therefore, the objective was to assess the economic burden of diabetes among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer by analyzing annual costs from administrative claims data.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, serial cross-sectional study using the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) from 2006 to 2012. Eligible beneficiaries must be currently or previously diagnosed with cancer (of any type), ≥65 years of age, non-institutionalized and continuously enrolled annually in Medicare Parts A, B and D. Diagnoses of cancer and diabetes were determined through self-report or claims. The primary outcome was the total economic burden of diabetes per capita annually, operationalized as the difference in total direct costs between cancer patients with and without diabetes. Simple linear regression was used to analyze trends of costs across the years. Multivariable regression estimated the effect of diabetes and covariates on total annual spending among beneficiaries with cancer from 2006-2012.

Key findings

From 2006 to 2012, 4918 beneficiaries included in MCBS had cancer, with over 25% (1275) also having diabetes. From 2006 to 2012, the mean economic burden of diabetes was $7815 per capita annually. After adjusting for covariates, beginning in 2006, diagnosis of diabetes significantly predicted higher total annual spending among cancer beneficiaries in 2007 [coefficient (SE) = 0.5768 (0.1918), P = 0.003], 2011 [coefficient (SE) = 0.4303 (0.1817), P = 0.018] and 2012 [coefficient (SE) = 0.3605 (0.1758), P = 0.040].

Conclusions

Medicare beneficiaries with cancer experienced a higher economic burden from concurrent diabetes.

National diabetes registries: do they make a difference?

AIMS

The global epidemic of diabetes mellitus continues to expand, including its large impact on national health care. Measuring diabetes outcomes and their causes of variation highlights areas for improvement in care and efficiency gains; large registries carry this potential. By means of a systematic review, we aimed to give an overview of national registries worldwide by quantifying their data and assessing their influence on diabetes care.

METHODS

The literature on MEDLINE up to March 31, 2020, was searched, using keywords diabetes mellitus, national, registry, registration, and/or database. National disease-specific registries from corresponding articles were included. Database characteristics and clinical variables were obtained. All registries were compared to the ICHOM standard set of outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 12 national clinical diabetes registries, comprising a total of 7,181,356 diabetic patients worldwide. Nearly all registries recorded weight, HbA1c, lipid profile, and insulin treatment; the recording of other variables varied to a great extent. Overall, registries corresponded fairly well with the ICHOM set. Most registries proved to monitor and improve the quality of diabetes care using guidelines as a benchmark. The effects on national healthcare policy were more variable and often less clear.

CONCLUSIONS

National diabetes registries confer clear insights into diagnostics, complications, and treatment. The extent to which registries influenced national healthcare policy was less clear. A globally implemented standard outcome set has the potential to improve concordance between national registries, enhance the comparison and exchange of diabetes outcomes, and allocate resources and interventions where most needed.

A systematic review considering risk factors for mortality of patients discharged from hospital with a diagnosis of diabetes

AIM

To identify known risk factors for mortality for adult patients, discharged from hospital with diabetes.

METHOD

The systematic review was based on the PRISMA protocol. Studies were identified through EMBASE & MEDLINE databases. The inclusion criteria were papers that were published over the last 6 years, in English language, and focused on risk factors of mortality in adult patients with diabetes, after they were discharged from hospitals. This was followed by data extraction "with quality assessment and semi-quantitative synthesis according to PRISMA guidelines".

RESULTS

There were 35 studies identified, considering risk factors relating to mortality for patients, discharged from hospital with diabetes. These studies are distributed internationally. 48 distinct statistically significant risk factors for mortality can be identified. Risk factors can be grouped into the following categories; demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, patient medical, inpatient stay, medication related, laboratory results, and gylcaemic status. These risk factors can be further divided into risk factors identified in generalized populations of patients with diabetes, compared to specific sub-populations of people with diabetes.

CONCLUSION

A relatively small number of studies have considered risk factors relating to mortality for patients, discharged from hospital with a diagnosis of diabetes. Mortality is an important outcome, when considering discharge from hospital with diabetes. However, there has only been limited consideration within the research literature.

A national observation study of cancer incidence and mortality risks in type 2 diabetes compared to the background population over time

We examined changing patterns in cancer incidence and deaths in diabetes compared to the background population. A total of 457,473 patients with type 2 diabetes, included between 1998 and 2014, were matched on age, sex, and county to five controls from the population. Incidence, trends in incidence and post-cancer mortality for cancer were estimated with Cox regression and standardised incidence rates. Causes of death were estimated using logistic regression. Relative importance of risk factors was estimated using Heller’s relative importance model. Type 2 diabetes had a higher risk for all cancer, HR 1.10 (95% CI 1.09–1.12), with highest HRs for liver (3.31), pancreas (2.19) and uterine cancer (1.78). There were lesser increases in risk for breast (1.05) and colorectal cancers (1.20). Type 2 diabetes patients experienced a higher HR 1.23 (1.21–1.25) of overall post-cancer mortality and mortality from prostate, breast, and colorectal cancers. By the year 2030 cancer could become the most common cause of death in type 2 diabetes. Persons with type 2 diabetes are at greater risk of developing cancer and lower chance of surviving it. Notably, hazards for specific cancers (e.g. liver, pancreas) in type 2 patients cannot be explained by obesity alone.

Pre- and Post-diagnosis Diabetes as a Risk Factor for All-Cause and Cancer-Specific Mortality in Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer Survivors: a Prospective Cohort Study

Objective: The relationship between diabetes and all- and cause-specific mortality in individuals with common cancers (breast, colorectal, and prostate) remains both under-researched and poorly understood. Methods: Cancer survivors (N = 37,993) from the National Health Interview Survey with linked data retrieved from the National Death Index served as our study participants. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to assess associations between pre- and post-diabetes and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Results: Over a median follow-up period of 13 years, 2,350 all-cause, 698 cancer, and 506 CVD deaths occurred. Among all cancer survivors, patients with diabetes had greater risk of: all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.35, 95% CI = 1.27-1.43], cancer-specific mortality (HR: 1.14, 95% CI = 1.03-1.27), CVD mortality (HR: 1.36, 95% CI = 1.18-1.55), diabetes related mortality (HR: 17.18, 95% CI = 11.51-25.64), and kidney disease mortality (HR: 2.51, 95% CI = 1.65-3.82), compared with individuals without diabetes. The risk of all-cause mortality was also higher amongst those with diabetes and specific types of cancer: breast cancer (HR: 1.28, 95% CI = 1.12-1.48), prostate cancer (HR: 1.20, 95% CI = 1.03-1.39), and colorectal cancer (HR: 1.29, 95% CI = 1.10-1.50). Diabetes increased the risk of cancer-specific mortality among colorectal cancer survivors (HR: 1.36, 95% CI = 1.04-1.78) compared to those without diabetes. Diabetes was associated with higher risk of diabetes-related mortality when compared to non-diabetic breast (HR: 9.20, 95% CI = 3.60-23.53), prostate (HR: 18.36, 95% CI = 6.01-56.11), and colorectal cancer survivors (HR: 12.18, 95% CI = 4.17-35.58). Both pre- and post-diagnosis diabetes increased the risk of all-cause mortality among all cancer survivors. Cancer survivors with diabetes had similar risk of all-cause and CVD mortality during the second 5 years of diabetes and above 10 years of diabetes as compared to non-diabetic patients. Conclusions: Diabetes increased the risk of all-cause mortality among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors, not for pre- or post-diagnosis diabetes. Greater attention on diabetes management is warranted in cancer survivors with diabetes.