1
|
Sterpin E, Widesott L, Poels K, Hoogeman M, Korevaar EW, Lowe M, Molinelli S, Fracchiolla F. Robustness evaluation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy treatment planning: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2024; 197:110365. [PMID: 38830538 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
Compared to conventional radiotherapy using X-rays, proton therapy, in principle, allows better conformity of the dose distribution to target volumes, at the cost of greater sensitivity to physical, anatomical, and positioning uncertainties. Robust planning, both in terms of plan optimization and evaluation, has gained high visibility in publications on the subject and is part of clinical practice in many centers. However, there is currently no consensus on the methods and parameters to be used for robust optimization or robustness evaluation. We propose to overcome this deficiency by following the modified Delphi consensus method. This method first requires a systematic review of the literature. We performed this review using the PubMed and Web Of Science databases, via two different experts. Potential conflicts were resolved by a third expert. We then explored the different methods before focusing on clinical studies that evaluate robustness on a significant number of patients. Many robustness assessment methods are proposed in the literature. Some are more successful than others and their implementation varies between centers. Moreover, they are not all statistically or mathematically equivalent. The most sophisticated and rigorous methods have seen more limited application due to the difficulty of their implementation and their lack of widespread availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Sterpin
- KU Leuven - Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium; UCLouvain - Institution de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Center of Molecular Imaging Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium; Particle Therapy Interuniversity Center Leuven - PARTICLE, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - L Widesott
- Proton Therapy Center - UO Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - K Poels
- Particle Therapy Interuniversity Center Leuven - PARTICLE, Leuven, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Hoogeman
- Erasmus Medical Center, Cancer Institute, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; HollandPTC, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - E W Korevaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - M Lowe
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S Molinelli
- Fondazione CNAO - Medical Physics Unit, Pavia, Italy
| | - F Fracchiolla
- Proton Therapy Center - UO Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pennazio F, Ferrero V, D'Onghia G, Garbolino S, Fiorina E, Marti Villarreal OA, Mas Milian F, Monaco V, Monti V, Patera A, Werner J, Wheadon R, Rafecas M. Proton therapy monitoring: spatiotemporal emission reconstruction with prompt gamma timing and implementation with PET detectors. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 35193131 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac5765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective. In this study we introduce spatiotemporal emission reconstruction prompt gamma timing (SER-PGT), a new method to directly reconstruct the prompt photon emission in the space and time domains inside the patient in proton therapy.Approach. SER-PGT is based on the numerical optimisation of a multidimensional likelihood function, followed by a post-processing of the results. The current approach relies on a specific implementation of the maximum-likelihood expectation maximisation algorithm. The robustness of the method is guaranteed by the complete absence of any information about the target composition in the algorithm.Main results. Accurate Monte Carlo simulations indicate a range resolution of about 0.5 cm (standard deviation) when considering 107primary protons impinging on an homogeneous phantom. Preliminary results on an anthropomorphic phantom are also reported.Significance. By showing the feasibility for the reconstruction of the primary particle range using PET detectors, this study provides significant basis for the development of an hybrid in-beam PET and prompt photon device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Felix Mas Milian
- INFN, Torino, Italy.,Universitá degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy.,Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilheus, Brazil
| | - Vincenzo Monaco
- INFN, Torino, Italy.,Universitá degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garbacz M, Cordoni FG, Durante M, Gajewski J, Kisielewicz K, Krah N, Kopeć R, Olko P, Patera V, Rinaldi I, Rydygier M, Schiavi A, Scifoni E, Skóra T, Tommasino F, Rucinski A. Study of relationship between dose, LET and the risk of brain necrosis after proton therapy for skull base tumors. Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:143-149. [PMID: 34461183 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated the relationship between RBE-weighted dose (DRBE) calculated with constant (cRBE) and variable RBE (vRBE), dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) and the risk of radiographic changes in skull base patients treated with protons. METHODS Clinical treatment plans of 45 patients were recalculated with Monte Carlo tool FRED. Radiographic changes (i.e. edema and/or necrosis) were identified by MRI. Dosimetric parameters for cRBE and vRBE were computed. Biological margin extension and voxel-based analysis were employed looking for association of DRBE(vRBE) and LETd with brain edema and/or necrosis. RESULTS When using vRBE, Dmax in the brain was above the highest dose limits for 38% of patients, while such limit was never exceeded assuming cRBE. Similar values of Dmax were observed in necrotic regions, brain and temporal lobes. Most of the brain necrosis was in proximity to the PTV. The voxel-based analysis did not show evidence of an association with high LETd values. CONCLUSIONS When looking at standard dosimetric parameters, the higher dose associated with vRBE seems to be responsible for an enhanced risk of radiographic changes. However, as revealed by a voxel-based analysis, the large inter-patient variability hinders the identification of a clear effect for high LETd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Garbacz
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, 31342 Krakow, Poland.
