Predictors of health-related quality of life among Hispanic and non-Hispanic White breast cancer survivors in New Jersey

Participation in and Satisfaction with a Community-Based Physical Activity Program Among Hispanic Cancer Survivors

The objective of this study was to explore the experience of Hispanic cancer survivors participating in Active Living After Cancer (ALAC), a community-based physical activity program. We analyzed participation and satisfaction data from 250 participants who completed the program from 2017 to 2020 (55% Hispanic, 28% Black, 14% non-Hispanic White). Using a hybrid coding approach, open-text survey comments responses from Hispanic participants (n = 138) were qualitatively analyzed and key themes developed to better contextualize the quantitative results. Quantitative analysis revealed that Hispanic participants attended an average of 9.44 out of 12 sessions. There were no differences in attendance by race/ethnicity; however, Hispanic participants reported significantly higher overall satisfaction ratings than non-Hispanic White participants (4.93 vs 4.65 on a 5-point scale). Open-ended comments indicated that Hispanic ALAC participants experience collective efficacy, self-efficacy, and self-regulation, through observational learning enabled by program facilitation. The ALAC program is highly acceptable and relevant to Hispanic cancer survivors and will inform the continued expansion of other community-based survivorship programs for Hispanic communities throughout Texas.

Effects of decisional conflict, decision regret and self-stigma on quality of life for breast cancer survivors: A cross-sectional, multisite study in China

AIMS

To examine the differences in decisional conflict, decision regret, self-stigma and quality of life among breast cancer survivors who chose different surgeries, as well as the effects of decisional conflict, decision regret and self-stigma on quality of life.

DESIGN

Observational study.

METHODS

Paper and online surveys were used to collect data from March to September 2020. The Chinese version of the Decisional Conflict Scale, Decision Regret Scale, Self-Stigma Form and Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-B were used to measure the corresponding health outcomes for breast cancer survivors who chose different surgeries from three university-affiliated hospitals. One-way analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation coefficient and hierarchical multiple regression analysis were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 448 participants, only 21% chose breast conservative surgery, while 79% chose mastectomy with or without reconstruction. Women who chose mastectomy with reconstruction reported higher decisional conflict (p = .028) and more decision regret (p = .013) than women who chose breast conservative surgery; women who chose mastectomy without reconstruction indicated higher decisional conflict (p = .015), more decision regret (p < .001), and higher self-stigma (p = .034) than women who chose breast conservative surgery. Decisional conflict (r = -.430), decision regret (r = -.495), and self-stigma (r = -.561) were negatively correlated with quality of life. After controlling for sociodemographic and clinical variables, decisional conflict and decision regret explained 19.7% and self-stigma explained 12.9% of the variance in quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Decisional conflict, decision regret and self-stigma vary according to different breast surgeries and are greatly associated with the quality of life of breast cancer survivors.

IMPACT

Future studies are warranted to investigate the decision-making process and the underlying reasons for surgical choices. Decision support strategies pre-surgery are needed to inform women about the risks and benefits of surgery options. Moreover, psychosocial support post-surgery is warranted to relieve women's self-stigma, thus improving their quality of life.

Determinants of Psychosocial Distress in Breast Cancer Patients at a Safety Net Hospital

INTRODUCTION

Psychosocial distress screening of cancer patients is an American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer mandate for accredited cancer programs. We evaluated psychosocial distress in breast cancer patients to characterize risk factors for high distress scores at a safety net hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The psychosocial distress screening form includes a list of potential issues and a distress score scaled from 1 through 10. Psychosocial distress screening results were retrospectively analyzed, along with patient demographics and clinical data. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was applied to identify predictors for high distress scores, which were defined as a score of 5 and greater.

RESULTS

775 distress screens were completed by 171 breast cancer patients. High distress scores were reported in 21.3%. Patients who had no evidence of disease at time of screening were less likely to report a high distress score compared to those who were newly diagnosed or in active treatment (odds ratio 0.51, 95% CI, 0.38-0.68, P< .0001). Patients with high distress scores were more likely to report concerns with insurance (29.1% vs. 7.6%, P< .0001), transportation (16.4% vs. 4.6%, P< .0001), housing (15.2% vs 2.1%, P< .0001), sadness/depression (63.6% vs. 14.1, P< .0001), and physical issues (89.1% vs. 52.8%, P< .0001).

CONCLUSION

Status of cancer at time of screening, particularly newly diagnosed cancer and active treatment of cancer were associated with high distress scores in this patient group. While there should be an emphasis to ensure patients with these risk factors receive psychosocial distress screening, routine periodic screening for all patients should continue to be implemented to ensure quality cancer care.