Bilastine: a lifetime companion for the treatment of allergies

Insights on molecular modeling and supramolecular arrangement of bilastine polymorphs

CONTEXT

The advancement in the development of second-generation drugs in the field of antihistamines represents a significant milestone in the management of allergic diseases, targeting the effects of histamine. The efficacy of bilastine in treating allergic disorders has sparked interest in investigating its polymorphism, a crucial property that impacts quality, safety, and effectiveness as per regulatory guidelines. This study examines the polymorphism of bilastine, focusing on two crystalline forms labeled as Form I and Form II. Utilizing advanced analytical techniques, the research explores the structural characteristics and molecular interactions within these forms. Geometric parameters, such as bond lengths, bond angles, and torsion angles, are examined to comprehend molecular conformations and crystal packing arrangements. Hydrogen bonding, covalent bonds, and van der Waals forces contribute to the unique supramolecular arrangements in these forms. This study provides a significant contribution to understanding bilastine's polymorphism, offering critical insights to researchers and regulatory bodies to ensure the quality, efficacy, and safety of antihistamine products.

METHODS

The molecular conformation of two bilastine forms was obtained through DFT with the exchange-correlation functional M06-2X and the 6-311 +  + G(d,p) basis set, and the results were compared with the experimental X-ray. The atomic coordinates were obtained directly from the crystalline structures, and charge transfer was also investigated using frontier molecular orbitals (HOMO and LUMO), and MEP map in order to evaluate the energies associated with charge transfers and regions of high electron affinity. The geometric and topological parameters and intermolecular interactions in the crystals were analyzed using Hirshfeld Surface.

Bilastine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria: results from an international Delphi study

Background

Second-generation oral H1-antihistamines, including bilastine, represent the emerging treatments of allergic rhinitis (including rhinoconjunctivitis) and chronic urticaria in both adults and children. This study analyses available evidence supporting the use of bilastine amongst second-generation antihistamines for the symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria in adults and children.

Methods

Consensus amongst experts from 17 countries on the ideal treatment of rhinitis and urticaria, and the specific role of bilastine was measured by means of a modified Delphi process. A total of 12 statements were voted on by the experts using a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = undecided; 4 = agree; 5 = strongly agree). The definition of consensus was set at a minimum of 80% concordance for 4+5 scores (agree or strongly agree).

Results

All proposed statements reached consensus, with a concordance of ≥98% for five statements and ≥96% for seven.

Conclusions

The wide consensus obtained for the proposed statements suggests a prominent role for bilastine in the management of allergic rhinitis and urticaria.

The new preservative-free ophthalmic formulation of bilastine 0.6% preserves the ocular surface epithelial integrity in a comparative in vitro study

Allergic conjunctivitis (AC) is the most common form of allergic eye disease and an increasingly prevalent condition. Topical eye drop treatments are the usual approach for managing AC, although their impact on the ocular surface is not frequently investigated. The aim of this study was to perform a comparative physicochemical characterization, and in vitro biological evaluations in primary conjunctival and corneal epithelial cells of the new multidose preservative-free bilastine 0.6% and main commercially available eye drops. MTT assay was used to measure cell viability; oxidative stress was analyzed with a ROS-sensitive probe; and apoptosis was evaluated monitoring caspase 3/7 activation. Differences in pH value, osmolarity, viscosity and phosphate levels were identified. Among all formulations, bilastine exhibited pH, osmolarity and viscosity values closer to tear film (7.4, 300 mOsm/l and ~ 1.5-10 mPa·s, respectively), and was the only phosphates-free solution. Single-dose ketotifen did not induce ROS production, and single-dose azelastine and bilastine only induced a mild increase. Bilastine and single-dose ketotifen and azelastine showed high survival rates attributable to the absence of preservative in its formulation, not inducing caspase-3/7-mediated apoptosis after 24 h. Our findings support the use of the new bilastine 0.6% for treating patients with AC to preserve and maintain the integrity of the ocular surface.

An international Delphi study on the burden of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria and the role of bilastine among current treatment options

BACKGROUND

allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and chronic urticaria are common histamine-driven diseases, exerting detrimental effects on cognitive functions, sleep, daily activities and quality of life. Non-sedating second-generation H₁-antihistamines are the first line treatment of choice. Aim of the study was to define the role of bilastine among second-generation H₁-antihistamines in the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria in patients of different ages.

METHODS

an international Delphi study was carried out to assess consensus among experts from 17 European and extra-European countries on three main topics: 1) Burden of disease; 2) Current treatment options; 3) Specific characteristics of bilastine among second generation antihistamines.