| | - Francesco Giuseppe Cordoni
- University of Verona, Department of Computer Science, Verona, Italy; Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications, TIFPA-INFN, Trento, Italy
| | - Marco Durante
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum fur Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany; The Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Jan Gajewski
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, 31342 Krakow, Poland
| | - Kamil Kisielewicz
- National Oncology Institute, National Research Institute, Krakow Branch, Krakow, Poland
| | - Nils Krah
- University of Lyon, CREATIS, CNRS UMR5220, Inserm U1044, INSA-Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Centre Léon Bérard, France; University of Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Renata Kopeć
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, 31342 Krakow, Poland
| | - Paweł Olko
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, 31342 Krakow, Poland
| | - Vincenzo Patera
- INFN - Section of Rome, Italy; Department of Basic and Applied Sciences for Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Rinaldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marzena Rydygier
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, 31342 Krakow, Poland
| | - Angelo Schiavi
- Department of Basic and Applied Sciences for Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Scifoni
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications, TIFPA-INFN, Trento, Italy
| | - Tomasz Skóra
- National Oncology Institute, National Research Institute, Krakow Branch, Krakow, Poland
| | - Francesco Tommasino
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications, TIFPA-INFN, Trento, Italy; Department of Physics, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Antoni Rucinski
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, 31342 Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jiří K, Vladimír V, Michal A, Matěj N, Silvia S, Pavel V, Kateřina D, Jana P, Barbora O, Eliška R, Petr L, Matěj P, Alexander G, Jozef R. Proton pencil-beam scanning radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: dosimetric parameters and 2-year results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 278:763-769. [PMID: 32623508 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06175-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with nasopharyngeal cancer are candidates for proton radiotherapy due to large and comprehensive target volumes, and the necessity for sparing of healthy tissues. The aim of this work is to evaluate treatment outcome and toxicity profile of patients treated with proton pencil-beam scanning radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between Jan 2013 and June 2018, 40 patients were treated for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) with IMPT (proton radiotherapy with modulated intensity). Median age was 47 years and the majority of patients had locally advanced tumors (stage 2-8 patients. (20%); stage 3-18 patients (45%); stage 4A-10 patients. (25%); stage 4B-4 patients. (10%). Median of total dose was 74 GyE (70-76 GyE) in 37 fractions (35-38). Bilateral neck irradiation was used in all cases. Concomitant chemotherapy was applied in 34 cases. (85%). Median follow-up time was 24 (1.5-62) months. RESULTS Two-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local control (LC) were 80%, 75%, and 84%, respectively. Acute toxicity was generally mild despite large target volumes and concurrent application of chemotherapy with skin toxicity and dysphagia reported as the most frequent acute side effects. The insertion of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrectomy (PEG) was necessary in four cases (10%). Serious late toxicity (G > 3. RTOG) was observed in two patients (5%) (dysphagia and brain necrosis). CONCLUSION IMPT for nasopharyngeal cancer patients is feasible with mild acute toxicity. Treatment outcomes are promising despite the high percentage of advanced disease in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kubeš Jiří
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
- Department of Oncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital, Charles University, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
- Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - Vondráček Vladimír
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - Andrlik Michal
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic.
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic.
| | - Navrátil Matěj
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - Sláviková Silvia
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
| | - Vítek Pavel
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
- Department of Oncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital, Charles University, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
- Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
| | - Dědečková Kateřina
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
- Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
| | - Prausová Jana
- Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
| | - Ondrová Barbora
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
| | - Rotnáglová Eliška
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
| | - Lukeš Petr
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic
| | - Patzelt Matěj
- Department of Medical Biophysics and Informatics, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha 10 Ruská 87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská 87, 100 00, Praha 10, Czech Republic
| | - Grebenyuk Alexander
- Department of Health Protection and Disaster Medicine, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Lva Tolstogo 6-8, 197020, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Rosina Jozef
- Department of Medical Biophysics and Informatics, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha 10 Ruská 87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|