Clinical relevance of transient worsening renal function after initiation of sacubitril/valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure: efficacy and safety in and outside clinical trials

Heart failure (HF) treatment has changed substantially over the last 30 years, leading to significant reductions in mortality and hospital admissions in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Currently, the optimization of guideline-directed chronic HF therapy remains the mainstay to further improve quality of life, mortality, and HF hospitalizations for patients with HFrEF. The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) has an important role in the treatment of patients with HFrEF. The PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) randomized controlled trial has established solid evidence for the treatment of HFrEF in various subgroups. Apart from HFrEF, several studies have been conducted using S/V in various indications: patients hospitalized with acute decompensated HF, HF with preserved ejection fraction, acute myocardial infarction with reduced ejection fraction, uncontrolled and resistant hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Data from the German Institute for Drug Use Evaluation reveal that implementation of S/V has increased steadily over time and, by the end of 2021, an estimated 266 000 patients were treated with S/V in Germany. The estimated cumulative real-world patient exposure is >5.5 million patient-treatment years worldwide. The number of patients treated with S/V largely exceeds the number of patients treated in clinical trials, and the current indication for S/V is larger than the strict inclusion/exclusion criteria of the randomized trials. Especially elderly patients, women, and patients with more and more severe comorbidities are underrepresented in the clinical trials. We therefore aimed to summarize the importance of S/V in HF in terms of efficacy and safety in clinical trials and daily clinical practice.

Levosimendan as a "Bridge to Optimization" in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection-A Single-Center Study

Background: Patients with advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction often cannot tolerate target doses of guideline-directed medical therapy due to symptomatic hypotension, renal dysfunction, and associated electrolyte abnormalities. While levosimendan can facilitate the titration of β-blockers in patients with advanced HFrEF, it is unclear whether ambulatory levosimendan infusions would offer the same benefit. In this prospective study, we investigate the effects of intermittent ambulatory levosimendan infusions on the uptitration of disease-modifying drugs. Methods: We enrolled 37 patients with advanced HFrEF who received repeated ambulatory infusions of levosimendan between January 2018 and January 2021. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were acquired 24 h before the first and the last ambulatory levosimendan infusion. Results: At the 1 year follow-up, the enrolled patients were on significantly higher doses of guideline-directed medical therapy, including bisoprolol (3.2 ± 2.8 mg vs. 5.9 ± 4.1 mg; p = 0.02), sacubitril/valsartan (41.67 ± 32.48 mg vs. 68.5 ± 35.72 mg; p = 0.01), and eplerenone (12.7 ± 8.5 mg vs. 22.8 ± 13.6 mg; p = 0.03). Furthermore, a substantial decrease in the furosemide dose was observed (123.2 ± 32.48 mg vs. 81.6 ± 19.47 mg; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Levosimendan facilitates the optimization of disease-modifying heart failure medications in previously intolerant advanced HFrEF patients.

The Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan Treatment on Cardiac and Renal Functions of a Patient With Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 4 and Stage 5 CKD After More Than Three Years of Follow-Up

It is difficult to treat cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) in clinical practice, which is the common reason for the death of patients. This report aimed to describe the effects of sacubitril/valsartan treatment on cardiac and renal functions of a patient with cardiorenal syndrome type 4 (CRS4) after more than 3 years of follow-up. A 77-year-old Chinese woman was admitted to our hospital because of CRS4 and stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), who had a history of long-term proteinuria and renal failure. The patient's cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) measured by chest X–ray was 0.6. Cardiac ultrasonography showed that the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 0.40. The patient had been treated for heart failure (HF) for 5 months, but there was no improvement in clinical manifestations, and the renal function gradually deteriorated. In our hospital, she received sacubitril/valsartan treatment for at least 40 months. The symptoms of HF relieved, and the indices of cardiac function improved. In addition, the patient's renal function was stable. During the treatment, the dosage of sacubitril/valsartan needed to be adjusted to achieve the optimal therapeutic effect. Follow-up results showed that she achieved cardiac function of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II with an ejection fraction of 0.60 and E/A &gt; 1 indicated by echocardiogram, and did not develop hyperkalemia. In summary, the improvement of cardiac and renal functions of the CRS4 patient was associated with the long-term sacubitril/valsartan treatment.

Comparison of the prognosis and outcome of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan according to age

The treatment with sacubitril/valsartan in patients suffering from chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction increases left ventricular ejection fraction and decreases the risk of sudden cardiac death. We conducted a retrospective analysis regarding the impact of age differences on the treatment outcome of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Patients were defined as adults if ≤65 years (n = 51) and older if >65 years of age (n = 76). The incidence of ventricular arrhythmias at 1-year follow-up was comparable in both groups (30.8 vs 26.5%; p = 0.71). The mortality rate in adult patients is significantly lower as compared with older patients (2 vs 14.5%; log-rank = 0.04). Older patients may suffer remarkably more side effects than adult patients (21.1 vs 11.8%; p = 0.03).