Systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical outcomes associated with isavuconazole versus relevant comparators for patients with invasive aspergillosis

[Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with nosocomial pneumonia]

BACKGROUND

 Nosocomial pneumonia, encompassing hospital-acquired (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized adults. In response to evolving pathogen profiles and emerging resistance patterns, this updated S3 guideline (AWMF Register No. 020-013) provides an evidence-based framework to enhance the diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia.

METHODS

 The guideline update was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing key German professional societies. A systematic literature review was conducted with subsequent critical appraisal using the GRADE methodology. Structured consensus conferences and external reviews ensured that the recommendations were clinically relevant, methodologically sound, and aligned with current antimicrobial stewardship principles.

RESULTS

 For the management of nosocomial pneumonia patients should be divided in those with and without risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens and/or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bacterial multiplex-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) should not be used routinely. Bronchoscopic diagnosis is not considered superior to non-bronchoscopic sampling in terms of main outcomes. Combination antibiotic therapy is now reserved for patients in septic shock and high risk for multidrug-resistant pathogens, while select patients may be managed with monotherapy (e. g., meropenem). In clinically stabilized patients, antibiotic therapy should be de-escalated and focused, as well as duration shortened to 7-8 days. In critically ill patients, prolonged application of suitable beta-lactam antibiotics should be preferred. Patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Diagnostics for Aspergillus should be performed with an antigen test from bronchial lavage fluid.

CONCLUSION

 This updated S3 guideline offers a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to the management of nosocomial pneumonia in adults. By integrating novel diagnostic modalities and refined therapeutic strategies, it aims to standardize care, improve patient outcomes, and enhance antimicrobial stewardship to curb the emergence of resistant pathogens.

Comparison of Patients With or Without COVID-19 and Without Hematological Diseases Treated for Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study with Propensity-Based Adjustment

Background

Our aim was to compare epidemiological, clinical and treatment characteristics, and outcomes between patients with diagnoses of coronavirus disease 2019-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) or putative invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (PIPA), without hematological cancers.

Methods

Retrospective, monocentric comparative observational cohort study, including nonhematological patients treated for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis between 2018 and 2022. Primary study end points were risk factors for 30-day mortality and clinical failure. To account for the imbalance in antifungal treatment allocation, a propensity score weighting approach was adopted.

Results

A total of 209 patients were included, 93 (44.5%) with CAPA and 116 (55.5%) with PIPA; 144 (68.9%) we admitted to the intensive care unit. Patients with PIPA had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index values (mean [SD], 5.8 [2.6]; range, 0-14) and higher prevalences of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (30.7%), solid cancer (36.8%), liver cirrhosis (12.3%), and concomitant immunosuppressive therapies (26.1%). Patients with CAPA received more invasive mechanical ventilation (70.5%) and corticosteroids (90.1%), more frequently had positive galactomannan (GM) results with bronchoalveolar lavage (80.5%), and had longer mean hospital stays (62.7 [SD, 52.1; range, 8-276] days) and intensive care unit stays (36 [30.7; 2-168] days). No differences in clinical cure or mortality rates were observed between groups. In multivariable analysis, isavuconazole was the only independent factor for clinical cure, reported also in the propensity score matching analysis (odds ratio, 0.41 [95% confidence interval, .16-1.03]; P = .06). A positive serum GM result was independently associated with 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 1.78 [95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.10]; P = .04).

Conclusions

Patients with CAPA have fewer comorbid conditions and higher fungal burden than those with PIPA, but clinical outcomes are similar between groups. Isavuconazole was an independent predictor for clinical cure, and serum GM positivity an independent predictor for 30-day mortality.

Economic evaluation of treating invasive aspergillosis with isavuconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole in China

Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness of treating invasive aspergillosis with isavuconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole in China.Materials & methods: A cost-consequence analysis (CCA) was conducted, considering both healthcare system and patient out-of-pocket perspectives. We considered the costs of medications, diagnostics and hospitalization and the consequences of mortality, response rate and adverse events.Results: From the healthcare system perspective, compared with voriconazole, isavuconazole saved 967.39 Chinese Yuan (CNY) and posaconazole saved 8624.82 CNY. From the patient out-of-pocket perspective, compared with voriconazole, isavuconazole saved 1056.00 CNY, posaconazole increased 3153.83 CNY. The CCA demonstrated that isavuconazole exhibited higher medical costs but lower out-of-pocket costs compared with posaconazole, while there were no significant differences in consequences.Conclusion: Isavuconazole is potentially the most economical option.

