1
|
Taylor KA, Kapos FP, Sharpe JA, Kosinski AS, Rhon DI, Goode AP. Seventeen-Year National Pain Prevalence Trends Among U.S. Military Veterans. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024; 25:104420. [PMID: 37952861 PMCID: PMC11184511 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
U.S. military veterans experience higher pain prevalence than nonveterans. However, it is unclear how the disparities in pain prevalence have changed over time because previous trend studies are limited to veterans using the Veterans Health Administration. This repeated cross-sectional study aimed to characterize pain prevalence trends in the overall population of U.S. veterans compared to nonveterans, using nationally representative data. We analyzed 17 years of data from the National Health Interview Survey (2002-2018), with a mean annual unweighted sample of 29,802 U.S. adults (total unweighted n = 506,639) and mean annual weighted population of 229.7 million noninstitutionalized adults. The weighted proportion of veterans ranged from 11.48% in 2002 (highest) to 8.41% in 2017 (lowest). We found that veterans experience a similar or higher prevalence of pain than nonveterans across the study period, except for severe headaches or migraine and facial pain. Pain prevalence among veterans increased over time, with a higher rate of increase compared to nonveterans for all pain variables. From 2002 to 2018, there was an absolute increase (95% confidence interval) in pain prevalence among veterans (severe headache or migraine: 2.0% [1.6-2.4%]; facial pain: 1.9% [1.4-2.4%]; neck pain: 4.7% [4.1-5.2%]; joint pain: 11.4% [10.8-11.9%]; low back pain: 10.3% [9.5-11.1%]; any pain: 10.0% [9.6-10.4%]; and multiple pains: 9.9% [9.2-10.6%]). The continued pain prevalence increase among veterans may have implications for health care utilization, highlighting the need for improved pain prevention and care programs for this population with a disproportionate pain burden. PERSPECTIVE: This article uses routinely-collected cross-sectional data that are nationally representative of U.S. adults to present changes in pain prevalence among military veterans compared to nonveterans. The findings underscore the need for improved prevention and pain care programs for veterans, who experienced a widening disproportionate pain burden from 2002 to 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Adam Taylor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Flavia Penteado Kapos
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jason Arthur Sharpe
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrzej Stanislaw Kosinski
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel I Rhon
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Adam Payne Goode
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Taylor KA, Kapos FP, Sharpe JA, Kosinski AS, Rhon DI, Goode AP. Seventeen-Year National Pain Prevalence Trends Among U.S. Military Veterans. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.03.27.23287408. [PMID: 37034604 PMCID: PMC10081421 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.27.23287408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
Importance U.S. military veterans experience higher pain prevalence and severity than nonveterans. However, it is unclear how these differences have changed over time. Previous studies are limited to veterans receiving care from the Veterans Health Administration. Objective To characterize pain prevalence trends in the overall population of U.S. veterans compared to nonveterans, using nationally-representative data. Design Repeated cross-sectional study. Data: National Health Interview Survey, 2002-2018. Analysis: January 2023. Setting Population-based survey of noninstitutionalized U.S. adults. Participants Across the 17-year period, mean annual weighted population was 229.7 million adults (unweighted sample total: n=506,639; unweighted sample annual mean: n=29,802). Exposure Veteran status. Main Outcomes Crude and demographics-adjusted pain prevalence trend differences between veterans and nonveterans across five pain variables (severe headache or migraine, facial pain, neck pain, low back pain, and joint pain) and two composite variables (any pain [≥1 prevalent pain] and multiple pains [≥2 prevalent pains]). Results Weighted proportion of veterans varied from 11.48% in 2002 (highest) to 8.41% in 2017 (lowest). Across the study period, crude prevalence was generally similar or higher among veterans than nonveterans for all pain variables except for severe headache or migraine and facial pain. When equalizing age, sex, race, and ethnicity, pain prevalence among veterans remained similar or higher than nonveterans for all pain variables. From 2002 to 2018 there was an absolute increase (95% CI) in pain prevalence among veterans (severe headache or migraine: 2.0% [1.6% to 2.4%]; facial pain: 1.9% [1.4% to 2.4%]; neck pain: 4.7% [4.1% to 5.2%]; joint pain: 11.4% [10.8% to 11.9%]; low back pain: 10.3% [9.5% to 11.1%]; any pain: 10.0% [9.6% to 10.4%]; and multiple pains: 9.9% [9.2% to 10.6%]. Crude and adjusted analyses indicated prevalence of all pain variables increased more among veterans than nonveterans from 2002 to 2018. Conclusion and Relevance Veterans had similar or higher adjusted prevalence and higher rates of increase over time for all pain variables compared to nonveterans. Continued pain prevalence increase among veterans may impact healthcare utilization (within and outside of the VHA), underscoring the need for improved pain prevention and care programs for these individuals with disproportionate pain burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Adam Taylor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Flavia Penteado Kapos
- Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jason Arthur Sharpe
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrzej Stanislaw Kosinski
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel I Rhon
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Adam Payne Goode
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vance B, Alhussain K, Sambamoorthi U. Five-year trend in healthcare access and patient-reported health outcomes among women veterans. Nurs Forum 2020; 55:165-173. [PMID: 31729039 PMCID: PMC7397546 DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to describe the five-year trend in healthcare access, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and health outcomes in women Veterans. METHODS A retrospective, pooled, cross-sectional study design was employed. Five-year trend was assessed using 2013 and 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data. Bivariate, multivariable logistic regression, and ordinary least squares regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS A total of 6561 women Veterans, aged 18 to 64 years (3534 in 2013 and 3027 in 2017) were included. Compared to 2013, more women Veterans in 2017 reported increased healthcare insurance and decreased cost as a barrier to care. Women Veterans with health insurance were less likely to report cost as a barrier to care. There were no statistically significant differences in HRQoL in bivariate or ordinary least squares regression analyses between BRFSS years. CONCLUSION Federal policy and Veterans Health Administration expansion have had an impact on improving healthcare access to women Veterans. However, increased healthcare access alone does not translate into improved HRQoL or health outcomes for women Veterans. Future policies should not only focus on increasing healthcare access, but also improving health outcomes, especially HRQoL. The quality of the healthcare accessed must be a focus for future research and policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Billie Vance
- Adult Health Department, School of Nursing, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Khalid Alhussain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Clinical Pharmacy, King Faisal University, Al‐Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Usha Sambamoorthi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Duan-Porter W, Martinson BC, Greer N, Taylor BC, Ullman K, McKenzie L, Rosebush C, MacDonald R, Falde S, Wilt TJ. Evidence Review-Social Determinants of Health for Veterans. J Gen Intern Med 2018; 33:1785-1795. [PMID: 30030735 PMCID: PMC6153229 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4566-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/30/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is committed to providing high-quality care and addressing health disparities for vulnerable Veterans. To meet these goals, VA policymakers need guidance on how to address social determinants in operations planning and day-to-day clinical care for Veterans. METHOD MEDLINE (OVID), CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Sociological Abstracts were searched from inception to January 2017. Additional articles were suggested by peer reviewers and/or found through search of work associated with US and VA cohorts. Eligible articles compared Veterans vs non-Veterans, and/or Veterans engaged with those not engaged in VA healthcare. Our evidence maps summarized study characteristics, social determinant(s) addressed, and whether health behaviors, health services utilization, and/or health outcomes were examined. Qualitative syntheses and quality assessment were performed for articles on rurality, trauma exposure, and sexual orientation. RESULTS We screened 7242 citations and found 131 eligible articles-99 compared Veterans vs non-Veterans, and 40 included engaged vs non-engaged Veterans. Most articles were cross-sectional and addressed socioeconomic factors (e.g., education and income). Fewer articles addressed rurality (N = 20), trauma exposure (N = 17), or sexual orientation (N = 2); none examined gender identity. We found no differences in rural residence between Veterans and non-Veterans, nor between engaged and non-engaged Veterans (moderate strength evidence). There was insufficient evidence for role of rurality in health behaviors, health services utilization, or health outcomes. Trauma exposures, including from events preceding military service, were more prevalent for Veterans vs non-Veterans and for engaged vs non-engaged Veterans (low-strength evidence); exposures were associated with smoking (low-strength evidence). DISCUSSION Little published literature exists on some emerging social determinants. We found no differences in rural residence between our groups of interest, but trauma exposure was higher in Veterans (vs non-Veterans) and engaged (vs non-engaged). We recommend consistent measures for social determinants, clear conceptual frameworks, and analytic strategies that account for the complex relationships between social determinants and health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Duan-Porter
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Brian C Martinson
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
- HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Nancy Greer
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Brent C Taylor
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kristen Ullman
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Lauren McKenzie
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Christina Rosebush
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Roderick MacDonald
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Samuel Falde
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Timothy J Wilt
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System HSR&D, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Danan ER, Krebs EE, Ensrud K, Koeller E, MacDonald R, Velasquez T, Greer N, Wilt TJ. An Evidence Map of the Women Veterans' Health Research Literature (2008-2015). J Gen Intern Med 2017; 32:1359-1376. [PMID: 28913683 PMCID: PMC5698220 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4152-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2017] [Revised: 06/08/2017] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women comprise a growing proportion of Veterans seeking care at Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare facilities. VA initiatives have accelerated changes in services for female Veterans, yet the corresponding literature has not been systematically reviewed since 2008. In 2015, VA Women's Health Services and the VA Women's Health Research Network requested an updated literature review to facilitate policy and research planning. METHODS The Minneapolis VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program performed a systematic search of research related to female Veterans' health published from 2008 through 2015. We extracted study characteristics including healthcare topic, design, sample size and proportion female, research setting, and funding source. We created an evidence map by organizing and presenting results within and across healthcare topics, and describing patterns, strengths, and gaps. RESULTS We identified 2276 abstracts and assessed each for relevance. We excluded 1092 abstracts and reviewed 1184 full-text articles; 750 were excluded. Of 440 included articles, 208 (47%) were related to mental health, particularly post-traumatic stress disorder (71 articles), military sexual trauma (37 articles), and substance abuse (20 articles). The number of articles addressing VA priority topic areas increased over time, including reproductive health, healthcare organization and delivery, access and utilization, and post-deployment health. Three or fewer articles addressed each of the common chronic diseases: diabetes, hypertension, depression, or anxiety. Nearly 400 articles (90%) used an observational design. Eight articles (2%) described randomized trials. CONCLUSIONS Our evidence map summarizes patterns, progress, and growth in the female Veterans' health and healthcare literature. Observational studies in mental health make up the majority of research. A focus on primary care delivery over clinical topics in primary care and a lack of sex-specific results for studies that include men and women have contributed to research gaps in addressing common chronic diseases. Interventional research using randomized trials is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisheva R Danan
- VA HSR&D Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, 1 Veterans Drive (152), Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA. .,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Erin E Krebs
- VA HSR&D Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, 1 Veterans Drive (152), Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kristine Ensrud
- VA HSR&D Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, 1 Veterans Drive (152), Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Eva Koeller
- VA HSR&D Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, 1 Veterans Drive (152), Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Roderick MacDonald
- VA HSR&D Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, 1 Veterans Drive (152), Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Tina Velasquez
- VA HSR&D Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, 1 Veterans Drive (152), Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Nancy Greer
- VA HSR&D Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, 1 Veterans Drive (152), Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Timothy J Wilt
- VA HSR&D Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, 1 Veterans Drive (152), Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goldstein KM, Melnyk SD, Zullig LL, Stechuchak KM, Oddone E, Bastian LA, Rakley S, Olsen MK, Bosworth HB. Heart matters: Gender and racial differences cardiovascular disease risk factor control among veterans. Womens Health Issues 2015; 24:477-83. [PMID: 25213741 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2013] [Revised: 05/29/2014] [Accepted: 05/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality for U.S. women. Racial minorities are a particularly vulnerable population. The increasing female veteran population has an higher prevalence of certain cardiovascular risk factors compared with non-veteran women; however, little is known about gender and racial differences in cardiovascular risk factor control among veterans. METHODS We used analysis of variance, adjusting for age, to compare gender and racial differences in three risk factors that predispose to CVD (diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) in