RESULTS

here, we present the results obtained for a selection of 15 out of 27 consensus statements, focused on disease burden, role of second-generation antihistamines and bilastine profile. The rate of concordance was ≥ 98% for 4 statements, ≥ 96% for 6, ≥ 94% for 3, and ≥ 90% for 2.

CONCLUSIONS

the high degree of agreement obtained suggests a wide awareness of the burden of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and chronic urticaria among experts from all over the world and reflect a broad consensus on the role of second generation antihistamines in general and of bilastine in particular for their management.

Current and future management of chronic spontaneous urticaria and chronic inducible urticaria

Background: Chronic urticaria (CU), characterized by ≥6 weeks of intense pruritus, remains a debilitating condition for patients. New and safe treatments are needed to manage CU recalcitrant to standard therapy. Objective: A review of the current literature of standard and novel therapeutics in the management of CU was conducted. Methods: A literature search via a medical literature data base and clinical trial data base was conducted to identify treatment options for CU and current clinical trials. Results: Second-generation antihistamines, omalizumab, and cyclosporine remain the most proven therapeutic options for CU. Dupilumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, tezepelumab, and CDX-0159 are all undergoing clinical trials for CU. Although ligelizumab demonstrated initial promising results, a phase III study was discontinued due to a nonsuperior clinical impact compared with omalizumab. Conclusion: Novel therapies are needed for the treatment of recalcitrant CU. With a deeper understanding of the pathophysiology of CU, promising therapeutics are in clinical trials for CU.

Safety and Tolerability of Bilastine 0.6% Ophthalmic Solution: An 8-Weeks Phase III Study

Purpose

The objective of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of preservative-free bilastine 0.6% ophthalmic solution after 8 weeks of once-daily administration in patients with allergic conjunctivitis (AC).

Patients and Methods

Multi-center, international, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase III study of adult patients with seasonal or perennial AC. The study was conducted in 26 centers of 5 European countries. Duration of daily treatment with bilastine 0.6% ophthalmic solution or placebo was 8 weeks. Safety was evaluated by analyzing incidence of ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); additionally, and as secondary parameters, ocular tolerability was assessed, in addition efficacy was also assessed by the average daily total eye symptoms score (TESS).

Results

A total of 333 randomized patients with AC were included (bilastine, N=218; placebo, N=115). Mean (SD) age of the patients was 39.9 (13.7) and were 63.7% female. Overall, the percentage of ocular related TEAEs was low, and the percentage of patients with ocular related TEAEs was lower in the bilastine ophthalmic solution group (2.8%) than in the placebo group (4.3%). No severe TEAEs were reported. The ocular symptoms and TESS improved during the trial in both treatment groups. Statistically significant treatment differences were observed at Week 8 for the TESS and all individual ocular symptoms, being significantly better in the bilastine ophthalmic solution group than in placebo group.

Conclusion

Bilastine 0.6% ophthalmic solution revealed no safety concerns in patients with AC after 8 weeks of once-daily administration. Bilastine was effective in reducing ocular symptoms associated with AC in response to both seasonal and perennial allergens.

Efficacy and Safety of Non-brain Penetrating H1-Antihistamines for the Treatment of Allergic Diseases

H₁ receptor antagonists, known as H₁-antihistamines (AHs), inactivate the histamine H₁-receptor thereby preventing histamine causing the primary symptoms of allergic diseases, such as atopic dermatitis, pollinosis, food allergies, and urticaria. AHs, which are classified into first-generation (fgAHs) and second-generation (sgAHs) antihistamines, are the first line of treatment for allergic diseases. Although fgAHs are effective, they cause adverse reactions such as potent sedating effects, including drowsiness, lassitude, and cognitive impairment; anticholinergic effects, including thirst and tachycardia. Consequently, the use of fgAHs is not recommended for allergic diseases. Today, sgAHs, which are minimally sedating and, therefore, may be used at more effective doses, are the first-line treatment for alleviating the symptoms of allergic diseases. Pharmacologically, the use of sedating fgAHs is limited to antiemetics, anti-motion sickness drugs, and antivertigo drugs. The use of histamine H₁-receptor occupancy (H₁RO) based on positron emission tomography (PET) has been developed for the evaluation of brain penetrability. Based on the results of the H₁RO-PET studies, non-brain-penetrating AHs (nbpAHs) have recently been reclassified among sgAHs. The nbpAHs are rapidly acting and exhibit minimal adverse reactions and, thus, are considered first-line drugs for allergic diseases. In this review, we will introduce recent topics on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of AHs and make recommendations for the use of nbpAHs as first-line treatment options for allergic diseases.