The efficacy and safety of first-line monotherapies in primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis: a systematic review

Objective

Several antifungals are available for the treatment of patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA). This study aims to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of the first-line monotherapies in primary therapy of IA through network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP database, Wanfang database, and China Biology Medicine for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to July 2023 that evaluated the efficacy and safety of monotherapies. We performed NMA with a frequentist random effects model and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. Primary outcomes were the all-cause mortality at week 12, and secondary outcomes included overall response rate, and incidence of adverse events (AEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs).

Results

A total of three RCTs involving 1,368 participants (four antifungals) were included. The NMA showed that compared to amphotericin B deoxycholate (D-AmB), the triazoles (posaconazole (POS), isavuconazole (ISA) and voriconazole (VCZ)) can improve the overall response rate in primary therapy of IA, but only VCZ and ISA can reduce the all-cause mortality at week 12 for patients with proven and probable IA (VCZ vs D-AmB: RR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.47-0.93, moderate certainty; ISA vs D-AmB: RR = 0.52, 95%CI = 0 .31-0.86, low certainty). ISA (SUCRA = 93.50%; mean rank, 1.20) seemed to be the most effective therapy in the above population. As to proven, probable, and possible IA patients, the triazoles were superior to D-AmB in terms of reducing all-cause mortality. Furthermore, the risk of AEs and SAEs was comparable for the three triazoles, but the risk of SAEs was significantly higher for D-AmB than others.

Conclusion

The efficacy and safety of triazoles are more favorable than D-AmB in the primary therapy of IA, with ISA being the optimal choice.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO CRD42023407632.

Comparison of antifungal drugs in the treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Voriconazole, isavuconazole, and amphotericin (AmB) formulations are currently recommended to treat invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). We aimed to estimate the efficacy of different antifungal drugs in the initial treatment of IPA.

Methods

We included all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating first-line treatments for IPA by searching PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the ClinicalTrials.gov database. We performed a network meta-analysis to compare the relative efficacy of different drugs in treating IPA. The primary outcomes were the overall response and all-cause mortality (ACM).

Results

Eight studies were identified that compared different drugs including voriconazole, isavuconazole, posaconazole, anidulafungin, liposomal AmB (L-AmB) at standard, high and low doses (3-5 mg/kg/d; 10 mg/kg/d; 1 mg/kg/d), AmB deoxycholate (dAmB) and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD). We found that second-generation triazole antifungal drugs containing voriconazole, isavuconazole, and posaconazole exhibited significantly superior overall response to dAmB and ABCD. Voriconazole was ranked as the best drug on network rank analysis. We found no difference in efficacy between triazole antifungals and L-AmB. A combination of voriconazole with anidulafungin, isavuconazole and voriconazole showed significantly better safety than dAmB.

Conclusion

The efficacy of second-generation triazole antifungal drugs for the first-line treatment of IPA is comparable with L-AmB and is better than both dAmB and ABCD. Isavuconazole may show better safety than voriconazole and posaconazole. Combination therapy with voriconazole and anidulafungin may serve as an alternative option for IPA patients with limited drug tolerance.

Systematic review registration

https://inplasy.com/.

Key summary of German national guideline for adult patients with nosocomial pneumonia- Update 2024 Funding number at the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA): 01VSF22007

PURPOSE

This executive summary of a German national guideline aims to provide the most relevant evidence-based recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia.

METHODS

The guideline made use of a systematic assessment and decision process using evidence to decision framework (GRADE). Recommendations were consented by an interdisciplinary panel. Evidence analysis and interpretation was supported by the German innovation fund providing extensive literature searches and (meta-) analyses by an independent methodologist. For this executive summary, selected key recommendations are presented including the quality of evidence and rationale for the level of recommendation.

