1
|
Weksberg DC, Bilton SD, Chang EL. Use of a deformable atlas to identify cryptic critical structures in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. PLoS One 2012; 7:e32098. [PMID: 22461883 PMCID: PMC3312881 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2011] [Accepted: 01/19/2012] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Dose constraints for traditional neural critical structures (e.g. optic chiasm, brain stem) are a standard component of planning radiation therapy to the central nervous system. Increasingly, investigators are becoming interested in accounting for the dose delivered to other non-target neural structures (e.g. hippocampi), which are not easily identified on axial imaging. In this pilot study, a commercially available digital atlas was used to identify cryptic neural structures (hippocampus, optic radiations, and visual cortices) in 6 patients who received intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) as part of multimodal management of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The patient's original IMRT plans were re-optimized, with avoidance parameters for the newly identified critical structures. Re-optimization was able to reduce both mean and maximum dose to the volumes of interest, with a more pronounced effect for contralateral structures. Mean dose was reduced by 11% and 3% to contralateral and ipsilateral structures, respectively, with comparable reduction in maximum dose of 10% and 2%, respectively. Importantly, target coverage was not compromised, with an average change in coverage of 0.2%. Overall, our results demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating tools for cryptic critical structure identification into the treatment planning process for GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C. Weksberg
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Stephen D. Bilton
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Eric L. Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Norris Cancer Hospital, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jhaveri PM, Teh BS, Paulino AC, Smiedala MJ, Fahy B, Grant W, McGary J, Butler EB. Helical Tomotherapy Significantly Reduces Dose to Normal Tissues When Compared to 3D-CRT for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2009; 8:379-85. [DOI: 10.1177/153303460900800508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Combined modality treatment (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery) for locally advanced rectal cancer requires special attention to various organs at risk (OAR). As a result, the use of conformal dose delivery methods has become more common in this disease setting. Helical tomotherapy is an image-guided intensity modulated delivery system that delivers dose in a fan-beam manner at 7 degree intervals around the patient and can potentially limit normal tissue from high dose radiation while adequately treating targets. In this study we dosimetrically compare helical tomotherapy to 3D-CRT for stage T3 rectal cancer. The helical tomotherapy plans were optimized in the TomoPlan system to achieve an equivalent uniform dose of 45 Gy for 10 patients with T3N0M0 disease that was at least 5cm from the anal verge. The GTV included the rectal thickening and mass evident on colonoscopy and CT scan as well as with the help of a colorectal surgeon. The CTV included the internal iliac, obturator, and pre-sacral lymphatic chains. The OAR that were outlined included the small bowel, pelvic bone marrow, femoral heads, and bladder. Anatom-e system was used to assist in delineating GTV, CTV and OAR. These 10 plans were then duplicated and optimized into 3-field 3D-CRT plans within the Pinnacle planning system. The V[45], V[40], V[30], V[20], V[10], and mean dose to the OAR were compared between the helical tomotherapy and 3D-CRT plans. Statistically significant differences were achieved in the doses to all OAR, including all volumes and means except for V[10] for the small bowel and the femoral heads. Adequate dosimetric coverage of targets were achieved with both helical tomotherapy and 3D-CRT. Helical tomotherapy reduces the volume of normal tissue receiving high-dose RT when compared to 3D-CRT treatment. Both modalities adequately dose the tumor. Clinical studies addressing the dosimetric benefits are on-going.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavan M. Jhaveri
- Baylor College of Medicine Department of Radiology, Section of Radiation Oncology One Baylor Plaza, Houston TX, 77030, USA
| | - Bin S. Teh
- The Methodist Hospital Department of Radiation Oncology,
- The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, 6565 Fannin, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Arnold C. Paulino
- The Methodist Hospital Department of Radiation Oncology,
- The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, 6565 Fannin, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | | | - Bridget Fahy
- The Methodist Hospital, Department of Surgery 6550 Fannin, Smith #1661 Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Walter Grant
- Baylor College of Medicine Department of Radiology, Section of Radiation Oncology One Baylor Plaza, Houston TX, 77030, USA
| | - John McGary
- Baylor College of Medicine Department of Radiology, Section of Radiation Oncology One Baylor Plaza, Houston TX, 77030, USA
| | - E. Brian Butler
- The Methodist Hospital Department of Radiation Oncology,
- The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, 6565 Fannin, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Desai S, Teh BS, Hinojosa J, Bell BC, Paulino AC, Butler EB. Standardization of Head and Neck Contouring Using the Acanthiomeatal Line. Med Dosim 2009; 34:225-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2008.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2008] [Revised: 09/19/2008] [Accepted: 09/23/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
4
|
Pioneering innovative radiation oncology technology in clinics. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2007. [DOI: 10.2349/biij.3.3.e57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|