Bilastine 10 and 20 mg in paediatric and adult patients: an updated practical approach to treatment decisions

Background

Bilastine, a non-sedating H₁-antihistamine, is indicated to treat the symptoms of allergic disorders (e.g. rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria) in adults and adolescents and, more recently, in children. Following its marketing approval, many questions regarding the ideal use of bilastine in various clinical practice situations have been received by the Medical Information Department (MID) of Faes Farma Spain. This article is an update of a previous review, with a focus on recent clinical information on the use of bilastine in paediatric and other populations.

Methods

Results of recent clinical studies in paediatric and other populations as well as questions received and responses provided by the Faes Farma MID.

Results

The information regarding the use of bilastine in paediatric patients is the most relevant aspect of this updated review. The stepwise approval of the paediatric formulations in various countries started with the European Medicines Agency approval in 2017 in accordance with a 2009 Paediatric Investigation Plan, followed by approval in other countries. The queries that are most commonly received by the Faes Farma MID include the potential for drug interactions involving bilastine and other frequently used drugs, and the use of bilastine in special populations or to treat specific symptoms related to allergic conditions. As the concomitant use of many medications is not permitted during clinical trials, the advice provided regarding the concomitant use of other medications with bilastine considers the pharmacological properties of both the drug in question and bilastine, as well as expert opinion. Likewise, advice regarding the use of bilastine in special populations (e.g. patients with renal impairment, obesity, lactose intolerance, and elderly or pregnant individuals) or to treat specific symptoms (e.g. treatment-resistant urticaria, pruritus or BASCULE syndrome) considers the best evidence from a variety of sources, including clinical studies, real-world experience, guideline recommendations and expert opinion.

Conclusion

This updated review provides current data regarding the best use of bilastine in specific situations and patients and identifies areas in which further knowledge is required. Although decisions regarding the use of bilastine may be aided by expert opinion that relies on knowledge of the underlying science, additional research and evidence are required to answer certain queries regarding the use of bilastine.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Bilastine Once-Daily, Preservative-Free, Ophthalmic Formulation

Introduction

Bilastine is a second-generation H₁ antihistamine indicated for the symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria. On the basis of the demonstrated efficacy and safety of the oral formulation, a new ophthalmic formulation of bilastine was recently developed. Previous preclinical studies had indicated that bilastine is mainly absorbed by the conjunctiva and shows low plasma concentration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of ophthalmic bilastine (6 mg/mL) after single and multiple dose administration at steady state in healthy adults.

Methods

This was an open-label, single-centre, phase I, bioavailability clinical trial. One drop of the bilastine ophthalmic formulation was administered once daily in each eye of the subjects for 5 days. Bilastine plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC–MS/MS. Adverse drug reactions were recorded for each subject during drug administration and follow-up visits.

Results

Twelve healthy subjects (age 18–55 years) were included in the study. After multiple dose administration, bilastine reached a mean (± SD) maximum blood concentrations of 2682.26 ± 1615.88 pg/mL at a median time of 2.50 h (range 1.25–4.00 h). The half-life of bilastine in plasma was 7.88 ± 6.72 h. Steady state AUC was 19,512.51 ± 9248.76 h·pg/mL. Adverse events were mild and transient, consisting mainly of dysgeusia.

Conclusions

Bilastine once-daily ophthalmic formulation 6 mg/mL is absorbed into the bloodstream in low amounts by the ophthalmic route. The bilastine ophthalmic formulation showed a good safety profile after multiple dose administration.

Management of adult asthma and chronic rhinitis as one airway disease

Introduction: Chronic rhinitis is defined as nasal inflammation with the presence of minimum two symptoms such as nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing and/or itching one hour daily for a minimum of 12 weeks/year. According their etiology, four groups of rhinitis are described: allergic, infectious, non-allergic non-infectious and mixed.Chronic rhinitis is frequently associated with asthma, shares similar mechanisms of the pathogenesis and has a negative impact of its outcomes sustaining the concept of unified airways disease.Areas covered: The present review summarizes the complex relationship between chronic rhinitis and asthma on the basis of recent epidemiological data, clinical characteristics, diagnosis and therapeutic management. All four groups are discussed with the impact of their specific treatment on asthma outcomes. Some medications are common for chronic rhinitis and asthma while others are more specific but able to treat the associated comorbidity.Expert opinion: The systematic assessment of chronic rhinitis in patients with asthma and its specific treatment improves both disease outcomes. Conversely, several therapies of asthma demonstrated beneficial effects on chronic rhinitis. Treating both diseases at the same time by only one medication is an interesting option to explore in the future in order to limit drugs administration, related costs and side effects.