a cohort of high-risk veterans eligible for enrollment in a clinical trial, including 23,955 men and 1,010 women. FINDINGS Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) values were higher in women veterans than men with age-adjusted estimated mean values of 111.7 versus 97.6 mg/dL (p < .01). Blood pressures (BPs) were higher among African-American than White female veterans with age-adjusted estimated mean systolic BPs of 136.3 versus 133.5 mmHg, respectively (p < .01), and diastolic BPs of 82.4 versus 78.9 mmHg (p < .01). African-American veterans with diabetes had worse BP, LDL values, and hemoglobin A1c levels, although the differences were only significant among men. CONCLUSIONS Female veterans have higher LDL cholesterol levels than male veterans and African-American veterans have higher BP, LDL cholesterol, and A1c levels than Whites after adjusting for age. Further examination of CVD gender and racial disparities in this population may help to develop targeted treatments and strategies applicable to the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M Goldstein
- Center of Excellence for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Ambulatory Care Services, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - S Dee Melnyk
- Center of Excellence for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Ambulatory Care Services, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Leah L Zullig
- Center of Excellence for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Karen M Stechuchak
- Center of Excellence for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Eugene Oddone
- Center of Excellence for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Ambulatory Care Services, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lori A Bastian
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Newington, Connecticut; University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut
| | - Susan Rakley
- Ambulatory Care Services, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Maren K Olsen
- Center of Excellence for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Hayden B Bosworth
- Center of Excellence for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Departments of Psychiatry and School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Delcher C, Wang Y, Maldonado-Molina M. Trends in financial barriers to medical care for women veterans, 2003-2004 and 2009-2010. Prev Chronic Dis 2013; 10:E171. [PMID: 24157074 PMCID: PMC3809923 DOI: 10.5888/pcd10.130071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women veterans are a fast-growing segment of the veteran population, yet they face many barriers to medical care. The objective of this study was to examine factors that put women veterans at risk for a financial barrier to medical care. METHODS We conducted repeated cross-sectional analyses of data from the 2003, 2004, 2009, and 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We used weighted logistic regression to examine the risk of a financial barrier to medical care as the primary outcome in a multivariate model controlling for factors in health-related domains. RESULTS In 2010, there were an estimated 1,719,750 (11.6%) working-aged veterans who needed to see a doctor in the previous 12 months but could not because of cost. For women, 13.4% faced this financial barrier. Over the study period, facing a financial barrier was consistently associated with insurance coverage, physical and mental distress days, and having children in the home. Other associations emerged in particular years, such as binge drinking in 2010. The trends for women veterans relative to men and for younger women veterans relative to older women veterans show reduction in financial barriers to health care. CONCLUSION The Veteran's Health Administration (VHA) should continue efforts to reduce financial and other barriers, especially among the higher risk groups we identified. This will help meet the VHA's objectives of providing comprehensive care to all veterans including women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Delcher
- University of Florida, Department of Epidemiology, 2004 Mowry Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610. E-mail:
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Relative to the general population, lesbian and bisexual (LB) women are overrepresented in the military and are significantly more likely to have a history of military service compared to all adult women. Due to institutional policies and stigma associated with a gay or lesbian identity, very little empirical research has been done on this group of women veterans. Available data suggest that compared to heterosexual women veterans, LB women veterans are likely to experience heightened levels of prejudice and discrimination, victimization, including greater incidence of rape, as well as adverse health and substance use disorders. They are also likely to encounter a host of unique issues when accessing health care, including fears of insensitive care and difficulty disclosing sexual orientation to Veterans Health Administration (VHA) providers. Training of staff and providers, education efforts, outreach activities, and research on this subpopulation are critical to ensure equitable and high quality service delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keren Lehavot
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way (116-POC), Seattle, WA 98108, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|