An Examination of Positive and Negative Dementia Caregiving Experiences

A Double Whammy? Psychosocial Disadvantages of Dementia Caregivers with Cancer Histories

Guided by the Diathesis-Stress model, this study examined how cancer history interacted with caregiving status to determine the psychosocial functioning of dementia caregivers. This study assessed a set of indicators for psychological health and social connections among 85 spousal caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease and 86 age- and gender-matched spouses of healthy controls at study entry and 15-18 months later. Results showed that dementia caregivers with cancer histories reported lower social connections relative to caregivers without cancer histories or non-caregivers with or without cancer histories, and reported lower psychological health relative to non-caregivers with and without cancer histories at two time points. The findings highlight that a history of cancer is a predisposing vulnerability factor for psychosocial dysfunctions among dementia caregivers and address gaps in knowledge about the psychosocial adjustment of cancer survivors as caregivers.

Factors related to the quality and stability of partner relationships after traumatic brain injury: A systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

The latest literature review on partner relationships following traumatic brain injury (TBI), conducted a decade ago, discussed solely quantitative work and noted significant knowledge gaps. The current review updates and expands on this work by providing an overview of the current state of knowledge on factors related to relationship quality and stability following TBI.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, APA PsycINFO, and PubMed were searched on April 23, 2020, for literature on factors associated with 1)relationship quality and 2)relationship stability following TBI.

STUDY SELECTION

English quantitative and qualitative studies investigating factors associated with relationship quality and/or stability following TBI were included. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility. If consensus was not reached, a third reviewer's conclusion was decisive. Forty-three studies were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Information regarding study objectives and characteristics, participant demographics, (in)dependent variables, and main findings was extracted. Study quality was rated using the JBI Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies and/or the CASP Checklist for Qualitative Research. Both were performed by the lead reviewer and checked by the second reviewer.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirty-eight factors related to relationship quality and/or stability were identified, covering injury characteristics (e.g., severity), body functions (e.g., personality changes), activities (e.g., communication), participation (e.g., social dependence), environment (e.g., children), and personal factors (e.g., coping strategies).

CONCLUSIONS

Relationship quality and stability following TBI are found to be related to a multitude of factors, including newly identified factors such as personality changes and dependence. Future research may wish to quantitatively investigate factors thus far only identified in qualitative research, explore possible positive effects of TBI on relationships, study the experiences of same-sex couples, and include the perspectives of both partners with and without the injury.

Family resilience and subjective responses to caregiving for children with epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

This study quantified caregiver burdens and the positive aspects of caregiving for the parents of children with epilepsy, with a focus on the impacts of family resilience as a protective factor for the caring process.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted among 173 parents of children with epilepsy, all of whom responded to questionnaires containing the shortened Chinese version of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale (FRAS-C), positive aspects of caregiving scale (PAC), and Chinese version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (CZBI). They also provided relevant sociodemographic data.

RESULTS

The mean CZBI total score was 22.16 (SD, 14.26; range, 0-71), while the mean PAC total score was 40.05 (SD, 11.09; range 11-55). The FRAS-C total score was positively correlated with the PAC total score (r = 0.368, p < 0.001), but negatively correlated with the CZBI total score (r = -0.301, p < 0.001). A multiple linear regression analysis showed that family resilience explained PAC and CZBI at rates of 11.4% and 5.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents have both positive and negative experiences when caring for children with epilepsy. In this context, family resilience may enhance the positive aspects of caregiving while reducing the frequency of negative feelings, thus highlighting the need for clinicians to focus on adequate interventions aimed at improving family resilience.