RESULTS

The original guideline contains 26 recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with nosocomial pneumonia, thirteen of which are based on systematic review and/or meta-analysis, while the other 13 represent consensus expert opinion. For this key summary, we present 11 most relevant for everyday clinical practice key recommendations with evidence overview and rationale, of which two are expert consensus and 9 evidence-based (4 strong, 5 weak and 2 open recommendations). For the management of nosocomial pneumonia patients should be divided in those with and without risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens and/or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bacterial multiplex-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) should not be used routinely. Bronchoscopic diagnosis is not considered superior to´non-bronchoscopic sampling in terms of main outcomes. Only patients with septic shock and the presence of an additional risk factor for multidrug-resistant pathogens (MDRP) should receive empiric combination therapy. In clinically stabilized patients, antibiotic therapy should be de-escalated and focused. In critically ill patients, prolonged application of suitable beta-lactam antibiotics should be preferred. Therapy duration is suggested for 7-8 days. Procalcitonin (PCT) based algorithm might be used to shorten the duration of antibiotic treatment. Patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Diagnostics for Aspergillus should be performed with an antigen test from bronchial lavage fluid.

CONCLUSION

The current guideline focuses on German epidemiology and standards of care. It should be a guide for the current treatment and management of nosocomial pneumonia in Germany.

Economic impact of managing invasive mold disease with isavuconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B followed by posaconazole in Spain

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The objective of this work was to compare the costs per adult patient, associated with intravenous isavuconazole (ISAV) followed by oral ISAV versus the regimen of liposomal amphotericin B followed by posaconazole (L-AMB→POSA) in the treatment of IFI. The comparison was conducted from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System (SNS).

METHODS

As indirect comparisons have demonstrated similar efficacy between the comparators, a cost-minimization approach was taken. Drug acquisition, administration, hospitalization, laboratory tests and adverse events costs were evaluated from SNS perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyzes were performed.

RESULTS

Total costs per-patient were €24,715.54 with ISAV versus €29,753.53 with L-AMB→POSA, resulting in cost-savings per patient treated with ISAV of €5,037.99 (-16.9%). Treatment costs of IFI remained lower for ISAV than for L-AMB→POSA across all sensitivity analyses (-7,968.89€ to -326.59€), being treatment duration the most influential parameter.

CONCLUSION

According to the present model, the treatment of IFIs with ISAV would generate savings for the SNS compared to L-AMB→POSA. These savings are attributed to the shorter duration of IV treatment, reduced use of healthcare resources and lower costs associated with managing adverse effects when ISAV was employed.

ISCCM Position Statement on the Management of Invasive Fungal Infections in the Intensive Care Unit

Rationale

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) are an emerging problem owing to the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, immunosuppressive agents, and frequency of indwelling catheters. Timely diagnosis which is imperative to improve outcomes can be challenging. This position statement is aimed at understanding risk factors, providing a rational diagnostic approach, and guiding clinicians to optimize antifungal therapy.

Objectives

To update evidence on epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostic approach, antifungal initiation strategy, therapeutic interventions including site-specific infections and role of therapeutic drug monitoring in IFI in ICU and focus on some practice points relevant to these domains.

Methodology

A committee comprising critical care specialists across the country was formed and specific aspects of fungal infections and antifungal treatment were assigned to each member. They extensively reviewed the literature including the electronic databases and the international guidelines and cross-references. The information was shared and discussed over several meetings and position statements were framed to ensure their reliability and relevance in critical practice. The draft document was prepared after obtaining inputs and consensus from all the members and was reviewed by an expert in this field.

Results

The existing evidence on the management of IFI was updated and practice points were prepared under each subheading to enable critical care practitioners to streamline diagnosis and treatment strategies for patients in the ICU with additional detail on site-specific infections therapeutic drug monitoring.

Conclusion

This position statement attempts to address the management of IFI in immunocompetent and non-neutropenic ICU patients. The practice points should guide in optimization of the management of critically ill patients with suspected or proven fungal infections.

How to cite this article

Bhattacharya PK, Chakrabarti A, Sinha S, Pande R, Gupta S, Kumar AAK, et al. ISCCM Position Statement on the Management of Invasive Fungal Infections in the Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(S2):S20-S41.

