Indirect comparisons of siponimod with fingolimod and ofatumumab in multiple sclerosis: assessing the feasibility of propensity score matching analyses

The Benefits and Risks of Switching from Fingolimod to Siponimod for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting and Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease that affects the central nervous system (CNS). Currently, MS treatment is limited to several Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved medications that slow disease progression by immunomodulatory action. Fingolimod and siponimod have similar mechanisms of action, and consequently, their therapeutic effects may be comparable. However, while fingolimod is mainly used for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), siponimod, according to EMA label, is recommended for active secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Clinicians and scientists are analysing whether patients can switch from fingolimod to siponimod and identifying the advantages or disadvantages of such a switch from a therapeutic point of view. In this review, we aim to discuss the therapeutic effects of these two drugs and the advantages/disadvantages of switching treatment from fingolimod to siponimod in patients with the most common forms of MS, RRMS and SPMS.

Current status and new developments in sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor antagonism: fingolimod and more

INTRODUCTION

Fingolimod was the first oral disease-modifying treatment approved for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) that serves as a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) agonist. The efficacy is primarily mediated by S1PR subtype 1 activation, leading to agonist-induced down-modulation of receptor expression and further functional antagonism, blocking the egression of auto-aggressive lymphocytes from the lymph nodes in the peripheral compartment. The role of S1P signaling in the regulation of other pathways in human organisms through different S1PR subtypes has received much attention due to its immune-modulatory function and its significance for the regeneration of the central nervous system (CNS). The more selective second-generation S1PR modulators have improved safety and tolerability profiles.

AREAS COVERED

This review has been carried out based on current data on S1PR modulators, emphasizing the benefits of recent advances in this emergent class of immunomodulatory treatment for MS.

EXPERT OPINION

Ongoing clinical research suggests that S1PR modulators represent an alternative to first-line therapies in selected cases of MS. A better understanding of the relevance of selective S1PR pathways and the ambition to optimize selective modulation has improved the safety and tolerability of S1PR modulators in MS therapy and opened new perspectives for the treatment of other diseases.

Clinical Evaluation of Siponimod for the Treatment of Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Pathophysiology, Efficacy, Safety, Patient Acceptability and Adherence

INTRODUCTION

A number of disease-modifying therapies have been approved for use in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) in the past two decades. However, only few treatment options are available for patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Siponimod has recently been approved for use in patients with active forms of SPMS (who experience clinical relapses or new lesions on MRI superimposed on secondary progression independent of relapse activity).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review on the mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, cost effectiveness and patient adherence with siponimod.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search using the search terms: "siponimod", "secondary progressive multiple sclerosis", "sphingosine 1-phosphate modulators". Titles and abstract were screened and selected for relevance to the key section of this article.

FINDINGS

Siponimod is an oral sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulator with selectivity to S1PR-1 and 5. Modulation of this receptor on lymphocytes causes its internalization and degradation, preventing their egress from lymphoid tissues to the blood. In the pivotal Phase 3 randomized controlled trial EXPAND, siponimod was superior to placebo in reducing the risk of disability progression confirmed at 3 and 6 months, as well as the development of new MRI lesions and the rate of brain volume loss. Secondary analysis also showed a benefit on measures of cognitive functioning. The risk of lymphopenia and first-dose bradycardia appears to be lower with siponimod compared to non-selective S1P1R modulators. Different CYP2C9 genotypes affect the metabolism of siponimod; hence, genetic testing is required to adapt the titration and final dose accordingly.

CONCLUSION

Long-term extension and real-world studies will allow further evaluation of efficacy and safety in this population. Future research should focus on better defining SPMS, and identifying biomarkers of progression and outcome measures of treatment response in this category of patients.