In vivo pharmacodynamic characterization of a next-generation polyene, SF001, in the invasive pulmonary aspergillosis mouse model

SF001 is a next-generation polyene antifungal drug in development, designed to have increased specificity to fungal ergosterol, which is absent in humans, and decreased binding to cholesterol. SF001 demonstrates long-acting, potent, broad-spectrum fungicidal activity. The goal of the current study was to determine the pharmacodynamic index and target of SF001 in an immunocompromised mouse model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis against six Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values ranged from 0.5 to 2.0 mg/L. Plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) pharmacokinetics were performed following single intraperitoneal doses of 1, 4, 16, and 64 mg/kg. Treatment efficacy was assessed with each of the six fungal isolates using daily doses of SF001 ranging from 0.25 to 64 mg/kg/day over a 96-h treatment duration. Efficacy was assessed by A. fumigatus quantitative PCR of conidial equivalents from lung homogenates. Nonlinear regression analysis using the Hill equation demonstrated that the 24-h exposure-response relationships for both plasma and ELF area under the concentration/MIC and Cmax/MIC ratios were strong and relatively similar [coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.74-0.75). Exposure-response relationships included a median plasma 24-h Cmax/MIC target for stasis and 1-log kill endpoint of 0.5 and 0.6, respectively. The present studies demonstrated in vitro and in vivo SF001 potency against A. fumigatus. These results have potential relevance for SF001 clinical dose selection and evaluation of susceptibility breakpoints.

Evolution of antifungals for invasive mold infections in immunocompromised hosts, then and now

INTRODUCTION

The current armamentarium of antifungal agents for invasive mold infections (IMI) has dramatically improved over the last 50 years. Existing therapies are, however, associated with toxicities, drug interactions, and in some cases, therapeutic failures. Novel antifungals are needed to address the increasing prevalence of IMI and the growing threat of antifungal resistance.

AREAS COVERED

We review the history and development of the most commonly used antifungals. We discuss the current consensus guidelines and supporting data for treatment of invasive mold infection (IMI), the role of susceptibility testing, and the niche that novel antifungals could fill. We review the current data for aspergillosis, mucormycosis, and hyalohyphomycosis.

EXPERT OPINION

Robust clinical trial data demonstrating the relative effectiveness of our current antifungal agents for treating IMI outside of A. fumigatus remains limited. Clinical trials are urgently needed to delineate the relationship between MICs and clinical outcomes for existing agents and to better evaluate the invitro and in-vivo aspects of antifungal synergy. Continued international multicenter collaboration and standardized clinical endpoints for trials evaluating both existing and new agents is necessary to advance the field.

Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is growing in incidence, as patients at risk are growing in diversity. Outside the classical context of neutropenia, new risk factors are emerging or newly identified, such as new anticancer drugs, viral pneumonias and hepatic dysfunctions. Clinical signs remain unspecific in these populations and the diagnostic work-up has considerably expanded. Computed tomography is key to assess the pulmonary lesions of aspergillosis, whose various features must be acknowledged. Positron-emission tomography can bring additional information for diagnosis and follow-up. The mycological argument for diagnosis is rarely fully conclusive, as biopsy from a sterile site is challenging in most clinical contexts. In patients with a risk and suggestive radiological findings, probable invasive aspergillosis is diagnosed through blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples by detecting galactomannan or DNA, or by direct microscopy and culture for the latter. Diagnosis is considered possible with mold infection in lack of mycological criterion. Nevertheless, the therapeutic decision should not be hindered by these research-oriented categories, that have been completed by better adapted ones in specific settings. Survival has been improved over the past decades with the development of relevant antifungals, including lipid formulations of amphotericin B and new azoles. New antifungals, including first-in-class molecules, are awaited.

Real-World Financial and Clinical Impact of Diagnostic-Driven and Empirical-Treatment Strategies in High-Risk Immunocompromised Patients with Suspected Aspergillus Infection in the United Kingdom

A diagnostic-driven (DD) treatment strategy has proven successful for treating invasive fungal infections (IFIs) caused by Aspergillus. However, uptake of this treatment strategy is not fully embraced. This study compares the economic and clinical impact of DD and empirical-treatment (ET) strategies used within hospitals. Methods: a decision-analytic model was developed to compare costs and clinical outcomes associated with ET or a DD strategy of identifying infections caused by Aspergillus via galactomannan-antigen testing or Aspergillus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in neutropenic patients with unexplained fever. Patients were treated prophylactically with antifungal treatments as seen in United Kingdom (UK) hospitals. The IFI incidence, response, mortality, resource use, and adverse events were obtained from meta-analyses and other clinical studies. Analyses were performed from the U.K. hospital perspective, and costs were obtained from standard costing sources. Although diagnostic-testing costs increased, total cost and length of stay were reduced by £1,121 and 1.54 days when treating via a DD strategy. Intensive care and general ward days accounted for > 40% of total costs and > 58% of the cost reduction came from reduced antifungal costs. Treating with a DD strategy reduced the number of patients being treated with antifungal agents while survival was increased. Thus, a DD strategy was cost savings (-£136,787 cost per death avoided) compared with an ET strategy. Conclusion: this study suggests that incorporating a DD strategy as the preferred treatment protocol may be a cost-saving and clinically improved treatment strategy for managing neutropenic patients with unexplained fever. IMPORTANCE Patients at risk of invasive fungal infections (IFIs), such as Aspergillus spp., tend to be immunocompromised and usually take several medications which may generate many side effects. Prescribing is further complicated by comorbidities, drug interactions and challenges accessing diagnostics. Therefore, adding another agent may be neither straightforward nor the best option for these types of patients. A diagnostic-driven (DD) treatment strategy has proven successful for treating IFIs. However, uptake of this treatment strategy is not fully embraced in clinical practice perhaps because this strategy is thought to be more costly and/or to result in higher mortality relative to treating empirically. We developed a decision-analytic model to examine the impact of these 2 strategies on costs and health outcomes. This study indicates that incorporating a DD strategy as the preferred treatment protocol may be a cost-saving and clinically improved treatment strategy for managing neutropenic patients with unexplained fever.

[Relevance of liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of invasive fungal infections in patients with hematologic malignancies]

Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) has been a key cornerstone for the management of invasive fungal infections (IFI) caused by a wide array of molds and yeasts during the last three decades. Multiple studies performed over this period have generated a large body of evidence on its efficacy and safety, becoming the main antifungal agent in the management of IFI in patients with hematologic malignancies in several not mutually exclusive clinical settings. First, L-AmB is the most commonly used antifungal agent in patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy for acute leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, as well as in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Additionally, due to the administration of newer targeted therapies (such as monoclonal antibodies or small molecule inhibitors), opportunistic mold infections are increasingly being reported in patients with hematologic malignancies usually considered low-risk for IFI. These agents usually have a high drug-drug interaction potential, being triazoles, commonly used for antifungal prophylaxis, included. Finally, patients developing breakthrough IFI because of either subtherapeutic concentrations of antifungal prophylactic drugs in blood or selection of resistant strains, require broad spectrum antifungal therapy, usually with an antifungal of a different class. In both situations, L-AmB remains as the best option for early antifungal therapy.

Immunomodulatory effect of ibrutinib: Reducing the barrier against fungal infections

The Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib is increasingly used in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Moreover, very promising results have been reported in other B-cell malignancies, including primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Although well-tolerated in the majority of patients, ibrutinib demonstrates in some cases troublesome toxicities, including invasive fungal infections (IFIs). In the present review, we summarize clinical manifestations of IFIs in patients treated with ibrutinib, generally characterized by an early onset, mild clinical manifestations, asymptomatic/low symptomatic pulmonary localization and high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) involvement. IFI risk appears particularly increased in patients receiving ibrutinib associated with other immune modulator agents, especially with steroids or immune-chemotherapy. Moreover, the immunomodulatory effect of ibrutinib is described, pointing the attention on the involvement of specific molecules targeted by ibrutinib in innate and adaptive response to fungal infection. Overall, the findings indicate the ibrutinib may rapidly impair innate immune cell functions, while concomitantly restoring an effective protective potential of adaptive immune compartment. A correct awareness, especially when other predisposing factors are present, is warranted about the potential risk of IFIs in ibrutinib-treated patients.